3 historically accurate Bitcoin on-chain metrics are flashing 'bottom'

Cointelegraph發佈於 2022-10-22更新於 2022-10-22

文章摘要

Key Bitcoin indicators tracking its market versus fair value, as well as long-term holders' confidence, hint at a market bottom formation.

Bitcoin and other riskier assets slipped on Friday as traders scrutinized macro indicators that suggest the Federal Reserve would continue to hike rates. Nonetheless, the BTC/USD pair remains rangebound inside the $18,000-$20,000 price range, showing a strong bias conflict in the market.
""

BTC price holding above $18K since June
""

Notably, BTC's price has been unable to diver deeper below $18,000 since it first tested the support level in June 2022. As a result, some analysts believe that the cryptocurrency is bottoming out, given it has already corrected by over 70% from its record high of $69,000, established almost a year ago.

BTC/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

""

During the 2018 bear market, BTC saw a max drawdown from peak to trough of 84%, lasting 364 days, while the 2014 cycle lasted longer, bottoming after 407 days," noted Arcane Research in its weekly crypto market report, adding:
""

"Both bottoms were followed by unusually low volatility."

Bitcoin's historical drawdowns. Source: Arcane Research

""

In addition, a flurry of widely-watched on-chain Bitcoin indicators also hints at a potential bullish reversal ahead. Let's look at some of the most historically significant metrics. 
""

Bitcoin MVRV-Z Score
""

The MVRV-Z Score assesses Bitcoin's overbought and oversold statuses based on its market and fair value.
""

Historically, when Bitcoin's market value crosses the fair value, it indicates a market top (the red zone). Conversely, it indicates a market bottom (the green zone) when the market value crosses below the fair value.

Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score. Source: Glassnode

""

The MVRV-Z Score has been in the green zone since late June, suggesting Bitcoin is bottoming out.
""

Reserve Risk
""

Bitcoin's Reserve Risk assesses the confidence of the token's long-term holders relative to its price at the point in time. Historically, a higher Reserve Risk (the red zone) has coincided with market tops, reflecting lower investment confidence at record-high Bitcoin prices.
""

Conversely, higher confidence and lower Bitcoin price mean lower Reserve Risk (the green zone), or better risk/reward for investing.

Bitcoin Reserve Risk vs. price. Source: Glassnode

""

Bitcoin's Reserve Risk plunged into the green zone in late June, suggesting that BTC may undergo a strong bullish reversal sooner or later.
""

Bitcoin Puell Multiple
""

The Puell Multiple reflects the ratio of the daily Bitcoin issuance (in U.S. dollars) and the 365-day moving average of daily issuance value.

""

Historical data shows Bitcoin market bottoming out when the Puell Multiple drops into the green zone defined by the 0.3-0.5 range. Conversely, the market peaks out when the ratio crosses into the 4-8 red zone.

Bitcoin Puell Multiple vs. price. Source: Glassnode

""

As of October, Bitcoin's Puell Multiple is inside the green zone, suggesting a potential price reversal ahead to the upside.
""

As Cointelegraph reported, the BTC balance on cryptocurrency exchanges has also fallen to multi-year lows at the fastest pace since June, suggesting that current price levels are becoming an important area of accumulation. 

你可能也喜歡

AI,正在消灭「穷人的娱乐」

文章以资深游戏玩家老G的经历切入,描述了过去游戏“晚买享折扣”的规律已被打破。PS5、Switch 2等主机价格持续上涨,甚至已发售多年的老机型也在提价。游戏本体价格攀升,如GTA6标准版定价涨至79.99美元。索尼宣布将逐步取消实体光盘,二手回血和收藏的渠道被堵死。玩家寄予厚望的V社Steam Machine性价比也令人失望。 厂商将涨价归因于全球经济环境、通胀及供应链成本上升。深层原因则是AI时代的到来改变了产业格局。数据中心和AI训练对高端GPU、内存的需求激增,挤占了消费电子(如游戏主机)的芯片与存储产能,导致硬件成本普遍上涨。同时,现代3A游戏开发成本极高(如传闻GTA6成本达10-15亿美元),迫使厂商推动数字版、订阅制以寻求更稳定的收入。 文章指出,游戏曾被认为是“性价比之王”的娱乐方式,但如今不仅越来越贵,其质量与优化也常被诟病。这种趋势蔓延至其他数字娱乐领域,如视频会员复杂化、音乐平台全面订阅、云存储收费、AI工具服务化等。AI发展在提升体验的同时,也推高了基础设施和服务的成本,使得许多娱乐从“一次性买断”转向“持续付费”。文章认为,一个“快乐越来越便宜”的互联网时代正在远去,消费者正为未来的技术升级提前买单。

marsbit21 分鐘前

AI,正在消灭「穷人的娱乐」

marsbit21 分鐘前

互联网私有化之后,硅谷开始私有化人类文明

文章探讨了人工智能公司通过大规模扫描纸质书籍获取训练数据,并在此过程中引发的知识私有化问题。Anthropic公司曾购买并扫描数百万本书籍,引发版权诉讼并最终支付和解金,但核心争议已超越版权,触及对人类知识与文明的控制权。 AI公司在互联网内容被AI生成文字污染后,转向未受污染的纸质书籍作为“干净数据”。这背后反映了硅谷的技术乐观主义和加速主义思想,将技术进步视为不容置疑的善,将增长与速度本身道德化,并将质疑者视为进步的阻碍。这种思潮将具体人类的福祉置于抽象的智能增长和文明延续目标之下。 文章进一步指出,伴随这种技术愿景的是一种对民主进程的怀疑。部分硅谷精英认为民主效率低下,倾向于由创始人或小团队集中权力,像运营公司一样制定规则。这种逻辑被应用于AI模型的治理中,例如通过“宪法”或模型规范来预先定义模型的价值观和行为准则,从而间接掌握了塑造数亿用户认知的权力。 最终,知识并未消失,而是被吸收并转化为少数几家公司的私有模型能力。传统的、分散的知识保存方式被集中化的AI系统所取代。这构成了“文明私有化”的闭环:人类共同积累的文明成果被免费开采,经AI处理后又作为付费服务返回给公众。新时代的“焚书”不再是销毁知识,而是使其脱离原有的语境和独立性,由私人模型决定其被记忆和解释的方式。人们可能不再直接接触原著,而是依赖经过AI筛选和诠释的答案,从而在不知不觉中让渡了对自身文明记忆的控制权。

marsbit36 分鐘前

互联网私有化之后,硅谷开始私有化人类文明

marsbit36 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片