The Shanghai Upgrade Could Spark Decentralization In Staking As Big Guns Are Forced To Step Back

zycrypto發佈於 2023-04-24更新於 2023-04-24

文章摘要

In a nutshell, some commentators argue that the SEC is trying to make staking completely decentralized, where users deal directly with the protocols without staking pools.


The Hotly-Anticipated Ethereum Shanghai Hard Fork Has An Official Kick-Off Date; Will ETH Break $2,000?


  • The Shanghai update has been implemented in the Ethereum blockchain giving validators access to their staked assets and rewards.
  • The SEC and CFTC hounding down on the staking arm of digital asset companies will lead to decentralization in the wake of the Shanghai upgrade.
  • Analysts and users on most centralized trading platforms express mixed feelings concerning the new developments in staking.

The Shanghai upgrade has been lauded in several quarters around the cryptocurrency space and is billed to spark new regulatory concerns as users begin to withdraw their staked assets.
After the much anticipated Merge which hit the Ethereum (ETH) network last year, the blockchain transitioned to a proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism replacing miners with validators. With a minimum staking threshold of 32 ETH, average ETH holders were not able to become validators until the emergence of centralized staking through exchanges.
Over 30% of staked ETH is facilitated by exchanges, with Kraken, Coinbase, and Binance leading the pack. Despite being the game-change in attracting over 18 million ETH in months, it raised centralization concerns coupled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) going after exchanges regarding their staking activities.
In February, Kraken reached an agreement with the SEC to halt its staking service in the US as part of its $30 million settlement with the Commission. Marco Santori, Kraken’s legal officer, stated that the settlement would be completed after locked assets became available. 
Users outside the United States can keep their assets with Kraken and continue staking on Ethereum, as the settlement only applies within the US. The SEC has also expressed that its staked assets could be categorized as securities because they are locked up in anticipation of a profit-making.

Is there a silver lining to this decentralization approach?
Most users would prefer validation on the blockchain to be completely decentralized without entities dictating the pace with their centralized staking pools. However, this is not attainable at least for now, because the minimum requirement to become a validator is 32 ETH, a sum too high for the average user.
Kraken is not the only platform to be affected by regulatory bodies, as Coinbase and Binance face their own with the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), respectively. Coinbase received a Wells Notice in March raising concerns over some products, including its staking program, Coinbase Earn.
Although a lawsuit has not been filed, the company says it is ready for anything while informing customers that there is a need for patience while expecting their assets after the Shanghai upgrade.
Customers may need to remain patient. We anticipate the Ethereum protocol will take weeks to months to process unstaking requests immediately following the upgrade,” the company wrote.
In a nutshell, some commentators argue that the SEC is trying to make staking completely decentralized, where users deal directly with the protocols without staking pools.

你可能也喜歡

连CZ都夸Hyperliquid“很棒”,但它最大的护城河,可能也是最大风险

在Galaxy Brains节目中,币安创始人赵长鹏(CZ)称赞了链上永续合约交易平台Hyperliquid的产品“很棒”,但也明确指出其基于“免KYC+去中心化叙事”的模式是币安无法、也不愿复制的赛道。这揭示了Hyperliquid的核心竞争优势——无需身份验证的开放访问体验,但也将其最大的护城河与潜在的法律合规风险紧密绑定。 CZ的评论将讨论从产品层面提升至市场结构问题。Hyperliquid的优势在于为交易者提供更快、更原生、更少障碍的高杠杆市场访问,但这恰恰可能成为监管机构的审查焦点。英国金融行为监管局(FCA)已对Hyperliquid发布未经授权运营的警示,将其视为金融服务提供方而非单纯的基础设施。 与此同时,受监管的在岸市场(如CME、Cboe)正在推出类似永续合约体验的连续期货产品,不断缩小与链上平台之间的“产品差距”。然而,它们无法复制Hyperliquid的“访问差距”。这导致Hyperliquid的长期优势可能越来越集中于其免KYC等特征上,而这也正是监管压力最可能指向的地方。 文章指出,未来的监管动向、Hyperliquid自身访问规则的变化,以及在岸产品的演进,将共同决定这条“护城河”的稳固性。Hyperliquid的成功取决于交易者是否持续认为“访问便捷性”的价值高于“监管不确定性”带来的折价。其最大的优势,也可能成为其最大的风险来源。

marsbit1 小時前

连CZ都夸Hyperliquid“很棒”,但它最大的护城河,可能也是最大风险

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片