ASIC起诉ASX涉嫌误导CHESS项目声明

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-14Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-14

币界网报道:

澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)已在联邦法院对澳大利亚最大的市场运营商ASX有限公司提起法律诉讼。该案的核心指控是,澳交所对其清算所做出了误导性陈述。清算所被定义为买卖双方之间的中介,有助于促进从交易开始到结算的整个过程。清算所简化了支付、证券或衍生品交易的交换。清算所位于两家清算公司之间,这两家清算公司也有助于降低任何一家成员公司未能履行各自贸易结算义务的风险。买方和卖方签订具有法律约束力的协议。清算所被定义为买方和卖方之间的中介,有助于促进从交易开始到结算的整个过程。清算所简化了支付、证券或衍生品交易的交换。清算所位于两家清算公司之间,这两家清算公司也有助于降低任何一家成员公司未能履行各自贸易结算义务的风险。买方和卖方就e-Read本期电子子注册系统(CHESS)更换项目签订具有法律约束力的协议。

ASIC挑战ASX的说法

ASIC声称,澳大利亚证券交易所于2022年2月10日发布的公告具有误导性,该公告声称CHESS替代项目将于2023年4月“上线”,并且“进展顺利”。

ASIC表示,这些声明表明该项目符合澳交所宣布的计划,预计将达到未来的里程碑,包括2023年4月的计划上线日期。

澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)是澳大利亚企业、市场、金融服务和消费信贷的主要监管机构。根据金融服务法,它有权促进、监管和执行澳大利亚金融法。澳大利亚委员会根据2001年《澳大利亚证券和投资委员会法》成立并管理。ASIC最初是根据1989年ASC法案成立的澳大利亚证券委员会。最初,澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)是澳大利亚企业、市场、金融服务和消费信贷的主要监管机构。根据金融服务法,它有权促进、监管和执行澳大利亚金融法。澳大利亚委员会根据2001年《澳大利亚证券和投资委员会法》成立并管理。ASIC最初是根据1989年ASC法案成立的澳大利亚证券委员会。最初,“阅读本条款”辩称,这些陈述具有欺骗性,因为在公告时,该项目没有按计划进行,澳交所没有合理的依据暗示它将达到预期的里程碑。

ASX问责制受到审查

ASIC主席Joe Longo强调了指控的严重性,并表示市场的完整性取决于ASX声明的准确性。“ASX的声明触及了人们对我们市场诚信的信任,”Longo说。他将这种情况描述为当时澳交所董事会和高级管理人员的“集体失败”。

Longo进一步解释说,公司和市场参与者依靠ASX的沟通来做出明智的决策和投资。他指出,CHESS替代项目是一项重大的技术举措,对澳大利亚经济的运行至关重要。

Longo补充道:“这一点至关重要,因为澳大利亚证券交易所需要确保向澳大利亚公众告知该项目如何跟踪以及是否会按时完成的真相。”。

ASIC声称,截至2022年2月10日的真实情况是该项目“进展不顺利”,这与ASX的公开声明相矛盾。该项目最终面临延误,并于2022年11月暂停,导致澳大利亚证券交易所和依赖早期保证的市场参与者承担了巨大的成本。

澳大利亚证券和投资委员会起诉澳大利亚证券交易所罚款

ASIC尚未确定对澳交所涉嫌违规行为的处罚。然而,据Finance Magnates报道,ASIC最近采取了一系列行动,包括2024年3月对澳大利亚证券交易所因不遵守市场诚信规则而处以1050000美元的罚款,以及对其他市场参与者的执法行动。

2022年3月28日,在有争议的声明发布约六周后,澳大利亚证券交易所宣布,2023年4月的上线日期可能会进一步推迟。随后,澳大利亚证券交易所聘请埃森哲对该项目进行审查。埃森哲报告强调了解决方案设计及其满足ASX要求的能力所面临的重大挑战,导致ASX暂停了该项目并减记了2.5亿美元的成本。

ASIC的法律行动突显了其对保持对澳大利亚市场完整性的信心的承诺,特别是考虑到ASX在公司治理和关键国家基础设施管理方面的作用。

Пов'язані матеріали

A Hair Dryer Blows Away $34,000 from Polymarket

A hairdryer was used to manipulate a temperature sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport (LFPG) on April 6 and 15, 2026, causing short-lived artificial temperature spikes. These false readings were used to exploit a prediction market on Polymarket, where users bet on Paris’s daily maximum temperature. The attacker targeted low-probability high-temperature outcomes, which settled as "Yes" based on the corrupted data, netting a total of $34,000 in profit. The attacker’s a newly created anonymous account funded just two days before the first incident. After the successful manipulations, the funds were quickly moved through mixers and decentralized exchanges to avoid tracing. French meteorological experts and authorities confirmed the anomalies were inconsistent with actual weather conditions and nearby station data, pointing to physical intervention. Legal action was initiated for "disrupting automated data processing systems," which carries severe penalties under French law. Polymarket’s market rules relied solely on a single, publicly accessible sensor and did not account for subsequent data revisions, making the system vulnerable to such physical oracle attacks. In response, Polymarket silently switched its data source to Paris-Le Bourget Airport (LFPB) without public explanation or refunding the exploited funds. The incident highlights the risks of single-point data dependencies in prediction markets and the low-cost, high-reward potential of real-world manipulation.

marsbit6 хв тому

A Hair Dryer Blows Away $34,000 from Polymarket

marsbit6 хв тому

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn1 год тому

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片