# Bài viết Liên quan Hedge Funds

Trung tâm Tin tức HTX cung cấp những bài viết mới nhất và phân tích chuyên sâu về "Hedge Funds", bao gồm xu hướng thị trường, cập nhật dự án, phát triển công nghệ và chính sách quản lý trong ngành tiền kỹ thuật số.

Podcast Notes: Hyperliquid Has Become the Top Interest Point for Traditional Hedge Funds

Empire Podcast hosts Jason Yanowitz and Santiago Santos discuss the surging institutional interest in Hyperliquid, a decentralized perpetual exchange, marking the highest level of engagement from traditional hedge fund managers since Paul Tudor Jones endorsed Bitcoin in 2020. The primary driver is the demand for weekend trading of commodities like oil, especially during geopolitical tensions such as the Iran conflict, as Hyperliquid provides the only active price discovery venue when traditional markets are closed. Trade XYZ, a front-end on Hyperliquid, has seen significant growth, with weekend oil price predictions having a median error of only 50 basis points. Santos predicts commodity trading volume on Hyperliquid will surpass Bitcoin within the year and that its market cap could rise from $25 billion to $100 billion. Other key points include Kraken raising $200 million at a reduced valuation of $13.3 billion, and the SEC clarifying that self-custodied DeFi frontends like MetaMask are not subject to broker-dealer rules, resolving a major regulatory uncertainty. The hosts also note the strong correlation between crypto and macro markets, with the S&P 500 posting one of its best 10-day rallies since 1950. They highlight MicroStrategy's continued Bitcoin acquisitions and the potential of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization as a key trend. The discussion concludes with skepticism towards many L2 projects, predicting a wave of protocols truly going to zero as capital concentrates in proven assets like Bitcoin and Hyperliquid.

marsbitHôm qua 07:23

Podcast Notes: Hyperliquid Has Become the Top Interest Point for Traditional Hedge Funds

marsbitHôm qua 07:23

US Stocks Hit Record Highs: Why Isn't the Market Afraid of the Flames of War?

U.S. stocks hit a record high on April 15, with the S&P 500 closing at 7,022.95, just 77 days after its previous peak. This rebound occurred in only 11 trading days—far faster than recoveries following past crises like the COVID-19 pandemic (103 days) or the 2011 debt crisis (106 days). The market's rapid recovery is attributed to "ceasefire expectations" rather than deteriorating economic fundamentals. During the sell-off triggered by the U.S.-Israel military action against Iran in late February, the S&P 500 fell nearly 10%. However, the market rallied twice on ceasefire rumors—first on March 24 and again on April 8—even before any permanent peace deal was signed. Notably, the VIX fear index fell below pre-war levels, indicating that the market had repriced the conflict from an uncertainty to a calculable risk. Major financial institutions like JPMorgan reported record trading revenues of $11.6 billion in Q1 2026, largely driven by volatility in commodities and emerging markets. Hedge funds turned net long for the first time since late 2025, while margin debt hit a record $1.28 trillion. This reflects a financial system that commercializes volatility, treating geopolitical shocks as tradable opportunities rather than systemic threats. However, the current optimism relies on assumptions of a sustained ceasefire and stable oil prices, leaving the market vulnerable if these conditions change.

marsbit04/16 07:13

US Stocks Hit Record Highs: Why Isn't the Market Afraid of the Flames of War?

marsbit04/16 07:13

The Real Reason for the "February 5th Crash": A Case of Collateral Damage from Wall Street Deleveraging

On February 5th, the crypto market experienced a sharp crash, with Bitcoin briefly plummeting to $60,000 and over $2.6 billion in liquidations. The article argues that the sell-off was not driven by crypto-native factors but by a broader Wall Street deleveraging event, likely originating from multi-strategy hedge funds facing extreme losses in software stocks and other risk assets. Key evidence includes record-high trading volumes in Bitcoin ETFs like IBIT, dominated by put options, and unusually high correlation between Bitcoin and software stocks. Forced deleveraging triggered the unwinding of delta-neutral strategies (such as basis trades), causing a violent, cascade-like sell-off. This was exacerbated by negative gamma dynamics in the options market, where dealers were forced to aggressively sell underlying assets as volatility spiked. Despite the steep decline, Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows—not outflows—suggesting the selling pressure came from paper/financial system positioning (e.g., hedge fund liquidations and dealer hedging), not long-term investor redemptions. The rebound on February 6th further indicated that traditional market-neutral capital re-entered to capture renewed basis trade opportunities. The author concludes that the crash was a result of accidental contagion from traditional finance deleveraging, not a crypto-specific crisis, and expects a strong rebound given Bitcoin’s deeper integration into global capital markets.

marsbit02/09 03:00

The Real Reason for the "February 5th Crash": A Case of Collateral Damage from Wall Street Deleveraging

marsbit02/09 03:00

活动图片