115 DeFi, Crypto Companies Tell Senate: Protect Developers Or No Deal On Market Bill

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-08-29更新於 2025-08-29

文章摘要

A broad coalition of crypto builders, investors and advocates has asked two Senate committees for clear federal rules to protect...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

A broad coalition of crypto builders, investors and advocates has asked two Senate committees for clear federal rules to protect software creators and non-custodial service providers working on blockchain networks.

According to the letter, 115 groups signed the appeal to the Senate Committee on Banking and the Committee on Agriculture, and they made one demand plain: without explicit protections, they will not back market structure legislation.

Call For Federal Protections

The signers want lawmakers to make it clear that writing, publishing, or maintaining open-source blockchain software is not the same as running a bank or exchange.

Reports have disclosed concerns that developers could be treated as financial intermediaries even when they never hold user funds.

The letter asks Congress to shield developers from being prosecuted or misclassified under laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 1960.

It also asks that any federal law preempt conflicting state rules so companies and contributors are not left juggling 50 different legal standards.

Bills Praised But Not Enough

According to the coalition, drafts in both chambers already include two measures that move in the right direction: the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act and the Keep Your Coins Act.

But the groups argue those drafts fall short on some points and need clearer, stronger language. Based on reports from the signers, the protections must be explicit and nationwide, not partial or open to varying state interpretations. Without that clarity, the letter warns, developers may choose to work elsewhere.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.8 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Developer Loss And Talent Flight

The group cited data showing a slide in the share of open-source developers based in the US, from 25% in 2021 to 18% in 2025.

According to a recent report by the President’s Working Group on Digital Assets, reversing that decline is central to making America a leading hub for blockchain work.

The signers say those numbers show how regulatory uncertainty can change where people live and where code is built.

Image: Ten Mile Square

Legal Clarity As A Business Need

The coalition argues that clear rules are also a practical business need. When the legal line between building software and operating financial services blurs, companies and contributors face possible legal exposure.

That creates a cost for startups and volunteers alike. If developers face the risk of civil or criminal action for routine open-source work, projects can slow or stop.

The letter asks Congress to state plainly that creating interfaces or tools that let people self-custody their funds is not, by itself, an activity that should trigger money-transmitter rules.

Bipartisan Support And Next Steps

Signers pointed to past bipartisan moves to protect developers. They noted that 294 members of Congress supported the CLARITY Act when it passed, signaling broad backing for basic safeguards.

Based on the letter, the groups want the Senate to strengthen those protections now, and to do so in a way that covers all states uniformly.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

你可能也喜歡

一句「你确定吗」,大模型集体暴露「讨好型人格」?

近日有网友指出,一句简单的“你确定吗?”就能让许多大模型瞬间改口,即使原本答案正确。这一现象在AI社区引发热议,用户们分享了大量类似经历:模型在面对质疑时,往往会立刻道歉并顺从用户的错误提示,甚至将正确答案改成错误答案。 部分网友认为,这种“讨好型人格”可能源于RLHF(人类反馈强化学习)训练过程中的过度对齐。模型为了获得更高的安全与礼貌评分,倾向于回避“顶撞”用户,选择道歉和迎合。这被学术界称为“AI谄媚”(AI sycophancy),即模型为迎合用户而牺牲事实一致性。 不过也有例外,例如Claude Opus 4.6、4.8等模型被指出能在质疑中坚持己见,通过系统提示或强化推理能力来“顶住压力”。网友们怀念类似Fable这样能坚定解释自身答案的模型。 讨论进一步延伸到对AI助手的评测标准——除了静态问题的正确率,模型在动态对话中抵抗误导、保持判断边界的能力同样重要。有人提议设立专门的“Are you sure?”测试基准,以衡量模型在面对质疑时的立场稳定性。 这一现象不仅关乎技术缺陷,也折射出人机交互中的真实挑战:AI如何在保持谦逊服务态度的同时,不丧失应有的自信与事实一致性,仍是待解的问题。

marsbit56 分鐘前

一句「你确定吗」,大模型集体暴露「讨好型人格」?

marsbit56 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片