# Пов'язані статті щодо Staking

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Staking", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

The End of Old Cryptography: How Ethereum is Preparing for the Era of Quantum Computing

Ethereum developers have proposed a new system for handling staking deposits, aiming to future-proof the network against the potential threat of quantum computers. Currently, Ethereum's security relies on elliptic curve cryptography, which could be broken by sufficiently powerful quantum machines capable of deriving private keys from public ones. While estimates of the timeline for this threat vary, with Google research in March 2026 suggesting it could be closer than previously thought, major blockchains are proactively preparing. The new proposal introduces a more flexible deposit contract capable of accepting keys of various types and lengths, identified by a scheme label. It also changes how deposit data is communicated within the network's layers. Crucially, the transition plan involves a three-phase process to ensure a controlled and predictable shift, initially disabling new deposits, then re-enabling the current format, and finally permanently switching to new post-quantum cryptography in a future update. The proposal is currently a draft with no set implementation date. It represents a strategic move to build infrastructure in advance, rather than a direct solution for existing accounts. Analysis notes that Ethereum is structurally vulnerable to a "store now, decrypt later" attack, as public keys revealed in past transactions remain permanently on-chain. This proposal prepares for a signature algorithm change but does not address the risk to keys already exposed.

cryptonews.ru47 хв тому

The End of Old Cryptography: How Ethereum is Preparing for the Era of Quantum Computing

cryptonews.ru47 хв тому

IOSG | EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Slashing Staking 'Subsidies'—What Does Ethereum Want in Return?

**Title: IOSG | EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking "Subsidies"—What Does Ethereum Aim to Gain?** **Summary:** EIP-8363 proposes a mechanism to progressively destroy a larger portion of validator rewards as the staking ratio increases, reaching 100% destruction when 50% of ETH supply is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, investigates whether ETH's yield truly explains its price, quantifies the on-chain economy's dependence on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. EIP-1559's fee-burn mechanism has become largely ineffective, with burn rates down 98% since 2022. Issuance policy is now Ethereum's primary remaining lever over ETH supply. 2. At the current staking level (~35% of supply), EIP-8363 would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, not eliminate it entirely. The mechanism is self-limiting; under reasonable yield thresholds, the system would stabilize at 26–34% staking with 0.3–0.5% annual issuance. 3. No statistically significant correlation exists between historical staking yield changes and ETH price movements. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 showed no detectable price impact. 4. The on-chain economy's direct dependence on this yield is limited. Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) like wstETH are crucial as collateral (e.g., 34.2% in major lending markets), but their utility persists as long as yield is positive. Staking-focused ETFs represent a tiny fraction (0.19% of supply) of current demand. 5. The debate is essentially a zero-sum wealth redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staker/intermediary interests (35% of holders) to the diffuse majority of non-staking holders (65%). The proposal is economically rational but faces high political hurdles due to this concentrated opposition. Verdict: The proposal is mildly bullish for ETH (reducing a structural sell-pressure) but bearish for staking intermediaries/protocols. However, its passage is unlikely due to governance dynamics favoring concentrated, organized opposition over diffuse benefits.

marsbit1 год тому

IOSG | EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Slashing Staking 'Subsidies'—What Does Ethereum Want in Return?

marsbit1 год тому

DeFi Sector Bounces Back Strongest: Which High-Revenue Projects Offer Entry Opportunities?

DeFi Sector Leads Recovery: Which High-Revenue Projects Are Worth Watching? DeFi has been one of the most active sectors during the recent market rebound. Beyond chasing price action, a key fundamental metric for evaluating DeFi protocols is sustainable revenue, which indicates real user demand. This analysis highlights high-revenue projects across key categories, using protocol fee data (net of supplier payouts). **DEX** * **Uniswap (UNI)**: Leads with $7.18M in 30-day revenue. Protocol fees from v2 and select v3 pools are used for UNI token burns. * **Solana DEXs**: Jupiter (JUP, $4.69M 30-day revenue) uses 50% of revenue for JUP buybacks. Meteora (MET, $1.67M) and Raydium (RAY, $1.13M) also allocate portions of fees to token buybacks. * **PancakeSwap (CAKE)**: Earned $5.16M in 30 days, with part of its fees used for CAKE burns, maintaining a net deflationary supply. * **Aerodrome (AERO)**: On Base, it generated $4.11M in 30 days. Revenue is directly distributed to veAERO holders rather than used for buybacks. **Lending** * **World Liberty Financial (WLFI)**: Top earner with $10.47M in 30-day revenue. A proposal passed to use 100% of fees from its Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) for WLFI buybacks, but holder net income remains zero. * **Aave (AAVE)**: Generated $4.12M in 30 days. Its buyback program was paused in April 2026 following the rsETH bridge attack. **ETH Staking** * **ether.fi (ETHFI)**: Earned $3.03M in 30 days. Revenue from eETH withdrawals is used for ETHFI buybacks, which are then distributed to sETHFI stakers. * **Lido (LDO)**: Generated $2.31M. Its new NEST mechanism automatically uses 50% of annual revenue exceeding $40M for LDO buybacks. In summary, several DeFi protocols are generating significant revenue, with many employing token buyback or direct distribution mechanisms. This revenue provides a fundamental basis for evaluation amid market volatility.

marsbit7 год тому

DeFi Sector Bounces Back Strongest: Which High-Revenue Projects Offer Entry Opportunities?

marsbit7 год тому

DeFi Sector Rebounds Most Strongly, Which High-Revenue Projects Can Be a Good Opportunity to 'Get On Board'?

**Title: DeFi Sector Leads Market Rebound: High-Revenue Projects to Watch** The recent surge in Bitcoin and Ethereum has revitalized the altcoin market, with DeFi emerging as one of the most active sectors. Beyond chasing price rallies, a key fundamental metric for evaluating DeFi projects is their protocol revenue—the actual income retained after paying liquidity providers. This indicates genuine user demand and sustainable business models. **Top Revenue-Generating DeFi Projects:** * **DEX (Decentralized Exchanges):** * **Uniswap (UNI):** Leads with $7.18M in 30-day revenue. It accrues income from protocol fees, which are now active on multiple chains and used to buy back and burn UNI. * **Solana Ecosystem:** Jupiter ($4.69M), Meteora ($1.67M), and Raydium ($1.13M) are top performers, with substantial revenues driven by Solana's vibrant trading activity. Jupiter and Raydium use a portion of fees for token buybacks, while Meteora has also executed significant buybacks. * **PancakeSwap (CAKE):** Generated $5.16M recently, maintaining a strong position on BNB Chain and other networks. Its token CAKE continues a net deflationary trend through buybacks and burns. * **Aerodrome (AERO):** On Base chain, it earned $4.11M. Its revenue is directly distributed to veAERO holders instead of funding buybacks. * **Lending:** * **World Liberty Financial (WLFI):** Topped the lending sector with $10.47M in 30-day revenue. A proposal to use fees from its proprietary market making for WLFI buybacks passed, but token holders' net income remains zero currently. * **Aave (AAVE):** Earned $4.12M. It had an active buyback program until it was paused in April 2026 following a security incident. * **ETH Staking:** * **ether.fi (ETHFI):** Generated $3.03M. Revenue from eETH withdrawals is fully used to buy back ETHFI, which is then distributed to sETHFI stakers. * **Lido (LDO):** Earned $2.31M. Its recently activated NEST mechanism automatically uses 50% of annual revenue above $40M to buy back LDO. In summary, during the market rebound, several DeFi protocols across DEXs, lending, and staking are demonstrating strong revenue generation. Key models include direct fee collection, token buyback/burn programs, and revenue distribution to governance token stakers, providing fundamental strength amidst market volatility.

Odaily星球日报7 год тому

DeFi Sector Rebounds Most Strongly, Which High-Revenue Projects Can Be a Good Opportunity to 'Get On Board'?

Odaily星球日报7 год тому

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

**EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Reducing Staking "Subsidies" – What Does Ethereum Want in Return?** EIP-8363 proposes burning an increasing portion of validator rewards as the staking rate rises, reaching 100% burn when 50% of ETH is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, examines whether ETH's yield explains its price, quantifies the chain economy's reliance on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. **EIP-1559 Burns Are Ineffective:** Post-merge, burning (via base fees) has collapsed by 98% and now offsets only 2.4% of new ETH issuance, making issuance policy Ethereum's sole remaining supply lever. 2. **EIP-8363's Real Impact:** At the current ~42.2M ETH staked, the proposal would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, removing ~633k ETH ($1.55B) in annual dilution (0.53% of market cap). It's not zero issuance; that would require 43% more ETH staked. 3. **Self-Limiting Mechanism:** The design has a built-in equilibrium. At reasonable required returns (e.g., 2%), the system stabilizes at ~26% staking rate and ~0.48% annual inflation. 4. **Yield vs. Price:** No detectable statistical relationship exists between changes in staking yield and ETH price returns over 43 months. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 did not drive price action. 5. **Chain Economy Dependence:** While LSTs like wstETH form ~34% of collateral in major lending markets, their utility as collateral remains if yield is positive. The direct revenue hit to protocols like Lido is significant (~50% of fee income) but not systemic. Staking-focused ETFs represent only 0.19% of ETH supply. 6. **Core Conflict:** The debate masks a zero-sum redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staking intermediaries (LST/LRT protocols, leverage players) to the dispersed majority of non-staking ETH holders. 7. **Outlook:** The proposal is economically sound for ETH's scarcity but politically difficult due to concentrated opposition. It is unlikely to pass in its current form.

marsbit18 год тому

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

marsbit18 год тому

活动图片