LBank推出1亿美元合约风险保护基金，全面提升交易安全

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2025-03-13Востаннє оновлено о 2025-03-13

Анотація

强化交易安全性、维护市场公平，并为用户提供更有保障的交易环境。

据Coindesk 报道， 2025 年 3 月 12 日 – 加密货币交易所 LBank（lbank.com）正式宣布设立 1 亿美元合约风险保护基金，以强化交易安全性、维护市场公平，并为用户提供更有保障的交易环境。该基金专为应对异常市场波动而设，确保用户在剧烈行情下依然能够放心交易，同时巩固 LBank 在风控管理和行业创新方面的领先地位。

基金详情

当 K 线价格在 1 分钟内偏离市场合理价格超过 2% 并迅速回调时，合约风险保障基金启动。该机制适用于 Coinmarketcap 市值前 100 合约交易对，包括$BTC、$ETH和$SOL，确保覆盖高流动性资产。

因价格剧烈波动而遭遇强制平仓或止损损失的受影响交易者将获得 120% 的补偿，这进一步体现了 LBank 对用户保护和市场诚信的承诺。

市场合理价格参考：Coinmarketcap 衍生品排行前五名综合取值判断。
插针补偿机制：符合条件的用户将获得其损失的 120% ，以 USDT 形式在 48 小时内计入其现货账户，最大限度地减少干扰，使他们能够继续活跃在市场。
额外奖励空投：除了个人补偿外，每次价格剧烈波动发生时，LBank 将从官方资金池额外拿出 10, 000 USDT 进行空投，根据持仓比例分配给受影响交易对的所有持仓者，在 48 小时内以 USDT 形式发放至用户现货账户。

重塑合约交易风控体系

LBank 的 1 亿美元合约风险保障基金是业内最全面的保障措施之一，旨在将市场波动从潜在风险转化为机遇。通过 USDT 结算，该计划消除了繁琐的资金转换环节，确保风控管理公平、高效、透明。

作为一家全球用户超过 1500 万的交易所，LBank 始终坚持以用户为中心的创新策略，结合深度流动性、顶级安全性及领先的风控机制，持续优化交易体验。本次基金的设立，进一步巩固了 LBank 在加密衍生品市场的领先地位，并为市场带来更多信任与稳定性。

关于 LBank

LBank 成立于 2015 年，是全球领先的加密货币交易所之一，已在 210+国家和地区拥有超过 1500 万注册用户。平台支持 800+ 种加密资产，每日衍生品交易量超过 670 亿美元，并致力于提供全面、便捷的交易体验。

作为 Meme 赛道的行业领导者，LBank 已上线 240+ 主流 Meme 币及 40+ 高潜力 Meme 项目，其中多个 Meme 币涨幅超过 500% 。凭借全球首发 Meme 币数量最多的优势，LBank 已成为 Meme 投资者的首选平台。

关注 LBank 获取最新动态
官网：https://www.lbank.com/Twitter：https://twitter.com/LBank_ExchangeTelegram：https://t.me/LBank_en

Пов'язані матеріали

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

Recent on-chain activity reveals the UXLINK exploiter is actively laundering stolen funds, complicating tracing efforts. The September 2025 hack, which exploited a 'delegateCall' vulnerability to steal roughly $4.5 million, involved converting illicit assets into DAI and Ethereum. Recently, the attacker swapped over 10 million DAI for approximately 6,000.8 ETH and has deposited a total of 14,336.6 ETH into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash in recent weeks, including over $8.1 million worth in a single move. Simultaneously, wallets connected to the defunct Mining Express Ponzi scheme have been converting long-held assets, swapping 5,004 ETH for 8.8 million DAI. Following a separate exploit of the Jaredfromsubway.eth MEV bot, about $5.1 million was also routed to Tornado Cash. These incidents underscore a critical vulnerability in DeFi: while enabling permissionless transfers, the ecosystem lacks effective mechanisms to halt or manage illicit funds once in motion, allowing them to be moved and concealed relatively easily. This highlights the need for strengthened cross-network coordination and real-time threat detection to better safeguard the space.

ambcrypto1 год тому

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

ambcrypto1 год тому

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit2 год тому

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit2 год тому

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit2 год тому

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit2 год тому

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature on stablecoin cross-border payments highlights rapid industry growth but notes the cost advantage remains theoretical. While stablecoins offer faster, 24/7, and more accessible international transfers compared to traditional forex brokers (charging 60-70 bps), they have not yet achieved their promised lower costs of 2-5 bps. The primary hurdle is a lack of deep, scaled liquidity pools, according to Imran Ahmad of Bitso Business. He states costs will only drop significantly with large-scale institutional and banking participation. Adoption faces a deeper challenge: trust. Businesses often stick with traditional brokers based on long-standing personal relationships, not just fees. Ezra Kebrab of cross-border payment firm Caliza emphasizes that reliability in handling complex details like tax codes is as critical as speed and cost. Contrary to some narratives, successful companies like Caliza see stablecoins as complementing, not replacing, existing infrastructure like SWIFT, which excels at payment standardization. Caliza itself uses SWIFT for many transactions and has seen monthly growth exceeding 40%. Ahmad predicts a future industry consolidation, where success will hinge on three pillars: proper licensing, reliable fiat on/off-ramps, and robust liquidity.

链捕手2 год тому

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

链捕手2 год тому

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手2 год тому

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот