Public Wi-Fi and a Phone Call: How They Became the Perfect Trap to Steal $5000 in Crypto Assets?

比推發佈於 2026-01-09更新於 2026-01-09

文章摘要

An individual lost approximately $5,000 in cryptocurrency assets after connecting to a public hotel Wi-Fi network during a vacation. The attack began when the victim was overheard discussing crypto and using a Phantom wallet in a public area, making them a target. While browsing on the unsecured Wi-Fi, the attacker executed a man-in-the-middle attack, injecting malicious code into a seemingly legitimate webpage. The victim was using Jupiter Exchange to swap tokens when a fraudulent transaction approval request was triggered, disguised as a normal operation. Instead of a direct fund transfer, the request asked for “authorization” or “session approval,” granting the attacker permission to act on the wallet. The victim approved, believing it was part of the Jupiter transaction. The attacker waited until the victim left the hotel to drain the wallet of SOL, tokens, and NFTs. Key mistakes included: using public Wi-Fi instead of a mobile hotspot, discussing crypto in public, and approving a transaction without thorough verification. The wallet was a secondary hot wallet, not the main storage, preventing greater losses. The incident highlights the risks of public networks and the importance of transaction scrutiny.

Author: The Smart Ape

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original title: After Three Days on Hotel Wi-Fi, My Crypto Wallet Was Drained of $5000


A few days ago, I went with my family to a very nice hotel for a year-end holiday. One day after leaving the hotel, my wallet was completely emptied. I was puzzled, as I had neither clicked on any phishing links nor signed any malicious transactions.

After hours of investigation and seeking help from experts, I finally figured out the truth. It turned out to be due to the hotel's Wi-Fi network, a brief phone call, and a series of foolish mistakes.

Like most cryptocurrency enthusiasts, I brought my laptop with me, thinking I could squeeze in some work while on vacation with my family. My wife repeatedly insisted that I not work during these three days—I really should have listened to her.

Like other guests, I connected to the hotel's Wi-Fi network. This network didn't require a password; it only needed to be logged in through a captive portal.

I worked as usual in the hotel without doing anything risky: I didn't create new wallets, click on strange links, or access suspicious decentralized applications (dApps). I just checked X (Twitter), my balances, Discord, Telegram, etc.

At one point, I received a call from a crypto friend, and we chatted about market trends, Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrency-related matters. But what I didn't know was that someone nearby was eavesdropping on our conversation and realized I was involved in cryptocurrency. This was my first mistake. The eavesdropper learned from our conversation that I was using a Phantom wallet and that I was a user with a significant holding.

This made me his target.

In a public Wi-Fi network, all devices share the same network, and the visibility between devices is actually higher than you might think. There is almost no real protection between users, which creates an opportunity for a "Man-in-the-Middle Attack." The attacker acts like a middleman, quietly inserting themselves between you and the internet, much like someone secretly reading and tampering with your mail before it reaches you.

While I was browsing the web on the hotel Wi-Fi, one website appeared to load normally, but in reality, malicious code had been injected behind the page. I didn't notice anything unusual at the time. If I had installed some security tools, I might have detected these issues, but unfortunately, I hadn't.

Normally, a website might request your wallet to sign certain operations. The Phantom wallet would pop up a window where you could choose to approve or reject. Generally, you would trust the website and browser and sign without worry. However, that day, I shouldn't have.

Just as I was performing a token swap on @JupiterExchange, the malicious code triggered a wallet request that replaced my normal swap operation. I could have detected it as a malicious request by carefully checking the transaction details, but because I was already performing a swap on Jupiter, I didn't suspect a thing.

That day, I didn't sign any transaction to transfer funds; instead, I signed an authorization. This was exactly why my assets were stolen days later.

The malicious code didn't directly ask me to send SOL (Solana), as that would have been too obvious. Instead, it requested me to "authorize access," "approve account," or "confirm session." In simple terms, I was actually giving another address permission to operate on my behalf.

I approved it because I mistakenly thought it was related to my operation on Jupiter. At the time, the message popped up by the Phantom wallet looked technical, didn't show any amount, and didn't prompt for an immediate transfer.

And that was all the attacker needed. He patiently waited until I left the hotel before taking action. He transferred my SOL, withdrew my tokens, and moved my NFTs to another address.

I never thought something like this would happen to me. Fortunately, this wasn't my main wallet but a hot wallet used for specific operations, not for long-term asset holding. Even so, I made many mistakes, and I believe I am primarily responsible.

First, I should never have connected to the hotel's public Wi-Fi. I should have used my phone's hotspot instead.

My second mistake was talking about cryptocurrency in the hotel's public area, where many people could have overheard our conversation. My father once warned me never to let others know you're involved in cryptocurrency. This time, I was lucky; some people have even faced kidnapping or worse because of their crypto assets.

Another mistake was approving the wallet request without paying full attention. Because I was sure the request came from Jupiter, I didn't analyze it carefully. In fact, every wallet request should be carefully reviewed, even on trusted applications. Requests can be intercepted and may not actually come from the app you think.

In the end, I lost about $5000 from a secondary wallet. While it's not the worst-case scenario, it's still very frustrating.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7601380

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat was the primary method the attacker used to compromise the victim's crypto wallet?

AThe attacker used a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack by exploiting the insecure public hotel Wi-Fi network. They intercepted the victim's web traffic and injected malicious code into a webpage, which triggered a deceptive wallet authorization request.

QWhat specific mistake did the victim make that allowed the attacker to identify him as a target?

AThe victim discussed cryptocurrency, his use of the Phantom wallet, and his substantial holdings during a phone call in a public area of the hotel, which was overheard by the attacker.

QWhat type of transaction did the victim accidentally sign, instead of a direct fund transfer?

AThe victim signed an authorization or approval request, which granted permission for another address to operate on their behalf. This did not immediately transfer funds but gave the attacker the ability to do so later.

QWhy didn't the victim suspect the malicious transaction request when it appeared?

AThe request appeared while he was performing a legitimate token swap on the Jupiter Exchange platform. He assumed the request was part of that normal operation and did not carefully inspect the technical details of the transaction, which showed no immediate transfer of funds.

QWhat were the two security precautions the victim identified that could have prevented this attack?

AFirst, he should not have used the hotel's public Wi-Fi and instead used his phone's mobile hotspot. Second, he should never have discussed his cryptocurrency activities in a public space where he could be overheard.

你可能也喜歡

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit3 小時前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit3 小時前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru6 小時前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru6 小時前

交易

現貨

熱門文章

什麼是 APECOIN

理解亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 在技術與環保交匯愈加重要的時代,數字貨幣正逐漸成為潛在變革的催化劑。在這些創新中,亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 脫穎而出,作為一個旨在支持亞太地區環保倡議的獨特項目。本文探討 $APECoin 的基礎、獨特特徵及其在更廣泛區塊鏈生態系統中的影響。 什麼是亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin)? 亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 是一種 ERC20 和 TRC20 代幣,於 2020 年 4 月推出,該想法最早於 2019 年 12 月提出。這一創新源於促進環保實踐和支持旨在可持續性與綠色倡議的環保項目的願望。 目標與宗旨 $APECoin 不僅僅是一種數位貨幣;它被設想為一種交換媒介,讓用戶能夠進行直接惠及環保事業的交易。其生態系統旨在促進各種金融活動,同時推廣綠色實踐的採用。這種貨幣的主要目標是: 支持環保倡議: 每筆交易中會分配一部分資金用於資助旨在保護和可再生能源的可持續項目。 促進環保創新: 鼓勵與環保可持續性對齊的初創企業和項目,通過將其代幣作為價值手段。 創建可持續市場: 該平台包含一個電子市場,在此架構下可以進行金融交易,專注於促進綠色實踐。 亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 的創建者 雖然$APECoin的具體創建者並未公開披露,但該項目得到了亞太經合組織(APEC Group)的強大支持,該聯盟專注於倡導環保倡議。這種支持為項目增加了可信度和重要性,將其連接到一個致力於可持續性和環保實踐的更廣泛網絡。 亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 的投資者 圍繞 $APECoin 的投資格局仍大致未公開。支持這一加密貨幣的具體投資基金或組織名稱尚未披露。然而,顯而易見的是,越來越多的投資者對支持具有影響力的可持續項目表示濃厚的興趣。 亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 如何運作? $APECoin 因其創新的運作模式而脫穎而出,這一模式利用了區塊鏈技術和智能合約。這一組合不僅保證了交易效率,還強化了遵守監管框架的能力,提高了交易的安全性和透明度。 $APECoin 的獨特特徵 基於區塊鏈的運營: 通過在區塊鏈平台上建立其運營,$APECoin 確保所有交易是不可變的,並通過先進的加密技術獲得保障。這種去中心化強調了代幣在其生態系統中的完整性。 智能合約: $APECoin 使用智能合約,促進無縫交易,並確保符合適用的法規。這些自動化協議最小化了爭議的可能性,簡化了流程,並有助於形成可靠的交易框架。 電子市場: $APECoin 的一大特色是其專屬的電子市場。這一數字環境作為服務支持環保實踐的中心,提供了一個促進項目綠色願景的交易平台。 通過這些特徵,$APECoin 在廣闊的加密貨幣市場中為其自身開闢了一個利基,有效地將區塊鏈原則與環境保護結合起來。 亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 的時間線 理解 $APECoin 的發展軌跡,有助於洞悉其發展里程碑和未來願景。以下是該項目歷史上重要事件的時間線: 2019 年 12 月: 亞太電子貨幣的構思,旨在通過加密貨幣推動可持續性。 2020 年 4 月: $APECoin 的正式推出,標誌著其作為環保項目的專用代幣進入市場。 2020-2021 年: 開展初始交易所發售(IEO),使用戶能夠購買 $APECoin,並與各大電子交易平台註冊以提高可及性。 在相對短暫的旅程中,$APECoin 在為以環境目標驅動的安全和有影響力的加密貨幣奠定基礎方面取得了重大進展。 結論 亞太電子貨幣 ($APECoin) 代表了技術與環境責任的結合,促進了加密生態系統的增長,同時倡導可持續性。憑藉其獨特的結構、可靠機構的支持和對綠色未來的願景,$APECoin 不僅僅是一種數位貨幣;它是一個旨在培養亞太地區負責任創新的先鋒項目。通過其對金融包容性的承諾及對環保倡議的支持,它成為數字貨幣如何被利用以實現積極社會影響的有力範例。 隨著項目的不斷發展,加密社區及更廣泛的利益相關者將熱切關注 $APECoin 如何塑造可持續實踐的對話,進一步拓展加密貨幣的新興世界。

317 人學過發佈於 2024.12.03更新於 2024.12.03

什麼是 APECOIN

如何購買APE

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買ApeCoin (APE)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買ApeCoin (APE)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的ApeCoin (APE)購買ApeCoin (APE)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易ApeCoin (APE)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易ApeCoin (APE)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

441 人學過發佈於 2025.02.24更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買APE

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 APE (APE)幣價的意見。

活动图片