# Пов'язані статті щодо Layer 2

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Layer 2", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

StarkWare Makes Drastic Cuts to Survive, L2 'Technical Faith' Liquidated by the Market

StarkWare, the infrastructure company behind Starknet, has announced a major restructuring, including layoffs and splitting into two separate business units. This move comes as the Layer 2 network faces a severe decline, with monthly revenue plummeting over 95% from its late 2023 peak to just tens of thousands of dollars. CEO Eli Ben-Sasson stated the company had become "too big and inefficient" and must return to a startup mentality. The new structure creates a Starknet development unit, focused on the core protocol, and an applications unit, tasked with direct revenue generation by building products that leverage StarkWare's unique tech stack, potentially in quantum security and Bitcoin-related areas. This reflects a wider crisis in the L2 sector triggered by Ethereum's EIP-4844 upgrade, which drastically reduced data availability fees and shattered the core business model of profiting from gas差价. The market has since polarized. Base and Arbitrum now dominate, capturing the majority of value and fees, while Starknet's TVL sits at a fraction of Base's and its native token STRK trades below its total historical fundraising amount. The article concludes that technical superiority is no longer enough to win; distribution power and strategic alliances are now the key drivers. StarkWare's shift from an infrastructure provider to a product-focused company is a strategic retreat in this consolidating market, forcing it to prove it can build and sell products, not just invent advanced technology.

marsbit2 дні тому 08:05

StarkWare Makes Drastic Cuts to Survive, L2 'Technical Faith' Liquidated by the Market

marsbit2 дні тому 08:05

A Brief History of Web3 Airdrops: A Review of Twelve Iconic 'Rug Pull' Projects

**Summary: A History of Web3 Airdrop "Rug Pulls" – 12 Iconic Cases** The era of Web3 airdrops has shifted from a golden age of mutual benefit between early users and projects to a landscape dominated by systematic exploitation. This article reviews 12 infamous "anti-airdrop" projects that eroded user trust: 1. **Hop Protocol (HOP):** Pioneered a "community witch-hunt" model, encouraging users to report Sybil addresses to claim their rewards, fostering a toxic environment of mutual harm. 2. **Blast:** Introduced the exploitative "points system," locking user funds for meager returns that often underperformed risk-free yields, turning airdrop hunting into a rigged casino. 3. **LayerZero (ZRO):** After 18 months of user-funded gas fees, it implemented a harsh "guilty until proven innocent" Sybil filter, forcing users to "self-confess" or face zero rewards, destroying multi-chain interaction narratives. 4. **zkSync (ZK):** Prioritized "funds held at a specific time" over long-term activity, betraying early contributors who spent significant gas and rewarding insiders, crushing L2 airdrop expectations. 5. **Infinex:** Lured users with NFT and point systems, only to announce a high FDV, a mandatory 1-year lockup, and chaotic rules at its public sale, betraying its community. 6. **Linea:** Perfected user exploitation with endless, grueling Galxe Odyssey tasks and KYC requirements, reducing airdrop hunting to a low-wage, full-time job. 7. **Grass:** Exploited users' physical resources (bandwidth/IP) for DePIN data, rewarding them with tokens worth less than the electricity and proxy costs incurred. 8. **Monad:** Allocated a mere ~3.3% of its airdrop to the community after extensive testnet participation, favoring KOLs and insiders and dampening enthusiasm for new L1s. 9. **Babylon:** Forced Ethereum-style staking onto Bitcoin, causing users massive losses from failed transactions due to high fees and network congestion, damaging trust in L2s. 10. **Backpack:** Encouraged massive trading volume for points, then applied strict KYC and Sybil rules last minute, resulting in massive losses for users and cementing a negative stereotype for projects with Chinese founders. 11. **EdgeX:** Perpetual DEX users lost significant fees for minimal rewards, while "insider" addresses received enormous allocations, exposing blatant corruption and killing the Perp DEX airdrop narrative. 12. **Genius:** The final straw: users were forced to choose between immediately claiming only 30% of their airdrop, locking tokens for a year for 100%, or a 100% burn for a gas fee refund, shattering trust in "elite-backed" narratives. **Conclusion** marks the painful end of the airdrop era. This collective "rug pull" was a co-created disaster of speculation and greed. The collapse, while brutal, forces a return to fundamentals: sustainable products with real product-market fit are paramount. This is not just the end of airdrops but a potential rebirth for Web3, weeding out exploitative projects and rewarding those that build genuine community value.

marsbit2 дні тому 03:14

A Brief History of Web3 Airdrops: A Review of Twelve Iconic 'Rug Pull' Projects

marsbit2 дні тому 03:14

活动图片