China Business Journal Unveils Cryptocurrency Extortion Scheme

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-30Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-30

Анотація

China Business Journal, a state-run Chinese newspaper, has issued a warning about scammers using its name to extort cryptocurrency from companies. According to the publication, fraudsters are sending emails impersonating its journalists. These emails threaten to publish damaging information about a company unless a Bitcoin payment is made. The scammers, using Proton Mail addresses, claim to possess compromising material from a secretive investigation. The newspaper's representatives have clarified that it has no involvement with these messages. They emphasized that the publication does not engage in such practices, never demands payment to suppress stories, and does not negotiate in this manner. The editorial team believes the criminals are exploiting the newspaper's authoritative reputation to pressure companies into making hasty decisions under threat of reputational harm. China Business Journal stated it is collecting evidence of this brand misuse, analyzing the fraudulent emails, and preparing materials for law enforcement. It reserves the right to pursue both civil and criminal liability against the scheme's organizers. Companies are urged to carefully verify any communication purportedly from the newspaper, avoid transferring cryptocurrency to unknown recipients, and report such incidents to the authorities. The newspaper confirmed it will continue its own investigation into the matter.

Chinese state newspaper China Business Journal has warned companies about scammers who use the publication's name to extort cryptocurrency. According to the editorial office, unknown individuals are sending emails posing as newspaper employees. They demand Bitcoin transfers, threatening to publish compromising materials.

As reported by representatives of China Business Journal, the perpetrators send emails from Proton Mail addresses. The messages claim that during a confidential journalistic investigation, information was obtained that could damage the company's reputation. They then proposed transferring cryptocurrency to prevent the information from being published.

The editorial office stated it has no connection to such messages. The newspaper emphasized that it does not use such working methods, does not demand payment to refrain from publication, and does not engage in such negotiations with business representatives. All such letters should be regarded as a fraudulent scheme.

According to the publication's representatives, the perpetrators deliberately use the name of an authoritative state media outlet, aiming to gain the trust of potential victims. The main goal is to force companies to make hasty decisions under the threat of potential reputational damage.

China Business Journal reported that it has already begun gathering evidence of the illegal use of its brand. The editorial office is documenting cases of the mass mailings, analyzing the content of the letters, and preparing materials for submission to law enforcement agencies. The publication also reserved the right to seek civil and criminal liability against the organizers of the scheme.

The newspaper urged companies to carefully verify any communications supposedly made on its behalf, not to transfer cryptocurrency to unknown users, and to report such cases to the competent authorities. The editorial office emphasized that the newspaper will continue its investigation.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main scam scheme described in the article that targets companies?

AThe article describes a scam where fraudsters impersonate employees of the state-run Chinese newspaper China Business Journal. They send emails threatening to publish compromising materials unless the companies transfer Bitcoin.

QAccording to the China Business Journal, what methods do the scammers use to send their fraudulent demands?

AAccording to the report, the scammers use Proton Mail email addresses to send their fraudulent messages to companies.

QHow has the China Business Journal responded to the fraudulent use of its name, as stated in the article?

AChina Business Journal has stated it is gathering evidence of the illegal use of its brand, recording instances of the emails, analyzing their content, and preparing materials for law enforcement. It also reserves the right to pursue civil and criminal liability against the organizers.

QWhat warning does the China Business Journal issue to companies to protect them from this scam?

AThe newspaper warns companies to carefully verify any communication claiming to be from them, not to transfer cryptocurrency to unknown users, and to report such cases to the competent authorities.

QWhy do the fraudsters use the name of the China Business Journal, according to the article's analysis?

AAccording to the article, the fraudsters intentionally use the name of the authoritative state-run media outlet to gain the trust of potential victims and pressure companies into making hasty decisions under the threat of reputational damage.

Пов'язані матеріали

MoonPay Launches PayBox

MoonPay, a developer of payment solutions for crypto and traditional currencies, has launched PayBox, a new type of payment wallet that enables AI assistants in Claude and ChatGPT to conduct transactions. Users can manage digital assets and pay for online services directly within chat interfaces. Upon user request, the AI can perform actions such as purchasing PYUSD, swapping tokens, cross-chain transfers, depositing funds into DeFi protocols, and booking flights. All transactions require user confirmation via an access key before execution. PayBox supports Solana and EVM-based blockchains like Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, Hyperliquid, Tempo, and Robinhood Chain, with plans to add more networks. It can store both crypto wallets and payment cards. Security is provided via MPC (Multi-Party Computation) technology and secure execution environments, ensuring no single entity—including MoonPay or the AI assistant—has full access to user funds. The wallet offers two permission modes: "Always Ask," requiring manual approval for each transaction, and "Standalone," where the AI can operate autonomously within user-set limits. Permissions can be modified or revoked at any time. PayBox is built on technology from Sodot, a secure crypto wallet solutions provider acquired by MoonPay earlier this year. This infrastructure reportedly secures over $50 billion in digital assets across more than 10 million wallets.

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

MoonPay Launches PayBox

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

Summary: This article examines the significant losses recently suffered by cryptocurrency traders and influencers who ventured into the stock market, specifically by heavily investing in AI-related and semiconductor storage stocks. The narrative centers on the dramatic reversal in the Korean and US equity markets in late July, with stocks like SK Hynix and related leveraged ETFs experiencing historic plunges, erasing massive gains. The analysis highlights several key factors behind the "flip." Traders, accustomed to crypto's high volatility and frustrated by a stagnant market, chased the apparent momentum in AI-themed equities. Many made fatal mistakes: applying high-leverage strategies common in crypto (e.g., 2x ETFs, on-chain perpetual contracts) to stocks, and failing to understand the distinct rules of different stock markets (like Korean pre-market trading). This led to widespread liquidations, especially when a thin Korean pre-market trade triggered a cascading flash crash on a decentralized exchange. Post-crash reflections from prominent figures reveal deep regret and self-criticism. They acknowledge misjudging their expertise, overestimating their edge against sophisticated institutional players, and the dangers of leverage. The article concludes that while such setbacks are part of trading, surviving long-term requires recognizing one's limitations and the inherent risks of cross-market strategies.

marsbit48 хв тому

Now the Greatest Regret Is to My Family: Crypto Experts Took a Stumble in the Stock Market

marsbit48 хв тому

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片