AI's Next Shortage King? This Material May Be More Scarce Than Memory, Nvidia Secures Its Position First

2026-08-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Facing supply shortages, suppliers are accelerating production expansion by upgrading wafer sizes. Coherent stated that the yield of its 6-inch indium phosphide production line surpasses that of traditional 3-inch processes, not only significantly reducing costs but also achieving a doubling of production capacity ahead of schedule, with plans to double it again before the end of 2027. Lumentum, through the renovation of a new factory, is introducing 4-inch and 6-inch processes, expected to begin mass production in 2028. Compared to building new wafer fabs, upgrading processes and expanding existing production lines are expected to alleviate market supply tightness more rapidly.

With AI data centers' surging demand for high-speed transmission, the compound semiconductor "Indium Phosphide (InP)" is becoming an indispensable material in the supply chain. Lumentum CEO Michael Hurlston bluntly stated its tightness will be more severe than memory. Since platforms like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Cisco's silicon photonics all require InP lasers as light sources, and even the future adoption of Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) architecture cannot replace its role, a new wave of material hoarding has emerged in the market.

"Indium Phosphide (InP)" is becoming an indispensable material in the AI data center supply chain. Lumentum CEO Michael Hurlston stated its tightness will be more severe than memory.

The enormous demand continues to widen the supply gap. Cloud service providers' demand has reached hundreds of millions of units. Even though Lumentum owns five wafer fabs, its shipment gap still exceeds 30%. To address the transmission bottleneck, Nvidia in March this year invested $2 billion each in Lumentum and Coherent to secure priority capacity. However, even with both major suppliers expanding production at full capacity, their combined output still struggles to meet the market's massive demand.

Lumentum pointed out that the supply of pump lasers remains constrained, with some key components almost sold out in the short term. Benefiting from strong demand and product price increases, the company's revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026 reached $808.4 million, a year-on-year increase of 90.1%. It also forecasted fourth-quarter revenue to further increase to $960 million to $1.01 billion, with operating profit margin expected to rise to 35%-36%.

In the face of supply shortages, suppliers are accelerating capacity expansion through wafer size upgrades. Coherent stated that the yield of its 6-inch indium phosphide production line is better than the traditional 3-inch process, not only significantly reducing costs but also achieving a capacity doubling ahead of schedule, with plans to double again by the end of 2027. Lumentum, through retrofitting new factories, is introducing 4-inch and 6-inch processes, expected to commence mass production in 2028. Compared to building new wafer fabs, upgrading processes and expanding existing production lines could alleviate market supply tightness more quickly.

İlgili Okumalar

On L1 Value Capture from Two Solana Proposals

The article, "Discussing L1 Value Capture Through Two Solana Proposals," by Max Resnick, explores how Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens derive their fundamental value, drawing parallels to traditional asset pricing theory. Resnick argues that L1 token value, like stock value, stems from claims on future income streams for holders, not merely from network activity or technological promise. This value is captured when fees are either burned (economically akin to a buyback) or distributed to stakers (akin to dividends). Inflationary staking rewards, by contrast, redistribute value among holders rather than creating it. The core challenge is the quality and defensibility of fee-based revenue. High-quality fees come from sustainable, recurring demand for the network's economic utility (e.g., long-term financial activity), not from transient speculation (e.g., meme coins, airdrops). The strength of a blockchain's network effects—liquidity, applications, users—can make its revenue more defensible and grant it greater pricing power than often assumed. The article proposes a foundational valuation framework for L1s, separating revenue (fees captured for token holders), costs, and total token supply. A key accounting principle is that inflationary rewards should not be counted as a cost unless the newly minted tokens are symmetrically counted as a value input; otherwise, it misrepresents profitability. Finally, Resnick discusses the economics of increasing protocol fees to boost revenue. Since revenue equals price times quantity, the net effect depends on demand elasticity. Research on Ethereum suggests transaction demand is somewhat elastic; a fee increase reduces volume. A uniform fee is a blunt instrument, as different transactions (e.g., small transfers vs. large settlements) have vastly different abilities to pay. The article suggests that transaction-value-based fees, potentially implemented via token programs, could be a more efficient way to capture value from high-willingness-to-pay activities. The discussion is framed around ongoing Solana proposals (SIMD-550, SIMD-553) but focuses on the universal principles of L1 value accrual.

marsbit2 dk önce

On L1 Value Capture from Two Solana Proposals

marsbit2 dk önce

Meme Coin with $60 Million Market Cap Plunges 65% in One Minute, FOMO Faces Renewed Scrutiny

A Solana-based meme token, $CATE, which had surged from a $20M+ to over $80M market cap in about a week, experienced a dramatic 65% crash within one minute. This flash crash has intensified scrutiny on the trading app 'fomo' and highlighted the speculative nature of the current meme coin market. The crash coincided with two events: the token's X account being suspended and the fomo app experiencing downtime, preventing users from trading. While the X suspension was straightforward, the fomo outage raised significant questions. $CATE's primary narrative driver was the open endorsement by Poorgoat, a top-ranked trader on fomo with over 200,000 followers, who had turned a ~$45,000 investment into over $2M at the peak. The token itself had no novel fundamentals, being a "cat sister" to Doge, a concept already existing on Ethereum without success. The crash, triggered by less than $1.5M in selling volume despite over 60,000 holder addresses, exposed a harsh reality: purely "organic" community-driven meme tokens (excluding past successes like $SPX) may now have a market cap ceiling around $17M, as exemplified by the long-term chart of $neet. This incident has fueled existing controversies surrounding fomo. Critics have grown skeptical of the app, alleging that rankings dominated by KOLs who receive lucrative token airdrops could be manipulated to create "pump-and-dump" schemes, luring in retail users before a rug pull. The timing of the crash during fomo's outage—preventing many of its users (who represent over 60% of $CATE holders) from reacting—was viewed as highly suspicious. Further controversy arose when another popular fomo trader publicly sold near the peak, and concerns were raised about the security of accessing private keys during the app's downtime. Fomo's official explanation of server overload due to surging user traffic was met with skepticism, given its substantial funding. The event serves as a stark reminder of the risks in meme coin speculation and the potential vulnerabilities of relying on a single trading platform during market volatility.

marsbit13 dk önce

Meme Coin with $60 Million Market Cap Plunges 65% in One Minute, FOMO Faces Renewed Scrutiny

marsbit13 dk önce

Arthur Hayes' 10,000-Word New Article: When Will the AI Wave Peak? Will the Bubble Burst? Why Am I Frantically Buying ETH?

Arthur Hayes' latest article explores the intersection of AI investment, credit markets, and cryptocurrency. He argues that the massive capital expenditure (CAPEX) in AI infrastructure resembles a real estate-driven credit bubble, akin to the 2008 financial crisis, rather than a tech growth story. Hayes predicts that the AI bubble's peak will arrive in 2027, triggered not by failing AI profits but by a slowdown in the growth rate of data center construction and capex, revealing systemic over-leverage. He explains that banks, incentivized by government policy and steep yield curves, will continue lending to AI projects despite rising risks, expecting eventual government bailouts. Hayes further speculates that the US government might directly intervene by creating a sovereign wealth fund to buy AI equities, injecting permanent liquidity into the system. For crypto investors, this misallocation of capital is bullish. Hayes believes Bitcoin will bottom as AI capex growth decelerates but credit continues to flow, setting the stage for a major rally fueled by the inevitable large-scale monetary stimulus. He sets a rough year-end 2026 target of $5,000 for Ethereum, citing its potential role as a settlement layer for tokenized real-world assets (RWA) as a key narrative driver. The eventual government response to the AI credit bubble, he concludes, will unleash a cryptocurrency bull market unlike any seen since 2021.

marsbit27 dk önce

Arthur Hayes' 10,000-Word New Article: When Will the AI Wave Peak? Will the Bubble Burst? Why Am I Frantically Buying ETH?

marsbit27 dk önce

Goldman Sachs Details Korea Memory "8 Key Focus Points": Valuation, Long-Term Agreements, Inventory, CXMT Impact, Buybacks, etc.

Goldman Sachs maintains a "Buy" rating on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, stating their recent sharp share price corrections reflect excessive market pessimism unsupported by fundamentals. The report addresses eight key market concerns: 1. **HBM Pricing:** GS forecasts HBM blended average prices for Samsung and SK Hynix to nearly double by 2027 due to persistent tight supply and a need to re-establish price premiums over standard DRAM. 2. **Long-Term Agreements (LTAs):** LTA terms are shifting in favor of suppliers, featuring longer terms, higher coverage targets (60-70% of capacity), "floor-price" protections, and significant upfront customer deposits. 3. **Inventory:** While module maker inventory is elevated, this represents a small portion of the overall market. Supplier and end-customer inventories remain healthy at low levels. 4. **NAND Supply:** Fears of a NAND oversupply are overblown. Strong enterprise SSD demand is expected to offset consumer weakness, with the supply-demand gap widening through 2027. 5. **Shareholder Returns:** GS expects both companies' actual dividends to exceed current market consensus. Share buybacks would be well-received, especially for SK Hynix to counter ADR-related dilution. 6. **SK Hynix ADR Premium:** The ADR's ~30% premium over the local share is likely persistent due to conversion constraints but aids long-term valuation re-rating by improving global investor access. 7. **SK Hynix Q2 '26 Results:** The earnings miss was due to one-time factors like slower HBM4 mix transition. Q3 is expected to see a strong recovery with higher volumes and better pricing/mix. 8. **CXMT Impact:** The competitive threat from China's CXMT is limited to the domestic market due to its technology lag and different product mix, posing minimal risk to the global supply-demand balance. GS concludes the current low valuations (approx. 3.5x 2027 P/E) imply an unrealistic lack of profit sustainability.

marsbit28 dk önce

Goldman Sachs Details Korea Memory "8 Key Focus Points": Valuation, Long-Term Agreements, Inventory, CXMT Impact, Buybacks, etc.

marsbit28 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片