Russian man loses over 2.3 million rubles due to cryptocurrency scammers

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-30Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-30

Анотація

In May, a 45-year-old man from Ugolnye Kopi met a woman on a dating app. She suggested he invest in cryptocurrency, promising stable returns. Initially refusing, he later changed his mind. In early summer, she connected him with someone posing as an investment specialist. This person explained a method of profiting from digital assets: buy during a price rise and sell at the peak. The victim was convinced to install a fake crypto exchange app on his phone. To gain his trust, the scammers first let him invest small sums—from 1,000 to 10,000 rubles—and showed fake profits. When he invested 50,000 rubles, the promised profit never came. A fraudster then contacted him, claiming the transfer was mistakenly blocked and that law enforcement might get involved. Following this, the scheme's organizers urged the man to "resolve the situation" by sending more money. He made ten transfers to various bank accounts, the last being 500,000 rubles. He eventually realized it was a scam, ceased contact, deleted the app, and reported it to the police. A criminal case has been initiated. Previously, a resident of Kyzyl in the Republic of Tyva lost 5.5 million rubles in a similar crypto investment scam, most of which came from selling his own apartment.

In May, a 45-year-old man met a woman on a dating app. The acquaintance suggested investing in cryptocurrency, promising stable returns. At first, the man refused the offer but later changed his mind. In early summer, the new acquaintance connected the resident of Ugolnye Kopi with a person who introduced himself as an investment specialist.

This person explained the principle of earning on digital assets: one must buy cryptocurrency at the start of its rise and sell at the peak price. The man was persuaded to install an application on his smartphone that mimicked the operation of a real crypto exchange.

"To lull the victim's vigilance, the criminals first allowed him to invest small amounts—from 1,000 to 10,000 rubles—and supposedly receive income. When the victim invested 50,000 rubles, the promised profit did not arrive. Then a scammer contacted him and stated that due to an error in the transfer, the money was blocked, and law enforcement representatives might come to him," said Chukotka police officers.

After the message about the blocked funds, the scheme organizers offered the resident of Ugolnye Kopi to "settle the situation" and transfer them additional money. In total, the victim made ten transfers to various bank accounts. The last transfer amounted to 500,000 rubles.

In the end, the man realized he had encountered scammers, stopped communication, deleted the installed application, and contacted the police. A criminal case has been initiated.

Earlier, a resident of Kyzyl in the Republic of Tuva lost 5.5 million rubles after attempting to earn from cryptocurrency investments. According to police, the man received the majority of these funds from the sale of his own apartment.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total amount of money the 45-year-old man lost to the cryptocurrency scammers?

AHe lost over 2.3 million rubles.

QHow did the scammers initially gain the victim's trust regarding the fake cryptocurrency investment?

AThey let him invest small sums from 1,000 to 10,000 rubles and receive supposed profits.

QWhat was the excuse the scammers used after the victim's 50,000 ruble investment didn't yield the promised profit?

AThey claimed the money was blocked due to a transfer error and that law enforcement might visit him.

QHow did the scammers make the victim make more transfers after blocking his initial funds?

AThey proposed he 'settle the situation' by transferring additional money to them.

QAccording to the article, what did another victim from Kyzyl do before losing 5.5 million rubles in a similar scam?

AHe sold his own apartment, which provided most of the funds he lost.

Пов'язані матеріали

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

Summary: This article examines the significant losses recently suffered by cryptocurrency traders and influencers who ventured into the stock market, specifically by heavily investing in AI-related and semiconductor storage stocks. The narrative centers on the dramatic reversal in the Korean and US equity markets in late July, with stocks like SK Hynix and related leveraged ETFs experiencing historic plunges, erasing massive gains. The analysis highlights several key factors behind the "flip." Traders, accustomed to crypto's high volatility and frustrated by a stagnant market, chased the apparent momentum in AI-themed equities. Many made fatal mistakes: applying high-leverage strategies common in crypto (e.g., 2x ETFs, on-chain perpetual contracts) to stocks, and failing to understand the distinct rules of different stock markets (like Korean pre-market trading). This led to widespread liquidations, especially when a thin Korean pre-market trade triggered a cascading flash crash on a decentralized exchange. Post-crash reflections from prominent figures reveal deep regret and self-criticism. They acknowledge misjudging their expertise, overestimating their edge against sophisticated institutional players, and the dangers of leverage. The article concludes that while such setbacks are part of trading, surviving long-term requires recognizing one's limitations and the inherent risks of cross-market strategies.

marsbit4 хв тому

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

marsbit4 хв тому

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片