WLFI Responds to Rumors of 'Trump Family Exit': Bank License Approval Has Entered Final Stage

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-08

Анотація

Amidst rumors that the Trump family had quietly exited World Liberty Financial (WLFI), Donald Trump Jr. and co-founder Zach Witkoff addressed the claims at the Miami Consensus conference. Trump Jr. dismissed the rumors as originating from the removal of the Trump family's names from the company's website and subsequent amplification by social media bots. Both affirmed that Don Jr. and Eric Trump remain co-founders. The conversation also covered WLFI's ongoing legal battle with Tron founder Justin Sun. After Sun sued WLFI last month alleging managerial misconduct, WLFI filed a countersuit, accusing Sun of spreading false information and shorting the WLFI token. Witkoff stated the lawsuit was a "last resort" and filed with evidence. Significantly, Witkoff revealed that WLFI's application for a national trust bank charter from the OCC is in the "final stages" of securing conditional approval. This charter is crucial for the company's USD1 stablecoin operations but has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers like Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has labeled the application potential evidence of corruption.

Author: Sander Lutz

Compiled by: TechFlow News

TechFlow Introduction: Amid swirling rumors of a "Trump family exit" from World Liberty Financial, Donald Trump Jr. and co-founder Zach Witkoff publicly addressed the speculation at the Miami Consensus conference. Beyond clarifying the rumors, Witkoff revealed the company is in the "final stages of obtaining conditional approval" for its national trust bank license application. Simultaneously, the company has filed a counterclaim against Tron founder Justin Sun. A single clarification has brought to light three separate threads: the license, litigation, and political controversy.

Donald Trump Jr. responded on Thursday at the Miami Consensus cryptocurrency conference to a recent claim circulating on social media: that he and family members had quietly exited World Liberty Financial.

"I think I saw something on Twitter about Don and Eric having walked away from the project," said Zach Witkoff, the other co-founder of World Liberty, on stage.

"That's news to me," Trump Jr. chimed in. He attributed the rumor to World Liberty's earlier removal of the list of co-founders, including President Trump and his three sons, from the company's official website. Subsequently, some individuals capitalized on this change, with bot accounts amplifying the speculation.

"If you get enough people just kind of running with whatever they're fed, plus you've got bots pushing it... If it were true, I wouldn't be on this stage," Trump Jr. said.

"To my knowledge, Don and Eric are still co-founders of this project," Witkoff added.

It is worth noting that the moderator for this Q&A, David Wachsman, is himself the head of public relations for World Liberty and not a neutral third party.

Counterclaim Against Justin Sun: 'We Would Not Sue Without Evidence'

The conversation then shifted to the lawsuit World Liberty filed this week against cryptocurrency entrepreneur Justin Sun, the founder of the Tron network and one of World Liberty's largest financial backers. Last month, Sun sued World Liberty first, alleging serious misconduct by the company's management.

World Liberty subsequently filed a counterclaim, asserting that Sun not only publicly spread false statements about the company but also secretly shorted the company's native token, WLFI, in an attempt to drive down its price.

"We would not be bringing this suit without the evidence," Witkoff said, calling the legal action a "last resort."

Bank License: 'Final Stages of Conditional Approval'

Witkoff then steered the discussion towards World Liberty's regulatory ambitions. In January of this year, the company submitted an application for a national trust bank license to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), an agency under the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Once approved, World Liberty would be able to provide crucial banking service functionalities for its USD-pegged stablecoin, USD1.

"We're very excited about getting the charter," Witkoff said. "I think we're in the final stages of getting conditional approval."

This very license has been a focal point of criticism from Democrats in recent months. Senator Elizabeth Warren has repeatedly pointed to World Liberty's bank license application as evidence of what "may be the most disgraceful presidential corruption scandal in American history."

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main subject of the response given by Donald Trump Jr. and Zach Witkoff at the Miami Consensus conference?

AThey are responding to and denying rumors circulating on social media that Donald Trump Jr. and his family members have quietly exited the World Liberty Financial project.

QWhat recent legal action did World Liberty Financial take against Justin Sun?

AWorld Liberty Financial filed a counter-lawsuit against Justin Sun, alleging that he publicly spread false statements about the company and secretly shorted its native token, WLFI, to suppress its price.

QWhat regulatory application did Zach Witkoff reveal is nearing a critical stage?

AZach Witkoff revealed that World Liberty Financial's application for a national trust bank charter with the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is in the final stages of potentially receiving conditional approval.

QAccording to the article, who has been a major critic of World Liberty Financial's bank charter application?

AU.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has been a major critic, repeatedly labeling the application as potential evidence for "perhaps the most disgraceful presidential corruption scandal in American history."

QWhat reason did Donald Trump Jr. suggest for the origin of the exit rumors about his family?

AHe attributed the rumors to World Liberty previously removing the list of co-founders, which included President Trump and his three sons, from its website, which was then amplified by individuals and bot accounts.

Пов'язані матеріали

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

On June 29th, the ENS community entered the on-chain voting phase for a proposal to renew the ENS DAO Security Council's veto power for two more years. Shortly after voting began, ENS founder Nick Johnson used his substantial ENS holdings to cast over 3.55 million votes against the proposal, swinging the outcome despite initial strong support. The Security Council was established in July 2024 with a 4/8 multisig veto power to protect the DAO's treasury (valued over $350 million) from malicious proposals during a period of low voter participation. Its powers were limited to vetoing only harmful proposals, not normal ones. Nick Johnson's opposition stems from broader concerns about ENS DAO's governance. In late 2025, he and others expressed frustration that the DAO had become mired in political gamesmanship, with capable contributors leaving and leadership falling to less experienced or misaligned parties. This context set the stage for a major restructuring proposal by ENS COO Katherine Wu on June 19th, titled "Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation." The controversial proposal aims to transfer daily operations, treasury management, and long-term strategy to a restructured ENS Foundation with a professional board, while the DAO would retain core protocol governance powers. Critics, including original ENS constitution author Brantly Millegan, argue this effectively transfers treasury control from token holders to ENS Labs (the core development team), undermining the DAO's original decentralized design. Nick's massive "no" vote on the Security Council renewal is seen as the first move in this power struggle. He explained his vote was due to concerns about insufficient checks on the Council's power and the potential for its veto to be used politically. In response, Katherine Wu submitted a revised proposal with higher execution thresholds (5/8 instead of 4/8) and stricter limits. The push for change comes as ENS's annual revenue has declined significantly, from over $10 million in 2023 to under $2 million in 2025, increasing pressure to manage the treasury more effectively. Nick Johnson now faces the challenge of proving that a more structured foundation can steer ENS better than the current DAO model.

Foresight News9 хв тому

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

Foresight News9 хв тому

Zcash whale opens $8.1M long position: What’s next as ZEC struggles near $400?

Zcash (ZEC) is struggling to hold the $400 price level, currently trading around $399 after recent volatility. Despite this market weakness and a bearish technical structure, significant whale activity has emerged. A large whale deposited $10.12 million into HyperLiquid and opened an $8.1 million long position on ZEC. This aligns with a rising Long/Short Ratio, indicating growing trader optimism for price gains. However, ZEC remains below key moving averages, and momentum indicators suggest strong downside pressure. If whale demand fails to spark an upside, ZEC could fall toward $336. Conversely, if it triggers short liquidations, the price could hold $400 and rally toward $452.

ambcrypto21 хв тому

Zcash whale opens $8.1M long position: What’s next as ZEC struggles near $400?

ambcrypto21 хв тому

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

AI performance in predicting the 2026 FIFA World Cup knockout matches varied significantly, according to an analysis of models including ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude. The standout predictions came from DeepSeek and Gemini for the Netherlands vs. Morocco match. Gemini precisely forecasted a 1-1 draw and a penalty shootout win for Morocco, while DeepSeek correctly identified the high probability of a draw and Morocco's potential to advance via a defensive and counter-attacking strategy. Grok and Tongyi Qianwen (千问) demonstrated strength in predicting accurate scores for matches with clearer favorites. They correctly called the narrow 1-0 win for Canada over South Africa and Brazil's 2-1 victory over Japan, as well as Norway's 2-1 win over Ivory Coast. ChatGPT and Claude excelled more in match process analysis than in predicting exact scores or upsets. They frequently identified potential challenges for favorites, such as Japan's pressing against Brazil or DR Congo's defensive tactics against England, even when predicting the favorite's ultimate victory. A notable failure was the unanimous misjudgment of Germany vs. Paraguay. All models incorrectly favored Germany, underestimating Paraguay's ability to force a penalty shootout and cause an upset. In summary, Gemini and DeepSeek showed the most insight for high-stakes, unpredictable matches. Grok and Qianwen were reliable "score predictors" for less volatile games. ChatGPT and Claude were strong "analytical models," adept at outlining match dynamics but often hesitant to predict upsets.

Odaily星球日报38 хв тому

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

Odaily星球日报38 хв тому

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

Velvet (VELVET) experienced a bullish push above the key $2.00 resistance on June 29, reaching a high of $2.17, fueled by partnership news with Aerodrome Finance. However, momentum has since slowed, with an 11.5% price correction in 24 hours and a 27.1% drop in trading volume. Technical analysis shows mixed signals. While the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicates sustained buying pressure, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has turned negative, signaling significant capital outflows and short-term distribution. The overall structure remains bearish on the 1-day chart, though the recent correction found support at the 20-day moving average. Market data suggests the current pullback represents controlled selling pressure rather than a full trend reversal. Key supports to watch are the $2.00 level and the 20-day moving average near $0.75. The risk-to-reward ratio for new long positions is currently unfavorable, but the steady spot Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) and funding rate indicate underlying bullish strength. Traders may consider using a deeper pullback as a potential buying opportunity.

ambcrypto50 хв тому

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

ambcrypto50 хв тому

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

**Title: Is There Another Wave for Web3 Gaming? A Veteran Player's Review: When Hype Peaks, You Must Exit at Least Half** **Summary:** In an interview, veteran player "Earn Money Chicken" shares his journey and reflections on Web3 gaming. He transitioned from being a traditional in-game trader to a Web3 gamer, having profited from games like Mobox, StepN, and Seraph, but also experiencing significant losses. He defines himself primarily as a player, not an investor, attracted to Web3 games for the blend of earning potential, engaging gameplay, and the satisfaction of researching game mechanics. While he enjoys strategic "gambling" within games, he emphasizes it's not about zero-sum competition with other players. The interview explores the complex, often adversarial relationship between players, projects, and major investors (whales). The player's experience as a traditional game merchant helped develop his analytical mindset for spotting opportunities, but wasn't directly transferable. He identifies the core sources of profit in early Web3 gaming as **"era红利" (era-specific红利)** and strategic foresight, not just simple calculations. He warns that the biggest mistake ordinary players make is calculating their return-on-investment (ROI) period at peak hype, as asset and yield depreciation can trap them. Reflecting on his wins and losses, he now advocates for managing expectations. His most successful exit was from Seraph, where he sold at a relatively good time. The key problem with current Web3 games, he argues, is that most are not mature games first. A successful Web3 game must primarily be a **good, fun game** with a genuine player base willing to spend money for enjoyment, not just participants seeking profit. The blockchain element should solve problems within that context, not be the primary driver. While he believes the sector might see another speculative boom (possibly another strong "Ponzi" model attracting hype), a truly mature and sustainable Web3 game likely needs to come from a traditional major game studio. It would leverage a proven IP, mature content, a functional NFT trading system, and attract both traditional and crypto-native players, offering more normalized returns rather than extreme暴利. His final advice: Newcomers without prior experience should avoid the space now, as it's like searching for a diamond in the rough. For those remaining, the rule is: be brave when assets are low and overlooked, but **when everyone is talking about it (at peak hype), you must sell at least half your holdings.**

marsbit1 год тому

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half