Willy Woo Sebut Bitcoin OGs Akan Membeli Stash Satoshi Jika Terjadi Peretasan Kuantum

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-14Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-14

Анотація

Debat tentang potensi ancaman komputer kuantum terhadap Bitcoin muncul di media sosial. Seorang YouTuber, Josh Otten, memicu perbincangan dengan skenario di mana komputer kuantum yang cukup kuat dapat meretas dompet Satoshi Nakamoto dan menjual 1 juta BTC miliknya, menyebabkan harga Bitcoin anjlok drastis. Willy Woo, pemegang Bitcoin jangka panjang, menanggapi bahwa meski demikian, banyak investor veteran (OG) akan membeli dalam kondisi crash tersebut, dan jaringan Bitcoin akan bertahan. Ia menjelaskan bahwa sekitar 4 juta BTC di alamat pay-to-public-key (P2PK), termasuk milik Satoshi, rentan terhadap serangan kuantum karena kunci publiknya terpapar di blockchain. Namun, alamat dompet Bitcoin yang lebih baru tidak serentan itu karena tidak menampilkan kunci publik lengkap. Adam Back, co-founder Blockstream, menyatakan ancaman komputer kuantum masih puluhan tahun lagi, sehingga ada cukup waktu untuk mengadopsi kriptografi pasca-kuantum. Analis James Check menambahkan bahwa ancaman terbesar adalah pada harga pasar, karena komunitas tidak akan membekukan aset Satoshi sebelum diretas, sehingga koinnya dapat kembali beredar.

Debat muncul di media sosial pada hari Sabtu tentang efek potensial dari komputer kuantum yang meretas stash Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin (BTC) dan kemudian membuang koin-koin tersebut ke pasar.

Debat dimulai ketika YouTuber Josh Otten membagikan grafik harga BTC yang anjlok menjadi $3,00 dan mengatakan bahwa hal ini bisa terjadi jika komputer kuantum yang cukup kuat muncul dan mencuri 1 juta BTC milik pencipta Bitcoin anonim Satoshi Nakamoto dan menjualnya.

"Banyak OGs akan membeli flash crash-nya. Jaringan Bitcoin akan bertahan; sebagian besar koin tidak langsung rentan," kata pemegang Bitcoin jangka panjang Willy Woo.

Namun, ada sekitar 4 juta BTC yang disimpan di alamat pay-to-public-key (P2PK), termasuk koin Satoshi, yang menunjukkan kunci publik penuh onchain ketika koin dibelanjakan, membuat mereka rentan terhadap serangan kuantum, tambah Woo.

Mengekspos kunci publik penuh dompet Bitcoin onchain membuat dompet ini rentan terhadap serangan kuantum di masa depan karena komputer kuantum yang cukup kuat secara teoritis dapat memperoleh kunci privat dari kunci publik di masa depan

Jenis alamat dompet BTC yang lebih baru tidak terlalu rentan terhadap serangan kuantum karena mereka tidak mengekspos kunci publik penuh onchain, dan jika kunci publik tidak diketahui, maka komputer kuantum tidak dapat menghasilkan kunci privat yang dipasangkan dari data tersebut.

*Kepemilikan Bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto. Sumber:* *Arkham Intelligence*

Komunitas Bitcoin dan crypto terus memperdebatkan efek potensial dari komputasi kuantum pada Bitcoin dan teknologi enkripsi yang mendasari cryptocurrency, dengan beberapa pihak berargumen bahwa komputasi kuantum akan menjadi kematian bagi industri ini.

Related: Bos VanEck Pertanyakan Privasi dan Enkripsi Bitcoin Melawan Teknologi Kuantum

Bitcoin OG Adam Back mengatakan ancaman komputer kuantum masih puluhan tahun lagi

Adam Back, pemegang Bitcoin awal, cypherpunk dan co-founder perusahaan teknologi Bitcoin Blockstream, mengatakan bahwa BTC tidak akan menghadapi ancaman kuantum dalam 20-40 tahun ke depan.

Back berargumen bahwa masih ada banyak waktu untuk mengadopsi standar kriptografi pasca-kuantum, yang sudah ada, sebelum komputer kuantum yang cukup kuat untuk memecahkan enkripsi modern dan standar keamanan cyber dibangun.

Analis pasar James Check mengatakan bahwa komputasi kuantum tidak mengancam teknologi Bitcoin karena pengguna akan bermigrasi ke alamat yang tahan kuantum pada saat komputer kuantum yang layak muncul.

Ancaman kuantum lebih menjadi ancaman bagi harga pasar Bitcoin karena "tidak ada kemungkinan" bahwa komunitas Bitcoin akan setuju untuk membekukan koin Satoshi sebelum komputer kuantum meretas dompetnya dan mengembalikan koin-koin tersebut ke dalam sirkulasi, kata Check.

Majalah: Serangan Kuantum pada Bitcoin Akan Membuang-buang Waktu: Kevin O’Leary

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Пов'язані питання

QApa yang dikatakan Willy Woo akan terjadi jika komputer kuantum meretas dan menjual 1 juta BTC milik Satoshi Nakamoto?

AWilly Woo mengatakan bahwa banyak pemegang Bitcoin lama (OGs) akan membeli BTC dalam flash crash tersebut, dan jaringan Bitcoin akan bertahan karena sebagian besar koin tidak langsung rentan terhadap serangan kuantum.

QMengapa dompet Bitcoin dengan alamat pay-to-public-key (P2PK) seperti milik Satoshi dianggap rentan terhadap serangan kuantum?

AKarena alamat P2PK menampilkan kunci publik lengkap di blockchain ketika koin dibelanjakan, yang memungkinkan komputer kuantum yang cukup kuat secara teoretis dapat menurunkan kunci privat dari kunci publik tersebut.

QBagaimana pendapat Adam Back tentang ancaman komputer kuantum terhadap Bitcoin?

AAdam Back menyatakan bahwa Bitcoin tidak akan menghadapi ancaman kuantum dalam 20-40 tahun ke depan, dan ada cukup waktu untuk mengadopsi standar kriptografi pasca-kuantum yang sudah ada.

QApa perbedaan kerentanan antara alamat Bitcoin lama (P2PK) dan alamat baru terhadap serangan kuantum?

AAlamat baru tidak terlalu rentan karena tidak mengekspos kunci publik lengkap di blockchain, sehingga komputer kuantum tidak dapat menghasilkan kunci privat yang dipasangkan tanpa data kunci publik tersebut.

QMenurut James Check, mengapa ancaman kuantum lebih berdampak pada harga pasar Bitcoin daripada teknologinya?

AKarena komunitas Bitcoin tidak akan membekukan koin Satoshi sebelum komputer kuantum meretas dompetnya, yang akan mengembalikan koin-koin tersebut ke sirkulasi dan mempengaruhi harga pasar.

Пов'язані матеріали

Circle's Q2 Earnings Report Released, Has the Wall Street Bull-Bear Divide Been Resolved?

Circle's Q2 2026 earnings report presents a mixed picture. While total revenue of $701 million slightly missed expectations, it reversed a recent declining trend. A key concern is USDC's circulation, which grew on average but fell 4.8% quarter-over-quarter by the period's end, contributing to a slight market share loss. Revenue remains heavily reliant on USDC reserve income. Notably, the company significantly raised its full-year "Other Revenue" guidance to $310-330 million, largely due to the one-time recognition of ARC token presale revenue. Its core profitability metric, RLDC Margin, held steady at 41%. Strategically, Circle is advancing its platform vision. The Arc network mainnet launch is set for September with major institutional validators like BlackRock and Visa. Its payment network (CPN) transaction volume is growing rapidly, and it secured key federal and state trust bank charters in the U.S. The report reflects the ongoing Wall Street debate: whether Circle's value lies primarily in its USDC stablecoin business or its broader digital infrastructure ambitions. Evidence exists for both views, leaving the long-term validation of its platform strategy to future quarters.

Odaily星球日报9 хв тому

Circle's Q2 Earnings Report Released, Has the Wall Street Bull-Bear Divide Been Resolved?

Odaily星球日报9 хв тому

ChangXin's "Peer": The Fate of Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd. Is Regrettable

China's DRAM industry saw a pivotal moment with ChangXin's (CXMT) successful IPO. However, the fate of its 2016 counterpart, Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit, offers a stark contrast. Both were founded the same year with similar missions, massive investment, and 12-inch wafer fab goals to break into the DRAM market dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Fujian Jinhua initially progressed faster by partnering with Taiwan's United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) for 32nm DRAM technology. This strategy, however, led to a protracted legal battle. In 2017, Micron sued UMC and Jinhua for trade secret theft. The situation escalated in October 2018 when the U.S. Commerce Department added Fujian Jinhua to its Entity List, citing its imminent mass production as a threat. This resulted in an immediate halt of equipment, software, and technical support from American suppliers, followed by UMC suspending cooperation. Although Jinhua was eventually cleared of criminal charges in late 2023 after a nearly six-year legal saga, it missed the critical industry growth window. In contrast, ChangXin took a different path from the start, focusing on building its own R&D system and securing intellectual property, notably through a license for former Qimonda patents. While also facing U.S. scrutiny and initial heavy losses, ChangXin benefited from a more mature domestic supply chain when it reached mass production. It achieved profitability in 2025 and represents the rise of China's DRAM industry. Jinhua's story is a crucial lesson. It was the first Chinese DRAM company to confront the complex realities of international IP disputes, export controls, and supply chain vulnerabilities. Today, it has resumed operations with a 40,000 wafers-per-month capacity, aiming for 60,000. While it missed its initial opportunity, its experience informed the strategic evolution of later Chinese semiconductor firms.

marsbit24 хв тому

ChangXin's "Peer": The Fate of Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd. Is Regrettable

marsbit24 хв тому

Crypto Fear and Greed Index Rises Over Last 24 Hours! Has It Exited the Fear Zone? Here are the Details

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index, a key indicator measuring investor sentiment in the cryptocurrency market, showed a limited recovery over the past 24 hours. According to data from CoinMarketCap, the index rose by 2 points to reach 37. Despite this increase, the indicator remains in the "Fear" zone, reflecting a continued cautious approach among investors. The index, which ranges from 0 (extreme fear) to 100 (extreme greed), suggests that while there is a slight improvement in investor confidence, market participants are still largely risk-averse. CoinMarketCap calculates the index by considering factors such as the price movements of the top 10 cryptocurrencies, overall market volatility, derivatives market data (like put/call ratios), stablecoin supply ratios, and user search data. Analysts note that the modest index rise points to a slight easing of market panic. However, its persistence in the fear zone indicates ongoing investor caution due to macroeconomic events, interest rate policies, and regulatory uncertainty. Experts suggest that for a sustained improvement in sentiment, increased trading volumes and stronger institutional capital inflows are necessary. Key factors expected to influence market mood in the coming period include capital flows into spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs and developments in global monetary policy. While the index alone is not a sufficient tool for investment decisions, its potential to exit the fear zone is seen as a significant signal for the future direction of the crypto market.

cryptonews.ru25 хв тому

Crypto Fear and Greed Index Rises Over Last 24 Hours! Has It Exited the Fear Zone? Here are the Details

cryptonews.ru25 хв тому

Circle Q2 revenue falls short of Wall Street estimates

Circle reported second-quarter fiscal 2026 revenue and reserve income of $701 million, a 7% year-over-year increase, but slightly missed Wall Street estimates averaging $713.32 million. Net income from continuing operations was $48 million. The company noted a 5% rise in reserve income, driven by a 25% increase in average USDC circulation. Despite the earnings miss, shares rose 5.7% in pre-market trading. Circle announced the founding validators for its upcoming Arc blockchain, set to launch on September 16, including major firms like BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard. Management raised its full-year guidance for other revenue, which includes Arc token presale revenue, to $310-$330 million from $150-$170 million. The results come amid a broader stablecoin market contraction, with total supply falling to $153 billion. Circle's USDC, with a $72 billion circulating supply, remains the second-largest stablecoin. According to a Talos spokesperson, USDC facilitated 72% of the $15.6 trillion in adjusted on-chain transfer volume in the quarter.

cointelegraph1 год тому

Circle Q2 revenue falls short of Wall Street estimates

cointelegraph1 год тому

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is reportedly drafting a ban on importing new models of Chinese-made optical transceiver modules, with a potential implementation target of 2026. This "decoupling" move comes as Chinese firms, led by industry leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink, dominate the global optical module market with over 60% share, and hold an even larger position in the high-speed 800G and 1.6T segments critical for AI data centers. Market reactions were mixed: U.S. optical module stocks initially rose, while Chinese A-shares opened lower but largely recovered by the close. Analysis suggests a complete U.S. decoupling from Chinese modules faces significant hurdles. North American cloud giants (Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon) and NVIDIA have massive demand for high-speed modules, estimated at around 40 million units in 2026. U.S. manufacturers' combined monthly production capacity for these modules is less than one-fifth that of a single major Chinese player like Zhongji Innolight, which reported production of 23.76 million units in 2025. Chinese companies are heavily reliant on the U.S. market, with over 90% of revenue for top firms coming from overseas, primarily the U.S. However, they have begun mitigating risks by establishing assembly plants in Southeast Asia and Mexico. Industry observers note the final impact depends on whether any potential U.S. restrictions target specific companies or products based on origin. Past U.S. sanctions on Chinese tech firms have often spurred increased domestic R&D and market diversification. Despite initial stock volatility, shares of major Chinese optical module companies pared losses, indicating market belief in the sector's resilience and the practical difficulties of abruptly replacing Chinese supply.

marsbit1 год тому

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test