# Zombie Chains İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Zombie Chains" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

The 2025 public blockchain landscape reveals a stark divide between hype and reality, with a severe concentration of value and widespread "zombification" of projects. Analysis of DeFiLlama's on-chain fee data exposes a critical structural issue: the crypto space is dominated by a "profit concentration and long-tail zombie" era. Notable examples highlight this crisis. Algorand, a chain with a $1 billion market cap and advanced technology, generated a mere $17 in daily fees, while Cardano, a top-10 asset, saw only around $6,000. These "classic chains" are likened to empty, expensive cities with no real economic activity. The biggest value capturers are not the most technologically elegant chains. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, succeeding as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers—crypto's only true mass-adoption use case. Solana ($600k daily) thrives as a high-frequency casino for meme coins and speculation, and Base ($105k daily) demonstrates that distribution (via Coinbase) is more critical than pure technology. The only validated business models generating significant fees are low-cost payments, high-frequency speculation, and, to a lesser extent, Ethereum's asset settlement layer. The VC-driven model is failing. New chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which raised hundreds of millions, show a severe disconnect between their high valuations and meager daily fee revenue (ranging from $320 to $12,000). Their lifecycle often follows a "pump and dump" pattern: VC funding -> airdrop farming -> token listing -> user exodus -> collapsed on-chain activity. The industry suffers from a massive oversupply of block space with a dire lack of killer applications. The article concludes that investors must shift from valuing narratives to scrutinizing financials. They should avoid "zombie coins" with high valuations and negligible fees, focus on chains with organic, fee-generating demand, acknowledge that distribution and community are now more valuable than pure tech, and see through the VC subsidy game. This is a necessary market correction; only by paying for real, generated value—not promised future stories—can the industry achieve healthy growth.

比推12/18 06:36

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

比推12/18 06:36

The Brutal Reckoning of the Public Chain Market in 2025: The Thriving Casino, The Fake Ghost Town, and VC's Harvesting Scheme

Crypto Public Chains Face a Reality Check: A Grim Settlement in 2025 The crypto market, often perceived as a lens of soaring market caps and futuristic promises, reveals a starkly different reality when analyzed through on-chain fee data. A deep dive into DeFiLlama’s “Fees by Chain” metrics exposes a severe structural issue: the public chain ecosystem is dominated by profit concentration, while the long tail languishes in zombification. Notable examples highlight this disparity. Algorand, a chain backed by Turing Award-winning cryptography, recorded a meager $17 in daily protocol revenue despite a billion-dollar valuation. Similarly, Cardano, a top-ten asset by market cap, generates only around $6,000 in daily fees, indicating a lack of substantial economic activity beyond basic transfers. In contrast, the chains capturing real value are those serving clear, immediate demands. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, powered primarily by its role as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers. Solana follows with nearly $600,000, driven largely by its vibrant on-chain casino of meme coin trading and speculation. Base, backed by Coinbase’s distribution power, has also emerged as a serious contender. These cases underscore that proven, fee-generating business models in crypto are currently limited to payments, high-frequency speculation, and Ethereum’s role as a settlement layer. The analysis further reveals the failure of the VC-driven model. Newer chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which launched with massive funding and high Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV), show alarmingly low daily fees—often in the low thousands or even hundreds of dollars. Their typical lifecycle involves attracting airdrop farmers with incentives, followed by a collapse in organic activity once subsidies end. This reflects a critical issue of “block space inflation”: too many chains have been built, without a proportional growth in killer applications that demand that capacity. The market is at an inflection point. Investors are shifting from valuing narratives to scrutinizing fundamentals. The new imperative is to identify chains that generate genuine, fee-based revenue from organic user demand—not those sustained by speculation, subsidies, or empty promises. This necessary清算 (settlement) in valuation may be painful, but it is essential for the industry's long-term health. The era of paying for dreams is giving way to an era of paying for proven utility.

marsbit12/18 04:08

The Brutal Reckoning of the Public Chain Market in 2025: The Thriving Casino, The Fake Ghost Town, and VC's Harvesting Scheme

marsbit12/18 04:08

活动图片