U.S. Senate has ‘different ideas’ about crypto bill – Why it’s delaying progress

ambcrypto發佈於 2025-07-23更新於 2025-07-25

Key Takeaways 

The crypto market structure bill could face a ‘long road ahead’ as the Senate diverges from the House-passed CLARITY Act. Will Congress pass it by September? 


The broader crypto market structure framework could take a little longer than expected, going by the recent updates at the U.S. Senate. 

According to Jake Chervinsky, legal chief of crypto-focused Variant Fund, the Senate has ‘different ideas’ on the market structure bill compared to the CLARITY Act passed by the House last week. 

“Not happening with CLARITY. The Senate has its own ideas about market structure, and so far, they are very different.”

CLARITY ActCLARITY Act

Source: X

He added that most people assumed that the CLARITY Act would pass smoothly in the Senate like the stablecoin bill, the GENIUS Act, did in the House.

According to him, this may not be the case, and a delay may be likely.

Senate diverges from House on key crypto bill

On the 22nd of July, the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs released a draft proposal for a broader regulatory framework targeting digital assets.

While it draws from elements of the House-approved CLARITY Act, experts have highlighted significant differences between the two approaches.

Notably, the Senate draft introduces a new asset category—“ancillary” tokens—allowing issuers to self-certify.

The Senate’s draft proposal expands the SEC’s oversight and limits annual fundraising through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) to $75 million. 

This stands in contrast to the House’s CLARITY Act, which allows broader fundraising exemptions and places regulatory authority primarily with the CFTC, reducing the SEC’s role.

Jake Chervinsky, a policy expert, described the Senate’s approach as indicative of a “long road ahead” toward passing a unified crypto market structure bill.

Meanwhile, blockchain security firm TRM Labs pointed out two major differences: tougher anti-money laundering (AML) measures and a stronger focus on public-private partnerships. 

According to the firm, the next step will be for the Senate to collect stakeholder feedback before formally introducing the bill.

But TRM Labs noted that the hearings and mark-ups could happen this summer or extend to fall, adding that, 

“If the bill advances, lawmakers will need to conference with the House to reconcile differences between the Senate draft and the CLARITY Act.”

That said, Senate Committee on Agriculture is expected to release its discussion draft in September, noted reporter Eleanor Terret, quoting people familiar with the matter. 

Overall, the White House expects the market structure bill to be done and submitted to President Donald Trump by the end of September. It remains to be seen whether this deadline will be met. 

Share

你可能也喜歡

李飞飞最新长文:当视频生成、机器人和 NVIDIA 都自称世界模型,我们需要一个分类法

李飞飞发表文章,针对当前AI领域中“世界模型”一词被广泛滥用的现象提出一个清晰的功能分类法。她指出,尽管视频生成、机器人和NVIDIA等不同领域都自称构建“世界模型”,但它们实际指的是强化学习闭环(POMDP)中三种不同的功能模块。 **分类法如下:** 1. **渲染器**:输出**观测**(如像素),追求视觉保真度,例如Sora、Genie等视频生成模型。其局限在于“好看不等于物理正确”。 2. **模拟器**:输出**状态**,即在几何、物理和动力学层面忠实的世界表征,服务于建筑设计、机器人训练等需要精确模拟的场景。李飞飞认为这是连接渲染和规划的关键枢纽,被严重低估。 3. **规划器**:输出**动作**,根据观测和目标决定智能体(如机器人)应执行的动作,是感知-行动回路的闭环。 **现状与趋势:** * **渲染器**商业化最成熟,但有物理准确性天花板。 * **规划器**最令人兴奋但最不成熟,实验室演示与实际部署存在巨大鸿沟。 * **模拟器**是核心桥梁,掌握了模拟就同时为渲染和规划提供了基础。 当前最重要的趋势是这三类功能的边界正在消融,因为它们共享对世界底层运作(几何、物理、动力学)的同一套理解。例如,World Labs的Marble模型能同时输出用于视觉的高斯泼溅和用于物理模拟的碰撞网格。 逻辑终点是构建一个**统一的世界基础模型**,能根据下游需求在渲染、模拟和规划模式间自由切换。尽管面临数据不均衡、优化目标冲突等挑战,但三者的融合将重新定义机器智能与物理世界的关系,推动空间智能的发展。

链捕手1 小時前

李飞飞最新长文:当视频生成、机器人和 NVIDIA 都自称世界模型,我们需要一个分类法

链捕手1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片