[Featured Research]What Has Changed In Crypto Market?

Mirror發佈於 2023-02-17更新於 2023-02-19

文章摘要

What Others Should We Know About The Market?

How crypto market has changed in 2023-- 5 lessons from recent bull run:

A closer look at the January mini bull run and what you can learn from it as an investor/speculator—

1. Rotation no more

Liquidity rotation used to be structural feature of crypto mkt— at onset of a bull run, large caps (BTC, ETH) rose the most & once mkt participants made gains on those, liquidity shifted to smaller caps, prompting them to pump next.

The rotation game is so 2021.

Most recent (mini) bull run in Jan 2023 showed different mkt progression. Once up cycle started in early Jan, it took mere 2 wks for 80%+ of tokens among top 1000 mkt caps to rise above their 40-day moving average.

In contrast, back in 2019 (similar stage of cycle) it took the mkt 3 mos & multiple small hype cycles for 80% of top tokens to rise over 40dma.

In other words, while there was distinctive liquidity rotation back in 2019, it doesn't work that way anymore. Once mkt up trend started everything that can go up goes up almost all at once.

Why the change?

Many reasons. For example—

Token listings on large exchanges have broadened. Mkt participant profiles have shifted & diversified. Rotation game has become public knowledge that everyone now wants to exploit & front run. Plus, a lot more liquidity on sideline now compared to a few yrs ago.

I'll talk abt what this means to you as individual investor in a min.

2. Underdogs lead recovery at market bottom

At mkt turning point coming out of long bear trend, downtrodden names that lead previous downturn also tend to lead subsequent recovery. This is a structural feature in other risk asset mkts as well not just crypto.

Chart below plots % gains in Jan 2023 against % gains in prior yr for mid-cap-and-above tokens (mkt cap > $250 mn). Study the chart & reach your own conclusion. Hopefully it's an obvious one.

Does this relationship hold in other market conditions? No.

This underdog-to-growth-star phenom is unique feature for when mkt has strong reversal from deep bottom.

3. Market cap matters (sort of)

There's significant inverse correlation btw token mkt cap and price gain among smaller cap tokens (<$230 mn mkt cap) during recent up move, after controlling for prior year price gain & age of token.

Among larger cap tokens this relationship does not exist esp in the $250 mn to $10 bn mkt cap range.

In other words conventional wisdom that smaller caps make bigger moves is true to some extent, but only if you're looking among small up-and-coming names, which is not practical for anyone w/ more than a few thousand $ to deploy since those are usually thinly traded.

4. Expect shorter cyclical moves in bear mkt

Bull runs in bear mks have shorter shelf life.

January mini bull run lasted in earnest for a month w/ majority of move done in 1st 2 wks of Jan. You can observe same pattern from previous run-up in July/August 2022.

These are distinctively shorter runs compared to up cycles in a bull mkt. The hostile macro environment means pumps are more fragile & prospect for continued buying demand after an up move is highly uncertain.

5. Rethink what the "fundamentals" mean

This is not a new pattern, but worth your attention b/c it'll persist.

Traditional metrics Wall St uses to evaluate company fundamentals—e.g. sales, earnings, margins— are mostly useless in crypto, at least at this stage.

I know it sounds politically incorrect but the biggest *fundamental* for any token is the amount of attention it can attract. Period.

What attracts attention?

For example:

· Over hyped themes— e.g. AI, zero knowledge, liquid staking.

· Big $ initiatives— e.g. $300 mn developer grants.

· Key personnel changes— e.g. famous so-and-so comes back as CTO.

Here's a list of top gaining tokens in Jan w/ $200 mn+ mkt cap (tokens w/ < 1 yr history excluded). Half have some attention driving narrative at play (aside from the fact, as discussed earlier, most of these are down horrendously bad, which is in itself an attention driver).

Do some research yourself. Can you identify what the driver is on each?

You may think a certain attention grabbing narrative is stupid or unjustified.

Well, first, tell that to the market & see if it cares.

Second, this is actually a rational behavior by the mkt despite appearing otherwise. Crypto projects at current stage are not steady money-making enterprises. They are experimental tech.

All that matters to the fate of experimental techs is whether they'll get mass-adopted. What would be a good predictor of that? The number of eyeballs they attract.

So the phenom of attention/narrative driving prices is really just mkt trying to deduce a project's growth prospect from however little information there is available. It's entirely rational if you ask me.

What all this means for you as an investor/speculator

What can you do to take advantage of evolving mkt features discussed above? A few ideas:

1. Be flexible & nimble when macro conditions are hostile. There'll be bull runs even in worst mkts but you need to act quickly & be vigilant on both entries & exists since these runs'll be more ephemeral than usual.

2. If you wait for rotation from large caps to the rest you'll be front run. There's hardly any rotation anymore. When mkt turns everything goes up together.

3. At mkt turning point out of major down trend, focus on beaten-down underdogs. If your capital size is small, focus on smaller caps as well.

4. Your time may be better spent researching the next attention-driving narratives & themes rather than studying technical analysis. Just sayin' ;)

你可能也喜歡

技术没有壁垒,全天候交易才是 Hyperliquid 制胜的关键

本文探讨了去中心化衍生品交易平台Hyperliquid如何凭借其“全天候交易”的核心优势,挑战并打破了传统金融市场的运作范式。 传统交易所(如纽交所、伦交所)均设有固定的交易时段,这一惯例源于历史遗留的物理局限。Hyperliquid则实现了7x24小时不间断交易,使其能在传统市场休市(如周末)时捕捉交易机会。例如,其在周日清晨抢先为SpaceX进行估值定价,并在周末完成巨额原油衍生品交易,这直接触动了芝加哥商品交易所(CME)等传统巨头的利益,引发后者的监管游说。 文章指出,Hyperliquid的竞争力并非单纯源于技术,其**全天候交易的时间优势**才是关键。这一优势在SpaceX、Cerebras等IPO前永续合约上得到充分体现,平台展现出了高效、连续的价格发现能力,预测精度远超部分传统二级市场平台。 面对监管压力,Hyperliquid采用的“纯合成衍生品”模式构成了其独特的防御壁垒。该模式不依赖实体股权或持牌机构,仅通过智能合约以USDC结算,使得监管机构或标的公司难以找到明确的追责主体。即便项目创始人面临法律风险,已部署的智能合约仍可自主运行。然而,这种无需身份核验、资金脱离传统银行体系的模式,也带来了市场操纵、规避制裁等合规与国家安全隐患。 总之,Hyperliquid通过融合“去中心化”的架构与“不间断交易”的时间维度,创造了一种传统金融难以复制的竞争力,但也正因此置身于监管风暴的中心。这场围绕“交易时间”的冲突,本质上是新旧金融体系运行逻辑的碰撞。

marsbit48 分鐘前

技术没有壁垒,全天候交易才是 Hyperliquid 制胜的关键

marsbit48 分鐘前

预测市场中的新型信息洗钱:秘密如何融入投资信号

本文探讨了预测市场中出现的“信息洗钱”现象及其潜在风险。文章以2026年2月Polymarket平台上九个关联匿名账户通过精准押注美伊战争相关事件获利超240万美元、胜率高达98%的案例引入。 核心观点指出,预测市场价格本质上是交易者集体预期的体现,它能高效地将信息转化为价格信号。然而,该系统无法区分公开信息与非法获取的机密信息。掌握内幕者(如知晓即将发生的罢工)可通过买入行为推高合约价格,其秘密就此被“洗白”成看似合理的市场信号并从中牟利。这种操作如同洗钱,使非法信息源头在市场公开数据中消失。 文章进一步分析,尽管区块链交易记录提供了透明度,使得分析工具能识别关联账户和可疑模式,但这种透明性也可能被敌对势力利用,从异常市场波动中低成本获取情报。现行法律(如内幕交易规则)难以监管此类涉及战争等非公司事件的行为,且平台可通过离岸运营规避地域限制。 作者认为,信息洗钱并非系统漏洞,而是预测市场核心机制(奖励最佳信息持有者)的必然副作用。随着市场影响力扩大,社会需面对一个根本性问题:是否能接受一个将国家机密等敏感信息转化为公开可交易价格并奖励信息持有者的机器。美国国会已开始调查并推动相关立法。

链捕手57 分鐘前

预测市场中的新型信息洗钱:秘密如何融入投资信号

链捕手57 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片