InfoFi遇冷:规则升级、收益缩水与平台转型困局

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-09-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-09-09

如果我们已迎来 InfoFi 时代的终结,或是正一步步逼近这个节点,我并不会感到意外。

自 InfoFi 兴起以来,许多人借此赚取了可观的收益,有人累计赚了 5 位数,有人甚至赚到了 6 位数。但如今,一些信号值得我们高度警惕。

门槛规则变更

严格来说,我并不认为 Kaito 这次升级完全是件坏事,它或许能有效杜绝大量账号用 AI 生成劣质内容 「刷量」 的行为,同时提升内容质量。

但升级后,不仅小号受到冲击,许多大号也未能幸免。这导致大量依赖 Kaito 的用户选择离开,因为升级后,他们几乎没有机会再通过平台赚到钱。

 Capital Launchpad

对此,一些项目方选择取消门槛,以吸引小号入驻。这恰恰说明:在大多数情况下,小号群体是至关重要的。

我的看法是:Kaito 似乎对这次升级的方向感到困惑,而且很多项目方显然不喜欢这种 「门槛限制」。不过不可否认的是,在过去几个月里,Kaito 的表现一直相当出色。


代币分配方案拉胯

对于内容创作者(yappers)而言,如今常规的 0.5%-1% 代币分配比例已远远不够,因为这些代币上线时的估值往往很低。

早期,有些账号通过 1-2 个月的推广活动就能赚到 4-5 位数收益;而现在,即便是参与 3-6 个月的活动,也只能赚 3-4 位数,这让很多人感到心灰意冷。

甚至连头部账号,即便产出了优质内容,也很难赚到可观的 4 位数收益。

这对依赖 InfoFi 的创作者来说为何是坏消息?在 InfoFi 兴起之前,许多创作者作为品牌大使或 KOL 推广内容,就能获得不错的收入。而现在 Kaito 上的项目方给出的报酬,根本无法与外部合作相提并论 。鉴于这一事实,越来越多创作者选择离开 InfoFi 平台,也就不足为奇了。


「Capital Launchpad」 主导地位凸显

7 月 22 日,Kaito 的 「Capital Launchpad」正式上线,首个上线项目是 Espresso,随后有更多项目陆续入驻。

 Capital Launchpad

对 Kaito 而言,这无疑是个不错的产品,但我也有几点担忧:

  • 通过 Kaito 首次代币发行的项目,至今没有一个在公开市场上线;
  • 这些项目均未公布上线日期;
  • 大多数项目的估值过高,且代币解锁方案对投资者不友好。

我的补充观点:Kaito 最初是专为 InfoFi 打造的平台,后来才决定增加额外的平台功能(如 Launchpad),这本身是很棒的尝试。但最近,越来越多项目选择入驻 「Capital Launchpad」,而非参与 「创作者排行榜」。对于一个 InfoFi 平台来说,这种趋势显然不太乐观。

不过,这只是我观察到的明显现象,似乎没多少人对此提出质疑。


项目方更倾向于与 KOL 直接合作,而非通过 Kaito 平台

这一点很明显:项目方已不再那么热衷于参与 InfoFi 合作了。

最近,Zachxbt 发布了一个谷歌表格,列出了一批从某项目方获得报酬的账号。我提及此事并非因为惊讶,而是因为这些报酬金额相当可观,尤其是与 Kaito 「创作者排行榜」 上的项目相比。

 Capital Launchpad

我相信,这已经让不少人意识到:除了 InfoFi,还有很多赚钱的方式。而人性的现实是 「想尽办法多赚钱」,因此我认为这对 Kaito 构成了直接竞争。

Пов'язані матеріали

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

This article analyzes the competitive landscape of China's AI industry through a dual-front war analogy: the "Eastern Front" of business model competition and the "Western Front" of global strategic positioning. **The Eastern Front: The Scramble for Supply Lines and Monetization** The "Eastern Front" examines the contrasting strategies of three Chinese tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—in the face of AI's high marginal costs. Tencent integrates AI as a catalyst within its existing ecosystems (advertising, gaming, cloud) for monetization, prioritizing high-value scenarios over user growth. Alibaba bets on a full-stack, self-developed approach from chips to applications, aiming to control costs and ecosystem, though this requires immense patience and resources. ByteDance, with Doubao as its flagship, pursues a traditional traffic-driven, "super app" strategy but faces severe monetization challenges as its massive user base incurs unsustainable operational costs. The central challenge for all is building a reliable "supply line" (sustainable funding/profit) and achieving efficient monetization, moving beyond being mere "token factories." **The Western Front: "Preserving Land" vs. "Preserving People"** The "Western Front" frames a global strategic divergence. The U.S. model ("preserving land") focuses on closed-source, high-premium models (e.g., Anthropic) targeting lucrative enterprise markets. China's strategy ("preserving people") leverages open-source models (e.g., Alibaba's Qwen, DeepSeek) and extremely low pricing to attract global developers and capture long-tail markets, akin to a "surround the cities from the countryside" approach. The goal is to make Chinese models the default infrastructure, locking in future ecosystem value. However, the critical test is whether this open-source ecosystem can achieve a commercial闭环, converting developer adoption into tangible revenue (e.g., via cloud services), and bridging the monetization gap with Western models that charge for value, not just tokens. **Conclusion: The Long March from Factory to Brand** The article concludes that China's AI industry possesses technology, users, and scenarios but must integrate them to create and capture value. Its ultimate success depends on navigating both fronts: companies must establish sustainable monetization on the Eastern Front, while the industry's Western strategy must evolve from simply "preserving people" (developer adoption) to truly "preserving both people and land" — transforming open-source ecosystem dominance into commercial success and premium brand value. This journey from being a "token factory" to a "value highland" will require strategic patience and the ability to outlast competitors in a prolonged contest.

marsbit30 хв тому

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

marsbit30 хв тому

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

The journey from the Rockdale aluminum smelter in Texas to space-based data centers illustrates a core economic principle: whoever controls the cheapest electricity dictates the use of computing power. The evolution is clear. Old industrial sites with pre-existing, high-capacity power grids are being repurposed. In Rockdale, a former Alcoa plant now houses vast Bitcoin mining rigs, which are increasingly being replaced by AMD chips for AI training. The logic is purely financial: while smelting aluminum yields $0.17–0.27 per kWh and Bitcoin mining $0.05–0.11, AI inference on H100 GPUs generates $1.27–3.67 per kWh. Recent deals confirm the rush for power infrastructure. Riot Platforms leases space to AMD; TeraWulf bought an old Kentucky aluminum plant for its grid; NYDIG secured a New York site for its cheap hydropower to mine Bitcoin. As AI giants like Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon aggressively expand, they now directly compete with crypto miners for the same industrial power resources, often outbidding them. This has led to a decline in Bitcoin's global hash rate and a wave of miner conversions to AI data centers. This "digital resource curse" extends globally. Gulf nations, long offering subsidized power to attract heavy industry like aluminum, are now pivoting to become AI and cloud computing hubs—exporting computational power instead of physical commodities. Similarly, Bhutan halted its sovereign Bitcoin mining to sell hydropower directly to India for a steadier return. The frontier is space. Projects like Starcloud plan orbital solar-powered data centers, leveraging constant sunlight and natural cooling, with Bitcoin mining as a secondary use for surplus power. Even consumer brands are transforming; Allbirds shifted from footwear to AI infrastructure, causing its stock to surge. Meanwhile, crypto projects like Bittensor, Render, and Akash propose a decentralized alternative, creating markets to aggregate distributed, idle computing resources from individual hardware. The underlying infrastructure—the power grid—remains constant. As profit margins shift, the facilities built upon it will continue to evolve, from aluminum to Bitcoin to AI and beyond, always chasing the highest yield per kilowatt-hour, whether in Texas, Abu Dhabi, or low Earth orbit.

marsbit39 хв тому

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

marsbit39 хв тому

Conquering is easy, governing is hard: Polymarket must bow to regulations to plant its flag globally

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, faces significant regulatory hurdles in its global expansion. Its "permissionless" model, which bypasses traditional identity and financial controls, has led to widespread crackdowns. India recently blocked the site, categorizing it as illegal online gambling under new 2025 laws. Brazil also banned it and similar platforms, though it simultaneously authorized a regulated, investor-only version on its national exchange. Across Europe, countries like France, Portugal, and the Netherlands are enforcing bans based on existing gambling and financial regulations. To enter key markets, Polymarket is adopting a pragmatic, compliant approach. In the U.S., it paid a $1.12 million fine, acquired a CFTC-licensed exchange, and now operates a regulated, KYC-mandatory platform for American users. It also secured a major investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which will distribute its prediction data to institutional investors. In Japan, where gambling laws are strict, Polymarket has begun a long-term lobbying effort, aiming for legalization by 2030 through building institutional partnerships and community presence. Despite these challenges, the prediction market industry is booming, with global volume projected to surge from $51 billion to potentially $1 trillion by 2030. Polymarket's core dilemma remains: adapting its decentralized, anonymous model to fit within sovereign regulatory frameworks focused on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering rules. Its survival in each market depends on navigating this complex political and legal landscape.

marsbit42 хв тому

Conquering is easy, governing is hard: Polymarket must bow to regulations to plant its flag globally

marsbit42 хв тому

It's Easier to Conquer than to Govern: Polymarket Must Bend to Every Rule to Plant Its Flag Globally

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, is facing significant regulatory hurdles as it expands globally, illustrating the tension between permissionless, crypto-native platforms and national legal frameworks. The platform, which allows users to bet on event outcomes, was recently blocked in India under new online gambling laws and faces similar outright bans in Brazil and Ukraine, the latter citing moral objections to wagering on active war events. In Europe, countries like France, the Netherlands, and the UK are restricting access by enforcing existing gambling and financial derivatives regulations, forcing Polymarket to geo-block users or operate in view-only modes. To navigate this complex landscape, Polymarket is adopting a market-by-market, compliant strategy. In the U.S., it paid a $1.4 million CFTC fine, acquired a licensed exchange (QCEX) for $112 million, and now operates a regulated U.S. entity with strict KYC, abandoning anonymity. It also secured a major investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which will distribute its prediction data to institutional investors. In Japan, a high-potential market, it has begun a long-term lobbying effort aiming for legalization by 2030, acknowledging the country's strict anti-gambling laws and slow regulatory processes. The article concludes that while the global prediction market is growing rapidly—projected to reach $2.4 trillion by 2030—Polymarket's core challenge is transforming its decentralized model to fit sovereign regulatory systems built on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering rules. Its survival depends on proving its legitimacy in each jurisdiction.

链捕手47 хв тому

It's Easier to Conquer than to Govern: Polymarket Must Bend to Every Rule to Plant Its Flag Globally

链捕手47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片