South Korea drops Travel Rule threshold for crypto transfers

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2026-08-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-11

Анотація

South Korea has eliminated the threshold for applying its crypto Travel Rule, now requiring compliance for all transfers between registered Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), regardless of transaction value. This move, approved by the Cabinet, aims to prevent users from circumventing the rule by splitting large transfers into smaller amounts below the previous 1 million won (approx. $700) limit. All receiving platforms must now obtain and verify sender and recipient information, with the authority to request missing data or reject transactions. Additionally, the amendments introduce stricter Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules for transfers involving overseas exchanges and personal wallets. Domestic VASPs must assess and manage risks based on the counterparty, prohibiting transactions deemed high-risk. For transfers of at least 10 million won involving foreign entities or personal wallets, platforms must establish their own suspicious transaction monitoring systems. The regulations also strengthen VASP registration requirements, including standards for financial health, internal controls, and infrastructure. While the expanded Travel Rule takes effect six months after the decree's promulgation, existing providers have an additional year to comply with some new operational requirements.

South Korea will expand its crypto Travel Rule to all transfers between registered virtual asset service providers (VASPs), removing the current 1 million won (about $700) threshold.

The country’s Cabinet approved amendments to the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information on Tuesday.

Under the changes, the Travel Rule will apply to all transfers between registered crypto service providers regardless of value. Receiving platforms will also be required to obtain sender and recipient information and may request missing information or reject transactions when required data is unavailable.

Removing the threshold is intended to prevent users from circumventing the rule by splitting transfers into smaller amounts, according to the Financial Intelligence Unit.

It cited one case in which a user bought Tether USDt (USDT) after depositing about 200 million won into a crypto exchange and then made 216 withdrawals, each worth less than 1 million won.

Related: South Korea plans stablecoin rules as opposition pushes crypto tax repeal

South Korea tightens rules for overseas exchanges, personal wallets

The amendments also introduce new Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements for transfers involving overseas crypto exchanges and personal wallets.

Registered local VASPs will be required to determine which transfers they allow based on the risk posed by the counterparty. Transfers to low-risk overseas exchanges will be permitted, while transfers involving other foreign exchanges and personal wallets will generally be allowed when the sender and recipient are the same person.

However, transactions involving counterparties deemed high risk will be prohibited.

Crypto platforms will also have to establish their own suspicious transaction monitoring systems for transfers worth at least 10 million won involving foreign exchanges or personal wallets.

South Korean authorities said suspected money laundering involving overseas exchanges and personal wallets has increased as gaps in existing AML rules governing such transfers have been exploited.

The decree also strengthens registration requirements for crypto service providers, including financial health, internal controls, staffing and infrastructure standards, while expanding scrutiny of major shareholders.

The VASP registration provisions will take effect on Aug. 20, although existing providers will have an additional year to comply with some financial, staffing, infrastructure and internal control requirements. The expanded Travel Rule and other transfer-related AML requirements will take effect six months after the decree is promulgated.

Asia Express: Thailand’s 0% crypto tax. Bitcoin Red Team forced to use Chinese AI

Пов'язані питання

QWhat major change is South Korea making to its crypto Travel Rule?

ASouth Korea is removing the current threshold of 1 million won (about $700) for the Travel Rule. The rule will now apply to all transfers between registered Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) regardless of value.

QWhat new requirements will receiving crypto platforms have under the amended Travel Rule?

AReceiving platforms will be required to obtain sender and recipient information for all transfers between registered VASPs. They may also request missing information or reject transactions when the required data is unavailable.

QWhat was the primary reason given for removing the Travel Rule threshold?

AThe primary reason was to prevent users from circumventing the rule by splitting large transfers into multiple smaller amounts, each below the previous threshold, as cited in a case study by the Financial Intelligence Unit.

QHow does the amendment affect transactions involving overseas crypto exchanges and personal wallets?

AThe amendment introduces new AML requirements. Local VASPs must assess the risk of the counterparty. Transfers to low-risk overseas exchanges are permitted, while transfers to other foreign exchanges or personal wallets are generally allowed only if the sender and recipient are the same person. High-risk counterparty transactions are prohibited.

QWhen will the expanded Travel Rule and other new AML transfer requirements take effect?

AThe expanded Travel Rule and other transfer-related AML requirements will take effect six months after the decree is promulgated.

Пов'язані матеріали

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

Citi Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Lacks Substantive Progress, Faces Supply Bottlenecks in Short Term. Reuters reported on August 4th that the U.S. government and FCC are considering a ban on Chinese optical modules. Citi's August 9th report clarifies that optical modules are not listed on any effective FCC ban. The FCC's Order 26-50 established two restricted list mechanisms (based on manufacturer and production location), but optical modules were only mentioned once, as an example in a disclosure requirement, not as a restricted product. The reported ban remains at a proposal stage. Citi estimates Chinese suppliers provide 60-70% of high-speed optical modules for U.S. hyperscalers. Non-Chinese suppliers cannot fill this gap in the short term, making the immediate implementation of a genuine ban unlikely. Future regulatory paths could be manufacturer-based (least likely), location-based covering all offshore production (strictest), or location-based covering only China (more feasible but with unresolved definitions). A ban would pressure U.S. AI infrastructure, conflicting with stated policy goals. Citi sees low near-term implementation probability, with the issue potentially becoming a negotiation chip in bilateral talks. U.S. domestic capacity build-out is a key long-term variable. Among Chinese companies, XSENS and Dongshan Precision have the highest U.S. exposure, while Tianfu Communication, as a passive component supplier, is relatively insulated. Citi maintains Buy ratings on all three with respective price targets. The conclusion is that Chinese modules are currently irreplaceable in the U.S. AI supply chain, creating a longer timeline for potential restrictions than the market may expect.

marsbit33 хв тому

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

marsbit33 хв тому

Lead Analyst Claims Bitcoin is at a Critical Stage: 'We are at the Bear Market Bottom, What Happens Next…'

Renowned cryptocurrency analyst Benjamin Cowen, in his latest analysis video, examined recent events and historical cycles in the Bitcoin market. Noting Bitcoin's trading range of $64,000 to $65,000, Cowen stated that market dynamics and investor interest show similarities to past cycles, suggesting the upcoming period marks a critical turning point. Cowen observed a significant decline in public interest and investor enthusiasm for the crypto market, with social risk metrics falling to 0.2, far below levels seen four years ago. He added that market volatility has notably decreased, and a sense of distrust prevails among investors, drawing parallels to the ends of bear markets in 2018 and 2022. Historical data indicates Bitcoin markets typically bottom in summer months, followed by a period of stagnation with low volatility, implying a major move could occur in the year's final quarter. However, Cowen noted on-chain indicators like the MVRV Z-Score have not yet signaled a definitive bottom. Cowen believes an event in the coming weeks could shake the market, potentially triggering a final sell-off wave. Such an event, he argues, would bring investors back and pave the way for a new bull cycle. He predicts October as the most likely bottoming period, while acknowledging September or November are also possible, advising crypto users to remain cautious and prepared for a decisive market moment.

cryptonews.ru41 хв тому

Lead Analyst Claims Bitcoin is at a Critical Stage: 'We are at the Bear Market Bottom, What Happens Next…'

cryptonews.ru41 хв тому

Bitcoin Community in Uproar: Deciphering the New Scaling War Sparked by BIP-110

On August 10, Luke Dashjr, a long-time Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) editor and co-founder of Ocean mining pool, was removed from the BIP editing team for bypassing discussion protocols and preemptively assigning a number to BIP-110, a controversial soft fork proposal he helped draft. The conflict stems from Bitcoin Core's version 30 release in October 2025, which removed the default 83-byte limit on OP_RETURN, a field used for embedding non-transaction data. In response, BIP-110 aimed to enforce this limit as a consensus rule. It controversially lowered the activation threshold for miners to 55% and included a mandatory activation clause, causing significant community backlash. Major mining pools like Foundry USA and AntPool did not support it, with public criticism from figures like F2Pool's Wang Chun and Michael Saylor, who argued it compromised Bitcoin's neutrality. On August 8, at block height 961,632, nodes running the BIP-110 patch rejected the main chain block, causing a chain split. The minority chain, supported by only about 2.53% of the network's hash rate, produced just one additional block before stalling. The main chain quickly outpaced it by over 240 blocks. No major exchanges have supported the minority chain. The event highlighted Bitcoin's governance reality: while rules can be proposed by a few, ultimate authority lies with the economic majority—miners willing to expend hash power and users/exchanges recognizing a chain's validity. Following the failed split, BIP-110 proponents, including Luke Dashjr, have begun discussing a change to the proof-of-work algorithm to create a separate coin, though this remains in early discussion stages.

marsbit1 год тому

Bitcoin Community in Uproar: Deciphering the New Scaling War Sparked by BIP-110

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片