SEC's Latest Crackdown Could Drive Crypto Firms Out of the U.S.

CoinDesk發佈於 2023-06-07更新於 2023-06-07

文章摘要

Companies such as Coinbase and Binance may not want to, but they could be forced to focus their efforts elsewhere.

Some industry experts say the SEC’s recent actions against U.S.-based Coinbase and Cayman Islands-based Binance could be a net positive for companies operating in the U.S, given the regulatory clarity they could help bring in the long run. In the short to medium term, however, these actions could force these firms to focus their efforts elsewhere.

“Regulatory pressure does create an incentive for exchanges to move overseas; for the digital asset industry specifically, it’s a much easier shift because there are no factories to move,” said Jason Allegrante, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer at infrastructure firm Fireblocks.

Coinbase recently announced it received a license to offer its services in Bermuda, where it reportedly plans to set up a crypto-trading platform outside of the U.S. The exchange is also doubling down on its operations in Canada, which has tightened its regulations for crypto firms but allowed Coinbase to sign an enhanced Pre-Registration Undertaking, signaling its intent to comply with the coming new regulatory framework.

“I suspect we will see more and more moves like this,” Andrew Lawrence, co-founder and CEO of Censo Inc., an on-chain custody solution said. “Yes, the U.S. is the biggest market, but people who are building in the crypto industry are doing so not because of the size of the market now, but because of the size of the market in the future and people are seeing that this future is not looking good in the United States.”

Ben Caselin, Vice President & Chief Strategy Officer at centralized crypto exchange MaskEX, agreed. “All eyes are now set on other jurisdictions,” he said. “This is not the best time for crypto startups in the U.S. Larger players such as Coinbase are able and should engage the regulator to come to solutions, but entrepreneurs and small businesses in crypto are probably better off in other jurisdictions.”

For his part, SEC chief Gary Gensler signaled he’s not too worried about the prospect of crypto firms leaving the U.S. On Tuesday he told Bloomberg TV that “we don’t need more digital currency… we already have digital currency, it’s called the U.S. dollar.”

Fireblocks’ Allegrante said even though the U.S. might be the most profitable market for some exchanges, that may not be reason enough for them to focus all their efforts there. “When a company publicly announces plans to establish exchange operations outside of the United States, you can assume that there are plans in place to shift that balance over time,” Allegrante said about Coinbase.

“I suspect we will see more and more moves like this,” Andrew Lawrence, co-founder and CEO of Censo Inc., an on-chain custody solution said. “Yes, the U.S. is the biggest market, but people who are building in the crypto industry are doing so not because of the size of the market now, but because of the size of the market in the future and people are seeing that this future is not looking good in the United States.”

Ben Caselin, Vice President & Chief Strategy Officer at centralized crypto exchange MaskEX, agreed. “All eyes are now set on other jurisdictions,” he said. “This is not the best time for crypto startups in the U.S. Larger players such as Coinbase are able and should engage the regulator to come to solutions, but entrepreneurs and small businesses in crypto are probably better off in other jurisdictions.”

For his part, SEC chief Gary Gensler signaled he’s not too worried about the prospect of crypto firms leaving the U.S. On Tuesday he told Bloomberg TV that “we don’t need more digital currency… we already have digital currency, it’s called the U.S. dollar.”

Fireblocks’ Allegrante said even though the U.S. might be the most profitable market for some exchanges, that may not be reason enough for them to focus all their efforts there. “When a company publicly announces plans to establish exchange operations outside of the United States, you can assume that there are plans in place to shift that balance over time,” Allegrante said about Coinbase.

你可能也喜歡

黄仁勋:Prompt正在过时,Loop才是新范式

黄仁勋等AI领域领军人物提出,传统的“Prompt Engineering”(提示词工程)正在被“Loop Engineering”(循环工程)取代。新范式的核心是从手动编写具体指令,转变为设计和管理能够自动运行、自我验证并持续优化的循环系统。 **Loop是什么?** Loop(循环)指一种系统设计:用户设定一个目标,AI Agent(智能体)会自动执行任务,完成后由独立的验证机制(如另一个模型)进行验收;若未通过,则带着反馈重新执行,直至成功或达到预设限制。人的角色从“逐句指挥”转变为“规则设计者”。这与单纯使用Agent的关键区别在于,Loop为其提供了自主持续工作的管理框架。 **当前落地情况** 目前,Claude Code和OpenAI Codex是Loop理念的主要实践者。两者都实现了将复杂任务拆分,由多个Agent并行处理并汇总结果。其核心设计原则是“执行与验证分离”,以避免自我评分时的宽松问题。例如,“Claude Code之父”Boris Cherny描述其工作流:数百个Agent在隔离环境中自动处理问题,仅疑难事项才需人工干预。 **如何构建有效的Loop?** 1. **前提测试**:任务需具备重复性、可自动化验收、成本可控且Agent拥有必要工具。 2. **从最小可行Loop开始**:包含触发器、技能定义、状态记录文件和自动化验证门禁。务必先手动跑通流程再自动化。 3. **执行与验收分离**:必须由独立的Agent或模型进行验收,确保评估客观。 4. **避开常见陷阱**:设置硬性停止条件(如token上限)、持久化状态、不让Loop处理需要主观判断的任务、坚持阅读代码变更以维持理解。 5. **核心衡量指标**:关注“每个被采纳改动的平均成本”,接受率低于50%意味着Loop可能效率低下。 **范式演进路径** Loop的兴起是AI应用控制粒度不断上移的结果:从**Prompt Engineering**(优化单次指令)到**Context Engineering**(组织背景信息),再到**Harness Engineering**(构建执行环境),最终演进至**Loop Engineering**(设计自主循环系统)。这一过程逐步将人类从具体操作中解放出来。 **渊源与反思** Loop的理念在学术界早有雏形,例如姚顺雨等人提出的ReAct框架,将“推理-行动-观察”构建为循环。业界火爆的背后也需冷思考,专家提醒需警惕token成本,并指出“AI可以外包思考,但无法外包人的理解”,强调在自动化中保持对问题的根本认知至关重要。

marsbit58 分鐘前

黄仁勋:Prompt正在过时,Loop才是新范式

marsbit58 分鐘前

以太坊基金会临时执行董事发声:我们的使命是什么?

以太坊基金会(EF)临时联合执行董事 Aerugo 发文明确了基金会的核心使命:确保以太坊始终是真正无需许可、保障用户自主权的基础设施,能够抵御审查、开源自由、私密安全,并支持大规模的自主协调。 文章首先明确了EF的“不为”:不追求自身重要性或商业吸引力,不服务短期投机者,也不推广所有应用。其核心作用是“消除弱点”,防御以太坊在协议、访问、用户和机构各层可能出现的榨取性、控制性或监视性风险。具体工作重点包括: 1. **自身实践**:将EF薪酬与财务转向以太坊原生资产,以身作则使用其力图改进的技术栈。 2. **对抗有害MEV**:将其视为核心威胁而非次要市场问题,致力于从系统层面降低MEV提取,防止交易流程被特权供应链把控,维护可信中立执行。 3. **强化隐私**:认为缺乏严格隐私默认设置的公链实为监控平台,必须优先实现强大的无条件隐私保护。 4. **保障质押去中心化**:视质押为协议安全基石,防止其集中在少数发行者或运营商手中。 5. **维护访问层自主性**:确保用户和机构能自主、抗胁迫地访问以太坊,而非通过削弱其核心价值的妥协方式。 同时,EF也致力于“抓住机遇”,推动以太坊发展为:抗量子攻击的全球基础设施;具备完全自主可验证、最小化有害MEV的协议栈;私密、尊重尊严的普通数字现金与协调平台;用户拥有完整主权的个人AI代理钱包;以及在机构场景中凭借其可信中立性胜出,而非沦为后端工具。 文章最后提及了近期的人员变动与“衍生公司”问题,强调离职原因多样,EF尊重所有贡献者但不会公开讨论个人事宜。对于从EF分离出去的项目,EF将谨慎评估资助,标准在于其是否对实现以太坊核心使命(无需许可、自主权等)至关重要,而非出于人情或延续旧项目。EF明确表示对以太坊的发展方向并非中立,将全力支持并优先推进那些保障其核心特性的工作。

链捕手2 小時前

以太坊基金会临时执行董事发声:我们的使命是什么?

链捕手2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片