On-Chain Stock Trading, Yet Retaining Reset Rights: Robinhood's Experiment in Progress and Retreat

比推Опубліковано о 2026-02-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-12

Анотація

Robinhood has launched the public testnet of Robinhood Chain, an Ethereum Layer 2 built on Arbitrum Orbit, aiming to tokenize real-world assets (RWA) like stocks, ETFs, and private equities. This move follows the company’s earlier experiments in Europe, where it offered tokenized stock derivatives—not actual equity ownership—with features like 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and dividend pass-through. The chain leverages Arbitrum for EVM compatibility and Ethereum for security, while allowing Robinhood to enforce compliance controls. Despite its vision for global accessibility and DeFi composability, challenges remain: the assets are legally structured as derivatives, Robinhood Europe acts as the sole counterparty, and the platform retains centralized control, including the ability to reset or restrict wallet access. The initiative represents Robinhood’s broader push to bridge traditional finance and crypto, though its success depends on navigating regulatory and operational hurdles.

Author: KarenZ, Foresight News

Original Title: Robinhood Ventures into L2, Focusing on RWA Tokenization

At the end of January 2026, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev revisited the "GameStop short squeeze" that shocked Wall Street five years ago on social media, stating bluntly: if blockchain technology's real-time settlement capability had been available at that time, the "pulling the plug" moment that angered countless retail investors could have been avoided.

Just two weeks later, Robinhood officially announced the launch of the Robinhood Chain public testnet based on Arbitrum, which will support tokenized real-world assets, including stocks, ETFs, private assets, and other financial instruments.

Architectural Choice: Why Arbitrum?

In terms of architectural choice, Robinhood chose to build the Ethereum Layer 2 network Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum Orbit, using Ethereum Blobs to ensure data availability and ETH as the native Gas token.

Robinhood is well aware that it doesn't need to reinvent the wheel. Arbitrum provides EVM compatibility, allowing existing DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure to migrate at near-zero cost. More importantly, Arbitrum Orbit allows Robinhood to build a "dedicated chain" that has both independent governance and custom logic (such as compliance review) while sharing the unbreakable security consensus of the Ethereum mainnet.

This is crucial for Robinhood, which needs to meet financial regulatory requirements. It can implement compliance rules on-chain, restrict access permissions for specific wallet addresses, all without leaving Ethereum, the largest pool of capital.

More critically, as early as mid-2025, Robinhood had already been trialing its tokenized stock business on Arbitrum. Launching its own chain on Arbitrum now is a natural progression.

Robinhood's Tokenized Stock Pilot

Prior to the Robinhood Chain testnet launch, Robinhood had been conducting an 8-month "tokenized stock" experiment in the European market.

At the Consensus 2026 conference, Robinhood Crypto General Manager Johann Kerbrat stated that Robinhood had launched about 2,000 tokenized stock and ETF products in the European market, covering mainstream U.S. stocks and ETF products. Future plans include tokenizing private equity, real estate, and artwork to enable 7*24 hour trading and instant settlement.

According to Dune data, as of February 9th, the total value of Robinhood's tokenized stocks is currently $15.1 million, with a cumulative trading volume of $74.43 million. Of course, this scale appears relatively small.

Operational Truth: How Does Robinhood's Tokenized Stock "Put" U.S. Stocks On-Chain?

  • Underlying Architecture: These tokenized stocks were initially issued on Arbitrum and will be fully migrated to Robinhood Chain in the future.

  • Essential Nature: These tokenized stocks are not actual ownership certificates but rather derivative contracts pegged to the price of the underlying stock or ETP. This means the tokens held by users track the performance of the U.S. stock, but the users do not have ownership of the corresponding shares.

  • Issuance and Destruction Mechanism: When a user buys a stock derivative contract on Robinhood, the platform immediately generates a corresponding fungible token on the blockchain. This token represents ownership of this contract, but this token cannot be transferred to others. Once the user closes this contract position, the platform will directly burn the corresponding token on the blockchain. The blockchain is updated immediately, and the token becomes completely invalid.

  • Dividend Pass-Through: Although users do not own the stock, Robinhood achieves dividend pass-through. When the underlying stock pays a dividend, the system automatically distributes the dividend in cash to the investor's account.

  • Compliance Armor: Robinhood's ability to legally launch tokenized stocks in Europe is thanks to its thorough regulatory preparation:

  • In June 2025, Robinhood acquired Bitstamp for $200 million in cash. The core value of this acquisition lies in Bitstamp's Slovenian MiFID Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) license.

  • In mid-2025, Robinhood obtained the EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) license and a Lithuanian MiFID brokerage license.

Because of this, Robinhood's tokenized stocks are custodied by Bitstamp.

In terms of trading门槛 and fees, the barrier to entry for such tokenized stocks is extremely low, starting from just 1 euro; trading hours cover 5*24 (weekdays 24/5). Users can place advance orders during non-trading hours, which are automatically executed when the market opens. Regarding fees, Robinhood implements a policy of zero trading commissions and zero spreads, charging only a 0.1% foreign exchange fee during transactions, minimizing user trading costs.

The "Second Half" of Financial Democratization

If Robinhood's first half was famous for "zero commission," then the second half is about "eliminating the barriers of time and space."

The core narrative of Robinhood Chain lies in the comprehensive on-chain representation of RWA (Real World Assets). Its significance is reflected in three dimensions:

  • 24/7 Market: Robinhood Chain brings U.S. stocks into Crypto's time dimension, allowing capital flow to no longer be restricted by Wall Street's schedule.

  • Instant Settlement: Faster trade confirmation speeds.

  • Asset Composability: This is the biggest area of imagination. Imagine, in the future, you could not only hold Tesla stock but also deposit it into Aave or Compound protocols as collateral to borrow USDC to buy coffee. The properties of assets are彻底释放 (thoroughly released). Of course, at this stage, stock tokens on Robinhood cannot be transferred to other digital wallets or trading platforms.

  • Permissionless: Robinhood Chain is designed to be permissionless and developer-friendly. Anyone can interact with the network, build applications, and deploy smart contracts.

  • Erosion of Global Investment Barriers: An investor in Southeast Asia can participate in the growth红利 (dividends) of top global companies through Robinhood Chain with extremely low friction costs.

Unavoidable Challenges and Variables

However, the voyage to the new world still faces several "high walls":

  • Legal Ambiguity of Asset Definition: It currently exists in the form of "derivatives" rather than direct tokenization of the underlying securities, leaving a layer of legal opacity.

  • Single Counterparty is Robinhood Europe: Robinhood Europe is the sole counterparty for this financial derivative, and counterparty concentration could pose potential liquidity and credit risks. However, Robinhood's official documents indicate that Robinhood will hedge the risk of its issued U.S. stock derivatives by purchasing U.S. stocks or ETFs on a 1:1 basis.

  • Ecosystem Closedness: Robinhood Chain currently exhibits strong centralized control attributes. Its terms of service clearly state that the platform can随时重置 (reset at any time), restrict, or revoke access permissions for specific wallets. While this design is necessary to meet compliance requirements, it also conflicts with the core spirit of Web3 decentralization, drawing it into the controversy of "imbalance between compliance and decentralization." However, decentralization and compliance are somewhat conflicting, which is understandable. Over the past few months, Robinhood's open-minded approach to tokenized stocks has also been continuously expanding.

  • Resistance from Third-Party Companies: OpenAI previously publicly stated that it "does not recognize" the legality of certain tokenized equities. This exposes the core矛盾 (contradiction) of RWA: the recognition of rights between third-party companies and the asset tokenizer (Robinhood).

Summary

The launch of the Robinhood Chain testnet did not trigger狂欢 (jubilation) in the Crypto industry, but this might also be a revolution of "still waters run deep."

When a giant like Robinhood, deeply entrenched in traditional retail finance, begins to seriously布局 (layout) blockchain and promote the on-chain representation and trading of real-world assets, the clear boundary between traditional finance and crypto finance is gradually being blurred and dissolved.

Whether Robinhood Chain will become a super gateway connecting traditional finance and Web3, or fall into a closed "island" due to excessive focus on compliance, still requires time to tell.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611482

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason Robinhood chose Arbitrum as the infrastructure for its new blockchain, Robinhood Chain?

ARobinhood chose Arbitrum because it provides EVM compatibility, allowing for easy migration of existing DeFi protocols and wallet infrastructure. More importantly, Arbitrum Orbit enables Robinhood to build a 'dedicated chain' with independent governance and custom logic (like compliance checks) while still leveraging Ethereum's robust security consensus, which is crucial for meeting financial regulatory requirements.

QWhat is the nature of the tokenized stocks Robinhood has been testing in Europe?

AThe tokenized stocks are not actual ownership certificates of the underlying stocks. Instead, they are derivative contracts whose prices are pegged to the value of the target stocks or ETFs. This means users hold tokens that track the performance of the stocks but do not confer ownership rights.

QHow does Robinhood handle dividends for holders of its tokenized stocks?

ADespite users not owning the actual stocks, Robinhood implements a dividend pass-through mechanism. When the underlying stock pays a dividend, the system automatically distributes the cash equivalent of the dividend to the investor's account.

QWhat regulatory preparations did Robinhood make to legally offer tokenized stocks in Europe?

ARobinhood acquired Bitstamp, which held a Slovenian MiFID Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) license. Additionally, it secured an EU MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) license and a Lithuanian MiFID brokerage license in mid-2025, enabling it to offer these products compliantly.

QWhat is one of the major criticisms or challenges facing Robinhood Chain regarding its design philosophy?

AA major criticism is its centralized control attributes. The platform's terms of service allow it to reset, restrict, or revoke access to specific wallets at any time. This design, while necessary for compliance, conflicts with the core Web3 principle of decentralization, leading to debates about an imbalance between compliance and decentralization.

Пов'язані матеріали

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist30 хв тому

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist30 хв тому

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit30 хв тому

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit30 хв тому

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit35 хв тому

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit35 хв тому

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1 год тому

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit2 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片