USDH arrives – Can Hyperliquid’s new stablecoin shake USDC’s $6B grip?

ambcrypto發佈於 2025-09-14更新於 2025-09-15

Key Takeaways

Who won the race for Hyperliquid’s USDH stablecoin ticker?

Native Markets secured the USDH ticker, winning nearly 70% of validator votes in Hyperliquid’s first major on-chain governance process.

Which firms did Native Markets beat?

It outpaced bids from Paxos, BitGo, and Ethena, with prediction markets showing overwhelming support for Native Markets toward the end of the race.


The race to secure the USDH stablecoin ticker on Hyperliquid [HYPE] has officially come to an end.

After a week of competitive bidding, Hyperliquid’s validator community voted in favor of Native Markets, granting the firm the rights to issue and manage the exchange’s U.S. dollar stablecoin, USDH.

Native Markets wins the USDH ticker

Max Fiege, founder of Native Markets, took to X and noted

“We will be deploying both the USDH HIP-1 and corresponding ERC-20 within days. We will then start with a testing phase for mints and redeems of up to $800/tx with an initial group, to be followed by the opening of the USDH/USDC spot order book as well as uncapped mints & redeems.”

For the uninitiated, Native Markets moved quickly, submitting the initial proposal for USDH just 90 minutes after Hyperliquid issued the call, later refining its plan in response to community feedback.

The Hyperliquid Foundation itself abstained from voting, leaving the decision entirely to validators.

This contest to secure the USDH ticker marks the exchange’s first major on-chain governance vote beyond routine token listings.

Other competitors

Despite competition from established players like Paxos, BitGo, and Ethena [ENA], Native Markets emerged as the clear frontrunner throughout the weeklong campaign.

On-chain trackers show that its proposal ultimately secured about 70% of validator votes, compared to 20% for Paxos and just 3.2% for Ethena.

Most bidders had pledged to direct stablecoin yields back into the Hyperliquid ecosystem, whether through contributions to the Hyperliquid Assistance Fund, ecosystem growth initiatives, or direct token repurchases.

Momentum firmly swung in Native Markets’ favor late in the process.

After Ethena withdrew from the race recently, prediction markets like Polymarket gave Native Markets over a 99% chance of victory by Saturday.

Controversy alert!

Still, the outcome was not without controversy.

Critics, including Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly Capital, questioned the selection process, raising concerns about fairness and long-term implications for governance on Hyperliquid.

Quershi observed, 

“Hearing from multiple bidders that none of the validators are interested in considering anyone besides Native Markets. It’s not even a serious discussion, as though there was a backroom deal already done.” 

Will USDH rule USDC?

With the launch of USDH, Circle’s USD Coin [USDC], the dominant dollar-backed asset on the network, is facing fresh competition.

However, data from DeFiLlama shows nearly $6 billion in USDC reserves remain on the platform, underscoring its entrenched position.

Still, Hyperliquid has made it clear that USDC and other stablecoins will continue to be supported as quote assets.

However, they have to meet requirements such as a 200,000 HYPE stake (approximately $10 million), a strong peg to $1, and sufficient liquidity depth against both USDC and HYPE.

Even so, market sentiment suggests ripples are already being felt.

Circle’s stock has slipped notably, falling 16% since the USDH initiative was announced, and most recently trading at $125.32 after a 6.27% daily decline, according to Yahoo Finance.

The HYPE token has also experienced modest pressure, dropping 1.09% in the past 24 hours to $54.02, according to CoinMarketCap.

Share

你可能也喜歡

韩国机构的加密竞赛:稳定币与 RWA 双线爆发

韩国加密货币市场正经历结构性变革,金融与互联网巨头依托庞大的散户基础,积极布局机构级区块链基础设施,其中稳定币和现实资产(RWA)代币化是两大核心驱动力。 在稳定币领域,各方正围绕合规韩元稳定币的发行主体展开博弈。银行(如KB金融、韩亚金融)、支付商(如新韩信用卡、BC Card、Danal)及互联网平台(如KakaoPay、NAVER Pay)均已开展试点,旨在防御因美元稳定币流行导致的资金外流,并将数字金融活动锚定在本土体系内。加密原生项目若能在此期间主动提供底层技术解决方案,有望在监管放开后成为关键基建一环。 RWA代币化方面,韩国机构进展迅速,且聚焦本土特色产业,如船舶融资、军工供应链、K-pop知识产权等。相关法律框架(《资本市场法》修订)将于2027年初生效,新韩投资证券等机构已牵头搭建交易平台。加密项目的机遇在于弥补韩国券商的技术短板,提供全球分发渠道、跨链流动性方案及资产赋能工具,而非试图颠覆现有机构。 用户入口方面,互联网平台掌握关键流量。NAVER拟收购Upbit母公司Dunamu,Kakao正打造统一数字钱包,Toss则拥有全金融牌照和广泛线下网络。它们将区块链视为底层基建,是加密项目触达海量普通用户的重要渠道。 当前韩国监管框架逐步明晰,市场已具备散户基础、机构试点和民众认知。在监管完全落地前,与本土机构建立深度合作、落地实用场景的加密企业,将更有可能定义韩国数字资产行业的未来格局。美国《CLARITY法案》等外部监管进展也可能影响韩国市场的推进节奏。

Foresight News39 分鐘前

韩国机构的加密竞赛:稳定币与 RWA 双线爆发

Foresight News39 分鐘前

如何判断AI视频真假?综述动态、可溯源、可解释的检测体系

随着AI生成视频技术(如Sora、Veo等模型)的飞速发展,生成内容的逼真度已大幅提升,对虚假视频的检测变得日益困难且紧迫。传统仅输出“真假”二分类的检测方法已无法满足需求,检测目标应重新定义为“事实保真度验证”,即核查视频内容在感知和认知层面是否与真实世界一致。 本文综述了AI生成视频检测领域的最新进展。首先,将AI生成视频分为三类范式:局部操控视频、跨模态音视频编辑和端到端生成式视频合成。针对检测,提出了一个从低层到高层的四层方法框架: 1. 底层视觉线索分析:检测像素异常、生理信号等底层伪迹。 2. 时空一致性分析:核查视频在时间和空间上的连续性与合理性。 3. 跨模态一致性分析:验证视频内画面、声音、文字等多模态信息是否对齐。 4. 语言引导的世界级推理:引入外部知识,判断视频内容是否符合常识、物理规律和事实。 检测方法的演进趋势是从依赖视觉线索(第1、2层)逐步转向结合语言和多模态推理(第3、4层)。评测体系也需相应发展,不仅评估分类准确率,更要关注模型判断的可解释性、证据的可靠性以及在真实复杂环境下的鲁棒性。 未来的可信检测系统需要协同视觉与语言双视角,建立“识别-定位-解释”的清晰推理路径,并将内容分析与来源追溯相结合。这需要计算机视觉、自然语言处理、多模态理解等领域的共同努力,构建动态、可溯源、可解释的检测体系,以应对日益严峻的AI生成视频挑战。

marsbit1 小時前

如何判断AI视频真假?综述动态、可溯源、可解释的检测体系

marsbit1 小時前

万万没想到,AI x Crypto 最先落地的是安全审计

AI正深刻改变加密领域安全审计的格局。数据显示,2026年上半年DeFi领域安全事件频发,累计损失约9.42亿美元,其中第二季度尤为严重。传统观点认为安全审计需求稳定,但以Claude Mythos为代表的新一代AI工具大幅降低了发现智能合约漏洞的门槛,攻击者可快速扫描并利用漏洞,使得传统审计报告的有效期急剧缩短。 攻击不再局限于小型协议,即使经过多家知名机构审计的头部协议也频繁遭殃。攻击手段扩展到社会工程学、基础设施配置缺陷等领域,显示代码审计的覆盖范围存在局限。例如,Drift Protocol和KelpDAO均因非代码层面的漏洞导致重大损失。同时,AI也在辅助攻击者挖掘多年前部署的旧合约漏洞,使历史审计的保护价值归零。OpenZeppelin联合创始人甚至公开表示“所有DeFi都不安全”,引发行业广泛讨论。 面对挑战,项目方开始基于新标准进行防御性的重复审计,但这更多是应对风险的被动支出。审计机构则加速转型,一方面研发AI辅助审计系统提升效率,如OpenZeppelin推出Skills系统将安全防线前移;另一方面,商业模式正从一次性报告交付转向提供持续监控、形式化验证等嵌入式服务。例如,AI原生审计工具Firepan在已被多重人工审计的Curve合约中发现了新的组合型漏洞,展现了AI在防守端的潜力。 总之,AI加剧了攻防两端的竞赛。对于项目方,安全已成为需要持续投入的基础设施;对于审计机构,唯有加快技术和服务模式的重构,才能适应新时代的竞争。安全审计赛道正从红利模式转向激烈的竞争模式。

链捕手1 小時前

万万没想到,AI x Crypto 最先落地的是安全审计

链捕手1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片