Banks Want to Ban Rewards on Stablecoins: Coinbase CEO

TheCryptoTimes發佈於 2025-09-30更新於 2025-09-30

While stablecoin adoption is growing, big banks are now under fire for trying to stop crypto rewards programs. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong warned on X that banks are lobbying to end USDC reward rights under the GENIUS Act. He argued that this move would protect banks’ monopoly while hurting American consumers. 

Armstrong stressed that crypto has clear rules coming, and banks are pushing for another handout by blocking stablecoin rewards. 

John Deaton, Managing Partner at Deaton Law and well-known XRP supporter, echoed Armstrong’s warning. He wrote on X, “Bank’s are the enemy of the people. I’m glad Brian Armstrong is bullish and fighting back against them but we can’t underestimate the hold they have on many Senators.” He also criticized Senator Ed Markey for siding with banks since the 2008 financial crisis.

Senators push back on bank influence

The controversy comes after a letter from the American Senate Blockchain Association surfaced on Monday. The group, led by Senators Tim Scott and Elizabeth Warren, accused big banks of trying to dismantle stablecoin legislation. They argued that banks are recycling an old playbook, claiming stablecoins would drain deposits and shrink lending. 

“Big banks are dusting off a predictable playbook using the ‘loophole’ trope whenever there is competition,” the letter stated. Senators pointed out that the same big banks blamed for the 2008 crash have now piled up trillions in deposits. According to them, these banks have only grown stronger, often leaving smaller banks struggling to keep up. 

Stablecoin market trends

Besides the regulatory fight, fresh data from rwa.xyz shows a shift in stablecoin liquidity. Tether (USDT) led inflows with $6.3 billion in the past 30 days. Ethena’s USDe followed with $2.1 billion, while Circle’s USDC added $1.7 billion. Paxos’ PYUSD also gained ground with $1.2 billion inflows.

Top Stablecoins Net Flow - Rwa
Source: rwa.xyz

Other tokens saw modest growth. USDai added $478 million, M gained $417 million, and USDtb pulled in $355 million. Paxos’ USDG and BitGo’s USD1 logged smaller inflows of $173 million and $109 million. However, a $210 million decline in MakerDAO’s USDS indicated a shift in capital toward more modern possibilities. 

This fight shows how old banks and new crypto firms are pulling in opposite directions. Banks want to stay in charge, but crypto leaders argue people should have the freedom to earn and use rewards without losing out. 

Also Read: Visa Pilots Real-Time Cross-Border Payments With Stablecoins


Mobile Only Image

你可能也喜歡

富达警示:AI代理的繁荣,未必是公链的盛宴

富达数字资产发布分析,对“AI代理必然推动公链繁荣”的流行叙事提出警示。报告指出,从“AI代理需要支付和身份”推导出“公链代币价值增长”至少存在三层过度假设:AI代理未必需要在公链结算;链上结算不一定发生在无需许可的公共网络;网络经济活动未必能有效传导至原生代币。 报告详细阐述了六大风险:首先,企业AI代理可能更倾向使用成本低、稳定可控的封闭系统,而非公共区块链。其次,即使链上交易量因AI微支付增加,若以稳定币结算为主,价值可能被支付层捕获,而非公链代币。第三,AI降低开发门槛可能导致应用供给过剩,代码数量不等于经济价值,竞争将转向用户、品牌等非技术壁垒。第四,技术优势因AI工具普及而稀缺性下降。第五,AI在提升开发效率的同时,也可能降低攻击成本,加剧安全风险。第六,金融机构更需要具备身份、权限和合规控制的“可控区块链”,而非完全开放的网络。 富达的核心观点是,AI与区块链的结合存在潜力,但市场不应将两条赛道简单等同。关键问题在于,哪些基础设施能真正承接AI经济的真实需求并将其转化为可持续的商业价值,而非简单地认为AI增长会自动转化为公链的繁荣。叙事需要从“讲故事”转向务实“算账”。

marsbit4 分鐘前

富达警示:AI代理的繁荣,未必是公链的盛宴

marsbit4 分鐘前

Telegram 推出 WEB-代理技术:将流量伪装成普通网站访问

2026年8月21日,Telegram推出了一项名为WEB-代理的全新实验性反封锁技术。该技术通过WebView,将Messenger的MTProxy流量伪装成普通的HTTPS或WebSocket网站访问数据,使其在传输过程中与合法网络浏览行为无异,为用户在受限环境下访问服务提供了新途径。 其核心原理是:客户端应用利用内置浏览器引擎,将多个加密的逻辑连接复用并封装成单一Web会话,外部观察如同加载网页。服务器端的转发器接收此流并将其分离还原给标准MTProxy,全程不解密内容或知晓最终目的地,保障了隐私。代理运行于普通的HTTPS域名上,该域名同时正常提供公开网站;只有携带特定计算参数(基于配置通过HMAC-SHA256生成)的精确请求才会激活代理桥接页面,普通访问者看到的是常规主页,有效规避自动检测。 目前该技术处于概念验证阶段,已有桌面版和实验性Android客户端,并计划支持iOS。统一的技术栈便于测试和发展。这项技术标志着抗审查手段正转向更复杂地融入合法网络基础设施,利用标准浏览器机制和安全协议,增加了流量过滤系统区分的难度。其长期价值将取决于其对抗自适应流量分析的能力以及在不损失性能下的扩展性。从技术演进看,此方案与此前受CDN限制的“域名前置”技术有相似逻辑,体现了封锁与反封锁技术之间持续循环的博弈。

cryptonews.ru20 分鐘前

Telegram 推出 WEB-代理技术:将流量伪装成普通网站访问

cryptonews.ru20 分鐘前

MiCA即将覆盖DeFi借贷金库,但监管之路充满挑战

欧盟的加密资产市场法规(MiCA)最初未涵盖加密借贷,但欧盟委员会正在考虑将其纳入监管范围。2026年5月20日,委员会就包括去中心化金融(DeFi)和加密借贷在内的遗留问题征求公众意见。争议焦点之一是借贷金库,这类工具能将大量资金引入链上信贷市场,但其法律地位目前依赖非强制性的解释,认为其不在MiCA和欧盟基金规则管辖范围内。 专家指出,当前法律对金库的定义模糊,且其通过智能合约和多参与者分散功能,使识别“服务提供者”变得复杂。以Morpho协议为例,其金库架构将职责分配给所有者、策展人、分配者和监督者,这不符合现有的任何监管模式。 律师Jonathan Galea警告,若将“DeFi借贷”作为一个单一类别纳入监管,可能会误将经济功能和管控方截然不同的结构混为一谈。他建议政策制定者应区分不同类型的金库。 关于监管对象,MiCA目前排除了“完全去中心化方式”提供的服务。但有人认为,仅以“去中心化”作为分界线可能会不公平地惩罚新协议。另一种观点认为,监管重点应放在金库的结构和人员的实际控制权上。 Curve Finance创始人Michael Egorov强调,DeFi借贷与传统金融不同,需要差异化的监管框架,既需新的保障措施,又应避免某些协议因架构而无法合规。 欧盟委员会的咨询将于9月30日结束,其结果将决定借贷金库是继续游离于MiCA之外,还是面临新的监管。布鲁塞尔面临的挑战是如何制定规则,以区分不同形式的链上借贷及其实际控制者。

cointelegraph2 小時前

MiCA即将覆盖DeFi借贷金库,但监管之路充满挑战

cointelegraph2 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片