ETC致宝二爷公开信:放弃ETH PoW分叉,矿工应该转移到 ETC

深潮TechFlowОпубліковано о 2022-08-09Востаннє оновлено о 2022-08-10

Анотація

为什么以太坊 POW 分叉不会成功,甚至会是一件非常困难的事情?

为什么以太坊 POW 分叉不会成功,甚至会是一件非常困难的事情?

此封公开信的背景是 ETH PoW 分叉论被热烈讨论的当下,宝二爷等人是此次事件的主导者。对此,以太坊联合创始人 Vitalik Buterin 表示,潜在的以太坊 PoW 分叉不太可能获得长期的广泛采用。

以下是公开信正文:

你好 ,宝二爷:

请让我说明一下为什么我认为以太坊 POW 分叉不会成功,甚至会是一件非常困难的事情。

在 ETH/ETC 分裂的时候,支持 ETC 是世界上最简单的事情——只要继续挖矿,只要继续运行相同的客户端软件。不需要做出额外的努力,而高难度的工作全都是在支持分叉的一方。

这一次,你将需要分叉 Geth(可能还有 Erigon、Besu 和 Nethermind)。这些代码中的每一个都需要删除 POS 转换逻辑,禁用难度炸弹,同时更新链 ID 以提供保护。挖矿软件也可能需要分叉/更新,以对不同链 ID 的支持,也许还有更多。不像客户端代码,它是公开的和开放的,很多采矿软件是封闭的,你需要说服它的创作者做出这些改变,然后支持它们。

你将需要与钱包供应商合作,以同意支持 ETHW;你将需要与交易所合作,同意支持 ETHW。

在你发布了工作的客户端软件后,你需要与所有的节点运营商合作,为了获得他们的支持以运行新软件。

所有这些协调都是非常艰苦的工作,并且需要很长的时间。我知道这一点是因为经历了 ETC 的多个升级周期,这真的是非常非常困难和缓慢。

目前,据我所见,网站上的信息几乎为零,没有关于客户端和其他软件开发发生的信息(即 Github 组织)。

这真的很关键,需要在公开场合进行以建立信任。当然也没有客户端软件的链接发布,这是迫切需要的,以便节点运营商可以开始工作,将这些客户端安装在网上,为过渡做好准备。同时,这里也没有博文、文章、教程或其他文件,这些对协调这项工作至关重要。

离合并只有几个星期了。现在做任何事情都太晚了。

即使你设法让客户端发布,在分叉发生时撮合好少数矿池与交易所,你仍然会面临问题,即该链将是多么破败不堪。

因为所有由现实世界资产(USDT、USDC 等)支持的稳定币都将归零,发行者会支持 ETH。DeFi 中的几乎所有东西都建立在这些稳定币之上,所以几乎每一个 DeFi 项目都将被完全破坏。

在 ETH/ETC 分裂的时候,没有 DeFi 或稳定币,所以没有什么真正的破坏。现在,ETH 上的大部分价值是以代币形式存在的,而不仅仅是原生的以太币。因此,PoW 新链对现有的 ETH 用户来说毫无意义。

所有建立在以太坊之上的 dApp 都有很多相关的链下资源——他们允许访问的网站、运行后端服务的服务器、社区资源和文档,以及最重要的是运行其 dApp 的人——开发、错误修复、维护、客户服务等等。所有这些都将在分叉时消失,因此,即使是那些不会立即归零的项目,对于大多数用户来说,仍然是破碎的,无法访问的,因为他们没有运行自己的节点,而是依赖于这些第三方服务。

除非特定的项目同意为他们的项目提供并行的基础设施(大多数不会),否则该项目将被破坏,任何有预言机的东西也会被破坏。

许多项目有管理员权限,用于智能合约升级和紧急维护操作。这些需要私钥,由项目负责人持有。他们不会把私钥交给那些想在 PoW 新链上运行 dApp 分叉的人,他们为什么要这样做?这只会给他们带来风险,也会使他们花费时间和金钱建立起来的项目价值受到影响。

对于大名鼎鼎的项目来说,更有可能的情况是,他们会明确选择关闭他们在 PoW 新链上的智能合约——以避免用户的混乱和损失。

NFT 的情况和 DeFi 的情况是一样的,PoW 链上的 NFT 不会被识别或支持,你有 Cryptokitties 吗?你不会得到这些东西的 PoW 分叉版本,你也不会得到像 OpenSea 这样的 NFT 市场的分叉版本。

在 EthereumPOW 上的任何东西都需要明确地与项目团队交谈,并说服他们(无论是谈话还是谈钱),值得他们重复他们所有的基础设施来重新建立。

这是一个巨大的、艰巨的协调任务,而合并尚且只有几周的时间,如今的繁荣在 Pow 新链上大概率不会重现。

我只是不认为这样一个链能给实际的最终用户提供任何价值,更何况启动这个链本身也有巨大的负担,然后还要付出更多的努力才能使它真正发挥作用。但无论发生什么,由于 DeFi 和 NFT 的断裂,链本身将成为分叉后的灾难区,没有办法避免这种痛苦。

我不认为你和其他 EthereumPOW 支持者对此有多深的了解,尤其是低估了或忽略这个 "不可分叉性 "现实。

还有时间来取消这个分叉,它的存在只会造成更多的混乱,并且在最初的拉盘后将不可避免地失败,因为它将没有任何用户。

正如 Barry 所说,"除 ETC 外,我们完全支持 ETH PoS,并且不会支持任何 ETH PoW 分叉。ETH 矿工应该转移到 ETC,以使他们的收入长期最大化,就这么简单"。

他是对的。

祝你好运,Bob。

Пов'язані матеріали

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit2 хв тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit2 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News3 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News3 хв тому

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

**Summary: South Korea's Institutional Crypto Race: Stablecoins and RWA Take Off** South Korea is undergoing a structural shift in its crypto ecosystem, moving beyond its historical role as a major retail trading hub. Major financial institutions and internet platforms are now building institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, with stablecoins and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization as the primary drivers. The push for a regulated Korean won stablecoin market is a major policy and corporate focus. This is driven partly by an estimated $115 billion outflow into dollar stablecoins like USDC, threatening the domestic financial system. Banks (e.g., KB Financial, Hana), payment giants (e.g., Shinhan Card, BC Card), and internet super-apps (KakaoPay, NAVER Pay) are all conducting pilots. The goal is to anchor future digital finance to the Korean won and local regulations. In RWA, South Korea is advancing rapidly within regulatory sandboxes, focusing on unique domestic assets beyond typical global templates like US Treasuries. Projects involve tokenizing ships (with Hyundai Heavy Industries), defense supply chain assets, and K-pop intellectual property, alongside more conventional assets. A legal framework is set for 2027, and platforms like NXT are preparing for regulated trading. Key opportunities for crypto-native projects lie in providing the underlying technology these traditional institutions lack: global distribution channels for tokenized assets, cross-chain liquidity solutions, and enabling infrastructure tools (e.g., for asset packaging and management). Partnerships, such as Solana with Shinhan Card or LayerZero with the Korea Gold Exchange, exemplify this proactive approach. Crucially, user access is being shaped by consumer platforms. NAVER's planned acquisition of Upbit's operator Dunamu and Kakao's development of a unified wallet aim to seamlessly integrate crypto with everyday payments for tens of millions of users. The race is now about which protocols and projects will become the foundational standards as regulation solidifies and institutional adoption accelerates.

Foresight News1 год тому

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片