Gary Gensler’s Bitcoin ETF position is ‘inconsistent’… says Gary Gensler

Cointelegraph發佈於 2023-10-29更新於 2023-10-31

文章摘要

Gary Gensler once criticized the United States securities regulator for its “inconsistent” approach to spot Bitcoin (BTC) products, according to a resurfaced video of Gensler from 2019.

Gary Gensler once criticized the United States securities regulator for its “inconsistent” approach to spot Bitcoin (BTC) products, according to a resurfaced video of Gensler from 2019.
The video clip, which has recently made the rounds again on social media, shows the pre-SEC Gensler discussing blockchain regulation at the 2019 MIT Bitcoin Expo in a fireside chat with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commissioner Hester Peirce.
“Bitcoin futures, and I think Ethereum futures and so forth, will exist and Bitcoin ETFs have not and that feels a little inconsistent to me [...]It feels a little inconsistent,” Gensler said.
“Even though the laws aren’t exactly the same, they’re quite similar,” he added.
Meanwhile, on X (Twitter), the crypto community couldn’t help but highlight the contrast with Gensler’s views toward spot Bitcoin ETFs today.
​​​​”​​Gary Gensler says Gary Gensler is wrong,” market analyst Zack Voell posted. “We missed out on chill and normal Gensler,” another X user remarked.
Gary Gensler says Gary Gensler is wrong. pic.twitter.com/sHGzHcUyIC
— Zack Voell (@zackvoell) October 28, 2023
To date, the SEC has only approved Bitcoin and Ethereum futures ETFs.
From as far back as 2017 the SEC has rejected spot Bitcoin ETF applications, a tradition carried on under Gensler who has denied, delayed or pushed back recent spot Bitcoin ETF applications claiming the funds don’t have protections for market manipulation.
Gensler’s SEC was sued by asset manager Grayscale for rejecting its bid to convert its existing Bitcoin trust into a spot ETF.
A court ruled the SEC was “arbitrary and capricious” to reject the application. The SEC did not appeal the decision.

你可能也喜歡

Circle CEO:稳定币处于互联网 2002 年阶段,未来将达数万亿美元

在2026年Q2财报AMA中,Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire就稳定币发展、公司战略及未来展望回答了投资者提问。Allaire将当前稳定币发展阶段类比为2002年的互联网,认为其规模将从数千亿美元增长至数万亿美元,并深入渗透全球经济。 他指出了稳定币已形成规模应用的三大场景:作为数字资产市场的营运资金与结算工具;在新兴市场充当数字美元储值手段;用于跨境支付与结算。此外,AI智能体经济、传统金融与链上金融的融合以及未来的零售支付将是关键增长领域。 关于Circle的商业模式,Allaire强调,长期来看,USDC的储备收入仍是核心经济引擎,但同时公司正积极构建多元收入来源,包括链上支付网络CPN和被誉为“经济操作系统”的Arc平台。Arc旨在成为对开发者和用户友好的底层设施,让区块链技术“隐身”,专注于提升应用体验。 对于监管,Allaire表示,即使美国CLARITY法案未通过,全球范围内稳定币合法化趋势(如美国GENIUS法案、欧洲MiCA)将继续推动USDC及EURC等产品的采用与增长。Circle的发展是高度全球化的,其增长逻辑独立于单一市场政策。 最后,Allaire分享了个人保持高效领导力的秘诀:严格的饮食睡眠管理、正念练习及持续运动,以应对长期使命中的挑战。

marsbit8 分鐘前

Circle CEO:稳定币处于互联网 2002 年阶段,未来将达数万亿美元

marsbit8 分鐘前

收入比长鑫少38亿,净利润却多86亿:长存控股IPO藏着什么秘密?

国产NAND闪存巨头长存控股已递交IPO招股书。2026年一季度,其营收为470.42亿元,归母净利润高达333.79亿元。值得注意的是,同期另一家存储龙头长鑫科技营收更高(508亿元),但归母净利润(247.62亿元)却比长存少了约86亿元。 这一看似反常的现象,核心原因在于两家公司核心资产的股权结构不同。长存控股的核心经营主体长江存储是其全资子公司,因此绝大部分利润都能归属于母公司股东。而长鑫科技对其核心生产主体(如长鑫新桥、长鑫集电)主要通过一致行动协议实现控制并表,但只拥有部分经济权益,导致其合并报表利润中有约四分之一(82.49亿元)需归属于少数股东,从而拉低了归母净利润。 从集团整体合并净利润看,两者一季度均赚取约330亿元,实际经营盈利能力相近。但对于IPO投资者而言,归母净利润直接关系到每股收益和估值基础。 在估值层面,市场给予长鑫科技的预期估值更高,这主要源于其主攻的DRAM市场规模更大,且市场看好其在AI服务器所需的HBM(高带宽内存)领域的增长潜力。长存控股面临的NAND市场总规模相对有限,其未来估值空间的进一步打开,将更取决于能否成功拓展企业级SSD等高价值产品,实现产品结构升级。 因此,长存与长鑫的对比,不仅是利润归属的会计差异,更反映了不同的发展路径与市场预期。

marsbit19 分鐘前

收入比长鑫少38亿,净利润却多86亿:长存控股IPO藏着什么秘密?

marsbit19 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片