# Пов'язані статті щодо Founders

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Founders", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Farewell to the Era of Founders, Neo Embarks on a True Restructuring

Neo, a public blockchain launched in 2014, is undergoing a major governance restructuring to resolve long-standing structural issues, including founder conflicts, opaque finances, and centralized control. A new proposal by co-founder Da Hongfei aims to fundamentally reform the Neo Foundation by decentralizing decision-making and asset control. Key reforms include establishing a unified on-chain and off-chain governance framework, introducing a staking-based voting mechanism with a 180-day lockup to discourage speculation, enabling fractional NEO tokens for broader participation, and redistributing a significant portion of the foundation’s assets—approximately 26 million NEO and 40 million GAS—back to the community through a "Giveback II" program. The foundation will relocate to the Cayman Islands under a new legal structure with a five-member board and an independent supervisor, explicitly barring founders from holding board seats for the first two years. This overhaul seeks to transition Neo’s governance from founder-dependent to community-driven, enhancing transparency, accountability, and long-term sustainability. If successful, it could set a precedent for other mature crypto projects facing similar governance challenges.

marsbit04/14 07:24

Farewell to the Era of Founders, Neo Embarks on a True Restructuring

marsbit04/14 07:24

Dragonfly: Venture Capital Can Only Be Stable and Sustainable by Listening to LPs, Backing Reliable People, and Adapting to the Market

The article "Dragonfly: VCs Must Listen to LPs, Back Strong Founders, and Follow the Market to Sustain Success" by Rob Hadick argues that venture capital, especially in crypto, is fundamentally market-driven. VCs serve their limited partners (LPs), whose priorities extend beyond absolute returns to include risk-adjusted performance, reputation, regulatory exposure, and access to key networks. The current market contraction and concentration of capital into fewer funds are signs of a healthy, functioning market, not a failure. To survive, VCs must align their strategies with LP demands. This often means investing in trending sectors like stablecoins and prediction markets, even if not first. While contrarian bets are possible, they are a privilege earned by first demonstrating consistent, stable returns. The industry rewards sustainability, not reckless heroism. Similarly, the notion that founders lack original ideas is misguided. Great companies are often not the first in a space but the best execution of a model. Success is driven by market forces: VCs are rewarded for correct judgment and delivering what LPs want, and founders are rewarded for building valuable, profitable businesses that attract investment. Ultimately, ideological posturing is irrelevant; market dynamics dictate everything.

marsbit04/14 02:13

Dragonfly: Venture Capital Can Only Be Stable and Sustainable by Listening to LPs, Backing Reliable People, and Adapting to the Market

marsbit04/14 02:13

Dragonfly Partner Talks About the Truth of Crypto Venture Capital: Market Logic Far More Important Than Ideology

Dragonfly partner Rob Hadick argues that the core of crypto venture capital is driven by market logic rather than ideology. VCs operate within a market where they must satisfy their limited partners (LPs), who evaluate investments based on multiple factors: risk-adjusted returns, reputation, regulatory exposure, liquidity cycles, co-investors, access to key information, and social relevance—not just absolute returns. The current pullback in crypto VC funding reflects normal market behavior: LPs are reducing allocations or concentrating capital in fewer, higher-quality funds due to concerns over risk-adjusted returns, liquidity, and reputational risks. To survive, VCs must align their strategies with LP expectations, balancing consensus and non-consensus bets. Consistent, stable performance is rewarded over high-risk heroism; only proven investors earn the right to make bold moves. Hadick also challenges the romantic notion of backing overlooked founders or purely original ideas. Most successful companies aren't first in their category but execute best. Founders are incentivized to build profitable products that attract investment, not necessarily to innovate radically. Ultimately, market forces—not ideological rhetoric—govern both VC and founder success.

marsbit04/13 10:51

Dragonfly Partner Talks About the Truth of Crypto Venture Capital: Market Logic Far More Important Than Ideology

marsbit04/13 10:51

From Housemate Arguments to a $300 Billion Showdown: WSJ Long-Form Article First Reveals the Decade-Long Personal Feud Between Anthropic and OpenAI Founders

The Wall Street Journal reveals the decade-long personal rift between Anthropic and OpenAI founders, Dario and Daniela Amodei, and OpenAI's Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. The conflict, rooted in philosophical differences over AI development and governance, began in 2016. Tensions escalated over leadership disputes, credit attribution, and management styles, culminating in the Amodeis and nearly a dozen employees leaving OpenAI in late 2020 to form Anthropic. Today, both companies are valued over $300 billion, competing fiercely while their founders' unresolved personal animosity continues to shape the global AI landscape.

marsbit03/28 07:27

From Housemate Arguments to a $300 Billion Showdown: WSJ Long-Form Article First Reveals the Decade-Long Personal Feud Between Anthropic and OpenAI Founders

marsbit03/28 07:27

Delphi Labs Founder: Two Weeks Deep in China's AI, Shenzhen Hardware Shocks Me, Software Valuations Scare Me

Delphi Labs co-founder José Maria Macedo spent two weeks in China meeting AI founders, VCs, and public company CEOs. His key takeaways: - **Hardware ecosystem in Shenzhen is impressive**, with systematic reverse-engineering of Western products and rapid iteration cycles. Companies like Bambu Lab are highly profitable and scaling fast. - **Software ecosystem is weaker than expected**. Chinese open-source models are strong, but closed-source models lag behind Western counterparts. GPU access remains constrained, and revenue gaps are significant (e.g., Anthropic’s $6B ARR vs. Chinese model companies at tens of millions). - **Founder profiles are highly accomplished** (top universities, Big Tech experience) but often lack rebellious, original vision. The education and VC systems favor execution over true innovation. - **Valuation bubbles exist** at both early and late stages. Some private AI companies are valued at 400x ARR, far exceeding Western multiples. Humanoid robotics is also overheating, with many pre-revenue companies targeting high-valuation IPOs. - **Information asymmetry favors Chinese founders**, who are highly informed about Western markets and tech trends. Many are building globally first, combining Chinese engineering with Western go-to-market strategies. Macedo believes the real alpha lies in finding non-traditional founders who break the "resume template" optimized by local VCs.

marsbit03/26 03:16

Delphi Labs Founder: Two Weeks Deep in China's AI, Shenzhen Hardware Shocks Me, Software Valuations Scare Me

marsbit03/26 03:16

How to Scale Web3 Startups Without Losing Mission Integrity: A Founder’s Guide

The most dangerous moment for a startup is not running out of money—it’s running out of vision. This guide explores how Web3 founders can scale their companies without compromising mission integrity. Key risks include chasing trendy narratives, falling into the "one big client trap" that derails innovation, and failing to evolve the founding team’s capabilities as the company grows. To scale vision-driven, founders should define a non-negotiable mission, filter all strategic decisions through mission alignment, embed vision into culture and hiring, and choose investors and partners who support the long-term purpose. Ultimately, disciplined, vision-first growth preserves a startup’s identity and builds lasting value.

bitcoinist03/17 05:02

How to Scale Web3 Startups Without Losing Mission Integrity: A Founder’s Guide

bitcoinist03/17 05:02

Dialogue with a16z Co-founder Marc Andreessen: Founders Are Better Off Without Introspection, Human Panic Always Accompanies New Things

Source: David Senra, Organized by Felix, PANews In a nearly two-hour podcast, a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen shared his personal habits, entrepreneurial philosophy, and management methods. Andreessen, who co-created the first widely used graphical web browser Mosaic and co-founded Netscape, discussed his belief that founders should avoid introspection. He argues that dwelling on the past hinders progress, and the best entrepreneurs are driven by impact, not happiness. Andreessen and Ben Horowitz founded a16z in 2009 with the core belief that startups and founders are the central engine of world progress. They champion the "founder-led" model over "managerialism," asserting that it's easier to teach a founder management skills than to teach a manager how to innovate. He cites Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk as prime examples. The conversation also covered historical patterns of "moral panic" surrounding new technologies, drawing parallels from bicycles to rock music. Andreessen detailed his unique management observations of Elon Musk, describing a hands-on, technically-deep approach where Musk personally identifies and solves production bottlenecks weekly, creating a culture of intense execution and innovation at companies like SpaceX and Tesla. Andreessen's worldview centers on technology as a powerful balancing force, and a16z's mission remains being the ideal partner for founders who want to change the world.

marsbit03/16 13:06

Dialogue with a16z Co-founder Marc Andreessen: Founders Are Better Off Without Introspection, Human Panic Always Accompanies New Things

marsbit03/16 13:06

Startups That Truly Survive Rely on Only These Two Moats

In the competitive startup landscape, mere ideas are easily replicated. True survival hinges on building one of two core moats: **technological depth** or **capturing timeless human needs first**. Technological moats involve creating deeply integrated, hard-to-replicate systems—like Apple's early iPhone—where hardware, software, and user experience form a cohesive stack. This demands engineering excellence, sovereignty over key infrastructure, and founders deeply embedded in the creation process. Without control over critical components, reliance on external platforms (e.g., APIs, cloud services) risks abrupt obsolescence. Alternatively, startups can win by speed: identifying persistent needs (e.g., Airbnb for lodging, Uber for transportation) and scaling rapidly to harness network effects. Market dominance breeds switching costs, data accumulation, and brand trust, making replication futile. Most failures stem from lacking both moats: easily copied technology without market speed leads to endless competition. Founders must choose—focus on depth for technological advantage or velocity for market capture—and avoid mixing strategies. Ultimately, enduring companies start with one moat and layer both over time, creating systems the world cannot easily replace.

比推03/12 11:36

Startups That Truly Survive Rely on Only These Two Moats

比推03/12 11:36

a16z Partner's Account: Boutique VC is Dead, Scaling Up is the Endgame for VC

In this article, a16z partner Erik Torenberg argues that the traditional "boutique" model of venture capital is outdated. As software becomes the core of the U.S. economy and AI accelerates innovation, startups require far more capital and operational support. The VC industry is shifting from a "judgment-driven" model to one where the ability to win competitive deals is paramount. Scaled VC firms like a16z, which offer extensive resources—capital, talent networks, go-to-market expertise, and global reach—are better positioned to support founders building capital-intensive, transformative companies. These firms can compete for and win access to the most promising startups, which now require unprecedented levels of funding and operational backing. Torenberg contends that the number of high-value startups and their potential scale have increased dramatically, justifying larger fund sizes. The best returns are concentrated in scaled platforms that can repeatedly win and support outlier companies. The future of VC will be a "barbell" structure: a few large, full-service firms on one end, and many small, specialized funds on the other, with mid-sized firms struggling to compete.

marsbit02/12 10:08

a16z Partner's Account: Boutique VC is Dead, Scaling Up is the Endgame for VC

marsbit02/12 10:08

How Do 99% of Non-Profit Web3 Projects Survive?

99% of Web3 projects lack cash flow and survive by relying on token sales and external funding rather than actual revenue. These projects often prioritize early token generation events (TGE) and aggressive fundraising over product development, leading to inflated valuations unsupported by real economic activity. The core issue is the "runway period"—the time a project can operate without revenue. Without sustainable income, projects eventually exhaust their resources and fail. Even marketing efforts become short-term fixes that can't compensate for a non-viable product. A comparison with the top 1% of profitable Web3 projects—which maintain reasonable price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios—highlights the unsustainable valuations of the remaining 99%. The system incentivizes founders to exit early via token unlocks and sales, regardless of project success, while investors bear the losses. This creates a distorted cycle where financial engineering outweighs genuine value creation.

marsbit01/09 03:02

How Do 99% of Non-Profit Web3 Projects Survive?

marsbit01/09 03:02

活动图片

Bitcoin

Industry News