Ronin and ZKsync’s onchain metrics fell the most in 2025

cointelegraph发布于2025-12-16更新于2025-12-16

文章摘要

According to Nansen data, onchain activity declined sharply across several major blockchain networks in 2025. Ronin saw the largest drop in active addresses at 70%, largely due to decreased usage of the Pixels game. ZKsync experienced one of the steepest transaction declines, falling 90% after its 2024 airdrop. Several Ethereum layer-2 networks, including Scroll, also posted declines as airdrop-related activity cooled. In contrast, Ethereum’s base layer saw active addresses rise 25% and transactions increase over 20%. Solana led the industry in active addresses with over 1 billion, despite a token price drop, while BNB Chain posted a 159% increase in active addresses. The data highlights how onchain activity is highly volatile and often driven by short-term factors like airdrops, viral applications, and migrating ecosystems, rather than indicating long-term network failure.

Onchain activity declined sharply on several major networks, according to Nansen data, with 11 blockchains posting drops in active addresses in the past year.

Ronin fell the most at 70%, while Bitcoin registered a 7.2% decline. Several Ethereum layer-2 networks made the list.

Nansen data also showed drops in transaction activity across many of the same networks. ZKsync recorded one of the steepest declines, with transactions falling 90%.

Meanwhile, Ethereum’s base layer recorded a 25% increase in active addresses and more than a 20% rise in transactions, even as debate continued around Ethereum’s rollup-centric roadmap and concerns over liquidity fragmentation across layer-2 networks.

Ronin and Ethereum layer-2 chains dominate activity declines as Bitcoin sneaks into the list. Source: Nansen

Networks with the biggest usage declines

Pixels is a popular game that migrated to Ronin from Polygon in the second half of 2023. At the time, Ronin had roughly 20,000 daily active users before Pixels’ arrival drove a sharp increase in activity, briefly making Ronin the second-most active chain by daily users.

By December 2024, Pixels registered around 300,000 daily active users, according to DappRadar. The game’s popularity has since declined, and Ronin’s onchain activity has fallen alongside it, showing the network’s reliance on hit games.

Pixels activity dropped throughout 2025. Source: DappRadar

Several Ethereum layer-2 networks also experienced a decline in usage as activity tied to airdrops cooled. ZKsync’s token airdrop claim opened in June 2024. The network said nearly 700,000 wallets were eligible while fending off criticism of its Sybil filtering. Nansen data showed that more than 40% of the top airdrop wallets immediately sold their allocations. Scroll also appeared on the list following its October 2024 airdrop, after which onchain activity slowed down.

Arbitrum saw active addresses fall by 3%, though its roughly 31 million users still ranked it among the top 10 networks by activity. The Ethereum rollup conducted its airdrop in 2023, and its transaction volume rose 36% over the past year to about 734.5 million, beating Ethereum’s 507 million transactions. Arbitrum drew activity from tokenized assets, including 500 US stocks stamped on the network by Robinhood.

Related: How crypto is used in 2025: YouTube, Pokémon cards and more

Base and Optimism stood out among Ethereum layer-2 networks. Both posted increases in active addresses and transaction volumes. Base does not have a native token and has never conducted an airdrop. Onchain activity rose alongside interest in areas such as memecoins, AI-related applications and decentralized exchanges.

Solana recorded the most active addresses in the industry with more than 1 billion, followed by Tron and Ethereum. BNB Chain posted a 159% increase in active addresses, while Bitcoin was the only network in the top five to record a decline, alongside a 22% drop in transactions.

Memecoin activity has cooled, but Solana still leads the industry in onchain activity. Source: Nansen

What the declines do and do not show

The data showed little consistent relationship between onchain usage and token prices. Solana’s price fell over the past year despite a 66% increase in active addresses, while BNB’s (BNB) token price rose alongside increased network activity.

BNB rose almost 20% in the past year. Source: CoinGecko

The year-over-year declines do not necessarily point to terminal problems for the networks involved. Onchain activity can swing sharply as applications migrate, incentive programs wind down or users shift between chains, particularly among newer networks still establishing their core use cases.

Telegram-linked blockchain The Open Network (TON) also recorded a 47% drop in active addresses and a 51% decline in transactions, a reversal that followed outsized growth in 2024. Telegram-based mini-games drove much of that earlier activity, drawing in users beyond the platform’s typical crypto-native audience.

Related: Bitcoin decouples from stocks in second half of 2025

Hamster Kombat was among the most prominent examples. The tapping-based game lowered the barrier to entry through simple mechanics and drew heavy participation from users anticipating a future token airdrop. According to Telegram CEO Pavel Durov, the viral game attracted 239 million users within three months, with more than 130 million qualifying for its airdrop in late September.

Nansen data shows that TON’s active addresses peaked at roughly 2.5 million per day on Sept. 30. Activity has since fallen back as engagement tied to Hamster Kombat cooled, underscoring how short-lived surges can distort year-over-year comparisons.

Hamster Kombat pushed Ton’s activity to new records. Source: Nansen

A few chains retained usage after hype

The past year’s blockchain data shows that onchain activity shifts quickly between networks rather than remaining anchored to any single chain. Usage fell most sharply on blockchains where activity had been concentrated around a small number of applications, incentive programs or viral moments.

At the same time, those declines do not automatically signal broader ecosystem failure. In several cases, activity cooled after periods of outsized growth, highlighting how year-over-year comparisons can be distorted by hype cycles, airdrops or short-lived applications.

Solana offers a useful contrast. While memecoin-driven activity boomed throughout 2024 and early 2025 before cooling toward the end of the year, the surge also brought in users, liquidity and applications that continued to support the network.

Solana’s memecoin boom has brought in new addresses that stayed after the boom. Source: Nansen

Solana’s daily active addresses peaked above 9 million on Oct. 22, 2024, during the height of memecoin trading. By December, daily users fluctuated between 2 million and 3 million. While that marked a sharp pullback from peak levels, activity remained consistently higher than before the boom.

Much of the past year’s onchain activity decline was driven by short-term profit-seeking, but networks such as Solana, BNB Chain and Base showed signs of retaining usage beyond viral surges, setting them apart from chains that saw sharper reversals.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

你可能也喜欢

Michael Saylor:我确实说要卖比特币,但我是为了买更多

微策略公司执行主席迈克尔·塞勒在近期播客访谈中,澄清了公司关于可能出售比特币以支付STRC优先股股息的决定。他强调,此举并非“净卖出”,公司始终是比特币的净累积者。微策略通过发行STRC等数字信用工具筹集资金,转而购买更多比特币,利用比特币作为“数字资本”的高增值属性(预期年升值约30-40%)来覆盖股息支付(约11%),从而实现持仓规模的持续净增长。例如,公司在一个月内融资30亿美元购买比特币,仅需支付约8000万至9000万美元股息,本质是“买入30个,卖出1个”。 塞勒解释,该商业模式类似于房地产开发公司:发行信用工具投资资产,资产增值后变现部分收益。他强调,只要公司持续增长且比特币年度增值超过2.3%,就能永久支付股息并保持净买入。他重申,个人投资者也应成为比特币的“净累积者”,每年持仓应增加。 访谈还提及,比特币作为表现最佳的资本资产,其杀手级应用之一是作为数字信用的抵押品。STRC因此成为市场上夏普比率最高、流动性最强的优先股之一,推动了数字信用生态发展。塞勒认为,比特币市场流动性极强,单一实体无法显著影响其价格,主要驱动力在于全球宏观因素。尽管存在地缘政治等逆风,比特币仍会因持续的资金流入和有限供应而缓慢上涨。

marsbit26分钟前

Michael Saylor:我确实说要卖比特币,但我是为了买更多

marsbit26分钟前

从生存到加速发展:ZODL创始人亲述Zcash三年崛起之路

Zcash(ZEC)在经历三年深度调整后,从治理僵局与增长困境中强势崛起,实现了从生存到加速发展的转变。其创始人回顾了关键突破点: 首先,治理枷锁被打破。旧有模式将20%区块奖励固定分配给少数机构,导致激励扭曲。随着ECC主动放弃直接资助并推动NU6升级,资金分配改为社区主导的追溯性模式,同时商标协议终止,治理垄断被彻底破除。 其次,产品战略转向用户增长。团队从专注底层技术研发,转向开发用户真正需要的产品,如默认匿名、易用的Zodl钱包。这直接推动了匿名池资产占比从11%大幅增长至31%,匿名交易占比达到86.5%,体现了真实用户对隐私自托管的信任。 再者,叙事定位得以重塑。Zcash摆脱了易受监管打击的“隐私币”标签,重新定位为“隐私货币”,构建了协议、资产、应用门户的“三位一体”清晰框架,为其获得更广泛的交易所、ETF及机构支持铺平了道路。 最后,组织架构完成蜕变。原ECC团队脱离非营利组织的束缚,成立ZODL并成功融资2500万美元,以创业公司模式加速产品开发与规模化。 目前,ZEC价格与市场情绪显著提升,社区讨论焦点已转向产品与技术。未来工作将集中于提升钱包用户体验、通过Tachyon项目实现高可扩展性,以及推进后量子安全准备,致力于使Zcash更快、更易用且更具未来安全性。

marsbit38分钟前

从生存到加速发展:ZODL创始人亲述Zcash三年崛起之路

marsbit38分钟前

五种对手方风险架构:加密交易所TradFi五模型分类的结算层方法论

本报告是币贝研究院此前发布的《加密交易所 TradFi 扩张:五模型分类框架》的伴侣篇,将分析焦点转向五种架构中“对手方风险持有者”这一核心维度。报告旨在揭示,在不同压力情境下,损失由谁的资产负债表首先吸收,这是评估各类架构稳健性的根本问题。 报告逐一剖析了五种对手方风险架构及其对应的历史失败模式: 1. **模型1:稳定币发行方与CEX自持仓**。用户面临稳定币(如USDT)发行方储备挤兑风险与交易所自身偿付能力的双重考验。 2. **模型2:CFD经纪商资产负债表**。在B-book模式下,经纪商是用户直接对手方。不同监管辖区(如ESMA强制负余额保护,而毛里求斯FSC不强制)决定了损失由经纪商承担还是转嫁给客户。 3. **模型3:链下托管与转让代理链**。资产实际由链下实体持有,其资产负债表健康状况、公司治理及用户协议条款(如Celsius案中明确转移资产所有权的条款)是用户能否取回资产的关键。 4. **模型4:DEX保险基金与被动减仓(ADL)机制**。协议无传统对手方,损失由预存的保险基金承担,不足时通过ADL机制强制平仓盈利方头寸来分摊,其稳健性取决于预言机设计和规则参数。 5. **模型5:受监管中央对手方(CCP)**。制度化程度最高,拥有多层预存资源(如违约基金)和清晰的损失分担流程,但在极端压力下仍可能动用撤销交易(如LME镍事件)或支持负价格结算(如CME原油事件)等非典型工具。 报告强调,监管差异与对手方风险分配是同一制度选择的两种表述,并非简单的因果关系。最后,报告为每种架构提炼出一组可观察的结构性指标(观察清单),用于在压力事件发生时进行归因分析,而非预测具体失败概率。本研究不构成投资建议。

marsbit55分钟前

五种对手方风险架构:加密交易所TradFi五模型分类的结算层方法论

marsbit55分钟前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

2.2k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2025.03.21

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片