Ripple CTO Details How RLUSD Might Trade At $1,200 On Debut

bitcoinist发布于2024-12-16更新于2024-12-16

文章摘要

Ripple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has outlined how RLUSD—the upcoming stablecoin on the XRP Ledger—could initially trade at highly inflated...

Ripple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has outlined how RLUSD—the upcoming stablecoin on the XRP Ledger—could initially trade at highly inflated prices, possibly even $1,200, despite its intended $1 peg. Speaking via X, he highlighted early supply bottlenecks, speculative fervor, and the fundamental market mechanics of stablecoins as factors likely to drive any short-lived spike.

Why The Ripple Stablecoin RLUSD Could Hit $1,200

In a reply to community chatter around a screenshot that showed an RLUSD value of $1,200 on the Xaman wallet, Schwartz confirmed such a price is theoretically possible. He remarked that “as RLUSD goes live, there may be supply shortages in the very early days before the market stabilizes. There actually is someone willing to pay $1,200/RLUSD for a tiny fraction of one RLUSD. Tools will show you the highest price anyone is willing to pay, even if it’s just for a tiny bit. Maybe someone wants the ‘honor’ of buying the first bit of RLUSD on the DEX.”

However, he was quick to stress that “the price will come back to very close to $1 as soon as supply stabilizes,” suggesting that any eye-popping listing would be more of a novelty event than a real market assessment of RLUSD’s long-term value. “But rest assured, the price will come back to very close to $1 as soon as supply stabilizes. […] If you want to spend a lot of money to get a tiny bit of RLUSD before anyone else does, you can. But please don’t expect the price to stay over $1 once things stabilize, which I expect they will do very quickly.”

Part of the reason for these anomalies, according to the Ripple CTO, lies in the basic minting and burning mechanics that underpin stablecoins. Minting the Ripple stablecoin involves creating new units when demand rises, while burning is the process of removing units from circulation when demand falls. Both processes help maintain the $1 peg but can lag behind real-time trading. At launch, an imbalance between the number of tokens available (supply) and those seeking to buy them (demand) could generate extreme initial price distortions.

Schwartz’s remarks on social media echoed points he made at the Emergence conference in Prague. He discussed “weird failure scenarios” that might occur when a stablecoin first goes live, jokingly referring to the possibility that “people might spend extra just to own RLUSD first.”

A scenario he described was someone paying $3—rather than $1—just to say they are an original holder of the stablecoin. While that still pales in comparison to $1,200, the principle remains: such anomalies, he said, could lead some buyers to mistakenly believe that the Ripple stablecoin might be a speculative asset rather than a stablecoin.

“Obviously it’s going to come back down from $3 to $1 as soon as somebody mints enough of it,” the Ripple CTO noted, adding that this is where arbitragers play a pivotal role. When the price of a stablecoin floats significantly above or below its peg, traders seize on the mismatch, either selling at a premium or buying at a discount and redeeming at face value. This process locks the price back to its target.

Schwartz also cautioned, “please don’t FOMO into a stablecoin! This is not an opportunity to get rich.”
Ripple Software Engineer Neil Hartner recalled that GateHub USDC was “regularly over $2 per GateHub USD” during its initial automated market maker (AMM) phase, especially on weekends when GateHub’s own mint-and-burn processes were offline.

A vital takeaway here is that many stablecoins rely on an external entity or protocol for minting and redemption. When those processes aren’t operational 24/7—or when liquidity is restricted outside of business hours—prices can decouple from the $1 peg on specific exchanges or trading venues.

Hartner cited Circle’s USDC depegging incident in March 2023 as another cautionary parallel. “Price distortions can happen if minting and burning aren’t available 24/7. Same thing happened when USDC depegged over a weekend in March 2023 because markets panicked and Circle had limited liquidity operations outside business hours, Hartner wrote.

Community member Khaled Elawadi.XRP, questioned how halting minting or burning could logically distort a stablecoin’s price if redemptions for fiat ultimately remain $1. “Surely, there should be a fixed buy and sell price on the DEX and on the other listed exchanges?” he remarked.

In response, Hartner underscored that the peg is enforced not by a universal algorithmic price fix but by traders themselves. “You don’t cash out stablecoins from exchanges, you trade them for fiat with other traders,” he explained. If more stablecoins are being sold than there are buyers willing to pay $1, the price on that particular exchange can slip until market participants or liquidity providers step in.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.40.

XRP price
XRP price, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com
Jake Simmons

Jake Simmons

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

你可能也喜欢

6道题,看懂AI的商业趋势

AI行业已进入“夏天”阶段,叙事与交付并存,但交付与商业化正变得至关重要。武汉大学苏德超教授提出的“周期判断六维框架”从叙事vs交付、系统连通性、交付能力、ROI合理化、行业普遍现象、资本环境六个维度对当前AI行业打分,各项均得1分,总分6分,处于夏季(5-7分)。这一阶段的特征是:想象空间仍在,但账本已摊开;资本仍会投资,但开始关注回报;用户持续增长,但开始分层付费。 近期两大关键信号印证了这一判断:一是字节跳动豆包推出付费订阅,标志着免费模式难以为继,算力成本压力倒逼商业化;二是OpenAI推出广告平台,旨在开辟新收入以覆盖巨额亏损并抓住市场机会。这背后是用户规模达到临界点后,成本压力与商业化机会共同驱动的结果。 企业如何在AI夏季有效落地?可分三步走:第一,寻找最小切口(如智能客服、内容生成),快速跑通可量化的价值闭环;第二,将成功经验标准化并复制,同时配套人才梯队、激励机制和组织架构调整;第三,进行体系化重构,利用AI将串行流程改为并行协同,实现业务自动触发与智能决策,从“为业务加AI”转向“用AI重做业务”。森马、安踏、太平鸟、美的等企业已通过AI实现效率大幅提升与成本显著节约,证明了AI正从辅助工具转变为核心生产力。

marsbit35分钟前

6道题,看懂AI的商业趋势

marsbit35分钟前

Bit Digital 在机构觉醒之前便已洞悉以太坊的战略价值

在大多数机构仍聚焦于加密货币本身时,Bit Digital 似乎采取了更具前瞻性的策略,很早就认识到了以太坊的战略价值。当许多市场参与者仍将 ETH 视为次要资产时,该公司已开始围绕其作为去中心化金融、质押和代币化经济支柱的长期潜力进行布局。 该公司在 X 上透露,早在机构共识普遍接受以太坊作为加密资产结算基础设施轨道的数年前,就已将其视为核心战略资产负债表资产。其核心理念基于一个简单动态:使用率和采用率持续扩大,而价格仍被压制。随着稳定币结算、代币化和链上金融活动的规模持续扩大,无论市场如何波动,ETH 的实际使用量都在稳步增长。当这个被持续积累的基础设施层变得更具成本效益,且现实效用不断增长时,资本配置的决策就变得更加清晰。Bit Digital 强调,其 ETH 持仓是在多个市场周期中精心构建的,最近的购买行为是该战略资产框架的延续。 来自现实世界资产(RWA)领域的一个强烈信号是,以太坊作为大多数代币化金融资产主要结算层的地位日益增强。这一趋势并非源于机构突然变得更具加密原生性,而是因为资本市场从根本上重视中立结算层、可信基础设施以及跨金融应用的可组合性。随着 RWA 领域持续扩张,公链将日益在结算可信度上展开竞争,而非社区文化或市场叙事。 数据显示,大型持有者正在市场疲软期间悄然积累 ETH,这是早期看涨布局的常见模式。持有 10 万枚以上 ETH 的钱包,其总余额已增至约 1741 万枚,达到 9 周高点,约占流通供应量的 22%。这种在价格弱势时期的战略性积累,被长期投资者视为 ETH 非常强劲的看涨信号。

bitcoinist3小时前

Bit Digital 在机构觉醒之前便已洞悉以太坊的战略价值

bitcoinist3小时前

美国政府首次解禁加密永续合约,对市场意味什么?

5月29日,美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)发布新指引,首次允许加密资产相关衍生品在美国进行7*24小时交易与清算,标志着以往被视为禁区的加密永续合约市场正式对美国开放。 此举被视作美国巩固其“加密之都”地位的关键一步。CFTC主席称这是将全球最活跃的加密衍生品纳入美国监管的历史性举措。政策公布后,市场反应迅速:预测市场平台Kalshi率先获得批准上市比特币永续合约;Coinbase成为美国首家受CFTC监管的期货佣金商,可为客户接入全球衍生品市场;芝商所(CME)也将其比特币期货和期权转为全天候交易。 监管机构在开放的同时也表现出谨慎态度,强调此举主要针对加密资产,农产品等传统大宗商品暂不适用,并要求相关机构必须提前报备并遵守严格的风险管理规定。 业内反响热烈。Coinbase CEO等业内人士认为这使美国用户得以进入占据全球加密交易量约80%的衍生品市场,有利于资本效率和风险管理。然而,消费者保护组织Better Markets则强烈批评CFTC,指责其未充分进行投资者保护,可能忽视产品风险,并暗示监管机构与行业存在利益关联。 预计未来将有更多美国交易所跟进,如Kraken已计划在30天内推出受监管的永续期货。数十万亿美元规模的加密永续合约市场大门已向美国用户打开。

marsbit11小时前

美国政府首次解禁加密永续合约,对市场意味什么?

marsbit11小时前

美国政府首次解禁加密永续合约,对市场意味什么?

2026年5月29日,美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)发布新规,明确加密资产衍生品因其数字化和全球交易特性,适合进行全天候(7*24小时)交易与清算。这标志着美国首次正式对加密永续合约这一巨大市场开放监管绿灯,结束了本土用户和平台长期被排除在外的历史。 据估计,2025年加密永续合约年交易量高达60至90万亿美元,占加密总交易量的75%-80%。新规下,Kalshi、Coinbase和芝加哥商品交易所(CME)成为直接受益者:Kalshi获准上线比特币永续合约;Coinbase成为首家受CFTC监管的期货佣金商,可为客户接入全球衍生品市场;CME的比特币期货和期权也将转为全天候交易。 CFTC在开放的同时也展现了谨慎态度,强调此举是出于加密资产的独特性,传统大宗商品(如农产品)暂不适用全天候交易,并要求相关机构必须提前提交合规计划和风险评估。 行业领袖如Michael Saylor和Brian Armstrong对此表示欢迎,认为这将促进比特币资本市场发展,吸引美国流动性回流。然而,第三方组织Better Markets则严厉批评CFTC忽视了散户投资者的风险,且与受监管企业存在利益关联之嫌。 随着Kraken等更多平台计划推出受监管产品,规模数十万亿美元的加密永续衍生品市场正向美国用户全面敞开大门。

Odaily星球日报11小时前

美国政府首次解禁加密永续合约,对市场意味什么?

Odaily星球日报11小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片