Hyperliquid leads $10B liquidation — Should ‘regulators look into the exchanges’?

ambcrypto發佈於 2025-10-11更新於 2025-10-12

Key Takeaways

Why did Hyperliquid record massive liquidations? 

Most positions were forcefully closed to ensure the platform remains debt-free.  

What’s next post-market crash? 

Leaders are calling for better use of insurance funds to safeguard traders’ capital. 


Hyperliquid [HYPE] faced massive criticism following its massive liquidation during the recent crash. It topped the charts with $10 billion worth of positions wiped out. 

In response, Kris Marszalek, CEO of the exchange Crypto.com, called for a probe into Hyperliquid and other top platforms. 

“Regulators should look into the exchanges that had most liquidations in the last 24h and conduct a thorough review of fairness of practices.”

Hyperliquid

Source: X

Hyperliquid slams criticism

However, Jeff Yan, CEO and Co-Founder of Hyperliquid, said the claims were “irresponsible.” He clarified that DEX’s liquidation was the highest because it was the most transparent and shared full data. 

Most CEXs only allow CoinGlass to sample a limited amount of liquidation data.

In fact, some estimated that the overall liquidation could be as high as $40 billion. That’s double the reported amount of about $20 billion

Yan added that the move was per the Hyperliquid standard procedures to ensure there is no “irresponsible gambling” and bad debt. 

“Any system that does not liquidate the necessary users is irresponsibly gambling with other users’ funds. On Hyperliquid, every order, trade, and liquidation is transparently verifiable on-chain.”

Hyperliquid

Source: X

Yan said Hyperliquid didn’t target profitable positions and used auto-liquidation to maintain the platform’s solvency.

“Contrary to misconceptions, HLP is a non-toxic liquidator that does not pick profitable liquidations.”

For the unfamiliar, perpetual trading or leveraged positions are a zero-sum game by design. For every short, there should be a corresponding long.

In this setup, winning shorts earn profits funded by losses from leveraged longs.

But if one side is wiped out (bulls) and shorts make more money as the market crashes, there’s not enough money to pay the winning short sellers. Exchanges close even profitable short positions to prevent bad debt.

Auto-deleveraging (ADL) is the liquidation of last resort. Yan said exchanges apply ADL when their insurance funds or vaults fail to absorb the crash.

Most platforms opted for it during the crash, capping gains and even wiping out other traders’ capital. 

Calls for better risk tools

For his part, Tushar Jain, Partner at Multicoin Capital, urged exchanges to use insurance funds to avoid such “value destruction” for users. 

Hyperliquid

Source: X

That said, the market slipped into an “extreme fear” level seen during the “Liberation Day” tariffs in April.

Historically, this has always been a buying signal. But only a positive update on the China-U.S. tariff wars could calm and juice the markets again. 

Share

你可能也喜歡

一文拆解“股神Serenity”投资方法论

本文拆解了网络投资者“股神Serenity”(@aleabitoreddit)的“瓶颈点投资法”。该方法论核心在于:先确认一个确定性的大趋势(如AI算力扩张),然后深入拆解其产业链,找出其中供给受限、难以替代且市场关注度低的上游环节(如InP衬底、特定激光器),在价格未被充分定价前提前布局。 该方法可拆解为五个关键因子: 1. **确定需求**:需求背景必须坚实,如巨头资本开支和明确的技术路线图。 2. **受限供给**:标的环节需具备“没它不行”、扩产慢、认证周期长等瓶颈特征。 3. **低关注度**:市场覆盖少、认知滞后,存在错误定价机会。 4. **价值捕获**:公司需具备定价权、高毛利、客户锁定等将瓶颈转化为利润的能力。 5. **催化剂**:需要财报、客户量产、政策等短期事件驱动价格重估。 文章以$AXTI、$RPI、$AAOI/$LITE为例,说明了如何应用此方法。并提出了六步实践路径: 1. 寻找已被验证的大趋势。 2. 绘制从终端到上游的完整产业链地图。 3. 识别其中真正的产能/技术瓶颈。 4. 搜集客户、订单、产能等证据链。 5. 做好风控,预先思考证伪点。 6. 使仓位大小与自身研究深度相匹配。 同时,文章指出了该方法的局限性:推断存在过拟合风险;早期标的缺乏估值锚;Serenity本人的影响力已成市场变量,可能影响赔率;其超高收益部分受益于AI牛市,存在幸存者偏差。该方法高度依赖专业判断、信息拼图和纪律性。 最终结论强调,应复制的不是其具体持仓,而是“走窄门”的研究顺序:从大趋势到产业链瓶颈,再通过证据和风控,用可承受的仓位进行非共识下注。

marsbit4 小時前

一文拆解“股神Serenity”投资方法论

marsbit4 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片