All Wealth Myths Are a Conspiracy of Non-Consensus and Time Compounding

marsbitXuất bản vào 2026-01-26Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-01-26

Tóm tắt

The article explores how extraordinary wealth creation in venture capital stems from non-consensus bets combined with long-term compounding. It highlights Balderton Capital’s landmark investment in Revolut, which generated nearly 1,400x returns. In 2015, Balderton invested £1 million in Revolut’s seed round, despite its early technical flaws and rejection by Y Combinator. Partner Tim Bunting saw potential in co-founders Nikolay Storonsky and Vlad Yatsenko—a driven ex-trader and a steady engineer—and recognized a structural opportunity in European banking. Post-2008 crisis, trust in traditional banks was low, regulation (PSD2) enabled open banking, smartphone adoption soared, and consumers demanded digital-first finance. Revolut expanded aggressively into a global super-app, offering forex, crypto, stocks, and banking—often amid controversy over culture, compliance, and growth-at-all-costs. Balderton supported Revolut throughout: backing its crowdfunding round, aiding management maturity, and helping secure a UK banking license. By 2025, Revolut reached 65M users, $4B+ revenue, and a $75B valuation. Balderton’s success was underpinned by its equal-partnership model—inherited from Benchmark Capital—ensuring aligned incentives and collaborative decision-making. The case illustrates the power law in VC: a few outlier investments drive most returns. The formula for outsized returns involves non-consensus founders, structural timing, and patient capital across cycles...

Original Author: Sleepy.txt, Insight Beating

In 2017, Heyi Capital first invested in Pop Mart and continued to invest in the following years. In December 2020, Pop Mart went public in Hong Kong, with its market value exceeding 100 billion Hong Kong dollars on the first day. Heyi Capital achieved a return of over 100 times on the books, becoming a classic case in China's consumer investment field.

In 2010, Sequoia Capital China invested in Meituan. After multiple rounds of follow-up investments, it eventually obtained a return of over 100 times when Meituan went public. This investment made Sequoia China one of the most successful institutions in the history of Chinese internet investment.

In the world of venture capital, a 10x return is excellent, and a 100x return is legendary.

However, in Europe, a venture capital firm achieved a return of nearly 1400 times on an investment.

This institution is called Balderton Capital. In 2015, they led the seed round of "European Alipay" Revolut, investing 1 million pounds. Over the next 10 years, they continued to follow up with multiple rounds of investment, with a total investment of about 3 million pounds.

In 11 years, Revolut grew from a grassroots project rejected by Y Combinator to a financial technology giant with a valuation of 75 billion US dollars, known as the most valuable financial technology company in Europe. Today, Revolut has over 65 million users worldwide, with annual revenue exceeding 4 billion US dollars, annual profit exceeding 1 billion US dollars, and processes tens of billions of dollars in transactions every day.

In 2025, Balderton Capital cashed out about 2 billion US dollars by continuously selling part of its shares in Revolut. The remaining shares in their hands, calculated according to the latest valuation, are still worth more than 4 billion US dollars. This means that Balderton's total return on Revolut exceeds 6 billion US dollars, nearly 1400 times its investment.

What is even more shocking is that the fund that holds Revolut's shares - Balderton Capital Fund V, established in 2014, had a total fundraising scale of only 305 million US dollars. In 2025, this fund has returned over 20 times the return to investors by selling part of Revolut's shares. This means that even if all other projects invested by this fund return to zero, its return multiple still far exceeds the industry's top fund average of 3~5 times.

This story tells the essence of venture capital. In a business world where certainty has long disappeared, how should we face uncertainty? When everyone sees risks, where are the opportunities hidden?

Two Different Worlds

The starting point of this story is the meeting of two completely different people in early 2015.

The first person is Nikolay Storonsky, a Russian who is restless to the bone. His father is a senior executive of Gazprom, and his family is well-off. He holds dual master's degrees in physics from the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology and economics from the New Economic School. He is also a sports fanatic, having been a national swimming champion, and is passionate about boxing and surfing.

In 2006, he came to London and became a derivatives trader at Lehman Brothers, dealing with transactions worth billions of dollars every day. In 2008, after Lehman Brothers collapsed, he moved to Credit Suisse. During frequent global business trips, he spent thousands of dollars on foreign exchange losses every year. He found this unreasonable and unfair.

So, he found Vlad Yatsenko, a software engineer who had worked at Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank for 10 years, and decided to solve this problem himself.

In 2014, they founded Revolut at the Level39 incubator in London's Canary Wharf. Storonsky took out all his savings, 300,000 pounds, and bet on his future.

The second person who was about to meet him, Tim Bunting, came from another world.

In 2007, 43-year-old Bunting decided to leave Goldman Sachs.

He worked at Goldman Sachs for 18 years, eventually becoming the global head of equity capital markets and international vice chairman, and was one of Goldman's partners. He stood at the top of the world of certainty, where every transaction had precise models, every decision was supported by massive data, risks were quantified, and the future was predicted.

But he chose to leave and jump into a completely different world - venture capital.

He joined Balderton Capital. The essence of venture capital is to find possibilities in uncertainty. There are no perfect models here, only vague vision and judgment of people.

When they met in February 2015, Revolut's situation was very bleak. Their product demo could not run properly at that time, and they had just been rejected by Silicon Valley's most famous incubator, Y Combinator. In any normal investment decision process, this would be a project that would be immediately rejected.

But Bunting saw something different.

He later recalled that he saw in Storonsky's eyes an ambition and momentum to overturn the entire European banking industry. At the same time, he saw steadiness and reliability in the technical partner Yatsenko. One understands finance, one understands technology, one has drive, one has determination - this is the perfect combination of founders.

When everyone sees risks, great investors can see opportunities. Consensus often only brings mediocre returns; only non-consensus can bring excess returns.

In July 2015, Balderton officially led Revolut's seed round, investing 1 million pounds, with a post-investment valuation of 6.7 million pounds.

However, is having excellent founders and brave investors enough? Is there a greater force behind a 1400x return miracle?

Timing, Location, and People

Behind Revolut's success are timing, location, and people.

First, the aftershocks of the 2008 financial crisis, which almost destroyed public trust in traditional banks.

According to a Eurobarometer survey, after the crisis, European public trust in banks fell to a historical low. The banks themselves were also deeply mired, with profitability plummeting. Data shows that the average return on equity (ROE) of the European banking industry fell from about 11% before the crisis to 4%-5% around 2015, far lower than that of American counterparts.

To survive, banks began large-scale layoffs. From 2012 to 2015, European banks closed over 10,000 branches and laid off tens of thousands of employees. This led to a sharp decline in bank service quality,糟糕透顶的客户体验, leaving a huge market vacuum for new challengers.

At the same time, the wave of technology was reshaping the market. In 2015, the penetration rate of smartphones in Europe began to increase significantly, and the adoption rate of mobile banking also grew rapidly. The shift of financial services from offline branches to mobile apps became an irreversible trend.

The regulatory east wind also came at the right time. At the end of 2015, the European Union passed the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2). The core of this bill is "open banking." It broke the bank's monopoly on customer data, allowing third-party financial technology companies to access their bank account data with user authorization to provide innovative financial services. This paved the way for the development of the entire financial technology industry.

A new generation of consumers was also growing up rapidly. As digital natives, they strongly dislike the cumbersome processes and poor experience of traditional banks. A 2015 survey showed that 80% of consumers under 45 believed that they should be able to complete any financial business through a mobile app.

The fragmented nature of the European market itself also became a booster for Revolut. Europe consists of dozens of countries, languages, and currencies. The inconvenience and high cost of cross-border transactions have always been a huge pain point.

It was against this background that around 2015, gunshots were fired simultaneously on Europe's financial technology track. Germany's N26, Britain's Monzo and Starling, and cross-border remittance-focused TransferWise (now Wise) emerged almost at the same time. They each occupied a山头, with N26 focusing on design and Monzo emphasizing social features. The industry consensus at the time was: conquer one market or one product category at a time.

But Revolut was an outlier from the beginning.

Its core insight was that banking could be built like a global software product, full-stack and borderless from day one. While competitors were still carefully cultivating a certain experimental field, Revolut was already expanding globally. This bold strategy, which was highly controversial at the time, eventually allowed it to leave all opponents behind.

However, from a grand vision to a great company, there is a journey of near-death experiences. Revolut was not一帆风顺.

Sprinting Amid Controversy

One of Revolut's company values is "Never Settle." This value is deeply ingrained in the company's DNA, driving it to sprint amid controversy over the past 11 years.

This never-settling attitude is first reflected in the speed of product expansion.

In July 2015, Revolut officially launched its product, processing over 500 million US dollars in transactions in its first year. By the end of 2016, the number of users exceeded 300,000, processing nearly 1 billion pounds in transaction volume. In November 2017, Revolut announced that the number of users had exceeded 1 million, reaching this milestone in just over two years.

Storonsky's creed is "Releasing and iterating faster gives you more chances to win." After launching the core product, the low-fee foreign exchange card, Revolut quickly launched many new features: cryptocurrency trading in 2017, followed by stock trading, savings vaults, budgeting tools, insurance, P2P payments, business accounts... It built itself into an all-encompassing financial super app, while its competitors were still carefully guarding their own acre of land.

This aggressive expansion strategy brought astonishing growth. In 2017, Revolut's user base grew 3 times, and revenue increased nearly 5 times. In 2018, the number of users grew from 1.5 million to 3.5 million, and revenue grew by 354%. By April 2018, Revolut completed a Series C financing of 250 million US dollars, with a post-investment valuation of 1.7 billion US dollars, officially becoming a unicorn.

The reason why Revolut can quickly launch new features is that they adopt a VC-like product strategy internally.

They are not superstitious about elite "top-level design." Internally, there are usually many new products and new features being tested simultaneously. But only a small part of them can eventually "graduate" and become real business lines. Those that don't work are cut off, and those that are successfully verified receive加倍 resource investment from the company.

None of Revolut's core revenue products today come from top-level strategic planning; they all grow from this internal horse racing and trial-and-error culture.

But this also comes at a huge cost. In these 11 years, Revolut has experienced at least three life-and-death tests.

The first test came from trust.

In 2016, the company needed more funds for expansion, but traditional financing channels were not smooth. Storonsky proposed a bold idea: raising funds from the public through the crowdfunding platform Crowdcube. This was a very unconventional move at the time, and many investors opposed it.

But Balderton overruled the objections and supported this decision. They believed that this could not only solve the funding problem but also be an excellent marketing opportunity to test the public's trust in Revolut. In the end, 433 ordinary people participated in this crowdfunding, with an average investment of about 2152 pounds per person. They believed in Revolut's vision and voted for this startup with real money.

Now, these early supporters have also received amazing returns. The price of an iPhone back then, after 10 years, became the down payment for a house in the suburbs of London. The initial investment of 2152 pounds is now worth more than 380,000 pounds, a return of over 170 times.

The second test came from culture.

In February 2019, the British magazine Wired published a重磅 report, exposing serious problems in Revolut's corporate culture. The report accused the company of doing whatever it takes for growth,疯狂压榨员工, leading to a very high employee turnover rate. For a time, the company fell into a huge public opinion crisis.

At this time, Revolut was in a period of rapid growth. In 2019, the number of company users exceeded 10 million, and it began to expand to Australia and Singapore. But the outbreak of this crisis severely damaged the company's reputation.

As a board member, Bunting immediately had an in-depth communication with Storonsky. He shared his experience of managing a team of thousands of people at Goldman Sachs, helping Storonsky realize that when a company develops to a certain stage, it must establish a more mature and humane management system. With the help of Balderton, Revolut introduced more experienced managers and began to systematically improve the corporate culture.

The third test came from compliance.

Starting in 2021, Revolut applied for a UK banking license from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), but it was not approved for three full years. Regulatory agencies raised serious questions about its anti-money laundering system and corporate governance. This was a fatal blow for a financial technology company.

While waiting for the UK license, Revolut did not stop expanding. In 2020, the company completed a Series D financing of 580 million US dollars, the number of users reached 14.5 million, and it entered the US and Japanese markets. In 2021, the company completed another Series E financing of 800 million US dollars, with a valuation of 33 billion US dollars. By 2022, the number of users had grown to 26 million.

At the critical moment, Bunting used his industry network again. He personally invited Martin Gilbert, the chairman of Aberdeen Standard Investments and a titan of the UK investment industry, to serve as chairman of Revolut. This move greatly enhanced the regulatory agency's trust in Revolut. In July 2024, Revolut finally obtained the precious UK banking license.

While obtaining the UK license, Revolut also delivered a dazzling report card. In 2024, the number of company users exceeded 50 million, annual revenue reached 4 billion US dollars, a growth of 72%, annual profit exceeded 1 billion US dollars for the first time, and the total customer transaction volume processed exceeded 1 trillion US dollars. The company became the highest-downloaded financial application in 19 countries.

During these 11 years of风雨兼程, Balderton Capital始终坚定地 stood behind Revolut. Bunting has been a board member of Revolut all along, providing indispensable support at every key node of Revolut's development and continuously following up with investments in subsequent rounds of financing.

European VC's "American Dream"

Revolut's deified battle brought Balderton, which had long been behind the scenes, completely into the spotlight. The underlying logic of this London VC capturing miracles did not stem from偶然的运气, but from the blood of Silicon Valley's豪门 Benchmark Capital flowing in its veins.

In 1999, Benchmark's partners decided to set up a European branch in London, Benchmark Capital Europe. They brought not only funds but also a unique organizational structure - Equal Partnership.

In traditional VC funds, there are usually a few General Partners who hold the vast majority of power and收益, while other partners are in relatively次要的地位. This pyramid structure can easily lead to internal competition and conflict of interest.

The equal partnership system is completely different. At Balderton, all partners equally own the company, have equal say in any decision, and enjoy the same economic returns, regardless of who found or led the deal. This system ensures that the interests of all partners are highly aligned, allowing them to work together like a pack of wolves.

The advantages of this system were fully demonstrated in the process of investing in Revolut.

First, better due diligence. When Bunting first met Storonsky, although he knew the financial market inside out, he did not fully understand the technical implementation behind it. So, he immediately brought in partner Suranga Chandratillake, who has an engineering background, to evaluate together. There was no worry about抢功劳 among partners, only a common goal, which was to invest in the best companies.

Second, because the interests of all partners are completely tied, they can truly make the most beneficial decisions from the company's perspective. In Revolut's multiple rounds of financing, Balderton provided firm support and never hesitated due to internal interest disputes.

Finally, more comprehensive post-investment support. Startups encounter different problems at different stages. The equal partnership system means that entrepreneurs can随时调用 the resources of the entire partner team.

In 2007, the European team became independent from Benchmark and was officially renamed Balderton Capital, named after the street where their first office was located. The core system of equal partnership was also completely保留了下来 and became the key for Balderton to stand out in the European VC jungle.

However, a good system does not guarantee the success of every investment. In the world of venture capital, what ultimately determines victory or defeat?

Power Law

This law, simply put, is an extreme version of the 80/20 rule.

In the world of venture capital, it means that a small portion of investments will contribute the vast majority of the entire fund's returns. And the vast majority of investments will eventually return to mediocrity or even be lost entirely.

According to PitchBook data, in the venture capital industry, the top 10% of investments contribute 60% to 80% of the industry's total returns. The daily work of VCs is to find that 1% possibility among countless seemingly unreliable projects. They need to cast a wide net, but more importantly, they need to make heavy bets on the very few projects that have the potential to become super winners at critical moments.

In Balderton Capital's 25-year history, it has invested in over 275 companies and has also invested in a number of star companies such as Darktrace, Depop, and GoCardless. Without Revolut, Balderton might still be an excellent European VC, but it would never be the legend it is today.

This also determines that the essence of venture capital is a game of non-consensus. If a project's prospects have become everyone's consensus, then its valuation will inevitably rise, and the future return will be extremely limited. Only those non-consensus projects that are not favored early on and are full of controversy can bring disruptive excess returns.

For venture capital, success is not a matter of命中率, but a matter of return magnitude. It doesn't matter if you invest in nine wrong projects, as long as you hit one that can increase 1000 times, it is enough to achieve success and fame. This sounds like gambling, but top VCs use a rigorous philosophy and discipline to increase the probability of winning the bet.

So, behind this 1400x return miracle, is there a replicable formula?

The Formula for a Thousandfold Return

Excess return = (Non-consensus founder x Structural era opportunity) ^ Patience through cycles

First, the non-consensus founder.

In the world of venture capital, judgment of people is always the first. Especially in the seed stage, when products, markets, and data do not yet exist, the founder is almost the only indicator. A top founder must be a paranoid optimist. He must have unrealistic fantasies about the future and be able to脚踏实地 solve immediate problems.

Second, the structural era opportunity. Revolut's success is inseparable from the unique historical window period in Europe in 2015. The sequelae of the financial crisis, the popularization of mobile Internet, the opening of regulatory policies, and the generational change of consumers. Great companies are all companies of the era. They can敏锐地捕捉到 structural changes and become the pronoun of that change with their products and services.

Finally, and most importantly, is the patience to穿越 cycles. From 2015 to 2026, Revolut experienced cultural crises, regulatory difficulties, and market competition重重考验. In these 11 years, Balderton has always been its firm supporter, not only continuing to follow up with investments but also providing valuable advice and resources at critical moments. This long-term holding, patience to overcome difficulties with the founders, is a necessary condition for achieving excess returns.

In the world of capital, time is the best friend and the worst enemy. Only those investors who can resist short-term temptations and adhere to long-term value can eventually wait for the compound interest of time.

1 million pounds变成 6 billion US dollars is not just a wealth myth, but also a story about cognition, courage, and patience. It tells us that in this rapidly changing era, real opportunities are always reserved for those long-termists who can洞察 the times, embrace change, and are willing to穿越 cycles with great entrepreneurs.

Original link

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWhat is the core formula for generating extraordinary returns in venture capital, as illustrated by the Revolut case?

AThe core formula is: Extraordinary Return = (Non-consensus Founder x Structural Era Opportunity) ^ Patience Through Cycles.

QWhat key factor did Tim Bunting see in the founders of Revolut that led to Balderton Capital's initial investment, despite the product's poor condition?

AHe saw an ambitious drive to disrupt the entire European banking industry in Nikolay Storonsky's eyes, combined with the technical reliability and steadiness of Vlad Yatsenko, forming a perfect founder combination.

QWhat unique internal product development strategy did Revolut employ to achieve rapid growth and feature expansion?

ARevolut used a VC-like product strategy with internal 'horse racing' and experimentation, where many new products and features were tested simultaneously, with only the successful ones receiving major resources and the unsuccessful ones being cut.

QWhat critical organizational principle did Balderton Capital inherit from Benchmark Capital that was key to its success with Revolut?

ABalderton inherited the Equal Partnership system, where all partners have equal ownership, decision-making power, and share economic returns equally, ensuring aligned interests and collaborative support for portfolio companies.

QBeyond the founder and the idea, what four macro-environmental factors (the 'Heavenly Timing, Earthly Advantage, Human Harmony') created the opportunity for Revolut's success?

AThe four factors were: 1) Low public trust in traditional banks post-2008 crisis, 2) The rise of mobile technology and banking apps, 3) Supportive regulation like the EU's PSD2 'Open Banking' directive, and 4) A new generation of digital-native consumers demanding better financial services.

Nội dung Liên quan

Làm thế nào để khiến bản thân trở nên không thể bị thay thế bởi trí tuệ nhân tạo

**Tóm tắt: Làm thế nào để trở nên không thể bị thay thế bởi AI** Bài viết phản đối việc than vãn về AI và thay vào đó đề xuất một giải pháp căn cơ: trở thành một "siêu cá nhân" không thể bị thuê mướn. Mối đe dọa thực sự không phải là AI, mà là tình trạng "nô lệ lương thưởng" – phụ thuộc hoàn toàn vào người khác để sinh tồn, làm công việc nhàm chán mà không có mục đích. Để thoát khỏi vòng luẩn quẩn này và phát triển mạnh trong kỷ nguyên AI, bạn cần trau dồi 5 yếu tố then chốt: 1. **Tính tự chủ:** Khả năng hành động mà không cần chờ chỉ thị. 2. **Khiếu thẩm mỹ:** Khả năng nhận biết điều gì thực sự có giá trị. 3. **Khả năng thuyết phục:** Thu hút sự chú ý và sự công nhận. 4. **Sự kiên trì:** Không sợ thất bại, xem đó là bài học. 5. **Khả năng lặp:** Điều chỉnh dựa trên phản hồi để tiến tới mục tiêu. Giải pháp là đầu tư vào sự nghiệp của chính mình. Trong khi AI giỏi tạo ra "tài sản" (nội dung, code), nó không thể thay thế được khả năng phân biệt thứ gì đáng để tạo ra, làm cho mọi người quan tâm và kiên trì theo đuổi. Trong hai kỹ năng đòn bẩy mạnh mẽ là **Code (Lập trình)** và **Media (Nội dung)**, bài viết nhấn mạnh **Nội dung** quan trọng hơn. Giá trị của nội dung là chủ quan và đòi hỏi sự am hiểu, trải nghiệm mà AI khó có được, tạo không gian cho các cá nhân sáng tạo thực sự. **Cách bắt đầu (Bài tập 15 phút):** 1. **Khai thác nguyên liệu thô của bạn:** Xác định chủ đề bạn am hiểu sâu, vấn đề bạn tự giải quyết được, hay sở thích đặc biệt từ nhỏ. 2. **Xác định "trục phản biện" của bạn:** Tìm ra quan điểm độc đáo của bạn – những điều bạn tin là đúng nhưng số đông lại sai trong lĩnh vực của mình. 3. **Xuất bản ý tưởng đầu tiên:** Kết hợp câu trả lời từ bước 1 và 2, tạo ra một nội dung (bài đăng, video) và đăng nó lên. Hành động này mang lại phản hồi thực tế, bắt đầu quá trình học hỏi, lặp lại và phát triển kỹ năng thuyết phục. Bằng cách xây dựng một sự nghiệp xoay quanh con người thật, trải nghiệm thật và góc nhìn độc đáo của mình thông qua nội dung, bạn có thể tạo ra giá trị mà AI không thể sao chép, từ đó trở nên không thể thay thế.

marsbit1 giờ trước

Làm thế nào để khiến bản thân trở nên không thể bị thay thế bởi trí tuệ nhân tạo

marsbit1 giờ trước

Nhờ việc tung xúc xắc, chìa khóa Bitcoin được lưu trữ offline, nhưng không phải ai cũng muốn làm điều này

Cảm biến từ cuộc tranh cãi gần đây xung quanh lỗ hổng trong ví phần cứng Coldcard, bài viết thảo luận về phương pháp tạo seed (cụm từ khôi phục) cho ví Bitcoin bằng cách xúc xắc vật lý. Mỗi lần xúc xắc công bằng cung cấp khoảng 2,6 bit entropy (thước đo tính ngẫu nhiên). Để đạt mức entropy an toàn cho một seed 12 từ (128 bit), cần khoảng 50 lần xúc xắc; Coldcard khuyến nghị 99 lần để đạt mức bảo mật cao hơn. Lợi thế chính của phương pháp này là tách biệt hoàn toàn với bất kỳ lỗi phần cứng hoặc phần mềm nào trong trình tạo số ngẫu nhiên của thiết bị, từ đó bảo vệ seed chính của ví. Tuy nhiên, bài viết cảnh báo rằng trong sự cố Coldcard, các chức năng phụ khác của thiết bị (như tạo ví giấy, khóa đa chữ ký, mật mã phiên USB) vẫn có thể bị ảnh hưởng nếu chúng dựa vào trình tạo số lỗi, ngay cả khi seed chính được tạo an toàn bằng xúc xắc. Nhược điểm lớn của việc dùng xúc xắc là quá trình thủ công, dễ xảy ra sai sót, tốn thời gian và không thực tế cho đa số người dùng mới. Người dùng có thể ghi chép sai, sử dụng xúc xắc gian lận, hoặc để lộ chuỗi kết quả. Do đó, mặc dù có nền tảng toán học vững chắc, phương pháp này đòi hỏi sự tỉ mỉ cao và không phải là giải pháp khả thi cho việc áp dụng Bitcoin rộng rãi. Bài viết kết luận rằng mục tiêu dài hạn vẫn là phát triển phần cứng/phần mềm tạo số ngẫu nhiên mạnh mẽ và đáng tin cậy, trong khi vẫn giữ phương pháp thủ công như một tùy chọn cho người dùng có kinh nghiệm. Cuối cùng, bài viết đưa ra khuyến nghị cho chủ sở hữu Coldcard: cập nhật firmware, kiểm tra các chức năng phụ đã sử dụng và xem xét các biện pháp bảo mật bổ sung như ví đa chữ ký kết hợp nhiều nhà sản xuất để giảm thiểu rủi ro từ một điểm yếu đơn lẻ.

cryptonews.ru4 giờ trước

Nhờ việc tung xúc xắc, chìa khóa Bitcoin được lưu trữ offline, nhưng không phải ai cũng muốn làm điều này

cryptonews.ru4 giờ trước

Michael Saylor tuyên bố, bản cập nhật Bitcoin mà ông phản đối đã không thể được thông qua!

Michael Saylor tuyên bố rằng về mặt toán học, BIP-110 không thể đạt ngưỡng hỗ trợ 55% từ các tình nguyện viên trong chu kỳ điều chỉnh độ khó khai thác Bitcoin hiện tại. Dữ liệu của ông cho thấy, trong tổng số 946 khối được tạo ra tính đến khối 960.561, chỉ 24 khối chứa tín hiệu ủng hộ BIP-110 trong trường phiên bản tiêu đề khối. Tất cả các tín hiệu này đều đến từ thợ đào DATUM chia sẻ phần thưởng thông qua nhóm khai thác OCEAN, và không có tín hiệu nào từ các thợ đào bên ngoài OCEAN. Saylor nhấn mạnh rằng trong tình huống này, BIP-110 sẽ không đạt được mức hỗ trợ tự nguyện 55% trong chu kỳ xem xét, và các tín hiệu hiện tại không thể được coi là sự đồng thuận chung của các thợ đào. BIP-110 là một đề xuất nhằm gây khó khăn cho việc thêm ảnh, văn bản hoặc các loại dữ liệu lớn khác vào mạng Bitcoin, ngoài giao dịch chuyển tiền. Người ủng hộ cho rằng Bitcoin chỉ nên được dùng để chuyển tiền và không nên làm tắc nghẽn mạng bằng dữ liệu không cần thiết. Tuy nhiên, Michael Saylor phản đối BIP-110. Ông lập luận rằng mạng Bitcoin không nên quyết định giao dịch nào là cần thiết, luật lệ không nên thay đổi theo ý muốn của một số ít người, và tỷ lệ hỗ trợ cao có thể không phản ánh đúng sự ủng hộ thực sự của thợ đào do một phần mềm tự động hóa quá trình báo hiệu.

cryptonews.ru5 giờ trước

Michael Saylor tuyên bố, bản cập nhật Bitcoin mà ông phản đối đã không thể được thông qua!

cryptonews.ru5 giờ trước

Số lượng bình luận tiêu cực về Bitcoin đạt mức cao nhất lịch sử: Điều này có nghĩa là gì?

Công ty phân tích tiền mã hóa Santiment thông báo rằng tình cảm tiêu cực đối với Bitcoin trên mạng xã hội đã đạt mức cao kỷ lục. Tỷ lệ bình luận tích cực/tiêu cực về Bitcoin trên các nền tảng như X, Reddit, Telegram đã giảm xuống mức thấp nhất kể từ khi công ty triển khai hệ thống giám sát hiện đại. Một lỗ hổng bảo mật trong phần sụn của ví cứng Coldcard được xác định là nguyên nhân chính gây lo ngại, làm dấy lên nghi ngờ về tính an toàn của phương pháp lưu trữ lạnh vốn được coi là an toàn nhất. Santiment lưu ý rằng, khác với các cuộc khủng hoảng lớn trước đây như sự sụp đổ của FTX hay Mt. Gox, cuộc thảo luận lần này tập trung vào rủi ro bảo mật phần cứng và ví lạnh nói chung, thay vì chỉ trích các sàn giao dịch tập trung. Theo dữ liệu, hiện chỉ có 0,58 bình luận tích cực cho mỗi bình luận tiêu cực về Bitcoin, cho thấy "nỗi sợ hãi" đang áp đảo "lòng tham" ở mức đáng kể. Mặc dù dữ liệu chỉ trong một ngày, mức độ hoảng loạn hiện tại được đánh giá là cao hơn cả đỉnh lo ngại về chiến tranh đầu năm và các cuộc khủng hoảng tiền mã hóa lớn trong quá khứ.

cryptonews.ru5 giờ trước

Số lượng bình luận tiêu cực về Bitcoin đạt mức cao nhất lịch sử: Điều này có nghĩa là gì?

cryptonews.ru5 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
活动图片