Ethereum Official Staking Withdrawal Guide & FAQ

Ethereum.org发布于2023-02-10更新于2023-02-10

文章摘要

The withdrawal function will be enabled through a two-part simultaneous network upgrade: Shanghai + Capella.

On February 10th, the Ethereum official website updated the staking withdrawals page, which introduced details related to Ethereum staking withdrawals, including staking reward collection, staking withdrawal steps, withdrawal time cycle, etc., as follows:

How do I prepare?

Current stakers

Some users may have provided a withdrawal address when initially setting up their staking deposit—these users have nothing more they need to do

The majority of stakers did not provide a withdrawal address on initial deposit, and will need to update their withdrawal credentials. The Zhejiang Testnet Launchpad has instructions on when and how to do this

New stakers (not yet deposited)

By default, new stakers looking to automatically enable reward payments and withdrawal functionality should provide an Ethereum withdrawal address they control when generating their validator keys using the Staking Deposit CLI tool

This is not required at time of deposit, but will prevent the need to update these keys at a later date to unlock your funds

The Staking Launchpad will guide you through staking onboarding.

Important notices

Providing a withdrawal address is a required step for any validator account before it will be eligible to have ETH withdrawn from its balance.

Each validator account can only be assigned a single withdrawal address, one time. Once an address is chosen and submitted to the Beacon Chain, this cannot be undone or changed again. Double-check ownership and accuracy of the address provided before submitting.

There is no threat to your funds in the meantime for not providing this. Failure to add withdrawal credentials will simply leave the ETH locked in the validator account as it has been until a withdrawal address is provided.

Exiting staking entirely

Providing a withdrawal address is required before any funds can be transferred out of a validator account balance.

Users looking to exit staking entirely and withdraw their full balance back must also sign and broadcast a "voluntary exit" message with validator keys which will start the process of exiting from staking. This is done with your validator client and submitted to your beacon node, and does not require gas.

The process of a validator exiting from staking takes variable amounts of time, depending on how many others are exiting at the same time. Once complete, this account will no longer be responsible for performing validator network duties, is no longer eligible for rewards, and no longer has their ETH "at stake". At this time the account with be marked as fully “withdrawable”.

Once an account is flagged as "withdrawable", and withdrawal credentials have been provided, there is nothing more a user needs to do aside from wait. Accounts are automatically and continuously swept by block proposers for eligible exited funds, and your account balance will be transferred in full (also known as a "full withdrawal") during the next sweep.

When are staking withdrawals enabled?

Withdrawal functionality will be enabled through a two-part simultaneous network upgrade, Shanghai + Capella.

Shanghai

Withdrawal functionality will be enabled in the upcoming Shanghai upgrade planned for Q1/Q2 2023 (as with any upgrade, timing subject to change). This enables previously staked ETH to be deposited into execution layer accounts, closing the loop on staking liquidity, and taking one more step on Ethereum’s journey towards building a sustainable, scalable, secure decentralized ecosystem.

Shanghai marks the end of an undefined lock-up period for ETH staking. Users will be free to:

Stake their ETH

Earn ETH rewards that will be distributed automatically

Un-stake their ETH to regain full access to their entire balance

And of course, re-stake to sign back up and start earning more rewards

Capella

For the Shanghai upgrade to take effect, a simultaneous upgrade to the Beacon Chain must take place named Capella. Node operating stakers should stay tuned to client communication channels to be alerted of upcoming client updates planned for Q1/Q2 2023.

Stakers who need to update their validator withdrawal keys can broadcast this message once the Capella upgrade has taken place.

How do withdrawal payments work?

Whether a given validator is eligible for a withdrawal or not is determined by the state of the validator account itself. No user input is needed at any given time to determine whether an account should have a withdrawal initiated or not—the entire process is done automatically by the consensus layer on a continuous loop.

When a validator is scheduled to propose the next block, it is required to build a withdrawal queue, of up to 16 eligible withdrawals. This is done by originally starting with validator index 0, determining if there is an eligible withdrawal for this account per the rules of the protocol, and adding it to the queue if there is. The validator set to propose the following block will pick up where the last one left off, progressing in order indefinitely.

While a proposer is sweeping through validators for possible withdrawals, each validator being checked is evaluated against a short series of questions to determine if a withdrawal should be triggered, and if so, how much ETH should be withdrawn.

Has a withdrawal address been provided? If no withdrawal address has been provided, the account is skipped and no withdrawal initiated.

Is the validator exited and withdrawable? If the validator has fully exited, and we have reached the epoch where their account is considered to be "withdrawable", then a full withdrawal will be processed. This will transfer the entire remaining balance to the withdrawal address.

Is the effective balance maxed out at 32? If the account has withdrawal credentials, is not fully exited, and has rewards above 32 waiting, a partial withdrawal will be processed which transfers only the rewards above 32 to the user's withdrawal address.

How frequently will I get my staking rewards?

A maximum of 16 withdrawals can be processed in a single block. At that rate, 115,200 validator withdrawals can be processed per day (assuming no missed blocks). As noted above, validators without eligible withdrawals will be skipped, decreasing the time to finish the sweep.

Expanding this calculation, we can estimate the time it will take to process a given number of withdrawals:

As you see this slows down as more validators are on the network. An increase in missed blocks could slow this down proportionally, but this will generally represent the slower side of possible outcomes.

Frequently asked questions

Once I have provided a withdrawal address, can I change it to an alternative withdrawal address?

No, the process to provide withdrawal credentials is a one-time process, and cannot be changed once submitted.

Why can a withdrawal address only be set once?

By setting an execution layer withdrawal address the withdrawal credentials for that validator have permanently been changed. This means the old credentials will no longer work, and the new credentials direct to an execution layer account.

Withdrawal addresses can be either a smart contract (controlled by its code), or an externally owned account (EOA, controlled by its private key). Currently these accounts have no way to communicate a message back to the consensus layer that would signal a change of validator credentials, and adding this functionality would add unnecessary complexity to the protocol.

As an alternative to changing the withdrawal address for a particular validator, users may choose to set a smart contract as their withdrawal address which could handle key rotating, such as a Safe. Users who set their funds to their own EOA can perform a full exit to withdrawal all of their staked funds, and then re-stake using new credentials.

What if I participate in liquid staking derivatives or pooled staking

If you are part of a staking pool or hold liquid staking derivatives, you should check with your provider for more details about how staking withdrawals will affect your arrangement, as each service operates differently.

In general, users will likely have nothing they need to do, and these services will no longer be limited by the inability to withdrawal rewards or exit validator funds after this upgrade.

This means that users can now decide to redeem their underlying staked ETH, or change which staking provider they utilize.

Do full withdrawals happen automatically?

No, if your validator is still active on the network, a full withdrawal will not happen automatically. This requires manually initiating a voluntary exit.

Once a validator has completed the exiting process, and assuming the account has withdrawal credentials, the remaining balance will then be withdrawn during the next validator sweep.

How can I withdrawal a custom amount?

Withdrawals are designed to be pushed automatically, transferring any ETH that is not actively contributing to stake. This includes full balances for accounts

It is not possible to manually request specific amounts of ETH to be withdrawn.

你可能也喜欢

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

一个由天主教领袖、执法相关团体及反贩卖倡导者组成的联盟警告称,《清晰法案》可能会削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施。批评焦点在于法案中保护非托管软件开发者免受货币传输服务商待遇的条款。 这一争议触及了加密货币监管中最棘手的问题之一:如何区分中性软件与金融中介。加密倡导者认为,发布非托管代码的开发者不应像交易所或支付处理商那样受到监管。批评者则担心,广泛的豁免可能使追踪非法金融活动变得更加困难。 非托管软件是去中心化金融(DeFi)的核心。钱包、智能合约和去中心化协议通常允许用户在没有公司控制资金的情况下进行交易。这种架构是加密货币价值主张的核心部分,但当不法分子使用相同工具时,也带来了执法挑战。 《清晰法案》旨在制定更清晰的市场结构规则,但反对意见表明并非所有政策争论都围绕投资者保护或交易所注册。一些立法者在决定开发者保护应扩展到何种程度时,还会考虑人口贩卖、制裁逃避、欺诈以及执法可见性等因素。 尽管面临阻力,该法案并未夭折,但支持者可能需要回应法案可能为非法金融活动创造漏洞的担忧。这可能导致修正案、更狭窄的安全港规则或额外的报告要求。对加密公司而言,风险很高:更明确的规则可能在美国释放投资和产品开发潜力,但如果法案被定性为削弱犯罪防护,其政治道路将变得更为艰难。

bitcoinist2小时前

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

bitcoinist2小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit6小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit6小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片