Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-26

Анотація

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-cha...

1/ Over the past month, the market has been fervently trading expectations, on the one hand betting on re-inflation from damaged global supply chains, and on the other hand trading rate hikes, whether based on factual developments or on expectations surrounding Vice Chair for Supervision nominee Wash. These two forces are like fire and ice, causing commodities and most equity assets to fluctuate constantly. However, technology, which is actually impacted by both, still benefits from the concentration of short-term liquidity.

2/ On a factual level, as we previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the chronic issues with the US's bloated balance sheet have exceeded the scope of what any single Federal Reserve Chair can resolve. All of Wash's hypothetical scenarios could only become reality when AI fundamentally alters social production relations. Until that day arrives, the majority of non-AI-leading nations worldwide (almost all except China and the US) will be the first to fall into a collapse of fiscal and monetary policies. By then, who sits as the Fed Chair will no longer be of great importance.

3/ From a trading perspective, crypto assets currently see little possibility within all the narratives mentioned above. We also observe that the 200-day moving average continues to strongly suppress the price trends of these assets. Even if the "anything but AI" sentiment spreads to "anything but mines," it's unlikely to change this situation. In this current phase of silicon-based versus carbon-based competition, there is no stage for crypto, but there certainly will be in the future. Rest assured.

Review and Commentary on Overall Market Conditions and Trends

Aside from hype, there isn't much noteworthy to discuss in the crypto market. The lackluster trading volume and scarcity of innovation are old news, and technical resistance is very evident. In fact, crypto assets could potentially be good tools for hedging against global liquidity risks. At this moment, it's difficult for any major market focus to directly link to crypto. Meanwhile, inflation/stagflation caused by supply chain damage clearly has more definitive large-capacity investment targets like gold and other metals, petrochemicals, and food. Looking at token distribution, Bitcoin also needs more time to consolidate and absorb selling pressure. The development of this variable is crucial. We expect this correction to persist until at least Q4 2026.

Looking ahead, we believe three events will successively become the dominant drivers of future market volatility:

1. In the short term, the market will highly focus on whether Wash will repeat the missteps of Besant or Musk, turning his stance into the next "333" plan.

2. The market is significantly underestimating the severity of substantial damage to a large number of global supply chains and the time needed for future repair. In the medium term, the market will eventually realize that local resource shortages and price volatility will far exceed initial expectations, similar to the situation during the pandemic.

3. Nations like the UK and Japan, which represent "AI non-beneficiaries + inflation first to fall," will successively face severe fiscal and monetary policy crises. We should hope that AI substitution does not occur too rapidly; otherwise, the existing credit system and national welfare fiscal systems could collapse swiftly.

One day, the market may understand that the bursting of the AI bubble could trigger a contagious credit crisis for some sovereign nations. The monetary and fiscal responses at that time might be the ultimate ignition for Bitcoin's final major bull run.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what are the two opposing forces causing volatility in commodity and equity markets over the past month?

AThe article states that markets have been trading on two opposing expectations: the re-inflation due to damaged global supply chains, and interest rate hikes, whether they are actual hikes or expectations stemming from Warsh. These two forces, likened to ice and fire, are causing significant volatility.

QWhat does the article suggest is the primary narrative or factor benefiting from current short-term liquidity concentration, despite the broader market volatility?

AThe article indicates that technology, specifically AI-related sectors, is benefiting from the concentration of short-term liquidity, even as it is simultaneously impacted by the opposing forces of supply-chain-driven re-inflation and interest rate hike expectations.

QWhat condition does the article claim must be met for all of Warsh's monetary policy assumptions to hold true, and what are the predicted consequences for most non-AI leading nations before that point?

AThe article claims that all of Warsh's assumptions can only hold true when AI fundamentally changes societal production relations. Before that day arrives, the majority of non-AI leading nations (almost all except China and the US) are predicted to fall into a collapse of fiscal and monetary policies.

QWhat is the article's main assessment of the current state of the cryptocurrency market in relation to broader global economic narratives?

AThe article's main assessment is that cryptocurrency assets currently see little possibility within the dominant global economic narratives. It notes low trading volume, a lack of innovation, clear technical resistance (like the 200-day moving average), and that market attention is focused elsewhere, such as on commodities like gold, oil, and grain as inflation hedges.

QWhat does the article identify as the potential catalyst for a future major bull run in Bitcoin?

AThe article suggests that a future contagion of sovereign credit crises, potentially triggered by an AI bubble burst, and the subsequent monetary and fiscal policy responses from governments could serve as the ultimate ignition for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

Пов'язані матеріали

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手58 хв тому

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手58 хв тому

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

The article titled "Ethereum Becomes a Chinese Concept Stock" presents a critical analysis of Ethereum's perceived decline in market confidence and its structural parallels to Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges. It begins by noting significant sell-offs by early investors like Wanxiang and key figures like Bankless's Hoffman in 2026, despite Ethereum's strong fundamental activity. The piece questions the erosion of trust in Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that while other ecosystems have faced founder controversies, Ethereum's issues stem from its internal governance model. The author draws a direct comparison to "China concept stocks," which are Chinese businesses operating globally but reliant on foreign capital and listings. Similarly, Ethereum, funded early by Chinese capital like Wanxiang, developed a strong institutional framework from its IXO to its PoS transition. The core problem, according to the article, is a leadership vacuum regarding price and direction. Vitalik's move to make the EF smaller and less active is framed as a mistake. While he advocates for ETH as a "commodity," the ecosystem lacks a clear entity to steward its price stability, creating tension within the PoS system, as seen with Lido's challenges. The narrative suggests that excessive abstraction and a hands-off approach from the EF have left the community adrift, contrasting with more proactive foundations like Solana's. The article then examines emerging technical narratives for Ethereum: privacy (ZK-proofs), AI integration, and a refocus on Layer-1. However, it observes a shift from Ethereum leading as a "world computer" to merely adapting to trends like AI, where crypto-native projects are finding success independently of Ethereum. The piece posits that Ethereum's unique value in an increasingly fragmented world may be as a permissionless, global financial testing ground—a neutral platform amid geopolitical tensions. In conclusion, it asserts that Ethereum's fate mirrors that of China concept stocks: an asset born from one region (conceptually "A"), funded by another ("B"), and dependent on "B" for exit liquidity. While Ethereum's "golden age" may be over, and selling pressure from early backers will continue, it remains positioned as a critical linkage point in a divided global landscape, standing at a new, albeit uncertain, starting point.

marsbit1 год тому

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

marsbit1 год тому

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

AI Agents Are Redefining Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the 2026 Agentic Paradigm The recent controversy in Rugpull Bakery, a competitive baking game on Abstract chain, highlighted a pivotal shift. Player complaints about unfair bot automation in Season 2 led developers to not ban them, but instead formally integrate AI agents as core gameplay in Season 3, providing official guides (skill.md, agent.json). This move signals Web3 gaming's transition into the "Agentic Gaming" era, where AI agents are sovereign entities with independent strategy and economic rights, moving beyond simple automation. By 2026, AI agent integration has evolved into three core models reshaping the ecosystem: 1. **Autonomous Competitors & Economic Entities:** Agents act as independent players. Examples include TEN Protocol's poker-playing agents, AI Arena's trainable NFT fighters, Satoshi Strike Force's "Digital Athletes" trained on player data, and Somnia's "Agentic L1" blockchain providing native infrastructure for millions of autonomous agents. 2. **Modular Infrastructure & Programmable Environments:** Games like EVE Frontier enable "server-side modding," allowing AI agents to program game world logic directly into structures like smart storage, turrets, and stargates via Smart Assemblies. Coupled with standards like ERC-8183, which enables autonomous job creation and payment between agents, in-game infrastructure gains a "commercial soul." 3. **Hybrid Companions & Dynamic Adaptive Worlds:** This model focuses on human-AI collaboration. In Parallel Colony, players guide highly autonomous AI Avatars with unique personalities and goals. Illuvium plans to use AI to transform NPCs into dynamic, context-aware entities that create personalized, emergent narratives. The conclusion is clear: blocking automation is futile. The future lies in leveraging blockchain's transparency and programmability to empower AI agents as first-class citizens. Web3 gaming is shifting from inefficient human labor to efficient algorithmic interplay and emergent intelligence, creating a "post-human" digital frontier where players become commanders and symbiotic partners in a new socioeconomic experiment.

marsbit1 год тому

AI Agents Fundamentally Transform Web3 Gaming: From the Rugpull Bakery Bot Controversy to the New Agent Paradigm in 2026

marsbit1 год тому

Where Did China's Q1 AI Funding Exceeding 100 Billion RMB Go?

In Q1 2026, China's AI sector raised over 110 billion yuan (approximately $152 billion) across nearly 600 financing deals, a 185.4% year-on-year increase. Major recipients included large model companies and embodied AI firms. Approximately 30-50% of funding was allocated to computing power (GPU procurement and cloud services), highlighting its critical role as a barrier to entry. Significant portions also went to R&D and global talent acquisition. In the large model sector, three key players emerged with distinct strategies: Moonshot AI (valued at $20 billion) pursued an open-source route, achieving rapid commercialization with its Kimi K2.5 model. StepFun (raising billions) focused on a trillion-parameter foundation model and terminal device integration, backed by smartphone supply chain capital. DeepSeek, launching its first funding round at a $45 billion valuation, maintained its open-source, cost-effective approach, now attracting state fund interest. The embodied AI sector saw over 50 deals totaling around 20 billion yuan, creating over 10 unicorns with valuations exceeding 10 billion yuan each. Leading companies like Galaxy General, Qianxun AI, Independent Variable Robotics, and Zhi Jian Power secured major funding, with some beginning initial product deliveries. However, a gap between high valuations and actual revenue poses bubble risks. Key trends identified include: a shift from VC-dominated funding to mixed industrial and state capital; rapidly rising valuations intensifying the "Matthew Effect"; accelerating IPO pipelines; the competitive advantage of open-source strategies; and embodied AI transitioning from proof-of-concept to small-batch delivery. Ultimately, the massive capital influx is pushing China's AI competition into a high-stakes phase where sustaining cash flow and operational endurance may be as decisive as technological breakthroughs.

marsbit1 год тому

Where Did China's Q1 AI Funding Exceeding 100 Billion RMB Go?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити T

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Threshold Network Token (T) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Threshold Network Token (T).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Threshold Network Token (T)Після придбання Threshold Network Token (T) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Threshold Network Token (T)Легко торгуйте Threshold Network Token (T) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

441 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.10Оновлено 2025.03.21

Як купити T

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни T (T).

活动图片