Who Exactly Is Persistently Funding the Crypto Bear Market?

Odaily星球日报Xuất bản vào 2026-04-25Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-04-25

Tóm tắt

Despite a significant crypto market downturn in Q1 2026, with Bitcoin falling over 25% and Ethereum down 35%, institutional investment continued to flow in. Key buyers included corporate treasuries like Strategy (MicroStrategy), which aggressively added over $10 billion in Bitcoin, sovereign wealth funds such as Mubadala, and major banks launching new crypto ETFs. Over 26 new single-asset crypto ETFs were filed or launched under new SEC rules, including products from BlackRock and Morgan Stanley. VC funding showed concentration, with total funding around $5-6.8 billion but deal count dropping 49%. Three major deals—BVNK ($1.8B), Kalshi ($1B), and Polymarket ($600M)—accounted for half the quarter’s funding. Investment shifted toward payment/stablecoin and prediction market sectors, while DeFi and NFT/gaming funding declined sharply. The market is bifurcated: long-term holders and institutions are accumulating, while tactical hedge funds and miners are selling. The U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve remains unallocated, leaving corporate and sovereign buyers as the main drivers during this bear phase.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | jk

Introduction: Who Is Laying the Groundwork for the Next Bull Run?

The crypto bull market of 2024-2025 was, in essence, a story of institutionalization. The force that drove Bitcoin to break through $100,000 was not retail FOMO sentiment, but the net inflows from BlackRock's IBIT ETF and the ongoing bond financing for coin purchases by Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy). The underlying logic of that bull run was inseparable from the accumulation quietly completed by institutions during the 2022-2023 bear market.

History seems to be repeating itself now, but the details are截然不同 (entirely different). In Q1 2026, Bitcoin retreated over 25% from its highs, Ethereum fell even deeper, and market sentiment turned cold again. Yet, against this backdrop, a group of institutions moved in the opposite direction to the price trend: corporate treasuries are adding, sovereign wealth funds are adding, bank-affiliated ETFs are listing, and traditional European financial institutions are entering the stablecoin space. All this points to the same question: If the next major rally is still to be driven by institutional capital, then who exactly is buying during this bear market accumulation phase?

Odaily reporters conducted an in-depth investigation into the capital inflows of the crypto market in Q1.

Conclusion first: Despite a brutal market pullback in Q1, institutional capital continued to flow into the crypto market. Bitcoin fell over 25% from around $88,000 to the mid-$60,000s, Ethereum plunged as much as 35%, yet Strategy still counter-trend accumulated over $10 billion worth of Bitcoin, sovereign wealth funds like Mubadala also bought the dip, and meanwhile, about 26 single-asset crypto ETFs were issued or applied for under the SEC's new universal listing rule framework.

The buying capital in Q1 2026 showed a clear divergence: Some hedge funds significantly reduced holdings (Brevan Howard cut IBIT holdings by 85%), while corporate treasuries, university endowments, ETF issuers, and Abu Dhabi sovereign funds took the opportunity to buy the dip In terms of venture capital, while the number of deals plummeted by 49%, the quarterly financing amount remained around $5-6.8 billion, with three deals (BVNK, Kalshi, Polymarket) accounting for half of the total. Externally, the SEC's new rules in September 2025 compressed the ETF approval cycle from 240 days to 75 days; on March 17, 2026, the SEC and CFTC joint statement classified staking rewards as non-securities, triggering a wave of intensive staking ETF issuances.

Part One: Active Institutional Buyers and Capital Deployment

New Crypto ETFs (Jan-Apr 2026)

Newly launched crypto ETF products were密集 (dense) this quarter. Bitwise launched the Chainlink ETF (CLNK) on NYSE Arca on Jan 14 with $2.5 million in seed capital. Canary Capital launched two products on Jan 13: the Litecoin Spot ETF (LTCC, cumulative AUM ~$9.7 million, the first US spot LTC product) and the HBAR ETF (the first US spot Hedera product); the company subsequently launched a staking SUI ETF with rewards in February. Grayscale also launched a SUI Staking ETF in February. 21Shares launched the SUI ETF (TSUI, AUM ~$12.5 million) on Nasdaq on Feb 24, and the Polkadot ETF (TDOT, fee 0.30%, the first US spot DOT product, AUM ~$11 million in the first week) on Mar 6.

Old money also released some ETFs. BlackRock launched the iShares Ethereum Staking Trust (ETHB) on Mar 12, becoming the first major institutional staking ETH ETF, with about 82% of staking rewards distributed directly to holders. Morgan Stanley launched the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) on Apr 8, the first US bank-affiliated spot BTC ETF, with a fee of 0.14%, attracting $34 million on the first day, and reaching a cumulative size of $133 million 8 days after listing. Additionally, ProShares launched the CoinDesk 20 Crypto Index ETF (KRYP) on NYSE Arca between Jan and Feb; NEOS launched the Enhanced Bitcoin High Yield ETF (XBCI) around Jan 29; Bitwise launched the Proficio Currency Depreciation ETF (BPRO, a BTC and precious metals combo); Nomura/Laser Digital launched the Bitcoin Diversified Yield Fund (BDYF, a tokenized yield product) on Jan 22; 21Shares launched the Strategy Yield ETP (STRC, BTC-backed) in Zurich on Feb 25; Hashdex expanded NCIQ in Q1 to cover BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL, and XLM.

In summary, New Money, meaning ETFs for smaller market cap coins, are being launched, but the ETFs from more established Old Money are still focused on high-market cap, established coins.

Notable ETF Applications (Pending approval as of Apr 23)

Morgan Stanley submitted S-1 applications for spot BTC (MSBT, listed in Apr), Solana, and ETH trusts in early January. Goldman Sachs submitted an application for a Bitcoin Premium Income/Options Strategy ETF on Apr 14. Hyperliquid (HYPE) attracted competing applications from four institutions: Grayscale (GHYP, Mar 20), Bitwise (BHYP, Apr 10), 21Shares (THYP, Apr 14), and VanEck (VHYP) are currently not approved for listing. Grayscale, VanEck, 21Shares, Bitwise, and Canary all submitted applications for ADA spot ETFs; CME's ADA futures contract also launched on Feb 9. Truth Social (Yorkville) submitted applications for a BTC+ETH combo ETF and a Cronos Yield Enhanced ETF on Feb 13. Bitwise submitted 11 crypto strategy ETFs (covering AAVE, UNI, ZEC, TAO, etc.). REX-Osprey/Defiance submitted applications for 27 crypto ETFs, including staking products and 3x leveraged products.

For now, the Hyperliquid ETF remains the most anticipated.

ETF Fund Flows (Q1 2026)

Spot BTC ETF flows were volatile: Net outflows of ~$1.6 billion in January (crypto.com data showed the third consecutive month of net outflows), but as buying returned in Mar-Apr, the quarter ultimately narrowed to a net positive value. BlackRock's IBIT remained the flagship product, with net inflows of ~$8.4 billion in Q1, but AUM shrank from ~$78 billion to ~$54 billion due to price decline. Ethereum ETFs set a record of 19 consecutive days of positive inflows in early January. XRP ETFs had net inflows of $1.07 billion for the quarter, with 43 consecutive days of positive inflows, significantly outperforming BTC products during the same period. Solana ETFs (BSOL, FSOL) combined AUM broke $1 billion in April; Goldman Sachs disclosed holding $108 million in SOL ETF positions.

Net inflows positive for the full quarter

Public Company Bitcoin Treasury Purchases

Strategy (MSTR) continued high-intensity accumulation this quarter. As of Apr 20, 2026, Strategy累计持有 (cumulatively held) 815,061 BTC, with an average price of $75,527, and a cost basis of ~$61.6 billion. Japanese listed company Metaplanet (3350.T) disclosed on Jan 1, 2026, purchasing 4,279 BTC at an average price of $104,638, totaling over $380 million; it added a total of 5,075 BTC in Q1, disclosing on Apr 2 a cumulative holding of 40,177 BTC, with Q1 purchase costs around $400 million.

Strive (ASST) purchased 123 BTC on Jan 13 at $91,561 each, totaling $11.3 million; subsequently completed an all-stock merger with Semler Scientific, with the merged company holding 12,798 BTC, ranking 11th among corporate treasuries; the merger was completed on Jan 16. By mid-March, Strive held ~13,628 BTC cumulatively through PIPE and the Semler merger. DDC Enterprise (NYSEAM) added ~600 BTC just in January, holding 2,383 BTC cumulatively by Mar 19, with a total value of $182 million.

BSTR Holdings (led by Adam Back, operated by Cantor SPAC) announced it would proceed with a listing backed by 30,021 BTC (worth $2.14 billion). Twenty One Capital (XXI) held 43,514 BTC (worth over $3.1 billion) as of Apr 2, making it the second-largest Bitcoin holder among public companies. Hyperscale Data (GPUS) held 663 BTC as of Apr 21, entering with $50.3 million, targeting a treasury size of $100 million.

Ethereum & Staking Related Corporate Treasuries

BitMine Immersion (BMNR) is currently the largest Ethereum corporate treasury, staking 74,880 ETH (~$219 million) via the MAVAN platform in Q1; it purchased 101,627 ETH (over $230 million) in the week of Apr 20, 2026, its largest weekly purchase in 2026 so far. As of Apr 20, the company held ~5 million ETH cumulatively, with ~3.33 million staked, AUM ~$12.9 billion. SharpLink Gaming (SBET) is the second-largest Ethereum treasury, holding ~867,000 ETH (value $1.7-$2.3 billion), nearly 100% staked, disclosed on Mar 10.

Major Sellers

Bitcoin miners were net sellers overall in Q1. MARA Holdings sold 15,133 BTC for $1.1 billion from Mar 4-25 to repurchase convertible notes; Riot Platforms sold 3,778 BTC for $290 million; Nakamoto Holdings sold 284 BTC; Genius Group liquidated its entire 84 BTC holdings on Apr 1. The Kingdom of Bhutan (Druk Holdings) transferred ~$42 million worth of BTC in small amounts throughout the year. Strategy alone accounted for 94% of the net Bitcoin accumulation by all public companies in March.

Bank & Asset Manager Moves

Morgan Stanley not only filed ETF applications; the bank applied to the OCC for a National Trust Bank Charter for digital assets in Feb 2026 and announced opening BTC/ETH/SOL trading to retail clients via E*Trade/Zerohash.

UBS announced on Jan 23 offering BTC/ETH trading services to Swiss private bank clients, covering its $7 trillion wealth management business.

Citigroup announced the launch of institutional-grade BTC custody infrastructure at the Strategy World conference on Feb 26. Standard Chartered launched institutional BTC/ETH custody services in Hong Kong in January and is reportedly in talks to acquire full ownership of its Zodia Custody unit (Apr 8).

BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) recommended high-net-worth clients allocate 3-7% to crypto assets.

12 European banks (BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING, UniCredit, KBC, Danske Bank, Handelsbanken, CaixaBank, DZ Bank, DekaBank, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg, Banca Sella) formed the Qivalis Euro stablecoin consortium based on the Fireblocks platform, compliant with the MiCA regulatory framework (Apr 21).

Vanguard Group opened access to third-party crypto ETFs for its 50 million brokerage clients on its $11 trillion platform. Fidelity offers a 1% BTC allocation option in its 401(k) pension plans, reportedly attracting about $800 million.

Nomura Securities, Daiwa Securities, and SMBC Nikko Securities all announced plans to launch cryptocurrency exchanges in Japan by the end of 2026.

13F Disclosures (Q4 2025 Holdings, disclosed Feb 2026)

Goldman Sachs' crypto ETF holdings totaled ~$2.36 billion, covering BTC ($1.06 billion), ETH ($1.0 billion), XRP ($152 million), SOL ($109 million), but BTC and ETH positions were cut by 39% and 27% QoQ respectively.

Mubadala (Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund) increased its IBIT holdings by 46% to 12.7 million shares (~$631 million), counter-trend accumulating the equivalent of ~2,300 BTC during the market downturn.

Al Warda Investments (under Abu Dhabi Investment Authority) increased IBIT holdings to 8.2 million shares (~$437 million), pushing Abu Dhabi sovereign capital's crypto exposure合计突破 (combined past) $1 billion.

Millennium increased IBIT holdings by ~67% (increase equivalent to ~8,100 BTC, making it the largest holder overall).

Jane Street increased IBIT holdings by over 50% to 20 million shares.

Harvard University reduced IBIT holdings by 21.5% but established its first ETH position (3.87 million shares of ETHA, value $86.8 million). Dartmouth College became the fourth Ivy League school to enter.

On the selling side: Brevan Howard slashed IBIT holdings by 85% (from 37.5 million shares to 5.5 million shares, equivalent to selling ~17,700 BTC); Farallon cut by 70% (cut ~2,800 BTC); Tudor reduced by ~1,300 BTC; D.E. Shaw hedge fund halved IBIT; Sculptor nearly liquidated FBTC (cut ~90%).

Sovereign Wealth Funds & Governments

Besides Mubadala and Al Warda, the Luxembourg sovereign wealth fund FSIL maintained a 1% Bitcoin allocation (~€8.5 million), becoming the first Eurozone sovereign wealth fund to hold BTC. El Salvador continued its "buy 1 BTC daily" strategy (now holds 7,547 BTC, total ~$635 million) and added $50 million in gold reserves on Jan 29. The Czech National Bank (purchased Nov 2025, continued into 2026) remains the only central bank in the world holding Bitcoin.

Zero additions to the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to date. CoinDesk confirmed on Mar 6 that the executive order was "progressing slowly"; the reserve still only holds ~328,372 seized BTC. White House Digital Asset Committee member Patrick Witt reiterated the commitment, but actual purchase actions have not occurred. Among US states, only Texas injected $5 million into IBIT in Nov 2025 (another $5 million remains unused). New Hampshire and Arizona have relevant legislation but have not deployed funds. Reports about CalPERS planning to allocate 1% (~$500 million) to BTC continue to circulate, but CalPERS has not officially confirmed.

Family Offices

Two surveys revealed截然相反的态势 (diametrically opposed trends): The J.P. Morgan Private Bank 2026 Family Office Report showed that among 333 surveyed institutions (average net worth $1.6 billion), 89% stated they had no Bitcoin allocation whatsoever, with AI investment being the primary focus. The BNY Mellon Wealth/NOIA survey showed that 74% of ultra-high-net-worth family offices are investing in or exploring crypto assets (significantly up from 53% the previous year), with typical allocation ratios of 2-5%, ~5% for Asian institutions, and ~2-4% for US and European institutions.

Part Two: Q1 2026 Crypto Venture Capital Financing Summary

Crypto VC financing in Q1 2026 presented a paradox: capital volume was还算稳健 (relatively robust) (down 8% YoY to 16%), but the number of deals plummeted by 49%. The most comprehensive statistics come from Crypto-Fundraising.info (Apr 1), recording 222 deals including M&A, with a total financing amount of $6.81 billion; excluding M&A, pure VC funding was 183 deals, totaling $4.77 billion. DefiLlama/DL News (Apr 4, VC only) tracked 53 deals over $10 million,合计约 (totaling approximately) $5 billion. J.P. Morgan estimated total digital asset inflows of ~$11 billion in Q1, about one-third of the Q1 2025 level. Galaxy Research's quarterly crypto VC report, regularly released, had not been published as of Apr 23, but its Q4 2025 benchmark data ($8.5 billion/425 deals) is available for sequential comparison.

Core Data

Compared to Q1 2025 (VC funding $5.37 billion, 358 deals) and Q4 2025 ($8.5 billion, 425 deals), Q1 2026 VC funding was ~$4.77 billion, down 11% YoY and down 44% QoQ; the number of deals was 183, down a sharp 49% YoY and 57% QoQ. Notably, the average VC deal size increased 76% YoY to $35.9 million (median $8 million), reflecting significant polarization: Seed stage was the most active by number of deals (37 deals, $252 million total), while the average size of four Series C rounds was as high as $108.8 million. Pre-Seed stage average was only $1.75 million, and the mid-market几乎萎缩 (almost萎缩 shrank).

Three Deals Gobbled Up Half the Quarter

Financing this quarter was extremely concentrated and heavily back-loaded. March alone generated $4.43 billion in financing (65% of the quarter), while February ended惨淡 (dismally) at $686 million.

Just the following three deals合计达 (combined reached) $3.4 billion, accounting for about half of the total disclosed financing for the quarter: payment sector M&A target BVNK ($1.8 billion, Mar 17), prediction market platform Kalshi (growth round led by Coatue, valuation $22 billion, $1.0 billion, Mar 19), and Intercontinental Exchange's strategic investment in Polymarket ($600 million, Mar 27).

The battle for prediction market leadership has intensified in the financing arena.

Other notable large financings include: Rain ($250 million Series C, stablecoin payments, led by Iconiq/Dragonfly/Galaxy, valuation ~$1.95 billion, Jan 9); BitGo completed an IPO on the NYSE, raising $213 million (Jan 22); XBTO strategic financing $217 million (Mar 25); Flying Tulip token issuance $206 million (FDV $1 billion); Whop received a $200 million investment from Tether (Feb 25); BlackOpal LatAm RWA financing $200 million (Jan 8); Kraken/Payward completed a $200 million secondary market transaction led by Deutsche Börse, valuation $13.3 billion; LMAX Group received a $150 million investment from Ripple (Jan 15); Alpaca completed a $150 million Series D; Bluesky received a $100 million Series B led by Bain Capital Crypto (Mar 19); Anchorage Digital received a $100 million investment from Tether, valuation over $4 billion (Feb).

Sector Distribution: Payments & Prediction Markets Outpace DeFi

The star sectors of the 2021 bull cycle—chain gaming, NFTs, L1 infrastructure—have almost disappeared from the top of the financing rankings.

  • Payments/Stablecoins led with $2.39 billion (35% share, 17 deals);
  • Prediction Markets followed with $1.72 billion (25.2%, 11 deals);
  • Finance/CeFi ranked third with $835 million (12.2%, 25 deals).
  • RWA (Real World Assets) financing $284 million (4.2%, 7 deals)
  • Trading Markets/Platforms $255 million (3.7%, 2 deals)
  • Infrastructure/L1-L2 financing $184 million (2.7%, 12 deals)
  • DeFi only $89 million (1.3%, 5 deals)
  • NFTs/Chain Gaming/Metaverse were almost negligible.

The top three sectors combined absorbed 72% of the quarter's disclosed capital.

Active Investment Firms

Coinbase Ventures topped the list of institutional investors by participation count with 12 deals, more than double the second place. Followed by: Tether (8 deals), Animoca Brands (7 deals), CMT Digital (6 deals), and a16z crypto, Castle Island, Big Brain, Galaxy Digital (5 deals each) tied.

Most active funds in March

Traditional financial institutions entered the infrastructure sector with罕见力度 (rare intensity): Franklin Templeton participated in 4 deals, Intercontinental Exchange invested in Polymarket, Deutsche Börse took a stake in Kraken, Citadel Securities, Bain Capital, Sequoia Capital, and Alibaba also participated in Q1 funding rounds. Geographically, the three largest deals (BVNK, Kalshi, Polymarket) and the BitGo IPO were all from the US, showing the US share of crypto VC continued at the ~55% level seen in Q4 2025.

Conclusion: Institutional Capital Shows a Barbell Structure

In early 2026, the institutional crypto investment landscape is undergoing a two-way分化 (divergence).

On the buyer side, institutions with long-term conviction, such as Strategy, BitMine, Metaplanet, Mubadala, and the BlackRock ETF ecosystem, took advantage of the market downturn to increase their bets, while tactical hedge funds (Brevan Howard, Tudor, Farallon) and most Bitcoin miners turned into net sellers. Strategy alone bought almost more Bitcoin in Q1 than all other public companies combined, and its weekly purchase from Apr 13-19 set the third-largest record in history.

The same两极格局 (bipolar pattern) played out in venture capital: super-large financings in payments and prediction markets continued to expand, while small and medium-sized projects generally faced a financing drought. The shift in sector leadership—from DeFi/NFTs/chain gaming to stablecoins, prediction markets, and compliant CeFi infrastructure—signals that the industry's growth engine is gradually shifting from speculative crypto-native narratives towards trading models closer to regulated fintech.

The biggest uncertainty currently comes from the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: despite high-profile announcements at the executive level for over a year, actual capital deployment remains zero. If the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act opens a funding path in the second half of the year, it will fundamentally reshape the demand landscape. Until then, the ones真正在买单 (truly paying the bill) are corporate treasuries and sovereign wealth funds, not Washington.

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWho are the main institutional buyers continuing to invest in the crypto market during the 2026 Q1 bearish trend?

AThe main institutional buyers during the 2026 Q1 downturn were corporate treasuries (e.g., Strategy/MicroStrategy, Metaplanet), sovereign wealth funds (e.g., Mubadala, Abu Dhabi's Al Warda), ETF issuers (e.g., BlackRock, Morgan Stanley), and some university endowments. They were countering the sell-off from tactical hedge funds and Bitcoin miners.

QWhat significant change in ETF regulations occurred in late 2025 that accelerated new product launches in Q1 2026?

AIn September 2025, the SEC's new rules compressed the ETF approval cycle from 240 days to 75 days. This, combined with a March 2026 joint SEC-CFTC statement declaring staking rewards as non-securities, triggered a wave of new crypto ETF launches, including many staking-focused products.

QWhich three venture capital deals dominated the funding landscape in Q1 2026, accounting for nearly half of the total capital raised?

AThe three dominant VC deals in Q1 2026 were: the payment company BVNK ($1.8 billion), the prediction market platform Kalshi ($1.0 billion led by Coatue), and the prediction market Polymarket ($600 million strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange). Together, they accounted for roughly half of the quarter's total disclosed funding.

QHow did the focus of venture capital investment shift in terms of sectors from previous cycles to Q1 2026?

AThe VC investment focus shifted dramatically away from the previous cycle's stars like gaming, NFTs, and L1 infrastructure. In Q1 2026, the top sectors were Payments/Stablecoins ($2.39B), Prediction Markets ($1.72B), and Financials/CeFi ($835M), which together absorbed 72% of the capital, indicating a move towards regulated fintech and trading models.

QWhat was the contrasting behavior between long-term conviction holders and tactical traders regarding Bitcoin in Q1 2026?

ALong-term conviction holders like Strategy (MSTR) and sovereign wealth funds (Mubadala) significantly increased their Bitcoin holdings during the price drop. In contrast, tactical hedge funds like Brevan Howard (cut IBIT holdings by 85%), Tudor, and Farallon, along with Bitcoin mining companies, were net sellers, taking profits or reducing exposure.

Nội dung Liên quan

Đối thoại với Ray Dalio: Chúng ta đang ở trong bong bóng AI, 1% danh mục đầu tư của tôi là Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, người sáng lập Bridgewater Associates, trong một cuộc phỏng vấn đã chỉ ra rằng thế giới hiện tại đang trong một "AI bubble" (bong bóng AI) cổ điển, với giá tài sản tăng vọt và đầu cơ quá mức. Ông cảnh báo bong bóng có thể vỡ do lãi suất tăng, nguồn cung cổ phiếu dư thừa hoặc khi nhà đầu tư cần tiền mặt trả nợ, dẫn đến suy thoái kinh tế. Đồng thời, Dalio mô tả một "chu kỳ lớn" kéo dài khoảng 80 năm, bao gồm ba động lực chồng chéo: khoảng cách giàu nghèo và xung đột nội bộ, thâm hụt ngân sách chính phủ khổng lồ và thay đổi địa chính trị. Ông nhấn mạnh rằng Mỹ và Anh đang đối mặt với những thách thức trong giai đoạn suy yếu này. Để bảo vệ của cải, Dalio khuyến nghị đa dạng hóa danh mục đầu tư với cổ phiếu, vàng, trái phiếu, bất động sản thay vì chỉ giữ tiền mặt. Ông tiết lộ khoảng 1% danh mục của mình là Bitcoin, nhưng vẫn ưa chuộng vàng vật chất hơn do tính ổn định và vai trò tiền tệ dự trữ. Về tác động của AI, Dalio cho rằng nó không chỉ thay thế lao động chân tay mà còn cả tư duy, làm trầm trọng thêm bất bình đẳng thu nhập. Con người cần phát huy trí tuệ cảm xúc và trực giác - những thứ AI chưa có - và học cách hợp tác với AI. Cuối cùng, ông phân tích những rủi ro của thuế tài sản và xu hướng thế giới có thể trở nên "khu vực hóa" hơn, với các khối như châu Mỹ và châu Á - Thái Bình Dương, trong bối cảnh sự thống trị toàn cầu của Mỹ đang suy yếu.

marsbit22 phút trước

Đối thoại với Ray Dalio: Chúng ta đang ở trong bong bóng AI, 1% danh mục đầu tư của tôi là Bitcoin

marsbit22 phút trước

Hơn 7.2 nghìn tỷ won trong một ngày, ngoại hải nước ngoài mua ròng kỷ lục vào thứ Sáu! Phố Wall: Cơn gió ngược về mặt vốn của thị trường chứng khoán Hàn Quốc đã tan biến

Dòng vốn nước ngoài đổ mạnh vào thị trường chứng khoán Hàn Quốc (KOSPI) với mức mua ròng kỷ lục 7,2 nghìn tỷ won chỉ trong ngày 31/7, đánh dấu sự đảo chiều rõ rệt sau nhiều tháng bán ròng mạnh. Theo báo cáo từ Citigroup, áp lực bán từ dòng vốn nước ngoài đã giảm đáng kể, với mức bán ròng tháng 7 thu hẹp còn 9,8 nghìn tỷ won so với mức 48,4 và 44,5 nghìn tỷ won trong tháng 6 và tháng 5. Đồng thời, các quỹ hưu trí và quỹ đầu tư trong nước cũng chuyển sang vị thế mua ròng 1,0 nghìn tỷ won trong tháng 7. Một yếu tố hỗ trợ khác là quy định mới từ Ủy ban Dịch vụ Tài chính Hàn Quốc (FSC), có hiệu lực từ 31/7, siết chặt điều kiện đầu tư vào các ETF có đòn bẩy đối với nhà đầu tư cá nhân. Quy định này đã ngay lập tức làm giảm khoảng 50% khối lượng giao dịch của các ETF này, góp phần kỳ vọng giảm bớt biến động cho thị trường. Citigroup duy trì mục tiêu chỉ số KOSPI ở mức 10.000 điểm, dựa trên các yếu tố thuận lợi như ngành chip bán dẫn ổn định, định giá thị trường thấp, nền tảng kinh tế vững mạnh và các chính sách hỗ trợ. Họ nhận định áp lực dòng vốn ngược chiều đang giảm dần, tạo điều kiện cho các yếu tố cơ bản và chính sách tích cực phát huy tác dụng.

marsbit23 phút trước

Hơn 7.2 nghìn tỷ won trong một ngày, ngoại hải nước ngoài mua ròng kỷ lục vào thứ Sáu! Phố Wall: Cơn gió ngược về mặt vốn của thị trường chứng khoán Hàn Quốc đã tan biến

marsbit23 phút trước

Làm thế nào để khiến bản thân trở nên không thể bị thay thế bởi trí tuệ nhân tạo

**Tóm tắt: Làm thế nào để trở nên không thể bị thay thế bởi AI** Bài viết phản đối việc than vãn về AI và thay vào đó đề xuất một giải pháp căn cơ: trở thành một "siêu cá nhân" không thể bị thuê mướn. Mối đe dọa thực sự không phải là AI, mà là tình trạng "nô lệ lương thưởng" – phụ thuộc hoàn toàn vào người khác để sinh tồn, làm công việc nhàm chán mà không có mục đích. Để thoát khỏi vòng luẩn quẩn này và phát triển mạnh trong kỷ nguyên AI, bạn cần trau dồi 5 yếu tố then chốt: 1. **Tính tự chủ:** Khả năng hành động mà không cần chờ chỉ thị. 2. **Khiếu thẩm mỹ:** Khả năng nhận biết điều gì thực sự có giá trị. 3. **Khả năng thuyết phục:** Thu hút sự chú ý và sự công nhận. 4. **Sự kiên trì:** Không sợ thất bại, xem đó là bài học. 5. **Khả năng lặp:** Điều chỉnh dựa trên phản hồi để tiến tới mục tiêu. Giải pháp là đầu tư vào sự nghiệp của chính mình. Trong khi AI giỏi tạo ra "tài sản" (nội dung, code), nó không thể thay thế được khả năng phân biệt thứ gì đáng để tạo ra, làm cho mọi người quan tâm và kiên trì theo đuổi. Trong hai kỹ năng đòn bẩy mạnh mẽ là **Code (Lập trình)** và **Media (Nội dung)**, bài viết nhấn mạnh **Nội dung** quan trọng hơn. Giá trị của nội dung là chủ quan và đòi hỏi sự am hiểu, trải nghiệm mà AI khó có được, tạo không gian cho các cá nhân sáng tạo thực sự. **Cách bắt đầu (Bài tập 15 phút):** 1. **Khai thác nguyên liệu thô của bạn:** Xác định chủ đề bạn am hiểu sâu, vấn đề bạn tự giải quyết được, hay sở thích đặc biệt từ nhỏ. 2. **Xác định "trục phản biện" của bạn:** Tìm ra quan điểm độc đáo của bạn – những điều bạn tin là đúng nhưng số đông lại sai trong lĩnh vực của mình. 3. **Xuất bản ý tưởng đầu tiên:** Kết hợp câu trả lời từ bước 1 và 2, tạo ra một nội dung (bài đăng, video) và đăng nó lên. Hành động này mang lại phản hồi thực tế, bắt đầu quá trình học hỏi, lặp lại và phát triển kỹ năng thuyết phục. Bằng cách xây dựng một sự nghiệp xoay quanh con người thật, trải nghiệm thật và góc nhìn độc đáo của mình thông qua nội dung, bạn có thể tạo ra giá trị mà AI không thể sao chép, từ đó trở nên không thể thay thế.

marsbit2 giờ trước

Làm thế nào để khiến bản thân trở nên không thể bị thay thế bởi trí tuệ nhân tạo

marsbit2 giờ trước

Nhờ việc tung xúc xắc, chìa khóa Bitcoin được lưu trữ offline, nhưng không phải ai cũng muốn làm điều này

Cảm biến từ cuộc tranh cãi gần đây xung quanh lỗ hổng trong ví phần cứng Coldcard, bài viết thảo luận về phương pháp tạo seed (cụm từ khôi phục) cho ví Bitcoin bằng cách xúc xắc vật lý. Mỗi lần xúc xắc công bằng cung cấp khoảng 2,6 bit entropy (thước đo tính ngẫu nhiên). Để đạt mức entropy an toàn cho một seed 12 từ (128 bit), cần khoảng 50 lần xúc xắc; Coldcard khuyến nghị 99 lần để đạt mức bảo mật cao hơn. Lợi thế chính của phương pháp này là tách biệt hoàn toàn với bất kỳ lỗi phần cứng hoặc phần mềm nào trong trình tạo số ngẫu nhiên của thiết bị, từ đó bảo vệ seed chính của ví. Tuy nhiên, bài viết cảnh báo rằng trong sự cố Coldcard, các chức năng phụ khác của thiết bị (như tạo ví giấy, khóa đa chữ ký, mật mã phiên USB) vẫn có thể bị ảnh hưởng nếu chúng dựa vào trình tạo số lỗi, ngay cả khi seed chính được tạo an toàn bằng xúc xắc. Nhược điểm lớn của việc dùng xúc xắc là quá trình thủ công, dễ xảy ra sai sót, tốn thời gian và không thực tế cho đa số người dùng mới. Người dùng có thể ghi chép sai, sử dụng xúc xắc gian lận, hoặc để lộ chuỗi kết quả. Do đó, mặc dù có nền tảng toán học vững chắc, phương pháp này đòi hỏi sự tỉ mỉ cao và không phải là giải pháp khả thi cho việc áp dụng Bitcoin rộng rãi. Bài viết kết luận rằng mục tiêu dài hạn vẫn là phát triển phần cứng/phần mềm tạo số ngẫu nhiên mạnh mẽ và đáng tin cậy, trong khi vẫn giữ phương pháp thủ công như một tùy chọn cho người dùng có kinh nghiệm. Cuối cùng, bài viết đưa ra khuyến nghị cho chủ sở hữu Coldcard: cập nhật firmware, kiểm tra các chức năng phụ đã sử dụng và xem xét các biện pháp bảo mật bổ sung như ví đa chữ ký kết hợp nhiều nhà sản xuất để giảm thiểu rủi ro từ một điểm yếu đơn lẻ.

cryptonews.ru5 giờ trước

Nhờ việc tung xúc xắc, chìa khóa Bitcoin được lưu trữ offline, nhưng không phải ai cũng muốn làm điều này

cryptonews.ru5 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
活动图片