Q Protocol to Apply International Court of Arbitration Rules to DeFi Disputes in a Sign of Growing Industry Maturity

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2023-12-11更新於 2023-12-12

文章摘要

Q protocol allows developers to build organizational constitutions that are enforced by smart contracts and include off-chain avenues for resolving disputes the code can't dea...

  • Q Protocol, which provides decentralized organizations with blockchain governance as a service, will use the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce's arbitration court to resolve DeFi disputes.
  • The International Court of Arbitration is one of the world's leading arbitration institutions and the ability to use its framework lends the DeFi space unprecedented credibility.
  • Q Protocol’s constitution lays down the rules of the system, which includes the resolution mechanism of the ICC.

Q Protocol, which provides blockchain governance as a service to Web3 and decentralized autonomous organizations, will use the rules laid out by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)'s arbitration court to resolve disputes and enforce awards, Nicolas Biagosch, the protocol's co-initiator, told CoinDesk in an interview.

The protocol allows developers to build organizational constitutions that are enforced by smart contracts and include off-chain avenues for resolving disputes the code can't deal with. Q Protocol’s own constitution lays down the rules of the system, which includes resorting to the 100-year-old International Court of Arbitration.

Historically, dispute resolution has been a problem in DeFi. One example: A clash between Aragon Foundation, the Swiss entity that oversaw Aragon, and a group of activist investors who took interest in the project’s ANT token and multimillion-dollar treasury, led to the foundation winding down and handing its $155 million in assets to token holders.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We would have had a solution to the Aragon dispute,” Biagosch said.

The ICC rules are often used by entities as a way to conduct private arbitration because it tends to be quicker than nation-state-based jurisdictions.

International Court of Arbitration Article 1 about the process of resolving disputes. 
(Screenshot from ICC website)
International Court of Arbitration Article 1 about the process of resolving disputes. (Screenshot from ICC website)

“We are in a position to administer matters submitted to us unless doing so would contravene the legal framework within which ICC operates,” Alexander G. Fessas, secretary general of the International Court of Arbitration, told CoinDesk in an interview. “I can confirm that the ICC International Court of Arbitration has already administered blockchain-related disputes.”

Despite not being a first, the fact that disputes within the space of decentralized finance (DeFi) can use the framework offered by ICC, the world's leading arbitral institution for resolution lends the space unprecedented credibility.

“Our mission is to ensure access to justice and the rule of law and our objective is to assist parties in resolving their disputes.” Fessas said. “It is good to see businesses in emerging industries like blockchain choose reputable institutional arbitration, and we expect to see more of this moving forward, particularly in specialized technologies.”

The mention of the International International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)'s arbitration rules in the constitution of Q Protocol. (Courtesy: Q Protocol)
The mention of the International International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)'s arbitration rules in the constitution of Q Protocol. (Courtesy: Q Protocol)

“The participants in the Q ecosystem (13 projects have signed on to use the services) are parties to the private contract that is the Q Constitution,” Biagosch said. “They have agreed therein that the ICC Court of Arbitration shall, based on the Q Constitution and through its rules of procedure, be the only mechanism to resolve disputes, instead of and alternative to nation-state court systems.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Biagosch also said that the ICC will always reserve the right, based on its rules, to not hear the case. “One cannot force it into dispute resolution.”

Apart from dispute resolution through the ICC, decentralized discretionary decision-making and decentralized enforcement of rules beyond code-is-law are other aspects of Q Protocol’s services. The Q Protocol mainnet started operations in March 2022. In addition to the projects signed on to use the governance services, as many as 123 DAOs have built their organization on Q, which is another service available on the platform.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.


你可能也喜歡

Arbitrum 假装成黑客,把 KelpDAO 损失的钱“偷”回来了

Arbitrum安全理事会近日采取非常规手段,成功追回了KelpDAO被盗资金中滞留在其链上的约7000万美元ETH。该事件源于上周KelpDAO遭遇的黑客攻击,总损失达2.92亿美元,被认为是今年DeFi领域最大安全事件之一。 被盗资金部分留在Arbitrum链上,黑客地址中的ETH被转移至一个看似黑洞的0x0000...地址。实际上,这是Arbitrum安全理事会通过紧急升级跨链桥Inbox合约,新增了一个无需私钥即可模拟任意地址发起交易的功能。他们以此冒充黑客身份,将资金转入冻结地址。整个操作在一次交易中完成,随后合约立即恢复原状。 据公告,安全理事会在行动前已与执法部门确认黑客身份为朝鲜的Lazarus组织,并经过技术评估确保不影响其他用户。该操作需12名理事会成员中9人签署批准,无需经过DAO治理投票。 社区反应两极:一方赞扬Arbitrum果断护产,另一方则质疑其中心化风险——9人多签即可临时升级核心合约、模拟任意用户操作。但事实上,主流L2普遍设有类似安全机制。 此次事件反映出DeFi安全攻防已进入新阶段:国家级黑客持续升级攻击手段,而链平台开始动用底层权限反击。尽管追回部分资金,但KelpDAO仍有超2亿美元资产流失于其他链上,Aave坏账未解,整体恢复仍面临挑战。

marsbit19 分鐘前

Arbitrum 假装成黑客,把 KelpDAO 损失的钱“偷”回来了

marsbit19 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片