# Пов'язані статті щодо Cross-Border

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "Cross-Border", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes Revision of MiCA to Cover Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift and 17 Banks to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes MiCA Revision for Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments with 17 Banks During the statistical period of July 3-10, 2026, the RWA sector showed signs of recovery. The total on-chain market capitalization of RWAs rebounded to $33.12 billion, ending a prolonged decline. The stablecoin market cap also returned above $300 billion, with active addresses and holders increasing, indicating restored market vitality. Key regulatory developments include China promoting the use of digital yuan in consumption vouchers, the EU considering revisions to its MiCA framework to cover tokenization and non-EU stablecoins, and Kazakhstan authorizing stablecoin use for cross-border corporate and government payments. In Hong Kong, HSBC issued its first "digitally native" structured product. Major project updates feature Swift announcing readiness of its blockchain ledger for a 24/7 tokenized cross-border payment pilot involving 17 global banks. Ondo launched a perpetuals platform allowing tokenized stocks as collateral. Sony received conditional U.S. OCC approval to launch a stablecoin-focused trust bank in 2027. Tether plans to natively issue USDT on Bitcoin via the RGB protocol. Significant funding rounds saw Securitize planning to deploy over $400 million for acquisitions to expand its institutional tokenization business, while Tether invested $20 million in Brazil's Mercado Bitcoin to support its growth in on-chain financial services. Analysis highlights that stablecoins are evolving into global financial infrastructure with regional specializations and that institutions should consider international expansion to gain practical experience in the RWA tokenization space amidst evolving regulations.

marsbit07/10 09:08

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes Revision of MiCA to Cover Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift and 17 Banks to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

marsbit07/10 09:08

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit07/05 09:23

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit07/05 09:23

Airwallex's Pivot: From Dismissing Stablecoins a Year Ago to Making High-Profile Investments Today

Airwallex, a major cross-border payments fintech, has made a notable strategic shift by leading a seed round investment in Metal, a tokenized financial settlement network. This move is significant given that Airwallex founder Jack Zhang was a prominent critic of stablecoins just a year prior, arguing they failed to reduce costs for mainstream currency corridors and lacked clear utility. The investment targets Metal, a Layer-1 blockchain designed for the tokenization and settlement of assets like stocks, bonds, and stablecoins, aiming for the institutional market. Metal's team includes veterans from Ren Protocol and Meta's Diem project. For Airwallex, this partnership integrates tokenized finance into its global payments network, providing a new settlement layer. Despite his company's investment, Zhang maintains a distinction, stating his skepticism toward "cryptocurrencies" remains, while classifying regulated, asset-backed stablecoins as a separate category. This stance reflects a broader trend of traditional finance (TradFi) cautiously engaging with crypto infrastructure. Companies like Stripe, Mastercard, and major banks are similarly exploring stablecoin payments and tokenization networks, recognizing their potential in emerging markets and 24/7 settlement. The article concludes that Airwallex's investment is less a change of belief and more a strategic necessity to secure a position in the evolving landscape of digital asset settlement, where stablecoins are becoming a key interface for global finance.

marsbit06/26 11:12

Airwallex's Pivot: From Dismissing Stablecoins a Year Ago to Making High-Profile Investments Today

marsbit06/26 11:12

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

**Summary: South Korea's Institutional Crypto Race: Stablecoins and RWA Take Off** South Korea is undergoing a structural shift in its crypto ecosystem, moving beyond its historical role as a major retail trading hub. Major financial institutions and internet platforms are now building institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, with stablecoins and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization as the primary drivers. The push for a regulated Korean won stablecoin market is a major policy and corporate focus. This is driven partly by an estimated $115 billion outflow into dollar stablecoins like USDC, threatening the domestic financial system. Banks (e.g., KB Financial, Hana), payment giants (e.g., Shinhan Card, BC Card), and internet super-apps (KakaoPay, NAVER Pay) are all conducting pilots. The goal is to anchor future digital finance to the Korean won and local regulations. In RWA, South Korea is advancing rapidly within regulatory sandboxes, focusing on unique domestic assets beyond typical global templates like US Treasuries. Projects involve tokenizing ships (with Hyundai Heavy Industries), defense supply chain assets, and K-pop intellectual property, alongside more conventional assets. A legal framework is set for 2027, and platforms like NXT are preparing for regulated trading. Key opportunities for crypto-native projects lie in providing the underlying technology these traditional institutions lack: global distribution channels for tokenized assets, cross-chain liquidity solutions, and enabling infrastructure tools (e.g., for asset packaging and management). Partnerships, such as Solana with Shinhan Card or LayerZero with the Korea Gold Exchange, exemplify this proactive approach. Crucially, user access is being shaped by consumer platforms. NAVER's planned acquisition of Upbit's operator Dunamu and Kakao's development of a unified wallet aim to seamlessly integrate crypto with everyday payments for tens of millions of users. The race is now about which protocols and projects will become the foundational standards as regulation solidifies and institutional adoption accelerates.

Foresight News06/26 08:03

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

Foresight News06/26 08:03

Stablecoins Becoming the Next Policy Challenge for the Fed's Walsh Version

Fed Governor Christopher Waller's speech at the June 22 conference on the U.S. dollar's international role signifies a notable policy shift: stablecoins like USDT and USDC are now being formally considered as potential channels for transmitting U.S. dollar liquidity globally. With their combined market cap surpassing $250 billion and high transaction volumes, these digital assets are moving from the periphery of crypto policy to the core of monetary system research. The key concern for policymakers is how stablecoin flows interact with traditional dollar infrastructure. Their growth could affect bank deposits, demand for short-term Treasury securities (like T-bills), and global access to dollars, depending on whether demand originates overseas or substitutes for domestic bank balances. Issuers' reserve management—holding assets in banks, money market funds, or Treasuries—links stablecoin activity directly to these core markets. The Fed's research agenda now examines whether stablecoins, by combining payment and balance-holding functions on digital rails, could complicate monetary policy implementation or transmit liquidity stress to banks. While current Treasury holdings by issuers are under 1% of the total market, their concentrated demand could marginally impact yields, especially during periods of stress. Consequently, stablecoins are evolving from mere crypto trading tools into a private-layer dollar transmission system with public policy implications, prompting closer regulatory scrutiny of their reserve robustness, redemption mechanisms, and systemic integration.

marsbit06/26 04:50

Stablecoins Becoming the Next Policy Challenge for the Fed's Walsh Version

marsbit06/26 04:50

Canada MSB, Why is it More Suitable for Teams Focused on Long-Term Payment Solutions?

**Canada MSB: Why Is It More Suitable for Teams Focused on Long-Term Payments?** Many crypto payment projects initially obtain a U.S. MSB registration for its cost-effectiveness and market recognition. However, as they scale operations, they often find it insufficient for sustainable, real-world payment business. This is where the Canadian MSB, regulated by FINTRAC, gains serious consideration. Unlike the U.S. framework, the Canadian MSB is not a "lightweight alternative" but a choice for projects committed to long-term, compliant operations, especially in B2B payments, cross-border settlements, and stablecoin transactions. **Key Distinctions:** The Canadian MSB emphasizes substantive, ongoing regulation. It requires establishing a full-fledged AML/CTF framework *before* launching operations, with continuous obligations for KYC, transaction monitoring, and reporting. This positions the holder as a regulated financial service provider from day one. **Operational Scope:** A properly structured Canadian MSB can support businesses like stablecoin/crypto payments and transfers, fiat-crypto exchange, B2B batch settlements, payment APIs for merchants, and underlying structures for services like crypto cards. **Strategic Advantages:** 1. **Bank & Partner Relations:** Its clear regulatory framework and operational requirements make it easier to explain compliance to banks and institutional partners, which is crucial for securing stable banking relationships. 2. **Centralized Path:** It offers a nationally unified system, avoiding the complexity and cost of navigating multiple U.S. state-level Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs). 3. **Business Model Clarity:** It fosters long-term stability by requiring clear business structures, transparent fund flows, and real risk management from the outset, reducing future uncertainties. **Ideal Candidates:** The Canadian MSB is particularly suitable for B2B crypto payment platforms, cross-border stablecoin services, enterprise payment solutions, Web3 financial infrastructure projects, and teams building a "compliance benchmark" for sustainable growth. **Choosing Between U.S. and Canadian MSB:** The choice depends on the project's stage and goals. The **U.S. MSB** is better for **speed, initial validation, and early launch**. The **Canadian MSB** is better for **stability, substantive compliance, and long-term operation**, especially when serving B2B/enterprise clients and requiring reliable banking channels. In essence, while the Canadian MSB involves higher initial compliance rigor, it provides a more solid foundation for building a payment business that banks, partners, and regulators can accept over the long term.

marsbit06/25 23:59

Canada MSB, Why is it More Suitable for Teams Focused on Long-Term Payment Solutions?

marsbit06/25 23:59

活动图片