Arbitrum(ARB)接受了L2原生代币质押的提议

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-16Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-16

币界网报道:

Arbitrum(ARB)在接受对流动性质押的投票后,将解锁其原生代币的效用。通过此举,Arbitrum加入了流动性质押竞争,遵循以太坊第二层协议的模型。

Arbitrum(ARB)正在启动第一个第二层流动性质押计划,该计划以LidoDAO等以太坊协议为蓝本。所有ARB持有人将能够将其资产与积极的治理参与者进行质押,进而获得新的资产stARB。

初步投票后,ARB流动性质押将不会向零售持有人分配协议费。Arbitrum DAO将进一步投票决定重新分配费用的可能性。新的投票以91.54%的赞成票通过,投票机制中共使用了1.45亿ARB。

Arbitrum将重建针对治理攻击的激励措施

在意识到Arbitrum可能会因激励措施不一致而遭受51%的攻击后,最近决定增加赌注和安全性。Arbitrum DAO金库持有价值3200万美元的ETH,可用于投票。51%的攻击估计将花费3175万美元,这意味着一些实体可能有动机攻击该协议。

Arbitrum DAO目前不奖励投票,尽管社区正在讨论分配部分储备和新费用流入的机会。最令人担忧的是,选民会支持一位影响力太大的代表,从而有可能对积极重新分配财政部的提案进行投票。

该提案得到了Arbitrum选民最多的评论和接受。其中一个问题是,根据某些代表在Arbitrum上的业力得分,他们是否有动机与他们打赌。对一个大型Arbitrum实体的过多授权将集中投票权,导致潜在的治理攻击和激进的费用再分配。

Arbitrum目前正致力于重建其激励机制,以避免对其第2层汇总技术的各种攻击。代表的游戏化业力和争端攻击是资源消耗的两个主要因素。目前,Arbitrum协议仍在建立其费用生成机制,可能不得不使用其以太坊资金来引导验证器并调整激励措施。

Arbitrum通过贷款增长扩大价值

Arbitrum成为使用最广泛的第二层协议之一,主要是因为它能够整合资金。Arbitrum的总锁定价值为26.5亿美元,超过了Base等其他广泛使用的连锁店,但仍落后于Solana。

Arbitrum钱包的数据还显示,该协议控制着超过110亿美元的资金,其储备中有200多万ETH。Arkham发现的Arbitrum智能合约是多个DeFi代币和稳定币的中心。

Arbitrum从以太坊流入中获得了超过29亿美元,其中74.2%属于ERC-20包装的代币,26.7%属于稳定币。第二层平台允许快速、相对廉价地使用去中心化协议,其增长来自Aave的版本以及Uniswap V3 DEX。Arbitrum还试图加入Web3游戏,试图复制Galxe的成功。然而,截至2024年,DeFi是Arbitrum活动和价值锁定的主要来源。

即使在这种活动水平上,Arbitrum也没有印刷一致的费用。该协议设法每天收取高达100万至300万美元的费用,尽管在某些日子里,费用会降至5万美元以下。

最近的激励提案还指出,Arbitrum需要将自己定位为产生可预测的收入,可能是通过提高费用。在这种情况下,ARB持有人将受到激励,投票并支持分散的代表。

目前,Arbitrum的费用为0.00077美元,即使是快速交易,在某些情况下甚至超过了Base。这些费用仍然不足以进行再分配,Arbitrum DAO不得不依靠其储备来调整激励措施。

Arbitrum还需要激励措施来吸收代币解锁,因为只有32%的代币在流通。8月16日晚些时候,Arbitrum将再次按计划解锁,为流通供应量增加2.77%。

在最近的市场调整中,ARB代币交易接近历史最低点。ARB从第一季度牛市期间的2.29美元峰值跌至0.54美元。


Hristina Vasileva的加密货币报道

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані матеріали

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit5 хв тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit5 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News6 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News6 хв тому

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

**Summary: South Korea's Institutional Crypto Race: Stablecoins and RWA Take Off** South Korea is undergoing a structural shift in its crypto ecosystem, moving beyond its historical role as a major retail trading hub. Major financial institutions and internet platforms are now building institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, with stablecoins and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization as the primary drivers. The push for a regulated Korean won stablecoin market is a major policy and corporate focus. This is driven partly by an estimated $115 billion outflow into dollar stablecoins like USDC, threatening the domestic financial system. Banks (e.g., KB Financial, Hana), payment giants (e.g., Shinhan Card, BC Card), and internet super-apps (KakaoPay, NAVER Pay) are all conducting pilots. The goal is to anchor future digital finance to the Korean won and local regulations. In RWA, South Korea is advancing rapidly within regulatory sandboxes, focusing on unique domestic assets beyond typical global templates like US Treasuries. Projects involve tokenizing ships (with Hyundai Heavy Industries), defense supply chain assets, and K-pop intellectual property, alongside more conventional assets. A legal framework is set for 2027, and platforms like NXT are preparing for regulated trading. Key opportunities for crypto-native projects lie in providing the underlying technology these traditional institutions lack: global distribution channels for tokenized assets, cross-chain liquidity solutions, and enabling infrastructure tools (e.g., for asset packaging and management). Partnerships, such as Solana with Shinhan Card or LayerZero with the Korea Gold Exchange, exemplify this proactive approach. Crucially, user access is being shaped by consumer platforms. NAVER's planned acquisition of Upbit's operator Dunamu and Kakao's development of a unified wallet aim to seamlessly integrate crypto with everyday payments for tens of millions of users. The race is now about which protocols and projects will become the foundational standards as regulation solidifies and institutional adoption accelerates.

Foresight News1 год тому

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити ARB

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Arbitrum (ARB) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Arbitrum (ARB).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Arbitrum (ARB)Після придбання Arbitrum (ARB) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Arbitrum (ARB)Легко торгуйте Arbitrum (ARB) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

258 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.11Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити ARB

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ARB (ARB).

活动图片