Hyperliquid Rival ‘Lighter’ Sparks Frenzy Over Airdrop Points Trading

TheCryptoTimes發佈於 2025-09-16更新於 2025-09-16

Lighter, a decentralized crypto perpetuals trading platform, is setting the crypto community ablaze with chatter around trading of its airdrop points. The platform is running a points program to attract users and support its initial growth, essentially rewarding contributors with a token airdrop. Users who trade on the platform and provide liquidity to public pools are currently provided with Lighter points. 

Since the past few days, Lighter Points have been a buzzword among airdrop farmers. Especially as these points are sold in live markets, even before airdrop is finalized. Professor Satoshi, a user on X, noted that users are paying as high as $33 for a single point via over-the-counter (OTC) deals. 

While pre-market trading for soon-to-be-launched tokens is not a new thing in crypto, airdrop points trading has taken this approach to a next level. A similar occurrence was also spotted prior to Hyperliquid’s airdrop but it largely took place after the official airdrop announcement. In Lighter’s case, neither any official airdrop dates are shared or token details are revealed. 

Lighter’s greater potential

Reacting to ‘pre-airdrop’ pricing for Lighter points, an X user YashasEdu, pointed out that $33 for each point is way lower than its potential. The user also noted that Lighter is targeting a $2-4 billion fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and it puts each point priced at $40 to $150 range over standard tokenomics design. 

“Lighter’s positions itself at the center of these trends with tech & execution that addresses real market needs,” YashasEdu said. “Current OTC pricing seems disconnected from underlying fundamentals & comparable project valuations.”

Recalling the Hyperliquid airdrop, the user noted that its points traded in a range of $15 to $25 on OTC markets but the protocol achieved significantly higher valuations after launch and early sellers missed upside. 

New competitor to Hyperliquid

While Hyperliquid is setting a trend for a decentralized trading ecosystem, Lighter is emerging as its closest competitor with over $440 million in total value locked (TVL) and an average of $1 billion in daily trading volume. Both the perpetual DEXs share similar functionalities. 

Hyperliquid employs a two-layer design with synchronized data sharing between HyperCore and HyperEVM, achieving decentralized trading speeds comparable to centralized exchanges. In contrast, Lighter leverages a proprietary zk-rollup (zkLighter) with a centralized limit order book (CLOB), delivering an impressive 5ms soft finality, enhancing trade execution speed and efficiency. 

Additionally, Lighter introduces capital composability through LLP positions usable as margin, a feature absent in Hyperliquid. It also optimizes yield and trading flexibility on Ethereum’s secure foundation. 

Given the first-mover advantage, Hyperliquid is currently positioned first among all decentralized trading platforms. If Lighter continues to gain traction, it might face stiff competition from Hyperliquid as prominent features of decentralized perpetual trading keep attracting a wider user base. 

Also Read: Israel Freezes 187 IRGC-Linked Crypto Wallets Worth $1.5M


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

你可能也喜歡

半年新增19家百亿独角兽,一级市场为何开始追逐“确定性”?

2026年上半年,国内一级市场呈现出一种反差现象:在整体面临募资与退出挑战的背景下,AI大模型、具身智能、核聚变等少数热门赛道却估值飙升,仅具身智能领域就新增了19家估值超百亿的独角兽,部分企业估值半年内突破200亿元。月之暗面等AI公司估值更是跃升至数百亿美元。 这一热潮背后,是资本正在猛烈追逐有限的“确定性”。首先,明确的IPO预期成为关键吸引力,资本愿意为更近的退出路径支付溢价。其次,已上市同类公司的高市值成为未上市企业的估值锚点,但这也使一级市场估值更易受二级市场情绪波动影响。再者,“下一轮会更贵”的交易预期本身成为一种确定性,部分投资逻辑从关注长期价值转向期待后续融资接盘。 此外,资本也向核聚变等早期硬科技赛道集中,为技术前景和稀缺性支付高溢价。然而,这轮热潮的本质是风险转移:技术不确定性并未消除,而是被估值上涨暂时覆盖。估值越高,企业未来需要兑现的业绩承诺就越多。 真正的风险不在于独角兽数量增多,而在于资本是否将“交易接盘的可能性”误读为“企业内在价值”。历史表明,当融资环境变化,市场终将回归本质问题:融资到底换来了什么技术、收入或利润。因此,这轮“确定性追逐”的最终考验在于,当资本重新要求基本面验证时,当前的高估值有多少能够经受住考验并真正留存下来。

marsbit3 分鐘前

半年新增19家百亿独角兽,一级市场为何开始追逐“确定性”?

marsbit3 分鐘前

Hyperliquid的合规之路:从无需许可到许可制HIP-3

Hyperliquid(基于HyperCore的去中心化交易基础设施)因其无需许可、用户自托管的特点,与美国针对期货交易的严格市场结构法律(涉及注册交易平台DCM、清算所DCO和经纪商FCM)存在根本冲突,因此一直对美国市场进行地理封锁。 为了解决此困境,Hyperliquid成立了政策中心(HPC),积极游说美国监管机构(CFTC、SEC),主张将Hyperliquid视为“中立基础设施”。其核心提议是:允许已受监管的实体(如经纪商、交易平台)在履行其原有KYC、市场监控等合规义务的前提下,利用Hyperliquid的底层技术(如HyperCore)来构建和运营产品,而非要求协议本身改变其无需许可的特性。 作为这一合规路径的实例,Hyperliquid已在测试网推出具备许可权限的HIP-3部署者功能。此类部署允许受监管实体创建仅对白名单用户(即已完成KYC的合规用户)开放的市场,并拥有对用户账户执行特定操作(如强制平仓)的权限,从而模仿传统金融中FCM的职责。尽管这些合规市场会形成独立的订单簿,但通过白名单做市商的桥梁作用,它们仍能共享Hyperliquid主市场的流动性。 总之,Hyperliquid的战略目标并非直接向美国用户开放其原生免KYC前端,而是通过提供工具,让合规机构能在其底层上构建符合美国法规的产品,从而为美国投资者提供间接参与其生态的合规通道,同时保持协议本身的中立性与开放性。

marsbit1 小時前

Hyperliquid的合规之路:从无需许可到许可制HIP-3

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片