Бывший чиновник раскритиковал американские власти за подход к криптовалютам

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2022-05-19Востаннє оновлено о 2024-09-19

Главный юрисконсульт торговой платформы Robinhood и бывший комиссар Комиссии по ценным бумагам и биржам США (SEC) Дэн Галлахер (Dan Gallagher) раскритиковал подход собственного бывшего ведомства к регулированию криптовалют.

Выступая перед подкомитетом по финансовым услугам Палаты представителей Конгресса США, Дэн Галлахер рассказал, что компания Robinhood провела более 12 встреч с комиссарами SEC, пытаясь зарегистрироваться как работающий с цифровыми активами брокер-дилер. По словам Галлахера, Robinhood приложила все усилия и ресурсы, чтобы соблюсти требования SEC. Однако ведомство не оценило усилия — вместо этого регулятор направил компании уведомление о готовности начать судебное разбирательство за несоблюдение правил.

Галлахер заверил, что Robinhood была готова пересмотреть список доступных активов, торгуемых на платформе. Речь о криптоактивах, которые SEC в своих исках назвала незарегистрированными ценными бумагами: Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), Coti (COTI), Algorand (ALGO), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos (ATOM), Sandbox (SAND), Axie infinity (AXS) и Decentraland (MANA). регулирующее ведомство не предоставило компании обратную связь и не внесло ясность в регулирование, возмущен юрист.

Галлахер обвинил SEC в том, что Комиссия предпочитает принуждать компании к исполнению требований в судебном порядке вместо разработки свода правил для работы с цифровыми активами. По мнению Галлахера, регулятор вредит американцам, подавляя развитие инноваций. Он привел в пример Европейский союз, предоставивший закон о регулировании криптовалют (MiCA).

Главный юрисконсульт Robinhood отметил, что с 1996 года у SEC появились законные полномочия устанавливать временный набор правил, однако регулятор этого не делает. Поэтому Галлахер призвал SEC как можно скорее продумать руководящие принципы для платформ, заинтересованных в торговле цифровыми активами. Это поможет крипторынку развиваться, уверен юрист.

Ранее Галлахер выступил против предложения американской криптобиржи Coinbase создать отдельное ведомство, которое бы контролировало криптоиндустрию. Если появится третий регулятор, помимо SEC и Комиссии по торговле товарными фьючерсами США (CFTC), это приведет к еще большей путанице, запротестовал бывший комиссар SEC.

Пов'язані матеріали

a16z Partner: The Next Space War May First Target Commercial Satellites

In May 2026, Russian Cosmos satellites maneuvered to within 500 meters of the commercial ICEYE-X36 radar satellite supporting Ukraine, highlighting the growing military targeting of commercial space assets. As constellations like Starlink and ICEYE provide critical communication, reconnaissance, and imaging services in conflicts, they are increasingly viewed as legitimate military objectives. This incident exemplifies modern space warfare's grey zone—actions like close approaches, jamming, or cyberattacks that fall short of kinetic destruction but demonstrate coercion and capability. Space warfare is constrained by physics, orbital congestion, and the threat of debris from kinetic strikes. While the US holds advantages in launch frequency, reusable rockets (led by SpaceX), and large commercial constellations, these assets are now vulnerable. True resilience requires distributed, proliferated satellite architectures, rapid replenishment, and robust space domain awareness. The future of space conflict will likely involve non-kinetic tactics to degrade an adversary's space-based support while avoiding catastrophic debris generation. The key is maintaining functionality under threat and deterring attacks by ensuring their cost outweighs any potential gain.

marsbitЩойно

a16z Partner: The Next Space War May First Target Commercial Satellites

marsbitЩойно

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Mid-Point Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Act Gains Momentum, Who Will Lead the Second Half? The U.S. crypto industry is hopeful for a breakthrough as the Senate advances the CLARITY Act, but securing the necessary 60 votes requires bipartisan compromise. With only about 40 legislative days left, the path is tight. The policy agenda is crowded. Alongside CLARITY, multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act seek attachment to larger bills. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act aims to codify developer protections, and key rules under GENUIS remain under negotiation. The CFTC operates with four vacant commissioner seats, creating uncertainty. A major unresolved battle is over which regulator—state authorities, the CFTC, or the SEC—will gain jurisdiction over prediction markets. The sector also faces the impending departure of two key advocates: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis. Industry leaders provided cautious perspectives. Sara K. Weed doubts CLARITY will pass this Congress, expecting agencies like the SEC to provide guidance instead. Sulolit "Raj" Mukherjee believes targeted crypto tax provisions have a real chance if attached to must-pass year-end legislation. Rashan Colbert highlights the CFTC's recent efforts to build a regulatory framework for the growing prediction markets sector, warning against an overly broad "gambling" classification that could stifle innovation. The second half of the policy year has begun. The window for action is narrow, but opportunities remain. Sustained bipartisan engagement is crucial for achieving substantive results.

Foresight News4 хв тому

Mid-Year Review of U.S. Crypto Policy: CLARITY Gains Momentum for a Comeback, Who Will Lead the Second Half?

Foresight News4 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

A "death spiral" concerns surround the "STRC" preferred shares from MicroStrategy, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor with significant AI consultation to trade near a $100 face value. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin (BTC) decline, STRC has traded at a discount, hitting a low of $82.53 and pushing its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The debate centers on whether STRC's structure—which relies on MicroStrategy issuing more shares to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividends—is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. Skepticism grew after Saylor revealed the product's design involved extensive AI dialogue to create a legally viable, monthly-dividend, price-stable preferred share—a novel concept. MicroStrategy's recent sale of 32 BTC to cover dividends, coupled with a sharp slowdown in its weekly Bitcoin buys (from billions to ~$100 million in June), has intensified fears. The "at-the-market" equity issuance, a key funding mechanism, is paused while STRC trades below par. This raises the "death spiral" risk: a lower STRC price triggers automatic dividend rate hikes, increasing cash obligations and potentially forcing more share sales or Bitcoin divestments. Bullish analysts like Jesse Myers argue the sell-off stems from leveraged positions unwinding, not fundamental failure, noting the company can cover dividends for decades if BTC appreciates modestly. The shift to semi-monthly dividends and the high yield at discounted prices may attract new buyers. Major AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, Claude) suggest a return to $100 is possible but conditional on restored market confidence, sustainable dividend coverage without asset sales, and a Bitcoin price recovery. The critical test arrives as new dividend rules take effect June 30, likely raising rates again with STRC below $95. The central question remains: Can MicroStrategy fulfill its obligations without selling Bitcoin, or will the mechanism accelerate its own decline?

marsbit10 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

marsbit10 хв тому

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

The article analyzes the contrasting market reactions to recent bond issuances by SpaceX and NVIDIA. While NVIDIA's $25 billion bond offering was met with strong demand and seen as securing long-term capital for its already profitable AI business, SpaceX's move to raise at least $20 billion in bonds (primarily to refinance bridge loans) triggered a sell-off in its stock (SPCX). The key difference lies in the stage of cash flow validation for their respective core narratives. For NVIDIA, the AI boom is generating substantial, visible revenue and profits, making debt a tool to amplify a proven growth curve. For SpaceX, despite a strong cash position post-IPO and a revenue-generating business in Starlink, its valuation is heavily tied to future, capital-intensive projects like Starship, global satellite networks, and potential AI infrastructure. The bond issuance acted as a trigger, shifting market focus from SpaceX's long-term vision to the pressing question of whether Starlink's profits can fund these ambitious, unproven ventures before they generate their own returns. Thus, the market penalizes not the act of borrowing itself, but the perceived gap between high capital expenditure and the speed of cash flow realization. SpaceX's valuation recovery hinges on demonstrating that Starlink's profitability can outpace the burn rate of its futuristic projects or that those projects (like Starship achieving reliable, low-cost reusability) can soon transition from costly visions to commercial realities.

marsbit16 хв тому

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

marsbit16 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

"Strategy's" (STRC) preferred share, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor in consultation with AI to trade steadily at $100, faces mounting pressure. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin price drop, STRC has traded at a steep discount, hitting a low of $82.53. This discount pushes its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The core debate revolves around whether STRC's structure is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. The mechanism relies on issuing new shares ("at-the-market" offerings) to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividend payments. However, the deep discount has paused these ATM offerings, slowing Bitcoin accumulation and forcing a minor sale of 32 BTC to cover obligations. Proponents, like The Smarter Web Company's Jesse Myers, argue the sell-off is a leveraged unwinding, not a fundamental failure. They note Strategy has ample resources to cover dividends for years if Bitcoin appreciates modestly. The deep discount also makes STRC attractive for yield-seeking buyers, as dividends are calculated on the $100 face value. The key test is whether Strategy can maintain dividends without sustained Bitcoin sales. A critical watchpoint is June 30th, when STRC switches to semi-monthly dividends. An automatic rule will likely raise the dividend rate further because the price remains below $95$, potentially creating a "death spiral": lower prices trigger higher yields, increasing the cash burden and forcing more dilution or asset sales. The question of whether this AI-designed "flywheel" is a stable instrument or a flawed accelerator will be answered by its price action and Strategy's funding choices in the coming months.

链捕手16 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

链捕手16 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси