Trump Slams Banks After Coinbase CEO Secretly Met With Him

marsbit2026-03-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Donald Trump met privately with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, as first reported by Politico and confirmed by CoinDesk, shortly before publicly criticizing major banks on his Truth Social platform. In his post, Trump accused banks of trying to undermine the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and urged the advancement of the CLARITY Act to prevent the crypto industry from moving overseas. The key disagreement stalling the digital asset market structure legislation is over interest-bearing stablecoins. Banks, including JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, argue they threaten deposits and lending capacity and should be regulated like banks. Crypto advocates, including a presidential advisory committee executive, counter that the GENIUS Act already prohibits such lending practices and that stablecoins are not deposits. Following the meeting and Trump's statements, crypto market and related stocks, including Coinbase (COIN), saw significant gains.

Author: CoinDesk

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: CoinDesk exclusively confirmed a key timeline: Coinbase CEO Armstrong first met privately with Trump, after which Trump publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing crypto legislation.

This clue directly reveals the lobbying path behind Trump's statement, making the legislative battle between the crypto industry and the banking sector clearer.

Full Text Below:

Key Points:

  • Before publicly accusing banks of undermining the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and calling for the advancement of the CLARITY Act, Trump had a private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.
  • The meeting was first disclosed by Politico and occurred before Trump posted on Truth Social stating that banks "need to make a good deal with the crypto industry" to push forward stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.
  • This crypto market structure bill has stalled because banks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto companies argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

CoinDesk confirmed that U.S. President Trump held a closed-door meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, shortly after which Trump posted on Truth Social claiming that banks are trying to undermine the GENIUS Act.

"America needs to complete market structure legislation ASAP. Americans should make more money from their money," Trump wrote in a post. "Major banks are making historic profits, and we won’t let them destroy our strong crypto agenda—if we don’t advance the CLARITY Act, all of this will go to China and other countries."

Politico first reported the meeting between Armstrong and Trump. Since then, Trump has publicly supported Coinbase's stance in the "ongoing lobbying battle with banks," a struggle that has stalled a major crypto bill.

The media cited "two people familiar with the matter" as sources, who spoke anonymously to discuss the closed-door event. The report also noted that it remains unclear what exactly the two discussed during the meeting.

However, the report reiterated that "the meeting took place shortly before Trump posted on social media saying banks 'need to make a good deal with the crypto industry,'" which was a key moment in pushing forward the stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.

The White House and Coinbase did not respond to CoinDesk's requests for comment.

The market structure bill has been in limbo since it was originally scheduled for debate and vote in the Senate Banking Committee. The core disagreement blocking the bill's passage is: banks believe stablecoin interest rates could impact bank deposits, thereby affecting their lending capacity; crypto exchanges argue that users should have the right to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings, which the GENIUS Act explicitly allows.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on Tuesday that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks. Patrick White, Executive Director of the Presidential Digital Asset Advisory Committee, countered this, stating, "What truly requires bank-like regulation is not the act of paying yields on balances itself, but the act of lending or rehypothecating the underlying dollars that constitute the balances." White also noted that the GENIUS Act "explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from engaging in the latter. Stablecoins ≠ deposits."

Crypto-related stocks surged significantly on Wednesday alongside a broad rally in the crypto market, with COIN breaking above $200, reaching its highest price since late January.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did former President Trump do shortly after his private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong?

AHe publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and called for advancing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the core disagreement between banks and the crypto industry regarding the market structure bill?

ABanks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto firms argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

QWhich media outlet first reported the private meeting between Trump and Armstrong?

APolitico first reported the private meeting between Trump and Armstrong.

QWhat did Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, say about stablecoin issuers paying interest to customers?

AJamie Dimon stated that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks.

QHow did crypto-related stocks perform following Trump's public statements and the market reaction?

ACrypto-related stocks surged significantly, with COIN (Coinbase stock) rising above $200, hitting its highest price since late January.

İlgili Okumalar

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报7 dk önce

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit14 dk önce

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit14 dk önce

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 saat önce

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 saat önce

Attracting Global Capital, Asia's New 'Super Cycle' Is Unfolding

Investors are turning to Asia as the next frontier for global equity growth, with a new "super cycle" unfolding across the region. Driven by the AI revolution, Asian markets, particularly South Korea, have seen significant rallies. According to Morgan Stanley analysis, the underlying drivers of Asia's industrial cycle are shifting from traditional sectors like real estate and manufacturing to massive investments in AI infrastructure, energy security and transition, and supply chain resilience. Fixed asset investment in Asia is projected to grow from around $11 trillion in 2025 to $16 trillion by 2030, with a 7% annual growth rate from 2026-2030. The AI wave is a primary catalyst, driving immense capital expenditure for chips, servers, data centers, and power systems. Asia is central to this hardware supply chain. In China, AI investment is focused on building a full-system domestic capability, with the local AI chip market potentially reaching $86 billion by 2030. Beyond AI, China's export story is expanding from EVs and batteries to robotics. The country already captures about half of new global industrial robot demand and over 90% of humanoid robot shipments. This growth phase mirrors the early stages of China's EV export boom. Simultaneously, energy security investments, spurred by AI's massive power needs, are rising, with China benefiting from its leadership in solar, batteries, and EVs. Regional defense spending is also increasing structurally, supporting demand for advanced manufacturing. The main beneficiaries are China, South Korea, and Japan, positioned in core supply chain areas. However, risks remain, including potential overcapacity, profit margin pressures from competition, persistent technological restrictions, geopolitical friction, and workforce displacement due to AI-driven automation. Market volatility is also expected to increase as investor expectations diverge on the realization of these capital investment and export themes.

marsbit1 saat önce

Attracting Global Capital, Asia's New 'Super Cycle' Is Unfolding

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片