# Пов'язані статті щодо Hyperliquid

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Hyperliquid", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

21Shares Report: HYPE's P/S Ratio Only Half That of CME, Bull Market Target Price $70

21Shares Research Report: HYPE's P/S Ratio Half of CME's, Bullish Target $70 A recent report from 21Shares highlights Hyperliquid's evolution from a crypto derivatives DEX into a 24/7 "everything exchange" for perpetual contracts across various asset classes. The platform gained prominence during a February geopolitical incident when it provided real-time price discovery for WTI crude oil while traditional markets like CME were closed. Non-digital assets now account for approximately 35% of its volume, with traditional commodities and indices featuring among its top-traded assets. Hyperliquid's business model is rapidly diversifying, significantly reducing its dependence on crypto market cycles. Its cumulative trading volume and revenue are approaching levels comparable to CME Group's crypto derivatives segment. A key feature is its Assistance Fund, which directs 97%-99% of protocol fees to automated HYPE token buybacks, creating a deflationary mechanism with an implied buyback yield significantly higher than CME's traditional share repurchase program. Despite strong fundamentals, HYPE currently trades at a Price-to-Revenue (P/R) ratio of ~10x, roughly half of CME's ~17x. The report outlines valuation scenarios: a bullish case targets $62-$70 based on annualized revenue reaching $12-$15B and applying CME's P/R multiple. A bear case considers $15-$19 if growth slows. Key risks include platform centralization during crises, regulatory uncertainty for on-chain commodities, dependence on geopolitical volatility for non-crypto volume, and the need for sustained high trading volume to offset token unlocks. The analysis concludes that HYPE is increasingly being valued as a legitimate exchange business rather than a speculative crypto asset.

marsbit18 год тому

21Shares Report: HYPE's P/S Ratio Only Half That of CME, Bull Market Target Price $70

marsbit18 год тому

Top 10 Promising Emerging Hyperliquid Native Protocols to Watch

Title: A Review of 10 Emerging Native Protocols on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid is evolving beyond perpetual contracts into a comprehensive on-chain financial stack. This article highlights 10 key native protocols driving this growth: 1. **Monetrix**: A yield-optimizing protocol akin to Ethena, aggregating funding rates, HLP rewards, maker rebates, and HIP-3 into a single stablecoin yield. 2. **ROSETTA**: An automated stablecoin yield router, allocating USDC across top protocols (e.g., Felix, Aave, HLP) for optimal returns, factoring in gas and slippage. 3. **papertrade.xyz**: A fair-launched perpetuals protocol offering up to 1000x leverage, no funding rates, no slippage, and fully on-chain, oracle-based execution. 4. **alt.fun**: A launchpad where tokens are paired with leveraged perpetual positions (2x-5x), linking token price to trading activity and underlying position performance. 5. **Ventuals**: Pre-IPO perpetual contracts (built on HIP-3) allowing up to 10x leveraged speculation on valuations of private companies like SpaceX and Stripe. 6. **Liminal**: A delta-neutral yield protocol that captures funding rates via automated short positions and uses generated xTokens (xBTC, etc.) as DeFi collateral. 7. **Melt**: Brings tokenized stocks, commodities, and RWAs to Hyperliquid spot markets, enabling 24/7 trading alongside crypto assets. 8. **Chainsight**: An oracle and data infrastructure protocol providing low-latency (<3s) price feeds, volatility indices, and risk metrics for novel derivatives. 9. **rip.xyz**: Tokenized vault strategies on HyperEVM; its flagship rHYPURR offers liquidity and fractional exposure to a Hypurr NFT basket, priced hourly via NAV. 10. **Markets**: A perpetuals exchange (by Kinetiq) for trading stocks, forex, commodities, bonds, and crypto with up to 50x leverage, using USDH collateral and Kaiko oracles. These protocols form the foundational layer for generating real yield, liquidity, and innovative financial products natively on Hyperliquid.

marsbitВчора 12:39

Top 10 Promising Emerging Hyperliquid Native Protocols to Watch

marsbitВчора 12:39

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

The article discusses how Solana's vision of becoming the "Internet Capital Markets" is being challenged, primarily by the rise of Hyperliquid. While Solana positioned itself as a high-performance blockchain for tokenizing all global assets, its native token SOL has significantly underperformed, and its core narrative faces pressure. Hyperliquid, initially a perpetual contracts platform, has evolved into a specialized Layer 1 financial network. Its focused, trading-optimized design is attracting users and capital, suggesting a vertical L1 may be better suited for a core capital market than a general-purpose chain like Solana. This external competition was compounded by an internal $200M+ exploit on Solana's key derivatives protocol, Drift, creating a strategic vacuum. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the Phoenix protocol as a decentralized, composable alternative. However, Phoenix's trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters also launched critiques against Hyperliquid's decentralization, citing its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics countered that Solana's own decentralization metrics have weakened, and the foundation's overt backing of Phoenix caused friction with other ecosystem builders. The piece concludes that Solana risks losing the "Internet Capital Markets" race if it cannot regain dominance in derivatives, potentially remaining a meme coin hub rather than achieving its grand ambition of hosting all global assets.

marsbitВчора 05:57

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

marsbitВчора 05:57

Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

marsbit2 дні тому 07:49

Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbit2 дні тому 07:49

Why is HYPE Still Surging? Has It Topped Out?

The article analyzes the reasons behind the continued surge of the HYPE token, despite the current market conditions. The primary drivers identified are: 1. **ETF Inflows and a New Buyback Mechanism:** The launch of two ETFs (THYP by 21Shares and BHYP by Bitwise) has opened a channel for traditional capital. Crucially, Bitwise announced it will allocate 10% of BHYP's management fee income to acquire and stake HYPE, creating a potential source of recurring buy pressure linked to the ETF's growth. 2. **USDC Integration and New Revenue Stream:** The return of USDC to Hyperliquid, facilitated by Coinbase and Circle, is significant. It establishes a protocol revenue-sharing model from USDC reserve yields. Community estimates suggest this could generate substantial daily income (approx. $440k), which could be used for HYPE buybacks, decoupling token demand from just trading fees and linking it to the platform's stablecoin deposits. 3. **Expansion into New Markets:** Hyperliquid is broadening beyond being just a Perp DEX. Its HIP-4 feature launches it into the prediction market space, already showing high volume. This requires HYPE staking for market creation, directly increasing token utility and staking demand. Furthermore, the platform's Real-World Asset (RWA) trading has seen Open Interest hit a new high of $2.6B, indicating growth in trading traditional assets like stocks and commodities. 4. **Regulatory Tailwinds for RWA:** Potential SEC exemptions for tokenized stock trading could further accelerate Hyperliquid's RWA business, turning a niche into a major battleground for on-chain trading. In summary, the market is re-rating HYPE as Hyperliquid evolves from a single-purpose DEX into a comprehensive on-chain trading system with multiple growing revenue streams (trading fees, reserve yields, prediction markets) and expanding asset classes (crypto, RWAs). However, the article notes that despite the strong long-term fundamentals, short-term price action is currently volatile due to a large-scale showdown between whale long and short positions exceeding $60 million.

marsbit2 дні тому 01:42

Why is HYPE Still Surging? Has It Topped Out?

marsbit2 дні тому 01:42

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Market' Script

The article "When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook" discusses Solana's struggles to maintain its "internet capital markets" narrative by 2026. Despite its initial success as a high-performance "Ethereum killer," SOL's price has underperformed, dropping significantly compared to other major cryptocurrencies. Solana's vision of a global, on-chain trading network for all assets is being challenged not primarily by Ethereum, but by Hyperliquid. Hyperliquid, evolving from a perpetual contracts platform into a dedicated financial infrastructure Layer 1, has become a major beneficiary of the shift of derivatives trading from centralized exchanges to on-chain. The article argues that for high-frequency financial trading, a specialized, performance-focused chain like Hyperliquid may be more suitable than a general-purpose ecosystem like Solana. Further compounding Solana's issues was a major $200+ million exploit on its key perpetual protocol, Drift, in April, which damaged market confidence. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the protocol Phoenix as a replacement, boosting its visibility but not its trading volume, which remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters have launched a public critique of Hyperliquid's decentralization, pointing to its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics, however, note Solana's own declining validator count and centralization metrics. This strategy has also caused internal friction, with developers of other Solana protocols expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The conclusion is that Hyperliquid's rise represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that the core of a capital market might be a specialized trading engine rather than a broad ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in derivatives, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" while its grand "internet capital markets" ambition slips away.

marsbit05/19 15:07

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Market' Script

marsbit05/19 15:07

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

The article discusses how Solana's grand vision of becoming an "Internet Capital Markets" platform is facing significant challenges in 2026, primarily from the unexpected rise of Hyperliquid. Solana's performance has weakened, with its token SOL experiencing the largest price decline among major cryptocurrencies. Its core narrative of building a global, chain-based marketplace for all assets is under pressure both internally and externally. Hyperliquid, originally a perpetual futures exchange, has evolved into a dedicated Layer 1 financial infrastructure network. Its focused, trading-centric approach is attracting capital and challenging the assumption that a "general-purpose" ecosystem like Solana is necessary for a capital market. Hyperliquid's success suggests that for high-frequency trading, superior performance, liquidity, and user experience may be more critical than a broad application ecosystem. Internally, Solana's strategy suffered a blow from a major hack on the Drift Protocol in April, resulting in over $200 million in losses. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko has heavily promoted Phoenix as a new decentralized perpetual futures platform on Solana. While this boosted Phoenix's visibility, its trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana's community has launched a rhetorical attack against Hyperliquid, questioning its decentralization due to its limited validator set and closed-source code. Critics, however, point out Solana's own decreasing validator count and increasing centralization of stake. This focus on "decentralization metrics" has also caused internal friction, with other Solana ecosystem developers expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The article concludes that the rise of Hyperliquid represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that an efficient trading engine might be more central to a capital market than a vast ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in the derivatives space, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" rather than achieving its ambition of hosting global assets.

链捕手05/19 15:00

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

链捕手05/19 15:00

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

In a notable development within the financial sector, two of the world's largest traditional exchanges, CME Group and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), have jointly filed a complaint with the U.S. Congress and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). They are demanding stricter regulatory oversight of the cryptocurrency derivatives platform Hyperliquid. This move signals escalating tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging digital asset trading venues, highlighting the ongoing regulatory debate surrounding the crypto industry.

marsbit05/16 10:57

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

marsbit05/16 10:57

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手05/16 07:23

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手05/16 07:23

Pump.fun with Built-in Leverage? A Deep Dive into Hyperliquid's New Project alt.fun

"Hyperliquid's 'Pump.fun'? Decoding alt.fun, a New Project with Built-in Leverage" alt.fun is a new dApp launchpad on HyperEVM, described as Hyperliquid's version of "Pump.fun." It allows anyone to permissionlessly launch meme/altcoins backed by leveraged perpetual contracts (perp-backed altcoins). Instead of a standard bonding curve with spot reserves, each token is directly tied to a leveraged token (LT) representing a Hyperliquid perp position. The token price is driven by both trading activity and the underlying perp's leveraged P&L. Key mechanics: Creators choose an underlying asset (HYPE, BTC, ETH, etc.), direction (long/short), and leverage (2x, 5x). All tokens launch with a fixed $4000 market cap. The bonding curve uses BounceTech's LTs as reserve assets. A "graduation" mechanism automatically migrates tokens to HyperSwap AMM once a USD threshold is met or the curve sells out, with LPs permanently locked. The platform token is $ALT. The project saw over $1M volume in its first hour and brought 300+ new users to HyperEVM. The whitepaper highlights significant risks: leverage exposure (LTs can go to zero), volatility decay for high leverage in sideways markets, and reliance on Hyperliquid/BounceTech infrastructure. It represents an innovative fusion of meme coin virality and real leveraged financial exposure, positioned as an "altcoin factory" and potential traffic gateway for the HyperEVM ecosystem.

marsbit05/15 09:00

Pump.fun with Built-in Leverage? A Deep Dive into Hyperliquid's New Project alt.fun

marsbit05/15 09:00

活动图片

Project Updates

Others