John Deaton slams ex-SEC official over claim that token buybacks count as securities

ambcrypto發佈於 2025-11-16更新於 2025-11-17

Key Takeaways

What’s behind the pushback against former SEC execs?

They have been correcting the flawed view that crypto had clear rules even in 2017. 

What’s the status of token buybacks?

Although they drive value accrual to token holders, at the time of writing, there was no formal classification of token buybacks or burns. 


Armanda Fischer, a former SEC Chief of Staff, has stirred some debate following her claims on the status of token buybacks. 

According to the exec, buybacks via DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) like Uniswap [UNI] can be deemed securities transactions, citing a 2017 SEC guidance

She added

“FYI: the crypto market structure legislation being contemplated by Congress & supported by the big crypto players generally would not allow token dividends/buybacks.”

However, crypto lawyers, including former U.S Senatorial candidate John Deaton, have slammed her claims. Deaton noted that the SEC’s 2017 directive was followed by 57 enforcement actions.

However, clearer guidance was issued in 2019 by former Chair Jay Clayton and more recently, by the Paul Atkins regime. These suggested that most tokens aren’t securities. 

Deaton also pointed out that Amanda Fischer advised Biden-SEC to file a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, but XRP was finally cleared as a non-security. This was reinforced by Judge Analisa Torres.  

He added, 

“Here’s my response to Amanda, Gary Gensler, Jorge Tenreiro, and the rest of the old crew at the SEC: Shame on you…Take the loss with class.”

What’s next for token buybacks?

All the Biden-era SEC crypto enforcement actions were rolled back under the Trump administration. Only the secondary sale of XRP to institutional investors was found to be a securities transaction, but the token was a non-security. 

Which raises the question – Are token buybacks really a securities transaction as Fischer claims? 

Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pumpfun [PUMP], Aave [AAVE], Lido [LDO], and recently Uniswap [UNI] have doubled down on token buybacks to boost token holders’ value accrual. 

Whether the ‘value accrual for token holders’ constitutes a securities transaction remains to be determined by the regulator. At the time of writing, there was no formal guidance on the same from the SEC. 

In fact, Hayden Adams, Uniswap CEO, noted that the buyback move was only made because of the current pro-crypto SEC regime. 

Other crypto lawyers, including former Uniswap CIO Marvin Ammori, also castigated Fischer’s position. Ammori quipped

“If the law was so clear, why did her SEC lose so many cases in court?”

John Deaton SEC

Source: X

By and large, the SEC’s treatment of crypto tokens has evolved since 2017. And, some instructions are about to be codified into law via the market structure bill.

However, only a formal regulatory directive on token buybacks could clarify whether it constitutes securities transactions or not.  

Share

你可能也喜歡

AI 时代的电力军备赛:NextEra 吞下 Dominion 背后的能源秩序重组

过去三年,AI发展焦点从GPU短缺、数据中心建设,逐步转向更底层的电力供应问题。AI数据中心耗电巨大,其扩张速度已超过电网扩容速度,电力正成为制约AI产业的关键瓶颈。在此背景下,NextEra Energy以约668亿美元收购Dominion Energy,不仅刷新行业纪录,更标志着AI正重构能源行业的增长逻辑与竞争秩序。 这笔交易的核心在于Dominion Energy掌握着美国数据中心核心腹地——弗吉尼亚州,尤其是北弗吉尼亚“数据中心走廊”的电力接入权。NextEra藉此获得了服务科技巨头庞大电力需求的入口。AI数据中心的用电需求集中、突发且规模堪比中型城市,彻底改变了美国电力需求平缓增长的历史模式,将公用事业公司从“稳定分红资产”推向“战略增长资产”。 当前真正的稀缺资源并非芯片或服务器,而是稳定、廉价的电力接入能力。数据中心建设周期远快于发电、输电等能源基础设施建设周期,导致电力供需出现巨大缺口。这使得科技公司的竞争力在未来可能取决于其锁定长期电力供应的能力。 AI引发的电力需求激增,正沿着能源产业链向上传导,影响天然气、核电、储能及输电设备等多个环节。同时,这场“电力军备赛”也带来了复杂的监管与社会挑战,涉及电价、资源分配和社区影响等多方利益的平衡。 NextEra收购Dominion的交易揭示,下一阶段AI竞争的本质正在转变:从模型与芯片的比拼,转向围绕发电、输电、电网接入和监管协调能力展开的新基础设施战争。谁掌控稳定的电力与关键的接入节点,谁就将掌握未来算力扩张的节奏。

marsbit24 分鐘前

AI 时代的电力军备赛:NextEra 吞下 Dominion 背后的能源秩序重组

marsbit24 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片