VC 说|剖析暴跌之下的加密市场、Pantera 解读交易所新模式、Variant 预言市场走向...

chainfeedОпубліковано о 2024-08-07Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-12

📖 加密 VC 说【08/08 目录】

💬 一、加密 VC 们在谈论些什么?

话题 1:暴跌之下的加密市场( Dragonfly/Multcoin Capital/LD Capital/DeFiance Capital/Framework Ventures/LongHash Ventures/Delphi Ventures/Delphi Labs/Matrix Partners/Placeholder/HashKey Capital)
话题 2:加密 VC 的现状与困境(TANGENT/HashKey Capital/1kx)

💡 二、加密 VC 们近期发表什么研究产出?

1️⃣ 交易所新商业模式解读:有哪些演变和机遇?(Pantera Capital)
2️⃣ 人工智能训练与推理技术栈:从硅到智能 ( IOSG Ventures)
3️⃣ 回顾加密风险投资 15 年的演变(insights4.vc)
4️⃣ 我们如何预判市场走向?(Variant Fund)

📢 三、一级市场重要融资一览(07/29-08/04)

过去一周公开的融资事件共 21 起,融资金额超 1.10 亿美元(Morpho/Layer2 Financial/Daylight/Hyperbolic/Rage Trade/Icebreaker/Breakout/Mintify/Jokerace/Pichi Finance/Raad Labs/MetaDAO/We.Rich/Liquorice/Agent Exchange/Destiny of Gods/Lukka/Particle Network/aPriori/Chateau/BlonkFi)


1/ 加密 VC 们在谈论些什么?

话题 1:暴跌之下的加密市场

背景:受日本央行加息与日元套利退场影响,股票和数字资产大幅抛售,比特币一度跌破 5 万美元。加密 VC 如何解读「8.5 暴跌」?又看好哪些加密赛道的发展?

📌 宏观市场

Rob Hadick(Dragonfly)

宏观方面:

  • 我坚信这次大规模抛售的严重程度主要与人们利用日元进行廉价杠杆交易和更广泛的日元套利交易导致的重大去杠杆化事件有关。随着日元兑美元上个月上涨超过 10%,日经指数同期下跌超过 20%,这种情况似乎已接近尾声。我预计这种情况不会持续到本周以后

  • 尽管如此,我们仍有可能看到与上述情况相关的一些蔓延风险,因此需要谨慎,但我认为日本进行金融干预的可能性更大,这应该可以抵御一些风险。

  • 2 年期国债收益率清楚地表明,在糟糕的就业报告和上个月的大量修正之后,市场开始担心美联储落后于曲线,但报告中许多错综复杂的因素表明这种担忧可能被夸大,许多临时裁员和失业救济申请与德克萨斯州的天气状况有关。趋势并不好,但具体情况正在缓解,历史劳动力水平仍然强劲。ISM 制造业不佳也与不安情绪有关,但这一直是趋势。而服务业更重要,我对此持谨慎乐观态度。

  • 消费者看起来仍相对强劲,第二季度零售业购买力强劲,冲销率 / 信贷占收入的百分比仍然处于历史正常水平。

  • 对 AI 相关资本支出 ROI 的整体担忧正在重新调整大型科技股的增长预期,但大多数聪明投资者认为这些担忧被过度抛售了,应该不会对整个市场产生影响。一旦环境风险加大,预计这些股票将大幅反弹

  • VIX 指数和「恐惧与贪婪」模型飙升,可能会出现大量短期波动,8 月份流动性将创历史新低,但如果 VIX 指数出现反转,并且最早在本周或杰克逊霍尔会议前后的某个时候我们能站稳脚跟,那么风险 / 回报可能会进入不错的范围。

  • 市场在为紧急降息定价,我认为这很可能不会发生,并将恐慌延续至杰克逊霍尔会议 —— 希望我是错的。

  • 伊朗似乎正在放弃其最具破坏性的言论,我们应避免任何大规模冲突。

  • 我们可能在几个月(不到一年)内实施新的量化宽松政策、大量降息、最终商业周期恢复加速增长等

总体而言,这意味着短期内仍会有一些痛苦,但中长期看涨

关于加密货币

  • 最近加密货币发生了很多内生性看跌事件,德国抛售、Mt Gox 分销、Jump 抛售等等,而在此之前我们一直保持着相对强势。

  • 这看起来像是投降,因此预计我们很快就会触底,可能比宏观市场稍早。从现在开始的下跌将主要是宏观市场 + 特定的杠杆作用。

  • 非原生散户在很长一段时间内都不会出现,需要再次持续增长才行。原生散户在长尾资产上的杠杆率过高,并且在过去几个月中已被榨干,大多数「优质」meme 和山寨相比高点下跌了 70% 或更多。

  • 正因如此,流动性的回归可能会集中在主力资产上。大多数山寨币不会再达到(或接近)ATH,尤其是在没有强大的 PMF 或长期预期的情况下

总体而言,在正确的时间框架内仍有大量值得看好的事情,除了商业周期 / 宏观观点之外,我们还有可以覆盖更广泛投资者的产品、销售这些产品的银行、广泛的代币化、加密货币相关支付和稳定币使用中不断增长的 PMF、相对而言不断增加的 Defi 活动、Cefi 市场的专业化、美国监管可能更加清晰,以及更广泛地接受去中心化和开源系统作为当前技术堆栈和金融市场中许多低效问题的解决方案。【原文为英文】(来源

Tushar Jain(Multcoin Capital)

  • 日本央行在 25 个基点后结束了紧缩周期。市场预计美联储今年将多次降息,明年将进一步降息。全球印钞机开始回暖。

  • 特朗普宣布支持将 BTC 合法化为主权储备资产。世界上每个主权国家都被迫认真考虑这项资产。

  • 摩根士丹利等主要财富管理公司现在才能够招揽客户投资比特币。他们的大多数同行公司不会落后。

  • 本周,加密货币市场的大部分杠杆刚刚被抹去。

在我的记忆中,上一次看到 BTC 如此强劲的顺风是在 2020 年全球印钞机开启之后,每个人都拿到了刺激支票,Paul Tudor Jones 等第一批大型宏观基金经理开始买入并使该资产合法化。【原文为英文】(来源

Yila(LD Capital):日元升值会导致杠杆套息资本的利润空间大幅压缩甚至亏损,BTC CME 杠杆基金套利资金的年化无风险收益是 14%,日央行加息+近期日元升值导致的资金成本增加为 0.25%+12%。因此日元是否继续升值是影响近期行情的关键,日央行不继续加息就还能接着奏乐接着舞,日元继续升值短期继续不乐观。(来源

Arthur(DeFiance Capital):与 2020 年 3 月加密货币因宏观经济疲软而引发的大崩盘极为相似,只是规模略小。未来几周,市场将进入低流动性时期,但一般来说,如果你有现金可以购买,你会在这里找到最好的投资机会。一些错过今年入市机会的大公司将借此良机入市。【原文为英文】(来源

Brandon Potts(Framework Ventures):过去两周,美股七巨头的市值已缩水逾 1.7 万亿美元,而整个加密货币市值仅为区区 2 万亿美元,上涨空间显而易见。【原文为英文】(来源

Emma(LongHash Ventures):在这样的日子里,我们需要放大视野,纵观全局。正是在 2008/09 年(全球金融危机)这样的日子里,比特币作为一种价值储藏被创造出来。而也是在 2020 年 3 月新冠疫情这样的日子里,许多加密货币 OG 坚定了自己的信念,抢占了先机。【原文为英文】(来源

Tommy(Delphi Ventures):我经历过几次加密货币的大规模抛售,回想起来,我真的后悔当时恐慌性抛售,并试图在合适的时间买回来。(来源

Kevin Simback(Delphi Labs):撇开经济衰退/宏观担忧不谈,加密货币领域将出现大量屠杀,原因很简单,因为太多团队推出的项目没有足够的人使用或愿意持有代币。但是,对于那些有执行力的人来说,大屠杀将带来机遇。【原文为英文】(来源

📌 加密赛道

Zixi.eth(Matrix Partners)

  • 不论是 9 月份的降息,还是 SEC 的监管政策,亦或者是 Trump 对 crypto 的支持,从美国的经济和政治角度来看,对 crypto 市场都是大利好

  • 类比于过去的两个周期,现在的牛市是 Stage1,即比特币领涨,比特币市占率上升,山寨币市占率大幅下降。这样的时间可能还续几个月。明年才是山寨币领涨的牛市 Stage 2

  • 最近半年持有 BTC 依然是最优选,但是今年下半年可以陆续考虑置换成 ETH 或者 Solana。此外,对于 BTC Ecosystem,这半年内,我们认为只有专注于开发如何给 BTC Holder trustless 进行理财,解放大户流动性的思路是正确的,这个在 Solv Protocol 的数据上可见一斑。

  • ETH 今年下半年非常适合建仓。我们建议今年下半年关注 BTC/ETH汇率,一旦到了灰度净流出结束,就是建仓的时机。

  • Solana 我们依旧长期看好,每个季度都有爆品

  • Ton 我们中短期看多,但是长期需要观察。(来源

Chris Burniske(Placeholder):BTC、ETH 和 SOL 都很好。对于你喜欢的山寨币,只需确保它们的低点高于 2022/23 年的跌幅即可。【原文为英文】(来源

Rui(HashKey Capital)个人觉得接下来几周机会在 Alts,一方面是价格跌到了相对合理的位置,昨天早上也放量换手了。另一方面是做市商回补把仓位买回来的过程中会有一波自然买盘。最后是短期内主流币行情修复需要时间山寨的各路庄会伺机而动。(来源


话题 2:加密 VC 的现状与困境

背景:前有对 VC 币的讨伐,后有项目方 rug 背刺 VC,加密 VC 如何走出当前的窘境?

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手1 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手1 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit4 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit4 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手5 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手5 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit6 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit6 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片