# Пов'язані статті щодо Decentralization

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Decentralization", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Staking Inflation Reforms Trap Ethereum and Solana

The article discusses the "Morton's Fork" dilemma facing both Ethereum and Solana, where both blockchains must choose between two paths that lead to the same outcome: increased centralization of their validator networks. Ethereum researchers have proposed EIP-8363, a "Progressive Issuance Burn" plan. It would gradually increase the proportion of validator rewards burned as the total staked ETH rises, aiming to reduce new token issuance. If staking reaches 50% of the supply, rewards would drop to zero. This proposal has faced strong opposition from major staking service providers and DeFi platforms (e.g., Aave, ether.fi), as staking yields form a crucial base rate for DeFi leverage strategies. Critics argue slashing rewards would first hurt small, individual node operators due to fixed operational costs, accelerating centralization. Solana faces a similar challenge. Its validators have fixed costs but rely heavily on token issuance for rewards (only ~13% of validator income comes from fees). Two current proposals, SIMD-0550 and SIMD-0553, aim to accelerate the reduction of its inflation rate and increase fee burns, respectively. A vote concludes on August 18th. The core conflict is between large token holders (whose assets are diluted by issuance) and the concentrated staking industry that depends on high yields. While reducing issuance could curb the influx of capital into centralized staking services, it could also force out smaller validators first. The article concludes that as blockchains grow into large financial systems, underlying economic forces—yields, leverage, and operational costs—ultimately constrain their original design visions and push them toward centralization, regardless of the specific policy path chosen.

marsbitВчора 13:00

Staking Inflation Reforms Trap Ethereum and Solana

marsbitВчора 13:00

ENS Has Quietly Completed a 'Self-Revolution'

On August 11th, the ENS DAO officially voted into effect the "Next Era of ENS DAO" proposal. This move by the crucial Ethereum domain name protocol establishes a legal entity, the ENS Foundation, to represent it in the real world—a long-missing piece after nearly a decade of operation. The proposal, initially introduced in June, sparked significant community debate. Critics feared it amounted to the DAO dissolving itself and handing over its treasury. The final version, however, represents a compromise, carefully balancing control. The DAO retains governance over its substantial ENS token holdings and its operational wallet. A $65 million endowment is delegated to the Foundation's Board but protected by a 9-day timelock and a Security Council veto. The DAO also holds ultimate power to appoint and remove Board members. The Foundation's role is to handle tasks the DAO is ill-suited for, such as legal representation, trademark enforcement, and engagement with traditional internet governance bodies like ICANN. This allows ENS Labs, the core development company, to focus on engineering, like the upcoming ENSv2. The five-member Foundation Board includes independent directors with provisions to manage conflicts of interest, particularly regarding funding to ENS Labs. This governance restructuring aims to create a clearer separation of duties: the DAO safeguards protocol neutrality, the Foundation handles real-world operations and diplomacy, and ENS Labs focuses on development. It acknowledges the limitations of pure token voting for day-to-day operations, seeking efficiency through a professionally managed entity with built-in accountability mechanisms. The ENS experiment—aiming to be both credibly neutral and effectively represented in traditional forums—will be closely watched as a potential model for the broader DAO ecosystem.

marsbit08/12 10:06

ENS Has Quietly Completed a 'Self-Revolution'

marsbit08/12 10:06

Congress Blocks CLARITY Act, SEC Decides to Act on Its Own: Crypto Regulation is Bypassing the Legislative Stalemate

Following a legislative impasse in the U.S. Senate over the CLARITY Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is moving forward independently with plans for a tailored regulatory framework for crypto assets. On August 11, the SEC announced a vote for August 14 on whether to formally propose "Regulation Crypto," a set of rules for investment contracts involving crypto assets. This marks the first formal crypto rulemaking initiative under Chairman Paul Atkins. The proposal, expected to be approved by the Republican-majority commission, would then enter a 60-90 day public comment period, with a final rule unlikely before 2027. This SEC action comes as the CLARITY Act, which passed the House and a Senate committee, remains stalled in the full Senate. A procedural vote was delayed until September 15 due to unresolved disagreements on anti-money laundering provisions, stablecoin regulation, and government ethics rules. Analysts give the bill a high probability of failure, citing insufficient bipartisan support. Regulation Crypto, based on a framework outlined by Atkins in March, is expected to propose three key exemptions: a startup exemption for limited fundraising, a financing exemption with simplified disclosures, and a crucial "investment contract safe harbor." This safe harbor could allow tokens to exit SEC jurisdiction if a project becomes sufficiently decentralized, addressing a long-standing industry concern over perpetual securities status. Two parallel tracks for crypto regulation are now advancing in Washington: the comprehensive but stalled legislative path of the CLARITY Act, and the administrative rulemaking of the SEC. While the SEC's rules would have more limited scope than a full law, they offer a potential regulatory baseline if Congress fails to act. The simultaneous progress signals a shift in Washington from debating whether to regulate crypto to actively determining how to do so.

marsbit08/12 01:26

Congress Blocks CLARITY Act, SEC Decides to Act on Its Own: Crypto Regulation is Bypassing the Legislative Stalemate

marsbit08/12 01:26

Self-Proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto Craig Wright Speaks Out Against Bitcoin Fork

The self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright, has publicly opposed the Bitcoin fork associated with BIP-110. This proposed update aimed to temporarily limit the storage of large amounts of non-financial data, like images or text, to reduce network load, but it failed to gain the required 55% miner support, receiving only 2.6%. An attempt to launch an alternative chain on August 8th resulted in just two blocks mined over eight hours. Wright argued that Bitcoin, designed as an open system, should not be altered. He warned that allowing a small group of developers to change rules and isolate dissenting users would undermine decentralization. He asserted that no single developer, miner, corporation, or foundation should control the blockchain or rewrite its rules for self-interest. Under a fixed protocol architecture, anyone can build services or competing business models without a central authority deciding participation, application development, or transaction access. Basic rules must remain stable, and competition should be unrestricted, he insisted. This stance follows a March 2024 UK High Court ruling that Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin whitepaper or the creator of Bitcoin. Months later, the same court sentenced him to a 12-month suspended prison sentence and a $180,000 fine for contempt of court. Wright's opposition aligns with recent comments from Michael Saylor, chairman of MicroStrategy, Bitcoin's largest corporate holder, who also warned of potential negative consequences from modifying the blockchain.

cryptonews.ru08/10 20:08

Self-Proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto Craig Wright Speaks Out Against Bitcoin Fork

cryptonews.ru08/10 20:08

The Future Outlook of Bitcoin

Bitcoin: A Mid-2026 Perspective Bitcoin analyst Will Clemente assesses the asset's outlook, arguing that despite a challenging period, it now presents a compelling long-term value opportunity. The current bear market, while less severe in peak drawdown than 2022, has been difficult due to a lack of clear catalysts, underperformance versus assets like gold, and persistent ETF outflows. However, key negative pressures are showing signs of abating. Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs), a major source of sell pressure during the bull market, are slowing accumulation or shifting strategies. While quantum computing remains a long-term concern, its risk is likely significantly priced in at current levels. Fundamentally, the Bitcoin network remains decentralized and healthy, with a robust global node distribution. Although hash rate has declined as miners pivot to AI/HPC, the network's difficulty adjustment ensures security, and the resilience suggests a diverse, non-public mining base. Valuation metrics indicate Bitcoin is in deeply undervalued territory. It is consolidating near its 2021 highs, below the 200-week EMA, with weekly RSI showing a bullish divergence from oversold levels. The MVRV ratio is at historically low levels, signaling the market's aggregate cost basis is near the current price. Long-term holders have resumed accumulation, and trading volume across spot, ETF, and derivatives markets has dried up to multi-year lows. Implied volatility is cheap, and futures basis is compressed, reflecting a complete lack of speculative interest. The core bullish thesis hinges on seller exhaustion. After a year of selling from DATs and ETFs, and with quantum risks largely discounted, the pool of remaining motivated sellers appears limited. A potential catalyst could be steady, price-insensitive inflows from large institutions adding small strategic allocations to portfolios for diversification, given Bitcoin's recent low correlation with other assets. Conclusion: Bitcoin is considered "cheap" with most risks priced in. While a final leg down is possible, the network is healthy, and long-term holders are buying. Strategies include dollar-cost averaging, waiting for a definitive catalyst or price reversal, or entering a position now while using inexpensive options to hedge against further downside. The current setup suggests an interesting period ahead for the orange coin.

marsbit08/09 12:07

The Future Outlook of Bitcoin

marsbit08/09 12:07

活动图片