TRON Foundation, Justin Sun Ask U.S. Court to Dismiss SEC Lawsuit

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-04-01更新於 2024-04-02

文章摘要

The defendants argue that the SEC failed to establish that the court has jurisdiction over the foreign defendants.

  • The TRON Foundation asked a New York court to dismiss an SEC lawsuit against it and others.
  • The March 2023 case pertains to allegations of selling and airdropping unregistered securities, fraud and market manipulation.

The TRON Foundation and Tron founder Justin Sun asked a New York court to dismiss a lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), saying the regulator failed to establish that the court has jurisdiction over the foreign defendants, a March 28 filing shows.

"The SEC is not a worldwide regulator," the memo to the District Court of the Southern District of New York said. "Its efforts to leverage highly attenuated contacts to the United States, to extend U.S. securities laws to cover predominantly foreign conduct, go too far and should be rejected."

The case pertains to allegations of selling and airdropping unregistered securities, fraud and market manipulation that the SEC brought in March 2023. At the time, SEC Chair Gary Gensler said "Sun and his companies not only targeted U.S. investors ... but they also coordinated wash trading on an unregistered trading platform ... "

Advertisement
Advertisement

The defendants – Sun, Tron Foundation, BitTorrent Foundation and Rainberry – argued that "even if it could be shown that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the foreign defendants is appropriate here, the claims still fail for myriad, equally powerful reasons."

California-registered Rainberry did not contest the court's jurisdiction, instead asking for dismissal for other reasons, including that the defendants did not receive fair notice.

"There was no fair notice that the SEC would attempt to pursue claims like those alleged here – reaching global contests and giveaways, free airdrops, and secondary trading in tokens (issued overseas, years earlier) on a developing blockchain, with few specific ties to the United States," the filing said.

Another reason cited is that the action was premature under the major questions doctrine – a legal precedent that is meant to curb government overreach, implying that Congress writes the rules that agencies like the SEC are meant to follow.

" ... the SEC’s unprecedented, novel expansion of its regulatory power to the global digital asset market is also a 'transformative expansion' of its regulatory authority in the absence of 'clear congressional authorization,' presenting a novel issue under the major questions doctrine and warranting dismissal," the filing said.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.


你可能也喜歡

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

谷歌接连失去三位顶级AI人才:工程副总裁、Transformer架构提出者之一Noam Shazeer加入OpenAI;DeepMind副总裁、AlphaFold核心人物John Jumper加入Anthropic;对话式AI先驱Daniel De Freitas的动向也引人关注。这些流失触及了Transformer、对话式AI和科学AI等关键领域,引发市场对谷歌竞争力的担忧。 然而,将此事视为谷歌的“讣告”可能为时过早。这更应被看作一次压力测试。人才流失本身反映了谷歌仍是AI顶级人才的核心储备库,正因其重要才成为竞争对手IPO前夜的重点挖掘对象。 谷歌的优势在于其远超单一模型的“全栈”能力:拥有自研TPU、云基础设施、Gemini等模型矩阵,以及搜索、YouTube、安卓等覆盖数十亿用户的终端产品,构成了强大的集成生态和分发网络。此外,谷歌通过巨额投资和云服务与Anthropic等对手形成深度绑定,在“AI淘金热”中同时扮演“掘金者”和“卖水人”的角色。 尽管面临创新者困境,核心搜索业务转型挑战以及大公司决策迟缓等问题,但谷歌正通过积极整合Gemini、重塑搜索体验、战略性收购(如Character.AI)等方式应对。AI竞赛是长期游戏,谷歌凭借其技术栈、资源与生态,仍是少数有能力在多层面参与竞争的公司。当前的动荡是一次严峻考验,但并非终局。

marsbit1 小時前

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片