Bidding Farewell to the 'Gray Gambling Game'! Polymarket Charges into the Compliance Track—How Will This Impact the Entire Crypto Industry?

marsbitXuất bản vào 2026-05-23Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-05-23

Tóm tắt

From Gray to Regulated: How Polymarket’s Compliance Journey Reshapes Crypto The evolution of Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, illustrates a critical trend in crypto: innovative, high-value sectors ultimately integrate into regulatory frameworks. Founded in 2020, Polymarket quickly gained traction by leveraging low-cost Layer 2 blockchain technology for event-based trading, notably during the 2024 US presidential election where its markets outperformed traditional polls. However, its "build first, comply later" approach led to a 2022 CFTC enforcement action, resulting in a $1.4 million fine and a ban from the US market. A pivotal shift occurred in 2025 under a new US administration. Polymarket strategically acquired CFTC-licensed derivatives exchange QCX for $112 million, securing a regulated pathway back into the US. This move coincided with a regulatory reversal, as the CFTC withdrew a prior proposal to ban political event contracts. The platform’s successful "regulatory acquisition" strategy, avoiding a lengthy independent licensing process, highlights a viable compliance path for crypto-native projects. Its journey from regulatory target to a CFTC-recognized entity—bolstered by a major data partnership and investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)—signals the maturation of prediction markets from a "crypto novelty" into acknowledged financial infrastructure. The story underscores that genuine utility provides negotiating power with regulator...

Author: EX.IO Research Institute, Digital Asset FinTech Group

This is not the victory of a single platform, but another validation of an industry-wide pattern: all new tracks with real value—be they native innovations in crypto finance or other industries—will ultimately be incorporated into a regulatory framework. The only difference lies in whether they embrace it actively or are co-opted passively.

I. Prologue: When 'Liangshan Heroes' Meet Imperial Pardon

In Water Margin, Song Jiang leads the 108 heroes to gather at Liangshan Marsh, robbing the rich to aid the poor and acting as champions of justice, yet they always face an ultimate choice—continue being 'champions of justice' on the mountain, or accept an imperial pardon in exchange for a certificate of amnesty?

This thousand-year-old tale is now being precisely replicated in the crypto world.

In the second half of 2025, the decentralized prediction market platform Polymarket acquired the CFTC-licensed derivatives exchange QCX for $112 million[1][2], subsequently receiving a 'no-action' letter from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)[3]. This officially transformed it from a 'crypto-native platform in a gray zone' into a 'federally regulated financial institution.' This turnaround came just three and a half years after it was fined $1.4 million and expelled from the U.S. market by the CFTC in 2022[4].

Polymarket's 'road to pardon' precisely mirrors the complete metamorphosis of the entire crypto prediction market track from a 'rough, unregulated realm' to the 'hall of power.'

II. The 'Previous Life' of Prediction Markets: From Academic Experiment to Commercial Exploration

To understand Polymarket's story, one must return to the academic origins of prediction markets.

In 1988, three economists from the University of Iowa were complaining in an Iowa City bar—Jesse Jackson's unexpected win in the Michigan Democratic primary had caught all polling agencies off guard. They conceived a bold idea: if an 'election market' existed where participants could use real money to express their expectations of political outcomes, could prices reflect reality more accurately than polls?[5]

This idea gave birth to the Iowa Electronic Markets (IEM)[6], the pioneering work of modern prediction markets. IEM used real money (with a cap of $500 per trader) to trade contracts based on real events. Remarkably, between 1988 and 2004, IEM's prediction accuracy exceeded that of traditional polls over 74% of the time[6][7]. A comparative study of 964 polls and contemporaneous market prices showed that the absolute average error of polls was 3.37 percentage points, while market predictions were only 1.82 percentage points[5].

The success of IEM sparked a wave of commercialization. Around 2001, Ireland's InTrade and TradeSports were established, bringing prediction markets to the masses[8]. InTrade gained fame during the 2008 and 2012 U.S. presidential elections, with The New York Times citing its data 68 times in one year[9]. By the 2012 election, the platform had over 82,000 users, with wagers on that single election exceeding $200 million[10]. However, on November 26, 2012, the CFTC sued InTrade for 'offering option contracts to U.S. users without approval'[11], forcing the platform to shut down in March 2013[8][12]. In 2018, a federal court ordered InTrade to pay a $3 million civil penalty[8].

The downfall of InTrade left a profound lesson: in the U.S., prediction markets cannot end well unless they reconcile with the regulatory framework. Subsequently, in 2014, PredictIt obtained a CFTC 'no-action letter' exemption under the academic shelter of Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, but with a strict investment limit of only $850 per person per contract[13][14]. In August 2022, the CFTC revoked this exemption, and PredictIt chose to sue the regulator[9].

In the crypto world, Augur launched in 2018 as the first decentralized prediction market protocol based on Ethereum[15], proposing a vision of 'permissionless, on-chain trading.' However, constrained by Ethereum L1's high gas fees (single transaction costs could reach $5-50[15]) and extremely poor user experience (users needed to run their own Ethereum node), Augur's daily active users quickly plummeted from about 265 to fewer than 30 after launch[15].

The 'first half' of prediction markets thus paints a clear picture: academically effective, commercially frustrated, and regulatorily pressured. This track needed a disruptor that could solve both user experience issues and find a compliant path.

III. Polymarket's 'Rough Era': From Bathroom Startup to FBI Knock

In June 2020, 21-year-old NYU dropout Shayne Coplan set up a website in his apartment's 'makeshift bathroom office'[16][17]. At the time, the COVID-19 pandemic was sweeping the globe, and the world was full of uncertainty—when would a vaccine be available? When would lockdowns end? Who would win the presidential election? Coplan keenly realized that people needed a venue to distill 'uncertainty with diverse opinions' into 'tradable price signals.'

Polymarket was born. Unlike Augur, Coplan chose Polygon (an Ethereum L2) as the underlying infrastructure, reducing transaction costs to near zero[18]. Simultaneously, Polymarket adopted the USDC stablecoin for settlement and supported credit card deposits via MoonPay, greatly simplifying the user experience. These product design decisions allowed Polymarket to achieve a dimensional reduction in user experience compared to its predecessors.

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Polymarket's trading volume surged rapidly, reaching a single-day volume of $1.297 million on November 3[18]. The platform's accurate prediction of Biden's victory attracted attention from crypto thought leaders like Vitalik Buterin[19]. By 2021, Polymarket completed a $4 million seed round led by Polychain Capital, followed by a $25 million Series A round led by General Catalyst[20].

However, the strategy of 'build first, seek compliance later' faced severe backlash in 2022.

On January 3, 2022, the CFTC initiated an enforcement action against Polymarket, alleging it offered event-based binary option contracts to U.S. customers without being registered[4]. The CFTC determined that each 'Yes/No' event market on Polymarket essentially constituted a swap. Under the Commodity Exchange Act, such products could only be traded on registered exchanges or swap execution facilities[4]. CFTC Acting Director of Enforcement Vincent McGonagle emphasized in a statement: 'All derivatives markets must operate within the framework of the law, regardless of the technology used, including so-called decentralized finance.'[4]

Ultimately, Polymarket settled with the CFTC: paying a $1.4 million civil penalty, promising to shut down all non-compliant markets by January 14, 2022, and blocking all U.S. user access to the platform[4][21].

For Polymarket, the fine itself was not a fatal blow; the real cost was losing the world's largest financial market—the United States. Thereafter, Polymarket geo-blocked U.S. users, but according to Similarweb data, 25% of website traffic in 2024 still came from the U.S.[22], and users bypassing restrictions via VPNs and other methods was an open secret.

IV. The 2024 Election: The Peak and Darkest Hour of 'Holding the Mountain Fort'

Polymarket's true 'breakout' moment occurred during the 2024 U.S. presidential election.

In January 2024, Polymarket launched its '2024 U.S. Presidential Election Winner' market, quickly igniting a trading frenzy[20]. As the race intensified—Trump's assassination attempt, Biden's unexpected withdrawal—the platform's attention and trading volume grew exponentially. In November 2024, monthly trading volume reached a record high of $2.63 billion[23]; cumulative annual trading volume surpassed $9 billion, with active traders peaking at 314,500 in December[24]. Throughout the election cycle, total bets on the presidential election on Polymarket neared $3.7 billion[25].

More symbolically, Polymarket's prediction accuracy surpassed that of traditional polls. While most pollsters showed a tight race, Polymarket's platform price consistently showed Trump leading[16]. A French 'whale' trader reportedly bet tens of millions of dollars on the platform for a Trump victory, ultimately netting an alleged $85 million[16].

However, the peak moment was fleeting.

On November 13, 2024, in the early hours, FBI agents knocked on Coplan's door at his Manhattan, New York apartment, seizing his phone and electronic devices[26]. The U.S. Department of Justice and the CFTC jointly launched an investigation, with the core question being: Did Polymarket violate the 2022 settlement agreement by secretly accepting bets from U.S. users?[26]

Coplan himself was not arrested or charged. He responded on X in his signature Gen Z tone: 'New phone, who dis?'[17]—hinting his old phone had been confiscated. Polymarket issued a statement, calling the raid an 'obvious political retaliation by the outgoing administration'[27].

From 'holding the mountain fort' to 'imperial siege,' Polymarket's situation was remarkably similar to that of the Liangshan heroes—the greater the momentum, the more dangerous the attention it attracts.

V. The Road to Pardon: $112 Million for a 'Certificate of Amnesty'

The turning point came in July 2025.

With the Trump administration taking office, the U.S. cryptocurrency regulatory environment underwent a fundamental shift. On July 15, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice and the CFTC simultaneously announced the termination of their investigation into Polymarket, bringing no charges or additional penalties[3].

Three days later, Polymarket dropped a 'bombshell': acquiring QCX LLC and its affiliated clearing agency QC Clearing LLC for $112 million[1][2]. QCX was a previously little-known entity whose founder, Sergei Dobrovolskii, had begun applying for a DCM (Designated Contract Market) license four years earlier and received formal CFTC approval on July 9, 2025[3]. Through this acquisition, Polymarket instantly obtained a complete CFTC exchange license and clearing license, bypassing the typically years-long independent application process.

Coplan announced in the acquisition announcement: 'Now, through the acquisition of QCX, we are laying the groundwork for Polymarket to return to the U.S. market—as a fully regulated and compliant platform that allows Americans to trade their views.'[1]

In September 2025, the CFTC issued a 'No-Action Letter' to Polymarket's newly acquired exchange division, giving it the green light to legally offer prediction market services in the U.S.[3]. In November 2025, the CFTC further issued a revised Designation Order, allowing Polymarket to operate a federally regulated matching trading platform in the U.S.[3].

Polymarket's 'pardon' strategy was masterful—rather than spending years applying for a license from scratch, it simply bought a ready-made 'certificate of amnesty.' In the crypto industry, this path of 'license acquisition via shell' is becoming the choice for more and more projects[28].

VI. Change at the Top: A Historic Reversal in Regulatory Attitude

Polymarket's successful 'pardon' was inseparable from the 'court's' own change in attitude.

In May 2024, during the Biden administration, the CFTC voted 3-2 to pass a proposal seeking to ban event contracts related to elections, sporting events, or awards competitions[29]. Then-CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam warned that allowing such contracts would put the CFTC in the role of an 'election police'[30].

However, in February 2026, new CFTC Chair Michael S. Selig announced the formal withdrawal of that proposal[31]. Selig stated bluntly in the announcement: 'The 2024 event contract proposal reflected the previous administration's hasty regulatory decision to impose a blanket ban on political contracts ahead of a presidential election.'[31]

Almost simultaneously, SEC Chair Paul Atkins, in testimony before the Senate Banking Committee on February 12, 2026, stated that prediction markets might fall under the 'overlapping jurisdiction' of the SEC and CFTC, and claimed, 'I think we have sufficient authority' to regulate certain products of prediction markets[32][33]. Atkins noted: 'Prediction markets are exactly the kind of area where there may be overlapping jurisdiction; this is an important issue we are highly focused on.'[34]

Even more symbolically, in February 2026, the CFTC announced the formation of an Industry Advisory Committee (IAC), with both Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour appointed as members[35]. This appointment was interpreted by outsiders as a symbolic move by the CFTC to 'pardon' the prediction market industry in an institutionalized manner.

The 180-degree turn in regulatory attitude provided the indispensable political soil for Polymarket's compliance transformation.

VII. From 'Championing Justice' to 'Seeking Official Rank': Revelations

Polymarket's 'pardon' story provides a profound compliance revelation for the entire crypto industry.

First, real value is the bargaining chip. The core reason Polymarket could go from being fined and expelled to being incorporated was that it proved the information aggregation value of prediction markets. In 2025, the entire prediction market industry's trading volume reached $63.5 billion, more than quadrupling from 2023[34][33]. NYSE parent ICE announced plans in October 2025 to invest up to $2 billion in Polymarket (at a valuation of approximately $9 billion)[25], becoming its exclusive institutional data distributor[36]. In March 2026, ICE completed the final $600 million tranche of this investment commitment[37]. What ICE values is the application potential of Polymarket's event-driven data in the institutional investment space.

Second, there is more than one path to compliance. Kalshi chose the 'frontal assault'—founders Luana Lopes Lara and Tarek Mansour, after graduating from MIT, spent nearly three years in repeated communication with the CFTC, becoming the first event contract exchange to receive a CFTC DCM license in November 2020[38]. Polymarket took the shortcut of 'reverse merger'—acquiring an existing licensed entity for $112 million[1]. Both paths lead to the same destination, confirming the feasibility of integrating crypto-native innovation with traditional financial regulatory frameworks.

Third, 'pardon' does not equal 'disarmament.' After obtaining the CFTC license, Polymarket still retained its crypto-native DNA—on-chain settlement, USDC denomination, global liquidity. It is no longer an 'outlaw on Liangshan Marsh,' but nor has it become a 'compliant subject in the court.' This posture of 'dancing in shackles' might be the most realistic survival strategy for the crypto industry in the age of regulation.

Epilogue

At the end of Water Margin, Song Jiang leads the Liangshan heroes to accept the pardon, fighting campaigns north and south, only to meet a tragic end of 'the hounds are killed once the hares are gone.' But Polymarket's story may not repeat this tragedy—because the prediction market it represents has already transformed from an 'interesting crypto toy' into financial infrastructure recognized by mainstream institutions like the NYSE, CNN, and Bridgewater[25][36].

When the CFTC's No-Action Letter and ICE's $2 billion check are both on the table, when the SEC Chair and CFTC Chair discuss jurisdictional归属 of prediction markets on Capitol Hill, this industry is no longer a 'gray gambling game.'

This is the first chapter of the crypto market writing its compliance revelation—and Polymarket is precisely the 'Song Jiang' who was pardoned first.

References

[1] PR Newswire. (2025-07-21). 'Polymarket Acquires CFTC-Licensed Exchange and Clearinghouse QCEX for $112 Million.' https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/polymarket-acquires-cftc-licensed-exchange-and-clearinghouse-qcex-for-112-million-302509626.html

[2] Quadcode Group. (2025-07-24). 'Quadcode Group Completes $112 Million Sale of QCEX to Polymarket.' https://quadcode.com/blog/quadcode-group-completes-112-million-sale-of-qcex-to-polymarket

[3] Crypto Times. (2026-04-29). 'Polymarket USD, CTF V2: How Prediction Markets Turn Institutional.' https://www.cryptotimes.io/learn/polymarket-usd-ctf-v2-how-prediction-markets-turn-institutional/

[4] CFTC. (2022-01-03). 'CFTC Orders Event-Based Binary Options Markets Operator to Pay $1.4 Million Penalty.' https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8478-22

[5] Mick Bransfield. (2024-01-18). 'The last 25 years of the Iowa Electronic Markets.' https://mickbransfield.com/2024/01/18/the-last-25-years-of-the-iowa-electronic-markets/

[6] Scientific American. (2008). 'When Markets Beat the Polls.' https://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/PAM/PRESS/ScientificAmerican-3-08.pdf

[7] Academia.edu. (2017-06-20). 'Prediction market accuracy in the long run.' https://www.academia.edu/33576301/Prediction_market_accuracy_in_the_long_run

[8] Marvn.ai. (2026-04-15). 'The History of Prediction Markets: From University Labs to a Billion-Euro Industry.' https://marvn.ai/discover/guides/the-history-of-prediction-markets

[9] ChainCatcher. (2024-08-15). 'Supporting Polymarket, Challenging CFTC: Crypto Giants Target the Hundred-Billion-Dollar Online Betting Market.' https://www.chaincatcher.com/article/2138558

[10] Jsquare Research. (2025-11-21). 'Forecasting Markets and Emerging Languages.' https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2222674

[11] CBS News. (2012-11-26). 'Intrade boots U.S. residents hours after feds file charges.' https://www.cbsnews.com/news/intrade-boots-us-residents-hours-after-feds-file-charges/

[12] Politico. (2012-11-26). 'Intrade to close U.S. accounts.' https://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/intrade-to-close-us-accounts-084248

[13] InGame. (2026-01-09). 'US Prediction Markets: Modern Timeline.' https://www.ingame.com/us-prediction-market-timeline/

[14] Political Prediction Markets. (2018-11-02). 'Is PredictIt Legal?' https://politicalpredictionmarkets.com/is-predictit-legal/

[15] Sacra. (2026-05-19). 'Polymarket funding, news & analysis.' https://sacra.com/c/polymarket/

[16] Odaily. (2025-10-21). 'From rags to riches: The life of the Polymarket founder.' https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5206978

[17] ChainCatcher. (2025-10-22). 'The Billionaire Who Came Out of the Bathroom: The Story of the Polymarket Founder.' https://www.chaincatcher.com/article/2214285

[18] ChainCatcher. (2024-05-18). 'The growth story of the crypto prediction market Polymarket.' https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2124865

[19] Forbes. (2024-08-01). 'Forbes Investigates Polymarket: 26-Year-Old Founder and a $1 Billion Prediction Market.' https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2136444

[20] Odaily. (2024-11-11). 'After the US election, how long will the Polymarket and prediction market craze last?' https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5199699

[21] CFTC. (2022-01-03). 'In the Matter of Blockratize, Inc. d/b/a Polymarket.' Order document. https://www.cftc.gov/media/6891/enfblockratizeorder010322/download

[22] Odaily. (2024-08-01). 'Polymarket founder: How a 26-year-old dropout disrupted the 500-year-old forecasting industry.' https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5197300

[23] The Block. (2025-01-03). 'Polymarket’s huge year: $9 billion in volume and 314,000 active traders redefine prediction markets.' https://www.theblock.co/post/333050/polymarkets-huge-year-9-billion-in-volume-and-314000-active-traders-redefine-prediction-markets

[24] ChainCatcher. (2025-01-04). 'Data: Polymarket’s cumulative trading volume in 2024 exceeds 9 billion dollars.' https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2160639

[25] Fortune. (2025-10-07). 'New York Stock Exchange parent company invests $2 billion in Polymarket at $9 billion valuation.' https://fortune.com/crypto/2025/10/07/polymarket-2-billion-intercontinental-exchange-new-york-stock-exchange-9-billion/

[26] Polymarkets.co.il. (2026-05-10). 'From Fort Bragg to Tel Aviv: The Polymarket Insider-Trading Arrests That Are Now Reshaping Prediction Markets.' https://polymarkets.co.il/en/news/polymarket-insider-trading-arrests-worldwide/

[27] Fortune. (2025-07-22). 'Polymarket says it is returning to the U.S. ‘in the near future’.' https://fortune.com/2025/07/22/polymarket-returning-to-us-qcx-qc-clearing/

[28] Investopedia. (2025-07-23). 'Polymarket’s Derivatives Exchange Acquisition Sets Stage for a Return to US.' https://www.investopedia.com/polymarket-s-derivatives-exchange-acquisition-sets-stage-for-a-return-to-us-11777497

[29] CFTC. (2024-05). 'CFTC Proposes Rule to Ban Event Contracts on Elections, Sports, and Awards.'

[30] CFTC. (2024). Statement by Chair Rostin Behnam on event contracts proposal.

[31] The Block. (2026-02-04). 'CFTC formally rescinds 2024 event contracts proposal.' https://www.theblock.co/post/389714

[32] Yahoo Finance. (2026-02-12). 'SEC Chair Suggests Some Prediction Markets Could Fall Under Agency’s Jurisdiction.' https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-chair-suggests-prediction-markets-212954244.html

[33] The Block. (2026-02-12). 'SEC Chair Atkins calls prediction markets a ‘huge issue’ amid growing legal spotlight.' https://www.theblock.co/post/389714/sec-chair-atkins-calls-prediction-markets-a-huge-issue-amid-growing-legal-spotlight

[34] PYMNTS.com. (2026-02-15). 'SEC Chair Says Agency May Get Involved in Regulating Prediction Markets.' https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/sec-chair-says-agency-may-get-involved-in-regulating-prediction-markets/

[35] CFTC. (2026-02). Industry Advisory Committee appointments announcement.

[36] FinTech Weekly. (2026-04-02). 'ICE/Polymarket: Intercontinental Exchange Has Put $2 Billion Into Polymarket. The Investment Is About Data, Not Prediction Markets.' https://www.fintechweekly.com/news/intercontinental-exchange-polymarket-financial-data-infrastructure-2026

[37] Yahoo Finance. (2026-03-27). 'Line Between Partner and Owner Blurs As ICE Pours Another $600 Million Into Polymarket.' https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/line-between-partner-owner-blurs-123320784.html

[38] Dune Docs. (2026-01-27). 'Kalshi - Company History.' https://docs.dune.com/data-catalog/kalshi/overview

[39] Thairath. (2026-01-11). 'Meet Luana Lopes Lara, the World’s Youngest Female Billionaire and Co-Founder of Kalshi.' https://en.thairath.co.th/money/business_marketing/corporates_leadership/2906839

[40] Odaily. (2025-11-21). 'Prediction Market Overview.' https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5207704

[41] BlockEden. (2026-03-18). 'Arizona Just Criminally Charged Kalshi: The Case That Could Decide Whether Prediction Markets Live or Die in America.' https://blockeden.xyz/blog/2026/03/18/arizona-ag-criminal-charges-kalshi-prediction-market-election-wagering-precedent/

[42] CSG South. (2026-04-15). 'Prediction Markets.' https://csgsouth.org/policies/prediction-markets/

[43] CSGSouth.org. (2026). Historical timeline of prediction market regulation.

[44] NPR. (2012-11-26). 'All Bets Are Off: Intrade Shuts Door To U.S. Customers.' https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/11/26/165954281/all-bets-are-off-intrade-shuts-door-to-u-s-customers

[45] Odaily. (2026-02-15). 'Polymarket vs. Kalshi: The Complete Timeline of the Prediction Market ‘Meme War’.' https://www.odaily.news/en/post/5209388

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWhat is the significance of Polymarket's acquisition of CFTC-licensed exchange QCX?

APolymarket's acquisition of the CFTC-licensed exchange QCX for $112 million was a pivotal strategic move. It provided Polymarket with a pre-existing DCM (Designated Contract Market) license and clearing license, allowing it to bypass the lengthy and uncertain independent application process. This 'shell company' acquisition effectively gave Polymarket a compliant pathway to re-enter the US market as a federally regulated financial institution, transforming its status from a 'grey-market' crypto-native platform.

QHow did the 2024 US presidential election impact Polymarket's growth and its subsequent regulatory challenges?

AThe 2024 US presidential election catapulted Polymarket into the mainstream. Trading volumes surged, with monthly volume reaching a record $2.63 billion in November 2024 and total election-related bets nearing $3.7 billion. Its market prices accurately predicted a Trump victory while traditional polls showed a tight race, demonstrating the platform's predictive value. However, this high-profile success also attracted intense regulatory scrutiny. In November 2024, the FBI raided the founder's apartment, investigating whether Polymarket had violated its 2022 settlement by accepting US users, marking a period of significant regulatory pressure.

QWhat were the key differences between Polymarket's and Kalshi's approaches to achieving regulatory compliance in the US?

APolymarket and Kalshi pursued two distinct compliance paths. Kalshi chose a 'frontal assault' strategy, where its founders spent nearly three years directly engaging with the CFTC, eventually becoming the first event contract exchange to receive a DCM license in November 2020. In contrast, Polymarket opted for a 'backdoor' or 'shell company' approach. After facing penalties and a US ban, it strategically acquired the already-licensed entity QCX in 2025 for $112 million, thereby obtaining the necessary licenses instantly. Both methods achieved the goal of regulatory integration but through different means and timelines.

QHow did the US regulatory landscape for prediction markets change between 2024 and 2026, facilitating Polymarket's compliance journey?

AThe US regulatory landscape underwent a dramatic reversal between 2024 and 2026, crucial for Polymarket's 'amnesty.' In May 2024, under the Biden administration, the CFTC proposed a rule to ban event contracts related to elections and sports. By February 2026, under the Trump administration, the new CFTC Chairman formally withdrew that proposal, criticizing it as a rushed decision. Furthermore, the new SEC Chairman indicated the SEC might also claim jurisdiction over some prediction markets, signaling high-level regulatory attention. Most symbolically, the CFTC appointed the CEOs of both Polymarket and Kalshi to its Industry Advisory Committee in 2026, institutionalizing the sector's integration into the regulatory framework.

QWhat broader lesson for the crypto industry does the Polymarket case illustrate regarding innovation and regulation?

APolymarket's story illustrates a core lesson for the crypto industry: genuine, value-creating innovations are ultimately incorporated into regulatory frameworks. The choice is between proactive engagement or forced assimilation. Polymarket proved the real-world utility of prediction markets through massive adoption and accurate information aggregation. This demonstrated value became its bargaining chip. The case shows that compliance is not necessarily 'disarmament'; platforms can retain their crypto-native features (like on-chain settlement) while operating within a regulated structure. It validates 'acquiring a license shell' as a viable, faster compliance strategy and underscores that regulatory acceptance often follows a change in political climate and proven market traction.

Nội dung Liên quan

Thượng Viện Anh Kêu Gọi BoE Nới Lỏng Quy Định Stablecoin Vì Lo Ngại Về Năng Lực Cạnh Tranh

Thượng viện Vương quốc Anh (House of Lords) đã kêu gọi Ngân hàng Trung ương Anh (BoE) và các cơ quan quản lý xem xét lại một số đề xuất quy định gây tranh cãi đối với stablecoin, cảnh báo rằng các quy tắc cứng nhắc có thể khiến Anh tụt hậu trong cuộc cạnh tranh toàn cầu. Ủy ban Quy định Dịch vụ Tài chính của Thượng viện, trong một báo cáo công bố hôm thứ Tư, ủng hộ nhiều đề xuất cốt lõi của BoE như yêu cầu stablecoin phải được đảm bảo 1:1 bằng tài sản dự trữ. Tuy nhiên, họ chỉ ra rằng một số khía cạnh cần được cân nhắc thêm. Cụ thể, ủy ban đề nghị đánh giá lại đề xuất yêu cầu các nhà phát hành stablecoin hệ thống phải giữ ít nhất 40% dự trữ dưới dạng tiền gửi ngân hàng không hưởng lãi. Họ cho rằng điều này tạo gánh nặng vận hành và có thể làm suy yếu khả năng cạnh tranh của thị trường Anh. Ngoài ra, các giới hạn sở hữu được đề xuất (10.000-20.000 bảng cho cá nhân, 10 triệu bảng cho doanh nghiệp) cũng bị cho là có thể cản trở không cần thiết sự phát triển của stablecoin dựa trên đồng bảng và khó thực thi. Báo cáo nhấn mạnh rằng khung quy định cuối cùng phải linh hoạt, minh bạch và tạo sân chơi bình đẳng để stablecoin cạnh tranh với các phương thức thanh toán khác. Nếu không, Vương quốc Anh có nguy cơ "tụt lại phía sau" so với các quốc gia khác, nơi có khung pháp lý rõ ràng hơn. Lời kêu gọi này diễn ra sau khi Phó Thống đốc BoE phụ trách ổn định tài chính, Sarah Breeden, thừa nhận các đề xuất trước đó có thể đã "quá thận trọng" và ngân hàng sẵn sàng xem xét lại các quy tắc. BoE dự kiến sẽ công bố chính sách cuối cùng và dự thảo quy tắc vào cuối tháng này.

bitcoinist1 giờ trước

Thượng Viện Anh Kêu Gọi BoE Nới Lỏng Quy Định Stablecoin Vì Lo Ngại Về Năng Lực Cạnh Tranh

bitcoinist1 giờ trước

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: Ba Gã Khổng Lồ AI Đồng Loạt Chạy Đà Lên Sàn, Nên Đặt Cược Vào Ai?

**Tóm tắt Podcast: SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic Đua Nhau IPO - Cơn Khát Vốn AI** Trong tập podcast này, hai host Josh Kale và Ejaaz Ahamadeen thảo luận về làn sóng IPO chưa từng có từ ba gã khổng lồ AI: SpaceX, OpenAI và Anthropic. Tổng số vốn huy động dự kiến lên tới 1800 tỷ USD, lớn hơn cả tổng vốn thời bong bóng dot-com. Lý do chính là nhu cầu chi tiêu vốn (capex) cho cơ sở hạ tầng AI (như chip, trung tâm dữ liệu, điện năng) đang vượt quá khả năng tài chính từ dòng tiền tự do của chính các công ty. **Điểm nổi bật:** * **SpaceX:** IPO của họ có thể thay đổi luật lệ thị trường, với các quỹ chỉ số (index fund) và quỹ hưu trí 401(k) phải mua vào cổ phiếu một cách thụ động chỉ sau vài ngày niêm yết. Tuy nhiên, mô hình kinh doanh trung tâm dữ liệu trong vũ trụ vẫn chưa được chứng minh. * **Anthropic:** Là công ty có tốc độ tăng trưởng doanh thu ấn tượng nhất, đạt 450 tỷ USD doanh thu thường niên hóa (ARR) nhờ Claude Code và các hợp đồng doanh nghiệp. Họ dự kiến sớm có lãi và có độ phủ rộng trong nhóm Fortune 10. * **OpenAI & Google:** OpenAI cần vốn để xây dựng thêm trung tâm dữ liục phục vụ việc đào tạo mô hình. Trong khi đó, Google - một công ty đã niêm yết - cũng huy động 800 tỷ USD bên ngoài để đổ vào cuộc đua AI, phản ánh sự cấp thiết và quy mô chi tiêu khổng lồ. **Quan điểm chính:** Dù có lo ngại về rủi ro bong bóng, các host nhìn chung lạc quan. Họ cho rằng đây không phải là hiện tượng đầu cơ rỗng mà là việc xây dựng nền tảng công nghệ thiết yếu cho tương lai. Nhu cầu về sức mạnh tính toán (compute) hiện vượt xa nguồn cung, bị giới hạn bởi các ràng buộc vật lý như tốc độ sản xuất chip và xây dựng cơ sở hạ tầng. Cuộc chạy đua vốn này có thể dẫn đến một sự tái công nghiệp hóa quan trọng tại Mỹ.

marsbit2 giờ trước

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: Ba Gã Khổng Lồ AI Đồng Loạt Chạy Đà Lên Sàn, Nên Đặt Cược Vào Ai?

marsbit2 giờ trước

“Cổ Phiếu Lão Làng” Biến Thành “Quý Tộc Mới”: Từ Dell Đến Nokia, AI Đang Định Giá Lại Cơ Sở Hạ Tầng Cũ Như Thế Nào?

Cách đây một năm, những công ty công nghệ lâu đời như Dell, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital thường bị gắn mác "tăng trưởng chậm" và "câu chuyện cũ" trong cơn sốt AI. Tuy nhiên, gần đây, họ lại trở thành những mã chứng khoán được quan tâm trở lại. Sự thay đổi này bắt nguồn từ việc AI đang chuyển từ giai đoạn phát triển mô hình sang giai đoạn triển khai hạ tầng thực tế. Khi các trung tâm dữ liệu AI được xây dựng hàng loạt, thị trường bắt đầu tìm kiếm những công ty có năng lực triển khai, tích hợp hệ thống và cung cấp hạ tầng vật lý. Đây chính là lợi thế của các "cựu binh" với nhiều thập kỷ kinh nghiệm về chuỗi cung ứng, kênh phân phối và dịch vụ khách hàng. Các công ty này được định giá lại chủ yếu theo ba mạch chính trong chuỗi hạ tầng AI: 1. **Máy chủ & Tích hợp hệ thống:** Dell và HPE không sản xuất GPU, nhưng họ đóng vai trò như "nhà thầu chính" lắp ráp, tích hợp hệ thống máy chủ AI hoàn chỉnh (bao gồm làm mát, nguồn điện) và giao hàng cho khách hàng. Doanh thu máy chủ AI tăng mạnh là minh chứng rõ ràng. 2. **Mạng & Kết nối:** AI quy mô lớn đòi hỏi mạng lưới truyền dữ liệu cực nhanh và ổn định. Corning (cáp quang), Nokia (mạng không dây AI-RAN, 6G) và Cisco (thiết bị chuyển mạch trung tâm dữ liệu) trở nên quan trọng khi nhu cầu kết nối tăng vọt. 3. **Lưu trữ:** Nhu cầu lưu trữ khối lượng dữ liệu khổng lồ cho đào tạo mô hình, nhật ký, dữ liệu lạnh... khiến ổ cứng dung lượng cao (HDD) của Western Digital và Seagate trở lại là mặt hàng thiết yếu. Tuy nhiên, không phải công ty cũ nào cũng được hưởng lợi. Một sự định giá lại thực sự cần dựa trên ba tiêu chí: (1) Có đơn hàng và doanh thu AI thực tế; (2) Được điều chỉnh tăng kỳ vọng tăng trưởng; (3) Chất lượng lợi nhuận được cải thiện. Tóm lại, AI không khiến tất cả các công ty cũ trở thành cổ phiếu tăng trưởng, mà chỉ định giá lại những ai đang nắm giữ các mắt xích hạ tầng then chốt và có khả năng biến nhu cầu AI thành lợi nhuận bền vững.

marsbit2 giờ trước

“Cổ Phiếu Lão Làng” Biến Thành “Quý Tộc Mới”: Từ Dell Đến Nokia, AI Đang Định Giá Lại Cơ Sở Hạ Tầng Cũ Như Thế Nào?

marsbit2 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
Hợp đồng Tương lai
活动图片