Coinbase押注Midas，RWA波澜再起

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-29Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-29

Анотація

RWA产品充分融入现有DeFi生态，将是其腾飞的关键。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

Coinbase押注Midas，RWA波澜再起

随着贝莱德推出代币化基金 BUIDL 在一周内吸引了 1.6 亿美元资金，并且 Ondo 作为 RWA 板块的龙头项目，将产品 OUSG（美国短期国债 ETF）的底层资产分配给 BUIDL 后，RWA 再次成为社区讨论的热门板块。

RWA 作为加密行业与现实资产连接的重要桥梁之一，从概念兴起之初，就备受大家期待，但真正为人熟知且采用的 RWA 项目仅有 Ondo 和 MarkerDAO 等少数知名项目。

不过，近期 RWA 项目 Midas 完成 875 万美元的种子轮融资，并获 Coinbase Venture 和 GSR 等机构参投。在知名机构的加持下，Midas 走入大众视野。

下面，Odaily星球日报将从 Midas 项目概况及后续发展前景为大家阐述。

表面 RWA，实际稳定币生息

Midas 是资产代币化的协议，将代币化的现实资产转化为无需许可的 ERC 20 代币，并允许代币在 DeFi 项目中流通。目前 Midas 推出的首个资产代币化产品是 mTBILL，目前 mTBILL 年化收益率为 5.23% ，TVL 为 303 万美元。

mTBILL 底层资产是 iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF（IB 01.L），该基金的资产管理规模为 146 亿美元，每日交易量总计 2518 万美元，年化回报率为 5.26% ，标普评级为 AA 级。每枚 mTBILL 代币与每股 IB 01.L以 1 ： 1 比例挂钩。

IB 01.L 在基础国库券到期，资产进行再投资，从而增加基金的资产净值（NAV）。随着整体基金资产净值的积累，对应的各个代币的价值依次增加。因此 mTBILL 产品赎回将采取当时净资产价值计算。

与其他 RWA 项目一样，购入和赎回 mTBILL 产品需要 KYC 和 AML 的审核，美国个人及机构无法参与，其他国家并不受限。并且初始购入门槛需要 12000 USDC，不算低，但并未指出是何种投资者允许购买，资金符合要求即可。值得注意的是，项目方并未明确标注为赎回资产的门槛要求，仅说明购入门槛，如果二级市场购买 mTBILL 的部分份额，能否即时兑换仍需进一步确认，且虽然项目方阐述为即时相应，但购入和赎回的过程需要一定时间。

Coinbase押注Midas，RWA波澜再起

mTBILL 产品的流程图如下，用户完成 KYC 和 AML 审核后，可以通过 USDC 的方式将代币打入合约，也可以通过银行电汇的方式存入资金，项目方将提供代币化票据 mTBILL。但存疑的一点，mTBILL 将以 1 ： 1 比例追踪 IB 01.L，项目方并未阐述代币打入合约地址后代币的后续动向，比如将通过什么公司购入 IB 01.L，或者说默认为 Midas 项目方自行购买，但并无第三方进行监督，也没有像 Ondo 提供 SPV 作为风险隔离场所。

Coinbase押注Midas，RWA波澜再起

除此之外，Midas 在 RWA 板块主打的是无需可代币 DeFi，在购入者买入 mTBILL 后，可在链上参与相关 DeFi 项目，主要是借贷，无需对方是否具备 KYC 资格，即可在市场上交易，但如果要进行资产赎回，赎回者必须满足 KYC 等相关审核。Midas 此举是将 mTBILL 的出入口进行审查，过程中的行为并不受限。

费率方面，Midas 在项目启动初期不收取发行费用，仅收取 ETF 管理费 0.07% ，后续是否收费尚未可知。

总的来看，在大多数以机构和高净值投资者为主的 RWA 项目中，Midas 协议着重强调 RWA 产品的链上 DeFi 用途，将 RWA 产品融入现有 DeFi 生态，提供产品额外收益率和利用率。虽然现阶段还未看到相关借贷协议的支持，不过 Midas 尚处于早期阶段，在 Coinbase 和 GSR 等机构的扶持下，DeFi 用例或将持续扩展。感兴趣的投资者，也需留意前文中所述的风险点——产品相关说明尚不完善。

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані матеріали

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

A "death spiral" concerns surround the "STRC" preferred shares from MicroStrategy, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor with significant AI consultation to trade near a $100 face value. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin (BTC) decline, STRC has traded at a discount, hitting a low of $82.53 and pushing its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The debate centers on whether STRC's structure—which relies on MicroStrategy issuing more shares to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividends—is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. Skepticism grew after Saylor revealed the product's design involved extensive AI dialogue to create a legally viable, monthly-dividend, price-stable preferred share—a novel concept. MicroStrategy's recent sale of 32 BTC to cover dividends, coupled with a sharp slowdown in its weekly Bitcoin buys (from billions to ~$100 million in June), has intensified fears. The "at-the-market" equity issuance, a key funding mechanism, is paused while STRC trades below par. This raises the "death spiral" risk: a lower STRC price triggers automatic dividend rate hikes, increasing cash obligations and potentially forcing more share sales or Bitcoin divestments. Bullish analysts like Jesse Myers argue the sell-off stems from leveraged positions unwinding, not fundamental failure, noting the company can cover dividends for decades if BTC appreciates modestly. The shift to semi-monthly dividends and the high yield at discounted prices may attract new buyers. Major AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, Claude) suggest a return to $100 is possible but conditional on restored market confidence, sustainable dividend coverage without asset sales, and a Bitcoin price recovery. The critical test arrives as new dividend rules take effect June 30, likely raising rates again with STRC below $95. The central question remains: Can MicroStrategy fulfill its obligations without selling Bitcoin, or will the mechanism accelerate its own decline?

marsbit8 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

marsbit8 хв тому

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

The article analyzes the contrasting market reactions to recent bond issuances by SpaceX and NVIDIA. While NVIDIA's $25 billion bond offering was met with strong demand and seen as securing long-term capital for its already profitable AI business, SpaceX's move to raise at least $20 billion in bonds (primarily to refinance bridge loans) triggered a sell-off in its stock (SPCX). The key difference lies in the stage of cash flow validation for their respective core narratives. For NVIDIA, the AI boom is generating substantial, visible revenue and profits, making debt a tool to amplify a proven growth curve. For SpaceX, despite a strong cash position post-IPO and a revenue-generating business in Starlink, its valuation is heavily tied to future, capital-intensive projects like Starship, global satellite networks, and potential AI infrastructure. The bond issuance acted as a trigger, shifting market focus from SpaceX's long-term vision to the pressing question of whether Starlink's profits can fund these ambitious, unproven ventures before they generate their own returns. Thus, the market penalizes not the act of borrowing itself, but the perceived gap between high capital expenditure and the speed of cash flow realization. SpaceX's valuation recovery hinges on demonstrating that Starlink's profitability can outpace the burn rate of its futuristic projects or that those projects (like Starship achieving reliable, low-cost reusability) can soon transition from costly visions to commercial realities.

marsbit13 хв тому

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

marsbit13 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

"Strategy's" (STRC) preferred share, a financial instrument designed by CEO Michael Saylor in consultation with AI to trade steadily at $100, faces mounting pressure. Since its July 2025 launch alongside a ~40% Bitcoin price drop, STRC has traded at a steep discount, hitting a low of $82.53. This discount pushes its effective dividend yield above 12.9%. The core debate revolves around whether STRC's structure is sustainable or a "centralized Ponzi scheme," as economist Peter Schiff claims. The mechanism relies on issuing new shares ("at-the-market" offerings) to fund Bitcoin purchases and dividend payments. However, the deep discount has paused these ATM offerings, slowing Bitcoin accumulation and forcing a minor sale of 32 BTC to cover obligations. Proponents, like The Smarter Web Company's Jesse Myers, argue the sell-off is a leveraged unwinding, not a fundamental failure. They note Strategy has ample resources to cover dividends for years if Bitcoin appreciates modestly. The deep discount also makes STRC attractive for yield-seeking buyers, as dividends are calculated on the $100 face value. The key test is whether Strategy can maintain dividends without sustained Bitcoin sales. A critical watchpoint is June 30th, when STRC switches to semi-monthly dividends. An automatic rule will likely raise the dividend rate further because the price remains below $95$, potentially creating a "death spiral": lower prices trigger higher yields, increasing the cash burden and forcing more dilution or asset sales. The question of whether this AI-designed "flywheel" is a stable instrument or a flawed accelerator will be answered by its price action and Strategy's funding choices in the coming months.

链捕手13 хв тому

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

链捕手13 хв тому

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News26 хв тому

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News26 хв тому

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报29 хв тому

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报29 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ONDO (ONDO).

Coinbase押注Midas，RWA波澜再起

Анотація

表面 RWA，实际稳定币生息

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані матеріали

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Lead to a Death Spiral?

Why Did NVIDIA's Bond Issue Go Unnoticed While SpaceX's Caused a Plunge?

Will the STRC Issue Price Determined by ChatGPT Really Fall into a Death Spiral?

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Торгівля

Популярні статті

Як купити ONDO

Обговорення