Too Tough? Poland’s New Crypto Law Faces Pushback

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-09-30更新於 2025-10-01

文章摘要

Poland’s lower house has approved a wide-ranging crypto bill that would put the country’s entire virtual asset market under stricter...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Poland’s lower house has approved a wide-ranging crypto bill that would put the country’s entire virtual asset market under stricter state control. Based on reports, the measure — known as Bill 1424 — passed the lower house of Poland’s national parliament, or Sejm, with 230 votes in favor and 196 opposed.

The law would give the Polish Financial Supervision Authority, KNF, sweeping powers over exchanges, issuers and custodians operating in or serving customers in Poland.

What The Law Requires

According to coverage, the draft compels all Crypto Asset Service Providers to obtain a KNF license to operate in the market. It would set detailed rules on capital, internal controls, anti-money-laundering safeguards and risk management.

Penalties are heavy: operating without a permit could draw fines up to 10 million złoty (about US$2.8 million) and, in some versions, criminal liability including up to two years in prison for serious breaches. Existing firms would get a six-month window to apply for authorization once the law takes effect.

Supporters Say It Brings Clarity

Backers argue the move will align Poland with the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets rules and give clearer rules to investors and businesses.

Clarity is meant to reduce scams and make large players feel safer about doing business in Poland. Some observers say stronger oversight could attract institutional money that has been wary of unclear local rules.

Concerns From Industry And Lawmakers

But many in Poland’s crypto community warn the bill goes further than EU minimums and could burden smaller players. Reports point to concerns about high costs and heavy paperwork that might push startups to move operations abroad.

BTCUSD trading at $112,886 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

There is also worry the KNF’s review process could be slow; some sources claim decisions might take as long as 30 months, creating an uncertain climate for firms that need speed to survive. Artists, small issuers and hobbyist projects fear that strict rules will squeeze out low-budget activity.

Transparency And Blocking Powers

The draft would also require more disclosures from issuers and service providers. Regulators could maintain a register of unpermitted domains and use tools to block access. Supporters say this helps fight fraud. Critics say it risks overreach and could limit legitimate users’ access to services.

Based on reports, after clearing the Sejm the text is moving to the Senate for review. President Karol Nawrocki has been reported to consider a veto unless certain provisions are softened, particularly those that introduce criminal penalties and broad supervisory powers.

Lawmakers and industry groups are pressing for amendments that would narrow the scope of some requirements and ease costs for smaller operators.

Featured image from Meta, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

你可能也喜歡

MiCA即将覆盖DeFi借贷金库,但监管之路充满挑战

欧盟的加密资产市场法规(MiCA)最初未涵盖加密借贷,但欧盟委员会正在考虑将其纳入监管范围。2026年5月20日,委员会就包括去中心化金融(DeFi)和加密借贷在内的遗留问题征求公众意见。争议焦点之一是借贷金库,这类工具能将大量资金引入链上信贷市场,但其法律地位目前依赖非强制性的解释,认为其不在MiCA和欧盟基金规则管辖范围内。 专家指出,当前法律对金库的定义模糊,且其通过智能合约和多参与者分散功能,使识别“服务提供者”变得复杂。以Morpho协议为例,其金库架构将职责分配给所有者、策展人、分配者和监督者,这不符合现有的任何监管模式。 律师Jonathan Galea警告,若将“DeFi借贷”作为一个单一类别纳入监管,可能会误将经济功能和管控方截然不同的结构混为一谈。他建议政策制定者应区分不同类型的金库。 关于监管对象,MiCA目前排除了“完全去中心化方式”提供的服务。但有人认为,仅以“去中心化”作为分界线可能会不公平地惩罚新协议。另一种观点认为,监管重点应放在金库的结构和人员的实际控制权上。 Curve Finance创始人Michael Egorov强调,DeFi借贷与传统金融不同,需要差异化的监管框架,既需新的保障措施,又应避免某些协议因架构而无法合规。 欧盟委员会的咨询将于9月30日结束,其结果将决定借贷金库是继续游离于MiCA之外,还是面临新的监管。布鲁塞尔面临的挑战是如何制定规则,以区分不同形式的链上借贷及其实际控制者。

cointelegraph54 分鐘前

MiCA即将覆盖DeFi借贷金库,但监管之路充满挑战

cointelegraph54 分鐘前

灰度研报:AI时代的金融隐私,Zcash为何不该被忽视?

本文探讨了在AI时代金融隐私日益重要的背景下,隐私加密货币Zcash的价值与潜力。文章指出,金融隐私是货币正常功能的关键,而当前公链的透明性无法满足用户对交易、余额和关系保密的需求。Zcash作为具备可选隐私功能的底层公链,通过零知识证明技术实现“屏蔽交易”,能隐藏发送方、接收方和金额,同时允许用户通过查看密钥进行选择性披露,为合规提供路径。 文章回顾了Zcash的发展历程,其通过多次重大升级(如Sapling、Orchard、Ironwood)显著提升了隐私交易的可用性和安全性,并持续优化钱包等基础设施以降低使用门槛。目前,Zcash链上屏蔽交易占比高达约90%,屏蔽池内ZEC数量创历史新高,表明隐私需求真实存在。 然而,Zcash当前市值仅占数字货币板块约0.6%,市场对其隐私属性的估值极低。文章认为,随着稳定币普及、AI监控手段增强以及合规环境变化,金融隐私需求可能被重新评估。若隐私被视为数字货币的核心属性而不仅仅是边缘功能,Zcash存在巨大的价值重估空间。主要风险包括监管对隐私交易的接受度、历史可信设置遗留问题、量子计算威胁以及未来技术升级的执行难度。总之,Zcash代表了市场尚未充分定价的、针对未来金融隐私需求的期权价值。

marsbit3 小時前

灰度研报:AI时代的金融隐私,Zcash为何不该被忽视?

marsbit3 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片