Pump.fun’s 2-week high looks impressive – UNTIL you see what’s really happening

ambcrypto發佈於 2025-09-29更新於 2025-09-29

Key Takeaways

What fueled Pump.fun’s 13% rally?

Perpetual traders added $56 million in Open Interest, while Spot buyers accumulated $2.94 million.

Why could PUMP’s surge fade soon?

Protocol revenue plunged 72% to $945K, Fees dropped to $1.82 million, token graduations fell from 286 to 70, and Daily Active Users dropped under 86,000.


Pump.fun [PUMP] recorded a major liquidity surge in the past day, with price climbing more than 13% from its previous daily candle close.

Market data showed mixed sentiment, as revenue and fees slipped to their lowest levels in two weeks. This gap between rising prices and falling usage left questions about the rally’s durability.

AMBCrypto analysis provides more context on what this could imply for PUMP.

Where did PUMP’s surge come from?

The recent rally in PUMP was driven largely by investors in the Perpetuals market, who poured more liquidity into the memecoin.

In fact, analysis showed that inflows in the Derivatives market amounted to $56 million, based on recent percentage changes in Open Interest.

The surge also coincided with the Open Interest-Weighted Funding Rate holding in the positive zone. This indicated that long contracts were dominating the market and providing most of the liquidity.

PUMP open interest chart

Source: CoinGlass

Spot investors also joined in, though to a lesser extent. This group accumulated $2.94 million worth of PUMP—their first notable accumulation since the 25th of September, when they added $3.52 million.

This buying activity across Spot and Perpetuals may be speculative, given that on-chain data showed falling usage and revenue.

Revenue falls—Is this a warning?

Sentiment around PUMP has weakened. At the time of writing, Revenue and Fees generated on the protocol dropped to a two-week low.

Revenue fell from $3.38 million to $945,960 at press time, while fees declined more sharply, from $8.52 million to $1.82 million during the same period.

PUMP fees and revenue chart.

Source: DeFiLama

That steep decline suggested weaker activity on Pumpfun and PumpSwap. It pointed to lower demand for the asset across on-chain users.

On top of that, active investors had not reached past milestones set in previous months.

Milestones become harder to reach

According to Artemis, both “Tokens Graduated” and “Token Minted” metrics on the Pump.fun protocol fell to monthly lows, signaling waning user interest and purchasing power.

Tokens Graduated —those that reached a $100,000 market capitalization—dropped sharply from 286 to just 70 at press time.

Pump.fun - Tokens Graduated

Source: Artemis

Similarly, minted coins, referring to meme tokens created on the platform, fell to 13,700 within the same period. This decline suggested that reduced investor interest is discouraging creators from launching new tokens.

The launchpad’s Daily Active Users also plummeted, hitting a recent low of 85,700, further confirming fading activity in the market.

Share

你可能也喜歡

租来的信仰:比特币ETF资金流里,有多少是真钱

文章《租来的信仰:比特币ETF资金流里,有多少是真钱》揭示了比特币ETF每周资金流入数据的真实构成。核心观点是,这些数据常被误解为纯粹的机构看多情绪,但实际上很大程度上受到一笔“期现套利”交易的影响。 套利者会同时买入ETF并在芝加哥商品交易所做空等值的比特币期货,以此锁定期货与现货之间的价差利润,而完全对冲了比特币价格波动的风险。这种“delta中性”的交易在数据上同样表现为ETF资金流入,与真正的信仰买盘难以区分。数据分析显示,每周资金流波动中约一半可由对冲基金新增的期货空头来解释,两者相关性高达0.70。相比之下,比特币当周的价格涨跌几乎无法预测资金流。 然而,这种套利交易主要驱动的是资金流的短期“波动”,而非长期“存量”。自ETF推出以来累计约550亿美元的净流入中,当前由套利交易贡献的净额仅约10亿美元。其余是稳定的、方向性的买盘,大约每周4亿美元,长期复利积累构成了持仓的主体。套利头寸在ETF总资产中的占比已从2024年高峰时的约14%降至目前的约4%-5%。 文章指出,这笔套利交易已持续离场近两年。当期货基差收益(套利空间)收窄至无利可图时,相关的ETF资金流入和对冲空头会同步消退。因此,不应将基差收窄时的资金流出简单解读为市场看空比特币。 总之,比特币ETF资金流数据高估了市场信仰的“波动率”,而非其“水平”。解读该数据时,应结合期货基差收益和杠杆基金的净空头头寸变化,以辨别其中有多少是“租来的”套利资金,多少是“自有的”真实买盘。

marsbit29 分鐘前

租来的信仰:比特币ETF资金流里,有多少是真钱

marsbit29 分鐘前

格林斯潘去世:他写下的市场规则,沃什正在改写

2026年6月22日,前美联储主席艾伦·格林斯潘去世,享年100岁。他留下的货币政策遗产——“格林斯潘卖权”和市场信条“别和美联储作对”,至今深刻影响着全球金融市场。 格林斯潘于1987年上任后,迅速以“提供流动性”应对“黑色星期一”股灾,奠定了美联储在危机中为市场托底的预期。1994年他果断加息控制通胀,展现了其政策的另一面。1998年协调救助长期资本管理公司,强化了“大而不倒”的逻辑。然而,2000年后他将利率降至1%并维持一年,被部分观点认为助推了房地产泡沫,为2008年金融危机埋下伏笔。 格林斯潘卸任后声誉历经起伏,但其塑造的央行干预市场预期和行为范式持续存在。 就在他去世前几天,现任美联储主席凯文·沃什启动了对美联储运作方式的全盘重审,成立了多个专项工作组,意图从“第一性原理”出发审视现有框架。沃什可能弱化或取消“前瞻性指引”,这动摇了市场赖以预测美联储行动的基石。若此,格林斯潘时代留下的“央行明确托底”预期将面临根本性改变。 格林斯潘代表了一个央行自信能管理市场的时代,而沃什面对的则是一个更复杂、充满怀疑的时代。格林斯潘的逝世,象征着一个货币政策范式的终结,美联储正试图在没有“大师”指引的情况下,独自前行。

marsbit46 分鐘前

格林斯潘去世:他写下的市场规则,沃什正在改写

marsbit46 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片