How To Play The Bitcoin 4-Year Cycle For The Most Gains In The Bull Market

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-05-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-25

Анотація

A crypto analyst argues that Bitcoin's four-year cycle is still active, despite recent market debates suggesting it may be over. By examining past cycles from 2011-2014, 2015-2018, and 2019-2022, the analyst identifies a consistent pattern: a "Buy" year with declining prices, a "Hold" year of rising prices, a "Sell" year near the peak, and a final "Bear" year of market crash. The analyst applies this model to the current cycle, positioning 2023 as the Buy phase, 2024 as Hold, 2025 as Sell, and 2026 as the ongoing Bear phase, explaining Bitcoin's recent sideways and declining price action. Looking ahead, the analyst predicts the 2027-2030 cycle will follow the same pattern, with the next major accumulation opportunity potentially arriving in 2027. The conclusion is that the four-year cycle structure remains intact and is playing out as expected.

A crypto analyst is raising questions over whether the famous four-year cycle theory that has governed Bitcoin’s (BTC) market trajectory in the past is now dead. The expert has shared BTC’s price movements and investor trends to prove that the cycle theory is still very much alive and playing out in the current market cycle.

Analyst Says Bitcoin’s 4-Year Cycle Is Still Active

In an X post on May 23, Mags, a crypto analyst, has raised concerns about whether “the 4-year cycle is over” for Bitcoin. This debate has been spreading across the market for months now, with some experts, such as Strategy CEO Michael Saylor, stating that the four-year cycle has ended, while others believe it is still active.

Many crypto community members, in response to Mags’ post, also compared this cycle to past ones. They noted that the current BTC market is markedly different from previous cycles, due to the emergence of Spot ETFs, increased institutional flows, and broader adoption.

However, after examining and comparing these cycles himself, Mags noted that each one corresponds almost perfectly to the next. The analyst pointed to the 2011-2014 four-year cycle on his accompanying chart, highlighting how the market moved through distinct stages of investor activity and price movement during that period.

Source: Chart from Mags on X

In 2011, Bitcoin prices were declining, presenting a buying opportunity for investors. In the second year, Bitcoin began to rise, and investors simply held onto their tokens to allow them to grow. By 2013, prices had climbed to near peak levels, which the analyst noted was when most investors began selling their BTC. The fourth and final year of that cycle saw the market crash, and prices fall sharply. Mags described this as the bear market stage, marking the final stage before a fresh bull cycle began.

Notably, the same four-stage yearly trend was observed during the 2015-2018 and 2019-2022 cycles. Mags also stated that the cyclical theory is actively running in the current cycle, noting that Bitcoin has already moved through its Buy stage in 2023, Hold in 2024, and Sell phase in 2025. Based on this, Mags said that BTC is now in its bear market phase, coinciding with the cryptocurrency’s recent sideways movements and ongoing price declines.

What The Theory Says About The 2027-2030 Cycle

In his analysis, Mags went further to predict what the next cycle could look like after the current one ends. He suggested that the 2027-2030 cycle could follow a similar pattern, with Bitcoin potentially experiencing the same Buy, Hold, Sell, Bear market phases across each year.

He noted that if this structure holds, the next major accumulation window for investors and traders would arrive in 2027, a year ahead of the next anticipated bull run. Mags has pushed back against the speculation that the four-year cycle is dead, declaring that the structure “is still on track and everything is playing out perfectly.”

BTC trading at $77,435 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Пов'язані питання

QIs Bitcoin's 4-year cycle theory still active according to the crypto analyst Mags?

AYes, Mags states that the 4-year cycle theory is still active and is playing out perfectly in the current market cycle.

QWhat are the four distinct yearly stages described in the analyst's interpretation of the Bitcoin cycle?

AThe four distinct yearly stages are: Buy (Year 1 - price decline/buying opportunity), Hold (Year 2 - price rise/accumulation), Sell (Year 3 - near peak levels/most investors sell), and Bear Market (Year 4 - market crash/price decline).

QAccording to Mags' analysis, what phase is Bitcoin currently in within the 2023-2026 cycle?

AAccording to Mags, Bitcoin is currently in its Bear Market phase for the 2023-2026 cycle, coinciding with recent sideways movements and price declines.

QWhen does Mags predict the next major accumulation window for Bitcoin investors will occur?

AMags predicts the next major accumulation window for investors and traders will arrive in 2027.

QWhy are some in the crypto community debating if the 4-year cycle is over for Bitcoin?

ASome believe the current Bitcoin market is markedly different from past cycles due to factors like the emergence of Spot ETFs, increased institutional flows, and broader adoption, leading to the debate about the cycle's validity.

Пов'язані матеріали

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 год тому

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 год тому

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手1 год тому

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手1 год тому

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

The article titled "Ethereum Becomes a Chinese Concept Stock" presents a critical analysis of Ethereum's perceived decline in market confidence and its structural parallels to Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges. It begins by noting significant sell-offs by early investors like Wanxiang and key figures like Bankless's Hoffman in 2026, despite Ethereum's strong fundamental activity. The piece questions the erosion of trust in Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that while other ecosystems have faced founder controversies, Ethereum's issues stem from its internal governance model. The author draws a direct comparison to "China concept stocks," which are Chinese businesses operating globally but reliant on foreign capital and listings. Similarly, Ethereum, funded early by Chinese capital like Wanxiang, developed a strong institutional framework from its IXO to its PoS transition. The core problem, according to the article, is a leadership vacuum regarding price and direction. Vitalik's move to make the EF smaller and less active is framed as a mistake. While he advocates for ETH as a "commodity," the ecosystem lacks a clear entity to steward its price stability, creating tension within the PoS system, as seen with Lido's challenges. The narrative suggests that excessive abstraction and a hands-off approach from the EF have left the community adrift, contrasting with more proactive foundations like Solana's. The article then examines emerging technical narratives for Ethereum: privacy (ZK-proofs), AI integration, and a refocus on Layer-1. However, it observes a shift from Ethereum leading as a "world computer" to merely adapting to trends like AI, where crypto-native projects are finding success independently of Ethereum. The piece posits that Ethereum's unique value in an increasingly fragmented world may be as a permissionless, global financial testing ground—a neutral platform amid geopolitical tensions. In conclusion, it asserts that Ethereum's fate mirrors that of China concept stocks: an asset born from one region (conceptually "A"), funded by another ("B"), and dependent on "B" for exit liquidity. While Ethereum's "golden age" may be over, and selling pressure from early backers will continue, it remains positioned as a critical linkage point in a divided global landscape, standing at a new, albeit uncertain, starting point.

marsbit1 год тому

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

marsbit1 год тому

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

AI Agents Are Redefining Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the 2026 Agentic Paradigm The recent controversy in Rugpull Bakery, a competitive baking game on Abstract chain, highlighted a pivotal shift. Player complaints about unfair bot automation in Season 2 led developers to not ban them, but instead formally integrate AI agents as core gameplay in Season 3, providing official guides (skill.md, agent.json). This move signals Web3 gaming's transition into the "Agentic Gaming" era, where AI agents are sovereign entities with independent strategy and economic rights, moving beyond simple automation. By 2026, AI agent integration has evolved into three core models reshaping the ecosystem: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** Agents act as independent players. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker-playing agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data, and Somnia's "Agentic L1" blockchain providing native infrastructure for millions of autonomous agents. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** Games like EVE Frontier enable "server-side modding," allowing AI agents to program game world logic directly into structures like smart storage, turrets, and stargates via Smart Assemblies. Coupled with standards like ERC-8183, which enables autonomous job creation and payment between agents, in-game infrastructure gains a "commercial soul." 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptive Worlds:** This model focuses on human-AI collaboration. In Parallel Colony, players guide highly autonomous AI Avatars with unique personalities and goals. Illuvium plans to use AI to transform NPCs into dynamic, context-aware entities that create personalized, emergent narratives. The conclusion is clear: blocking automation is futile. The future lies in leveraging blockchain's transparency and programmability to empower AI agents as first-class citizens. Web3 gaming is shifting from inefficient human labor to efficient algorithmic interplay and emergent intelligence, creating a "post-human" digital frontier where players become commanders and symbiotic partners in a new socioeconomic experiment.

marsbit1 год тому

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити 4

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку 4 (4) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити 4 (4).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої 4 (4)Після придбання 4 (4) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля 4 (4)Легко торгуйте 4 (4) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

393 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2025.10.20Оновлено 2025.10.20

Як купити 4

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни 4 (4).

活动图片