Is Bitcoin Bull Cycle Over? This Analyst Thinks Different

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-04-08更新於 2025-04-08

文章摘要

The CEO at on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant has declared the end of the Bitcoin bull cycle, but this analyst has...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The CEO at on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant has declared the end of the Bitcoin bull cycle, but this analyst has provided a counterpoint.

Realized Cap Could Provide Hints About What’s Next For Bitcoin

In a post on X, CryptoQuant founder and CEO Ki Young Ju has explained why the bull cycle could be over for Bitcoin, based on the data of the Realized Cap. The “Realized Cap” refers to an on-chain capitalization model that assumes the actual value of any token in circulation is the spot price at which it was last transacted on the blockchain.

The last transaction price of any coin is nothing, but the price at which its investor purchased it, so the Realized Cap measures the sum of the cost basis of all coins in the circulating supply. In other words, the model represents the amount of capital that the holders as a whole have invested into the cryptocurrency.

The Market Cap, which simply sums up the supply at the current spot price, is in contrast to this model, indicating the value that the investors are holding in the present.

Whenever the investors buy coins, the Realized Cap goes up by the exact amount as what they bought for. The same, however, doesn’t hold true for the Market Cap. Depending on various market conditions, an increase in the Realized Cap can trigger an increase in the Market Cap that’s smaller, larger, or equal in scale.

According to the CryptoQuant founder, which of these ways the Market Cap is reacting to changes in the Realized Cap can provide bullish or bearish signals for BTC.

Bitcoin Market Cap Vs Realized Cap

The difference between the growths in the BTC Market Cap and Realized Cap | Source: @ki_young_ju on X

From the above chart, it’s visible that the growth rate difference between the Market Cap and Realized Cap has turned negative recently. This means that capital inflows aren’t able to raise the price, which is a signal that has historically coincided with bearish periods for Bitcoin.

While this could indeed suggest the bull market may be over, another analyst, James Van Straten, has provided a different perspective in an X post. Here is the chart that the analyst has shared as a counter to Young Ju, displaying the trend in the BTC Realized Cap, as well as its drawdown percentage, over the coin’s history:

Bitcoin Realized Cap Drawdown

The Realized Cap has continued to climb up in recent days | Source: @btcjvs on X

As is apparent from the chart, the Realized Cap has historically witnessed a strong drawdown during bear markets. This happens as a result of investors capitulating at lower prices than they bought at, thus repricing the supply down.

So far, the Realized Cap hasn’t seen any significant drawdowns, despite the fact that the price has plunged recently. This would imply the investors still hold a degree of confidence in Bitcoin. Not just that, the Realized Cap has in fact continued its upwards trajectory recently, a sign that capital inflows haven’t let off.

“Bear markets don’t usually start with confidence and inflows,” notes Van Straten. Only time would be able to answer for sure now whether BTC has transitioned into a bear or not.

BTC Price

Bitcoin has kicked off the new week with a crash of almost 7%, which has brought its price down to $76,500.

Bitcoin Price Chart

Looks like the price of the coin has plunged over the past day | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Dall-E, CryptoQuant.com, Glassnode.com, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Keshav is a Physics graduate who has been employed as a writer with Bitcoinist since June 2021. He is passionate about writing and through the years, he has gained experience working in a variety of niches. Keshav holds an active interest in the cryptocurrency market, with on-chain analysis being an area he particularly likes to research and write about.

你可能也喜歡

坐拥万亿市场,房地产代币化为何火不起来?

房地产代币化虽被视作革新房地产投资的突破口,理论上能降低门槛、提升流动性,但在现实中进展缓慢,在全球房地产市场中占比不足0.1%。其核心问题并非技术,而是缺乏完善的法律、运营与合规体系,导致代币未能成为具备公信力的金融产品。 早期发展过于聚焦技术而忽略了投资者对资产信任的需求,导致产品所有权模糊、流动性仅停留在理论层面。基础设施存在明显短板,如缺乏具备法律效力的所有权框架、合规的流转机制以及与现有金融体系的互通,这些都需要大量时间、专业资源和监管配合。 机构投资者因此持观望态度,主要由于规则模糊、权益不明,且现有传统投资渠道已相对成熟。理想的成熟模式应具备低起投门槛、透明收益分配和真实二级市场流动性,但目前此类案例寥寥。 近期出现积极苗头,如阿联酋等地区监管逐步明晰,部分企业开始推出合规产品,行业讨论重心也转向解决资产所有权等核心问题。但房地产代币化的价值在于优化投资效率,而非创造新收益,它必须证明具备真实经济优势才能吸引主流资本。 未来行业将比拼实际运营成果而非发行数量,需依靠规模化合规平台和可审计的记录来赢得机构信任。技术已非瓶颈,基础设施与合规体系才是关键,其完善程度将决定这一愿景能否实现。

marsbit4 分鐘前

坐拥万亿市场,房地产代币化为何火不起来?

marsbit4 分鐘前

大模型刷爆所有考试,却离AGI更远了:这篇论文拆穿了什么?

大模型在各种考试中表现优异,却被一篇新论文指出离真正的通用人工智能(AGI)更远了。目前业界对AGI缺乏公认定义,导致目标模糊。学者Michael Timothy Bennett提出新观点,认为真正的AGI不应以模仿人类为标准,而应是在有限计算、记忆和能量资源下,能像“人工科学家”一样广泛、高效、科学地适应新环境和发现新知识的系统。 他指出当前大模型本质是“规模最大化近似”,依赖海量数据记忆答案,缺乏真正的因果理解和主动探索能力。例如,模型可能因文本概率而错误比较“9.11和9.9”。真正的AGI需具备三大关键能力:从被动响应变为主动实验者;从学习相关性到理解因果关系;在资源限制下动态平衡“探索新知”与“利用已知”。 论文将构建智能的元方法分为三类:主流的规模最大化、追求简洁的简单性最大化,以及弱化约束让系统自寻最优解的约束弱化最大化。Bennett认为,单靠堆参数的路线无法实现AGI,未来需要多种方法融合。 若“人工科学家”标准被接受,AI发展将迎来范式转移:评估重点将从刷榜考试分数,转向测试其在未知环境中的适应与发现能力;技术路线也将从单纯追求规模,转向融合因果推理、主动学习等多维能力的发展。这提示AGI的实现并非现有技术的线性延伸,而是一次根本性的路线重置。

marsbit1 小時前

大模型刷爆所有考试,却离AGI更远了:这篇论文拆穿了什么?

marsbit1 小時前

教皇发布首份AI通谕:4万字10个观点,AI焦虑被说透了

2026年5月,教皇良十四世发布了天主教会首份关于人工智能的通谕《Magnifica Humanitas》。这份四万余字的文件并非技术指南,而是一份道德框架,旨在探讨AI时代下的人类价值与挑战。 通谕的核心观点认为,技术并非中立,其发展与应用深刻反映了构建者的价值观与利益。AI已悄然融入日常决策系统(如内容推荐、招聘匹配),但其内部运作机制甚至开发者也难以完全解释。关键问题在于技术权力的集中:少数大型私营机构掌控着算力、数据和平台,可能加剧数字鸿沟。 通谕指出了AI带来的具体焦虑:在就业、医疗、司法等领域,自动化决策需要透明与人工监督;AI生成内容的能力可能大规模制造虚假信息;AI伴侣虽满足情感需求,却无法承担真实关系中的责任。此外,通谕强调,AI教育不应只停留在工具使用,更需培养批判性思维;AI重塑劳动时,工作不应仅被视为效率问题,更是人发展能力、参与社会的途径。对于致命或不可逆的决定,人类必须保留最终判断与责任。 最终,通谕将AI的挑战定义为“人类学挑战”。当AI能够模拟创造、判断甚至关系时,人类必须重新审视自身不可替代的价值——即承担真实责任、拥有自由意志与面对脆弱的能力。这份通谕并非提供解决方案,而是将一套道德话语引入全球关于技术未来的讨论之中。

marsbit1 小時前

教皇发布首份AI通谕:4万字10个观点,AI焦虑被说透了

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片